Hola muy buenas, he seguido este tutorial
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-squirrelmail-centos-5.3-x86_64
, con algunas dificultades ya que la version de centos que tengo es la
5.5 i386, pero está todo implementado. Todos los servicios funcionan
bien
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 09:57:52 pm Kevin C wrote:
Yes,
Well works for you may be more correct then. Hard to call it stable
especially in the context of an enterprise dist when it's officially a
technology preview.
/Peter
We use it for 4 months on our backup server, we no issue at the
2010/12/22 S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
when i want to use ssl on my domain?
delicated port (443) is needed per ssl host. you can
In article 133721.39495...@web121405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com,
S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
when i want to
use ssl on my domain?
2010/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com:
Greetings,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
hi all,
hmm..
scp oldbox:/etc/passwd brand new CentOS 6 Box geewiz:/etc/passwd
ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
It's possibly better
Greetings,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com:
scp oldbox:/etc/passwd brand new CentOS 6 Box geewiz:/etc/passwd
ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
It's possibly better way only to
On 22.12.2010 11:05, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article
133721.39495.qm-j4irtxk+zdtuqs8rmknbopow+3bf1jufvpnb7ypn...@public.gmane.org,
S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to
I am interested in fscache module. I know where to get the userland
tools (http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/fscache/) but I am not sure
where to obtain its module. Moreover, I am not sure once I get the
source code how I can compile it for Centos 5.2.
Has anyone compiled, fscache before?
TIA
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
Yes.
Reverse DNS has to be working.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:53 AM, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
when i want to use ssl on my domain?
thank you
happy
I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, and reading
pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had been allocated to
/var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc telling it that
MAILDIR=/home/anne/Maildir/
Any idea what might have caused this? It seems to have been
On 12/22/10 4:26 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
2010/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathanraju.rajs...@gmail.com:
scpoldbox:/etc/passwdbrand new CentOS 6 Box geewiz:/etc/passwd
ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups,
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
Yes.
Reverse DNS has to be working.
Why is that? I have several ssl sites, and many of them
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, and
reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had been
allocated to /var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc telling it that
MAILDIR=/home/anne/Maildir/
Mag Gam wrote:
I am interested in fscache module. I know where to get the userland
tools (http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/fscache/) but I am not sure
where to obtain its module. Moreover, I am not sure once I get the
source code how I can compile it for Centos 5.2.
Has anyone compiled,
Anyone know ORACLE support ext4 file system or not?
--- 10/12/21 (二)，Kevin C li...@tuxalafenetre.net 寫道：
寄件者: Kevin C li...@tuxalafenetre.net
主旨: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 64bit
收件者: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
日期: 2010年12月21日,二,下午3:57
Yes, We use it for 4 months on our
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
hi all,
hmm..
scp oldbox:/etc/passwd brand new CentOS 6 Box geewiz:/etc/passwd
ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
YMMV
Regards
Rajagopal
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 13:44 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
The patch shown in
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/16625
prompted me to try a
$ grep -r \=\ \%s\ *
in the web root of a WordPress installation. The matches are a bunch of
possible SQL injections. Haven't checked
On December 22, 2010 02:05:26 am Tony Mountifield wrote:
The thing you CAN'T do is to have name-based virtual hosting with multiple
domains on a single IP address, with more than one of them using SSL.
Name-based virtual hosting relies on the HTTP Host: header to identify
which virtual host is
Hi All,
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not sure
how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catch all
so it does get to me.
How do I change where this e-mail
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 08:12 -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catch
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
Its LOGWATCH what is doing it. It will be scheduled in / ETC / CRONTAB
Thanks Paul, I found it!
-Jason
On 12/22/2010 10:12 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catch all
The question was:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
and one reply asseted:
On Wed,
Hi
you have to add the record to /etc/aliases:
root: y...@adress.tld
and then run: newaliases
Pavel
Dne 22.12.2010 17:17, Always Learning napsal(a):
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 08:12 -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 10:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
/etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
Or you can edit
/etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
and change line 64
$Config{'mailto'} =
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message,
and reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had
been allocated to /var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message,
and reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had
On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
/var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well.
There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be
Delivered to command /usr.bin/procmail which of course is correct. The
only messages affected are thos which should be
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
/var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well.
There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be
Delivered to command /usr.bin/procmail which of course is
correct. The only
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 17:39:56 Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
/var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well.
There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be
Delivered to
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
# /etc/procmailrc
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
Interesting. I don't have an /etc/procmailrc. Are there other things
you'd recommend to place there?
That's all I put in there. It may be worthwhile to take a peek at the
Environment variable defaults
On 12/21/2010 10:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/17/2010 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Not with PIV-II cards
Why? Do they use a non-standard SSH agent?
pkcs11. opensc. NOT COOLKEY.
I'm not really sure what that has to do with anything. You said that
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 18:35:29 Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
# /etc/procmailrc
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
Interesting. I don't have an /etc/procmailrc. Are there other things
you'd recommend to place there?
That's all I put in there. It may
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 10:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
/etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
Or you can edit
/etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
and change line 64
If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
/etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
Or you can edit
/etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
and change line 64
$Config{'mailto'} = root;
Exactly what I did earlier.
I would strongly
On 12/22/2010 12:58 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
/etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
Or you can edit
/etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
and change line 64
$Config{'mailto'} = root;
Exactly
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message,
and reading pm.log I discovered that it had
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/21/2010 10:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/17/2010 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Not with PIV-II cards
Why? Do they use a non-standard SSH agent?
pkcs11. opensc. NOT COOLKEY.
I'm not really sure what that has to do with
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
*snipped*
And, there may be other interesting/critical mail coming to root.
Good point.
I always have root's email sent to my own user account.
That's one of the things my ALI scripts sets up for me.
echo
echo Processing /etc/aliases config file
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I had a look at systemtap but I have the feeling that in it's current
state it is aimed more at kernel developers rather than average admins
like me :-)
Still, I'll keep an eye on it also give the fact that there seem to be
now new documentation being written
hey list
I'm doing a PCI audit for my company. One of the requirements is to
specify a lockout duration of 30 minutes after 6 failed login
attempts:
For a sample of system components, obtain and insp 8.5.14
rd parameters system configuration settings to verify that passwo
ed out, it are set
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Antonello Piemonte wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Antonello Piemonte apiem...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I/O size distribution?
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I had a look at systemtap but I have the feeling that in it's current
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
slackmoeh...@me.com wrote:
Hi All,
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which
On 12/22/10 2:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
If you're running sendmail, put an alias in /root/.forward. That gets
*all* root email forwarded to the appropriate account, not just cron
jobs. It also doesn't require editing of system files such as
/etc/aliases.
that's a borderline bizarre
On 12/22/2010 4:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/22/10 2:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
If you're running sendmail, put an alias in /root/.forward. That gets
*all* root email forwarded to the appropriate account, not just cron
jobs. It also doesn't require editing of system files such as
On 22/12/10 11:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's the easiest way to do it. If you allow someone else to hold your
SSL keys, they can do interesting things to act as your front end to
Where in the original post did it mention using a system that's not
under their control? The question was
On 12/22/2010 5:40 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Most people wanting SSL on their website see it as a business
requirement and most of those sites are running on shared or VPS
hosting.
The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
browser to find the matching certificate,
see cis rhel 5.5 documentation and latest version of it for configuration
examples. or use compensative controls.
is it really sampled? usually no ;)
eero,
rhce
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 12/22/10 2:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
If you're running sendmail, put an alias in /root/.forward. That gets
*all* root email forwarded to the appropriate account, not just cron
jobs. It also doesn't require
Sir/Madam,
This is Aravindh,final year student of Anna University India.We are carrying
on research in Cloud Computing and using Open Nebula toolkit for that;for
which we need strong network connectivity. The problem i am facing is that i
am not able to ping continuously to other nodes in the
Aravindh,
Tell us a little bit about your current server hardware, are your NICs showing
using ifconfig, what about your gateway sing route. It would be good to know a
little bit about your current configuration, including if you are using IPv6.
Please elaborate so we can help you further.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Aravindh Ramaswamy
aravindhr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sir/Madam,
This is Aravindh,final year student of Anna University India.We are carrying
on research in Cloud Computing and using Open Nebula toolkit for that;for
which we need strong network connectivity. The
Thank you sir for replying..
Given below is my system's status after 'ifconfig'...
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 44:87:FC:68:5E:33
inet addr:192.168.100.168 Bcast:192.168.100.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::4687:fcff:fe68:5e33/64 Scope:Link
UP
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Beartooth bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
She's far more likely to outlive me than I her; so I want to
install something requiring a lot less maintenance on her machine, so
that she'll have it and be used to it, years ahead of need.
I'm thinking
Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
ext3 for it?
Before committing to ext4 on a production server, it
would be good to consider the comments made in
Antonello Piemonte wrote:
Hello
I have read that under Solaris one can use DTrace to get I/O request
size distribution on a global scale (also on a per process/pid basis).
See for example
http://prefetch.net/articles/observeiodtk.html
Can anyone recommend an alternative to get similar
On 12/22/2010 11:39 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Right, which AFAIK, doesn't work with the new US federal PIV-II cards.
Certainly, I can't add the card when it's inserted in the reader with just
that.
OK. Well, that's more or less what I meant when I asked if there was
something non-standard.
ext4 better then ext3 !
you can install ext4 by yum
see:
https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Howto#Compatibility
2010/12/23 cpol...@surewest.net
Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be
59 matches
Mail list logo
