On Thursday 23 December 2010 18:40:43 Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2010 16:53:22 Bart Schaefer wrote:
LASTFOLDER is informational, procmail sets it immediately before
delivering to that folder;
Hi,
I need to use PHP 5.2 in my Centos 5.X servers. I've been using the one
found in Testing for more than a year without problems but I feel that it is
not being updated in a while, specially with the security issues.
I found a post about this iuscommunity.org which maintains 5.2 and 5.3 rpm
Dear Friends of CentOS,
I read a reply by John R Pierce, Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk
December 04, 2010 01:30PM
do you realize that if any one of those 4 miscellaneous drives fails,
you lose the whole volume?
Can anyone confirm this? and thank you to John above.
2: can you add(extend) a physical
Markandeya wrote on 12/24/2010 07:57 AM:
...
do you realize that if any one of those 4 miscellaneous drives fails,
you lose the whole volume?
Can anyone confirm this?
Yes.
2: can you add(extend) a physical hdd with data to a LV without losing the
data?
No.
3: can you remove one hdd to
Am 24.12.2010 13:06, schrieb robert mena:
Hi,
I need to use PHP 5.2 in my Centos 5.X servers. I've been using the one
found in Testing for more than a year without problems but I feel that
it is not being updated in a while, specially with the security issues.
I found a post about this
I trust and am very happy with Atomicorps' repository at
http://www.atomicorp.com, which currently offers 5.2. with security-updates and
some backported features from 5.3. We have been using it in a corporate
hosting-environment for about 10 months so far.
Howether, there is no indication of
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Markandeya mrc55...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Friends of CentOS,
I read a reply by John R Pierce, Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk
December 04, 2010 01:30PM
do you realize that if any one of those 4 miscellaneous drives fails,
you lose the whole volume?
Can anyone
Hi,
I'm developing C plugin for Centos which will be installed as kernel module.
The problem is how to collect the data about:
CPU
Check – Utilization, Model, Number of Cores
RAM
Check – Total Memory, Free Memory, Memory Load
HDD
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, derleader __ wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: derleader __ derlea...@abv.bg
Subject: [CentOS] Collecting data
Hi,
I'm developing C plugin for Centos which will be installed as kernel module.
The problem is how to collect the data about:
CPU
Check –
Hi List,
I have been using the php 5.2.10 from the testing repo and note the
following:
the php-suhosin packages in testing do not match the php version
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: suhosin: Unable to initialize module
Module compiled with module API=20050922, debug=0, thread-safety=0
PHP
On 12/24/10 7:01 AM, derleader __ wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing C plugin for Centos which will be installed as
kernel module. The problem is how to collect the data about:
*
CPU Check – Utilization, Model, Number of Cores
*
RAM Check – Total Memory, Free Memory,
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Rob Kampen wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-testing php issues
Hi List,
I have been using the php 5.2.10 from the testing repo and note the
following:
the php-suhosin packages in
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Box is fully updated CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). DHCP is from the ADSL modem
192.168.1.1. After I update the DNS settings and restart the network,
the DNS changes do not hold. I have tried using
Per replies in this thread,
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:26:56 -0800
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 12/24/10 7:01 AM, derleader __ wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing C plugin for Centos which will be installed as
kernel module. The problem is how to collect the data about:
none of that stuff should be in a
Hi,
I'm developing C plugin for Centos which will be installed as
kernel module. The problem is how to collect the data about:
none of that stuff should be in a kernel module. a simple daemon is far
more appropriate.
What is the most appropriate way to do this task?
On 12/24/10 4:45 PM, derleader __ wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing C plugin for Centos which will be installed as
kernel module. The problem is how to collect the data about:
none of that stuff should be in a kernel module. a simple daemon is far
more appropriate.
What is the most
On 12/24/10 2:45 PM, derleader __ wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing C plugin for Centos which will be installed as
kernel module. The problem is how to collect the data about:
none of that stuff should be in a kernel module. a simple daemon is far
more appropriate.
What is the most
On Friday, December 24, 2010 06:40:06 am Ryan Wagoner wrote:
LVM is just like the name implies a logical volume manager. It allows
you to easily combine and carve space from physical disks. It doesn't
provide any redundancy. If you want redundancy you either need to use
the LVM mirror
On Thursday, December 23, 2010 07:10:36 am Ross Walker wrote:
As long as the forward DNS resolves to the common name the cert will be
accepted and you can have multiple host names resolve to the same IP.
There's also the possibility that you can use multiple subdomains. Instead of
What is the most sensible or correct way to migrate ALL the users to the
new system?
Way in the past is was just perhaps copy the /etc/passwd file but I know
thats not the case anymore.
how do I easily recreate their account names etc... on the new machine.
When transitioning mail servers,
20 matches
Mail list logo
