Alguna lista de seguridad básica de sistemas que recomendarle al amigo?
El 10/11/11 01:26, David Rosado T. escribió:
ya me parecia raro, el amigo puede comprometer datos delicados si continua
así!!
El 9 de noviembre de 2011 21:16, Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@ecualinux.com
escribió:
Layer 8
El 10 de noviembre de 2011 08:30, Ernesto Miranda
ernesto.mira...@unap.clescribió:
Alguna lista de seguridad básica de sistemas que recomendarle al amigo?
El 10/11/11 01:26, David Rosado T. escribió:
ya me parecia raro, el amigo puede comprometer datos delicados si
continua
así!!
Vreme: 11/10/2011 10:03 AM, Fajar Priyanto piše:
Hi all,
Recently one my Centos 5.7 VM just crashes at least once a day randomly
(hang).
In /var/log/messages there is nothing at all that there is problem (no
error, no failure). The log just stops.
The only change I did before this crashes
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, James A. Peltier wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone have a working CentOS 6 kickstart file that they are using to bind a
host to Active Directory 2008 R2? I'm working on a full AD/Linux
environment and would like to stand on the shoulders of others if they are
already doing such a
This is a continuation of the thread about redhat vs centos and the
thought of moving from centos
due to redhats new business model. Forgive the length, but I had to share.
I went ahead and downloaded the 5 year supported version of ubuntu server.
You think centos/redhat is a bit tough or not
Bob Hoffman wrote:
This is a continuation of the thread about redhat vs centos and the
thought of moving from centos due to redhats new business model.
Forgive the length, but I had to share.
Thank you, very much, for the details (not that I was planning on going to
ubuntu...)
Two things:
Vreme: 11/10/2011 02:44 PM, Bob Hoffman piše:
In closing, it is down to suse or back to centos and just pray redhat
turns around. Maybe scientific linux.
Ubuntu is not ready for prime time and a HUGE step backwards. It is not
cutting edge and very insecure.
So maybe centos, even if a year or
Hello all,
I noticed that pirut is no longer part of CentOS6. Does anybody know if
there is a different graphical interface to yum that came to replace it?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Recently one my Centos 5.7 VM just crashes at least once a day randomly
(hang).
In /var/log/messages there is nothing at all that there is problem (no
error, no failure). The log just stops.
The only change I did before this crashes is I activated LDAP
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 09:23 -0500, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello all,
I noticed that pirut is no longer part of CentOS6. Does anybody know if
there is a different graphical interface to yum that came to replace it?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
I noticed that pirut is no longer part of CentOS6. Does anybody know if
there is a different graphical interface to yum that came to replace it?
A Google search says:
Pirut was the system level updating tool which PackageKit aims to replace in
RHEL 6.
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote
Vreme: 11/10/2011 02:44 PM, Bob Hoffman pis(e:
/ In closing, it is down to suse or back to centos and just pray redhat
// turns around. Maybe scientific linux.
// Ubuntu is not ready for prime time and a HUGE step backwards. It is not
Vreme: 11/10/2011 03:36 PM, Bob Hoffman piše:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote
My only real concern was where red hat was going with this clone war (just a
yoda line :) )
I decided to try out some non red hat versions.
I really was excited about ubu and getting somewhat newer packages of things
hi,
I installed the epil repo and imported the key but everytime i try to
install a package from epil
Public key for proftpd-1.3.3f-1.el6.i686.rpm is not installed
I get this with evry package i try to install
using centos 6 i686
___
CentOS mailing
Vreme: 11/10/2011 03:46 PM, mike and bud piše:
hi,
I installed the epil repo and imported the key but everytime i try to
install a package from epil
Public key for proftpd-1.3.3f-1.el6.i686.rpm is not installed
I get this with evry package i try to install
using centos 6 i686
You mean
On 11/9/2011 6:23 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
SPAMAssasin is a monster and the documentation is *BAD*. But I've
gotten it working. Just post specific questions.
SpamAssassin is not THAT bad. There is a fair amount of info out there
on how to integrate it with various mail servers.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Any clue where to look for the cause?
Two questions: is there anything on the console screen? Does it just hang,
or reboot?
If the latter, and there's nothing in the logs, it's possible activating
openLDAP was just coincidental with
yes.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:54 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] questions about epil repo
Vreme: 11/10/2011 03:46 PM, mike and bud piše:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:18:43AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
This is a continuation of the thread about redhat vs centos and the
thought of moving from centos due to redhats new business model.
Forgive the length, but I had to share.
Thank you, very much, for
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 06:35:38AM -0800, John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
I noticed that pirut is no longer part of CentOS6. Does anybody know if
there is a different graphical interface to yum that came to replace it?
A Google search says:
Pirut was the
On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
This is a continuation of the thread about redhat vs centos and the
thought of moving from centos
due to redhats new business model. Forgive the length, but I had to share.
I went ahead and downloaded the 5 year supported version of ubuntu
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Scott Robbins wrote:
Yeah, all kidding aside, I think the whole crippling of the RH text
installer was a step in the wrong direction. A text installer is
smaller, faster, and doesn't suddenly, as has happened to me with
various video card monitor combos, stop working or
Vreme: 11/10/2011 04:30 PM, Scott Robbins piše:
Well, Fedora is going to systemd, which seems more designed for
desktop/laptop users, where speed of a boot seems to be the most
important goal, so I suspect RH will get there too.
systemd will be much much more once it is done.
From
I just want to say that this is the stupidest conversation I have ever had
heard - Screw this I am going back to FreeBSD.
Benjamin Warriner
Technology Specialist
Region 7 Education Service Center
1909 North Longview Street
Kilgore, Texas 75662
Phone: (903) 988-6949
Fax: (903) 988-6965
Region 7
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Warriner, Benjamin bwarri...@esc7.net wrote:
I just want to say that this is the stupidest conversation I have ever had
heard - Screw this I am going back to FreeBSD.
Thank you, yuou made my Friday
___
CentOS mailing
On 2011-11-10 17:07, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 11/10/2011 04:30 PM, Scott Robbins piše:
Well, Fedora is going to systemd, which seems more designed for
desktop/laptop users, where speed of a boot seems to be the most
important goal, so I suspect RH will get there too.
systemd will be
Anyone have a script or utility to convert an RTF file to ANSI? The
main idea here is to preserve the color codes that are specified in
the RTF file, so they can be displayed easily in a terminal window.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:33:38 AM Craig White wrote:
[Ubuntu is] different - not better, not worse (save for the fact that with
Ubuntu I have been able to get timely updates this year). Also, I much prefer
their packaging of Apache BIND9 to Red Hat's.
[snip]
If your expectation was
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:33:38 AM Craig White wrote:
[Ubuntu is] different - not better, not worse (save for the fact that with
Ubuntu I have been able to get timely updates this year). Also, I much
prefer their packaging of Apache
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Any clue where to look for the cause?
Two questions: is there anything on the console screen? Does it just hang,
or reboot?
If the latter, and there's
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Any clue where to look for the cause?
Two questions: is there anything on the console screen? Does it just hang,
or reboot?
If the latter, and there's
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 12:16:18 PM Craig White wrote:
I would generally agree with this (brevity is not your strongest trait)
That would be correct. As Mark Twain once said, I didn't have time to write a
short letter, so I wrote a long one instead. And I type (and read) relatively
Sean Carolan writes:
Anyone have a script or utility to convert an RTF file to ANSI? The
main idea here is to preserve the color codes that are specified in
the RTF file, so they can be displayed easily in a terminal window.
Unrtf claim they can convert to HTML while preserving colours. Does
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:49:30 AM Sean Carolan wrote:
Anyone have a script or utility to convert an RTF file to ANSI? The
main idea here is to preserve the color codes that are specified in
the RTF file, so they can be displayed easily in a terminal window.
unrtf --vt
Unrtf is
Lamar Owen wrote
If you doubt the speed at which a non-locked-down system can be exploited, take
a 1990s vintage copy of
, say, RHL 6.2, go ahead and pre-download the last set of updates for that
distribution, do the install
on a public IP with no firewall
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 02:20:25 PM Bob Hoffman wrote:
The newer stuff is cool, but it lacks the polish of a ready to go
system. Centos has the polish, but lacks the new stuff.
sigh.
And right there is the core (or maybe it's 'sore') point to all of this; it
really depends on what you
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
CentOS is what it is: as close as possible to upstream EL without being
upstream EL. Nothing more, nothing less, and bug-for-bug compatible. If
that's not what you need, then CentOS won't meet your need.
Yes, but that
- Original Message -
| This is a continuation of the thread about redhat vs centos and the
| thought of moving from centos
| due to redhats new business model. Forgive the length, but I had to
| share.
|
| I went ahead and downloaded the 5 year supported version of ubuntu
| server.
|
- Original Message -
| Bob Hoffman wrote:
snip
| Yes. Just like the grub ubuntu uses, that is a bloody script, and a .d
| directory *full* of files, rather than the clean, simple menu with
| RHEL/CentOS.
| snip
|
| I don't want to have to read scripts to find out how to configure
|
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:42:36PM -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
Then you downloaded the alternative, netboot or server installer. The
desktop installer is fully graphical, however, is lacking many
features such as LVM and RAID support selections. This is *entirely*
different than
James A. Peltier wrote:
Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well. It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the next
release. Get used to it. ;)
Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose.
One can't help wondering if the simplicity of the old grub
offended the developers.
Simplicity does not seem to be highly
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 07:23 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 01:10 -0500, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
CentOS Community
I was wondering if anyone had a good resource or procedure for a step by
step in installing a mail server with Centos. There ARE documents on
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:30 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 02:20:25 PM Bob Hoffman wrote:
The newer stuff is cool, but it lacks the polish of a ready to go
system. Centos has the polish, but lacks the new stuff.
sigh.
And right there is the core (or maybe it's
When all of you mean to stop wasting our time bickering among yourself?
If there was ANY chance ANY of you would change it's mind then I would
be willing to endure senseless flame war. Since that is not likely to
happen in next 100 years, I ask you nicely to finish this thread with
we agree to
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:33 PM, Craig White wrote:
7- The install, of the virtual host, added libvirt. It did not however
install things like virt-install or any other virt software.
Infact, no guest installation tools were added, though things like virsh
were installed. Sigh.
8-
On Friday, November 11, 2011 12:37 AM, Thomas Johansson wrote:
Compare systemd to Solaris Service Management Facility. Solaris SMF is a very
nice and useful part of Solaris.
A lot of similarities between systemd and SMF. Solaris is mainly a server OS.
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 11:07 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:33 PM, Craig White wrote:
7- The install, of the virtual host, added libvirt. It did not however
install things like virt-install or any other virt software.
Infact, no guest installation tools
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:49:33PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
I just can't embrace installing an OS whose security updates have
consistently lagged 3-6 months behind.
You've made this point, repeatedly, for the past few months. It's
getting old; we are all well aware of your feelings about
On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:49 AM, Craig White wrote:
If you want something heavy duty you could simply 'apt-get install
shorewall'' but I suspect that you just want to be pedantic. The point
that Lamar made - that was that there wasn't any firewall installed by
default at all, which I
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 22:07 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:49:33PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
I just can't embrace installing an OS whose security updates have
consistently lagged 3-6 months behind.
You've made this point, repeatedly, for the past few months.
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 12:12 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
I would not have said much if you have pushed Debian but Ubuntu? It's a
joke. I only happen to have one Ubuntu Hardy server because I did not
have a Centos disk at hand when I had to do an emergency installation of
a box to take
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Craig White wrote:
I just can't embrace installing an OS whose security updates have
...
Then please leave -- your sustained venom and bile are not
needed, wanted, nor useful here, let alone remotely on topic
-- Russ herrold
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
For CLAMAV you need to have clamd running and a milter. I'm not certain
what milter's are current - when I set one up they were all had equally
stale documentation. Does CentOS currently ship a working
On 11/10/11 4:48 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
You don't mention a mail store [IMAP Server]? Such as Cyrus IMAP.
Something for Postfix to deliver the mail too.
Mail store != imap server. Mail store = structure for mboxes/maildirs.
indeed, reader protocol servers like imap, pop3, are a
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
For CLAMAV you need to have clamd running and a milter. I'm not certain
what milter's are current - when I set one up they were all
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:49 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Craig White wrote:
I just can't embrace installing an OS whose security updates have
...
Then please leave -- your sustained venom and bile are not
needed, wanted, nor useful here, let alone remotely on topic
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Mail store != imap server. Mail store = structure for mboxes/maildirs.
Cyrus is sort of its own thing with its own mail store.
Sorry, I keep forgetting about that crap...
Never touched it and
On Friday, November 11, 2011 12:33 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 12:12 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
I would not have said much if you have pushed Debian but Ubuntu? It's a
joke. I only happen to have one Ubuntu Hardy server because I did not
have a Centos disk at hand
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:23 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Sorry, I keep forgetting about that crap...
Never touched it and never wanted to after I heard the screams from a
friend who used cyrus and swore by it until he got corrupt mailboxes.
Had to help setup postfix, dovecot and
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote:
Oh, things have improved have they? Last I tried, you could not get d-i
Please take this elsewhere -- it has nothing to do with centos
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 21:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/10/11 4:48 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
You don't mention a mail store [IMAP Server]? Such as Cyrus IMAP.
Something for Postfix to deliver the mail too.
Mail store != imap server. Mail store = structure for
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:49 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
Then please leave -- your sustained venom and bile are not
needed, wanted, nor useful here, let alone remotely on topic
what venom? what bile?
For the record, I wasn't the one who brought up
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:23 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Sorry, I keep forgetting about that crap...
Never touched it and never wanted to after I heard the screams from a
friend who used cyrus and swore by it until he got
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:31 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 21:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/10/11 4:48 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
You don't mention a mail store [IMAP Server]? Such as Cyrus IMAP.
Something for Postfix to deliver the mail
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:40 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:31 PM, Craig White wrote:
LMTP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
That's still nothing to do with imap/pop3 servers. dovecot provides an
LDA for just that purpose
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:38 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:23 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Sorry, I keep forgetting about that crap...
Never touched it and never wanted to after I heard the
67 matches
Mail list logo
