[CentOS-docs] Small change to Virtualization/VirtualBox
My CentOS wiki name: MVieira I'd like to suggest a small update to the page http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Virtualization/VirtualBox where it reads usermod -G vboxusers username could be updated to usermod -a -G vboxusers username The reason being, usermod -G will add the user to the new supplimentary group but will also remove the same user from any other supplementary groups he/she might be part of. While adding the argument -a will append the group list instead. Regars Marcos Vieira ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0360 CentOS 6 openssl Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0360
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0360.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
4f96f5e39834ec9f47b280187f091616234e2f75fdf985c38d36d2c2d89990f8
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
3d6576b3bd42ab08bac2c01f6eb3b453d3195f473b7d6697bbae80bfab772d63
openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
b8b4021e69890920d532729bc09d9188f67b3abbeb2ae7532a1286c1e255751c
openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
f23fd1063fc8cfb1427506cfb97e9c5f487da5c7ca2fa629b402f516d779f201
openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
4f96f5e39834ec9f47b280187f091616234e2f75fdf985c38d36d2c2d89990f8
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
13809dae4e39ddde8232cd2cf2e4d13366cdf2d4cf85a3473b32864d23fddf0f
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.x86_64.rpm
3d6576b3bd42ab08bac2c01f6eb3b453d3195f473b7d6697bbae80bfab772d63
openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
7b967ff1661c6e13c94786a70d4563f378b423584cd0223f4b9b86f4da7371f6
openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.x86_64.rpm
63878422b839439329c747bf87160d79a1090fdc620411715c45933cb3d611a4
openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.x86_64.rpm
a9686e5da664569424476735f510be1e4cbe59041736be4827bd2dad752a22ce
openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
34906572844bd7af843d07c13ad6e21b8a105b3f8d2610cad6169756be392634
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0350 Moderate CentOS 6 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0350 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0350.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
86782236a2779ab81c207547785c4c18d26fc18d563c6e8257602d226ecb1435
kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686.rpm
4be3ff61e203027720ea23951287135628f47384b3d6f859a445e22fb201b9b2
kernel-debug-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686.rpm
76507bd5a82bebdf032d788524f21c21d3d7892d5e9c42bc6ae29fad952b8127
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686.rpm
6eb40643ca7f5b1845f367fec1eb995f33af4b4a22e31222f08956e07e038edd
kernel-devel-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686.rpm
3bfc257c140c0df6c52a8ce65eed778f08d0cd6e59f85ad35ee377a90b95dc78
kernel-doc-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.noarch.rpm
59ee225992e327ceaee30ba5256469e3db8d25d9c0f31228ceddf5df0489cf83
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.noarch.rpm
2bdd4259d694c035daeb6c5fe5a5911ce485b7f778c8e404566bf258b4d7dcf8
kernel-headers-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686.rpm
77e86aca4683be703f1ce8bbacc33f67a62cb3131e27a8713661c03745ba7924
perf-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686.rpm
a3bf33e39c5fafc94a8b2cd2ff9adcf442f188f59ac5c3b2f64bc1bcf32daa34
python-perf-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
7368d0e8f121ec9c172a9979243a68bfac366482b4567b16dcb704b47410fde6
kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
8a60d421e50fec0da55ec9fdd632b9e70f837c9356cd1f43b3d3e9b9b1f7aa19
kernel-debug-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
7b0b42186183822ad14eb9bf54446225c341bc0ca8987d690936bd3eda93b4ac
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
4337dbcb12f02f238d53ef19b3e4e4f2960539d68bfbfdabe77ab8291745392b
kernel-devel-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
5817cd4ada91690e27971987f44144b86289f7bbd67a135dcca5bf1045cd08b6
kernel-doc-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.noarch.rpm
3491dbc300805b73e00ec25a5071cdd6f751acbca2ea7effcd48b701a3899501
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.noarch.rpm
141d120c4ebd5b859bf7671965e507f31285de3060b03079361e64441901cb23
kernel-headers-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
7980f323f57676c2a228525f4b593b407f59925696d23b3828a9693ea12b7544
perf-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
ef2635c9957327d51e8f667e0f0fc855898e028018afb7ca59b5de874dd26016
python-perf-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
702091f502a2af1729f938fba87c73f0f74c76ecec42c9b00110a50e1a33106a
kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0356 CentOS 6 tzdata Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0356
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0356.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0cab9345a5a91f55575ce128767d0429b8cedc7f1ec8daba916b96fea178cdef
tzdata-2011n-2.el6.noarch.rpm
ea6eed5de4070750d611f9f4f8f8ed720e6aa8ea542119f738658ada7d365cea
tzdata-java-2011n-2.el6.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
0cab9345a5a91f55575ce128767d0429b8cedc7f1ec8daba916b96fea178cdef
tzdata-2011n-2.el6.noarch.rpm
ea6eed5de4070750d611f9f4f8f8ed720e6aa8ea542119f738658ada7d365cea
tzdata-java-2011n-2.el6.noarch.rpm
Source:
fcd1d5543bb76ddf3616b9eb257e9f2fed91f3a01011403d7759554f22133557
tzdata-2011n-2.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0353 CentOS 6 fence-agents Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0353
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0353.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
22a7a00e5c24e1c60bd0d9b8b2662937e3cd0bed750b359b14f9d6de46f0ba0f
fence-agents-3.1.5-10.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
c3a7b57433ffe172ff920109ae43a882b41658daa755c418ad5d7641e42bbdea
fence-agents-3.1.5-10.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
56bc13a85d4a8f258a18f49c2bfe1dca00b8cd880bc73f10c3d0e3d24c2123c1
fence-agents-3.1.5-10.el6_2.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0355 CentOS 6 initscripts Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0355
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0355.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
a903fddfe60548092d2af1d7bea46cd584414c3de46c92cfd3a1a76a6435637a
debugmode-9.03.27-1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm
ed2f265234edd0f628df7f1c1ecc06fb8994b37803d2ff2af942033b412d635e
initscripts-9.03.27-1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
8e8dfca8e1d83526b81b051788931fd005348662a0607deb95c63092a9a94515
debugmode-9.03.27-1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
94ca1b961c8676ad34bdde60b9e6f2a45b47a61f1ef75d479081734f8309a00f
initscripts-9.03.27-1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f5335e3c74229b5d6cc2080c24f3883ff5141a0cb3429be3a3a61aee303bac04
initscripts-9.03.27-1.el6.centos.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0357 CentOS 6 pki-core Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0357
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0357.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
4a6b504a592f9bb07ddf135d2a518205ab3cf4fd143ad374ec58693e2bf4fb07
pki-ca-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
514a8c6f4604cdb0046d96ba1657b3586a4a8f44bfa8d1efcdf7dc2440fb07e5
pki-common-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
e4d81f5d96e25428aacae0acd0fc0c05f2dc57c7387e5c0d57448214a8bb
pki-common-javadoc-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
b79600cf82f42590af9c46f368658fcaad3794eb48752b1f661c9777800c2c6a
pki-java-tools-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
e2eab9401ce94f23cdc62de56b27d1e07e4c9fc54195e7082caf89342e28
pki-java-tools-javadoc-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
429f85c6b5fafbb8a43c310ad6586a46b7cc775aef1c655bb2ae035232608e54
pki-native-tools-9.0.3-21.el6_2.i686.rpm
961007554d0a6453e41e75fb1f69cb69843ea44b7f88fd8fcce55a7e1b571a2f
pki-selinux-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
8cea872e54280517ba825b06af5651baf3621f2abbb9e331677c5ccdf7d8730a
pki-setup-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
e7e7483247230eeceb66115a9a13c96cedf8d5ecbdddc0c687fa3f91a2bb1db2
pki-silent-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
44f474a0512a5e57cd5887ab53756ee290864b298b5d5f57c38fc804b770fa78
pki-symkey-9.0.3-21.el6_2.i686.rpm
a98d1177e9d2905187cbbfbfd063a377e08e05fbc7cbd62aa59bce5d299b4fde
pki-util-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
3c2ea2e6e1306a64f6b45d558ab32970df426b39465b64a01ab420d1e49c0ec3
pki-util-javadoc-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
f3b00b4921d152b18c4530bfc9b6648bdbfe420488f66e097f6f65db629dfe57
pki-ca-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
988c63c3df405dead6b2e33e80d19a50ea9d61f3851516a0467b29ba411d9258
pki-common-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
66b762a2e8914e9d60191db4fa28ac53237f6c9e0d83dced4211a4d542f14d53
pki-common-javadoc-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
28db208335711a07c2df8fda9d6d418560d7d8d7f000e70ae62172678c08d871
pki-java-tools-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
d8d5da56ce2967a13f18efc7e88ae0932febb852995599340017248aacdef05c
pki-java-tools-javadoc-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
0b89499bfe1abd2c9dcfacaab4bf5f15985e66c3862a3ddabbb1090a7457d4e6
pki-native-tools-9.0.3-21.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
26e3583cc1ed32d09cbc14df0628aca09015abe1cbb5af8fdbb736f325a8896a
pki-selinux-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
17868d487bdec62e24c2048e22e03920969bac2f3714e12d8831e629e65c047f
pki-setup-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
30c1f591bac61763f24c97fd1a21f6b9d4f41cea9566ec32a817f94f131b3c38
pki-silent-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
8be76ab20714e45de071e65e07bad4ff105aca1393e34335baac7a765df4dad1
pki-symkey-9.0.3-21.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
230c79ef2e1040c901f844560bae391f4b923424d9ab2fbe59c430f4282ea1d3
pki-util-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
e0708567087932394cb867f277f9259c3fbd416e84c87a25d66176d5d8ae0914
pki-util-javadoc-9.0.3-21.el6_2.noarch.rpm
Source:
3d27ba76a50027bd2ffc33f27e67a4ff3a401d35cd76c4ab1a6e51b543082b1d
pki-core-9.0.3-21.el6_2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0366 CentOS 6 module-init-tools Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0366
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0366.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d7bb818e7e305eeb1f0cd49321b4f75508c25d23eb33f70ef438d7e0c3abf8ea
module-init-tools-3.9-19.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
3c60663fecfcd876d38c1e35bd00a7280cf8e5a4ca7488a57ff93b1af0b435a1
module-init-tools-3.9-19.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e2ea992f159365372cb85ffb623f3a9fb2ef1c8ee547ed822b6dad3f65a42e6e
module-init-tools-3.9-19.el6_2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0369 Moderate CentOS 6 python-sqlalchemy Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0369 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0369.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
9fffbe93d25a32bebb898734536cbe6dbd2544f14c6daf07215b8601a56bde59
python-sqlalchemy-0.5.5-3.el6_2.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
9fffbe93d25a32bebb898734536cbe6dbd2544f14c6daf07215b8601a56bde59
python-sqlalchemy-0.5.5-3.el6_2.noarch.rpm
Source:
6b7a6c12633d31885b425636593f35d55a49fabe9b58bd76428e51783714a5ec
python-sqlalchemy-0.5.5-3.el6_2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0364 CentOS 6 selinux-policy Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0364
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0364.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0f0e04cefb5e7fc3e70a32e8a0dc83720edfbe2627cc28d8d7e18f6ce7f9b55d
selinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
cab70e6ece098139b7a64250780355aca9d0a2f5796e3362a623444e9683f08b
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
980db5e1cc737aba52a57fd58fc64c0a258337bd8031c9a61f657bb86f977bdf
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
9df7481c81bf86452952b0bc732a44fa52615a119245051af59dfee821d1f528
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
b9c41b9d3f0fc9bdea4f135a869a8b72ba0a0c8dbcb8407f2ee7a798a6e56261
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
30d60b29af2a54bdfe68ff334d9a282504b3853a794ca207b527183413c5b06e
selinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
bd406bbd87837dd39e3d041ebedfd9f0cf85d83cf8db5f8725a009157ce34aac
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
a4c5feb29a350c269ff22de754441cd8f8f06df10f1c007c87e16dc0df857fa7
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
f3e848afb0648d8c541764ef24b81b4cd983e05dee1fb09ab59111677e392ed0
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
bb2aebebcd091717367bef0235c0fd82ff2d02bb730823fc18abe22d281003d8
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.noarch.rpm
Source:
cb6089f94ddcb5546008b54ca59f32811789f68c558dd17c10fe80f63527d23d
selinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0365 CentOS 6 gmp Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0365
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0365.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f1855126a943ed4aac412006af98490248b739b4f9f78487f17c3275557948e2
gmp-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
79970b1d4219889536ba4cf865ddf9defa9b0c9a057e94c11d6a95e46abad2fa
gmp-devel-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
a77b0ea59c96efd3401859f65d5ca055a5cc674d2e1a7a58ab2100eb28caff7a
gmp-static-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
f1855126a943ed4aac412006af98490248b739b4f9f78487f17c3275557948e2
gmp-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
ec257a3a9b58ac802f344623cf4bb8a507c75583c18c0a3d798dafd69059b7fe
gmp-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.x86_64.rpm
79970b1d4219889536ba4cf865ddf9defa9b0c9a057e94c11d6a95e46abad2fa
gmp-devel-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.i686.rpm
6d547ef86dc2d1e368e6f7eecc04a776aa27a4145562346f48a34c3d5f5fa417
gmp-devel-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.x86_64.rpm
1c5da38cf1b3ed1a322c56c209161bde511aaba8deefbd06218328894a164f2f
gmp-static-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
bdcb4d9e864f97b74f116b9bcb22ee2a589b8b7defef76d72004b80a157d9c7c
gmp-4.3.1-7.el6_2.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0368 CentOS 6 xorg-x11-server Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0368
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0368.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0e6d3308b7ba1f44d43e3e7485eb89fa946b34440e83c1ba5fed546bcb835f23
xorg-x11-server-common-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
96fa2f871b97c679a4bc86ed5257aa2d7f884bcf339779681dc07c120d247724
xorg-x11-server-devel-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
4e3dbc44c586b5274ea241d27a413d1cf77653d7251f6d85b7f6a79909fcfd6d
xorg-x11-server-source-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.noarch.rpm
5a848a407882ab083d9ec36b1ad17b515172a44662550dbd6885feca85dfb53e
xorg-x11-server-Xdmx-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
c94f266436a55dfc090ecf48b54d86683855068ac44df7bc8eabb2ee99149947
xorg-x11-server-Xephyr-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
209d13ee95ff56391bbb359c6d4f64392344d015605bc4344d1f40b451f6238c
xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
b8893e74b1107333d0e9cfc8c3c32f901378bbd562abd94e5d876858ddf8a6a2
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
ab9c79de61313f153363dfb79f304c6371165622f02b39b3ba61934206ce8589
xorg-x11-server-Xvfb-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
x86_64:
36bec5aa9d5a6a5b2e16b2807684aa03b78e8f7c29b0a29ad0b37c8bb41c606c
xorg-x11-server-common-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
96fa2f871b97c679a4bc86ed5257aa2d7f884bcf339779681dc07c120d247724
xorg-x11-server-devel-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.i686.rpm
a8e69a70d444ca8582a740650ebe5cbb45a592f4a99ded266a479489353b91fb
xorg-x11-server-devel-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
6c18801742cb4d1fb7a7de9ef14626ee9dc0dbd403b88d8ac1bb24ed21f6c283
xorg-x11-server-source-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.noarch.rpm
bd018e0fabb906c742d1307f543ff283784f6c227c24da8aeb45b986318efe89
xorg-x11-server-Xdmx-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
2332ca573ba725d5c173dd1488fed5b62213c6c498e2c2de1c39f9e6d0702ef0
xorg-x11-server-Xephyr-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
2a2dd91caa5e8828f6b110176ff5ef6adda2fbbbe2caa1563a49d8f367496077
xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
97f9fa4be8f5eacc91e080a5669ff449661e874654fa8f9e4c75e5787582611d
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
8538ba3115ff9258a06525ffbd5934dca55ae5e181d928436e33527c96f44341
xorg-x11-server-Xvfb-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ba29381c02095266362c1a548b50a3de4bd5cf996fb54d0eb340e8878dafd276
xorg-x11-server-1.10.4-6.el6.centos.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.8 i386 and x86_64
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.8 for the i386 and x86_64 Architectures. CentOS-5.8 is based on the upstream EL 5.8 release and includes packages from all variants including Server, Client, Virtualization, and Clustering. All upstream repositories have been combined into one to make it easier for end users to work with. This is just an announcement email, not the release notes. The Release Notes for CentOS-5.8 can be found on-line at : http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.8 Everyone is encouraged to look through them once. Also worth browsing through are the CentOS FAQs: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ +++ Upgrading from CentOS-5.7 ( or CentOS-5.0/5.1/5.2/5.3/5.4/5.5/5.6): If you are already running CentOS-5.7 or any older CentOS-5 version then all you need to do is update your machine via yum by running : 'yum update' Running 'yum list updates' before doing the update is recommended, so you can get a list of packages that are going to be updated. +++ Downloading CentOS-5.8 for new installs: When possible, consider using torrents to run the downloads. Not only does it help the community and keeps mirrors from running up high bandwidth bills, in most cases you will find its also the fastest means to download the distro. There are currently over a hundred people seeding CentOS-5 and it's possible to get upto 100mbps downloads via these torrents. While torrent files will do their own content checks, and only the right torrent will register and download from torrent.centos.org - its very important for your own security that an md5/sha1sum check is done on the .torrent file itself, and ensure that only the torrent.centos.org tracker is being used. Sha1sum's are more secure than md5's. Whenever possible, use sha1sum's instead of md5. Torrents (and signed md5, sha1, and sha256 sums) are available from the standard iso download directory here: http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5.8/isos/ -- Via direct download: Due to bandwidth considerations the CentOS Project does not publish ISOs directly from our network machines. However direct downloads are available from external mirrors over http, ftp and rsync. A geoip based list is available at http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5.8/isos/ to give you the best predictable match ( and only lists mirrors that are updated already, so you don't need to waste time looking for a sync'd mirror ) +++ sha1sum for these ISOS: i386: f101e6d01bcfdd55f8ce2bb4a9a4c1dd6d5cc40e CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-1of7.iso 09bf6762895312dbef0810bc883457d5efe0b0a5 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-2of7.iso 246cec5bcf343f290d85ac00b51e2c2405fbe6e7 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-3of7.iso cc7a91ade43e14dffbcc055b3ac7b09e7656f1e2 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-4of7.iso 58a55366cd6cbd7635d07263c66909f7ca807fe4 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-5of7.iso 6d49b5392e1d0576d0e382db297477ef397d4bc5 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-6of7.iso adde0d2e49a7a5058b2b78d91a1f847e106e7af7 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-7of7.iso a7291b58a4c15c12d8dba82c4ddb202c4c20d3a5 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-DVD-1of2.iso a1c3dee04c5d164c71541a4fe053b892b83a5dc7 CentOS-5.8-i386-bin-DVD-2of2.iso 9a0f80243cd7d77c138f3a61ae731346fc142782 CentOS-5.8-i386-netinstall.iso x86_64: 9f3f13bacda39bf8ed62338ce3c098941e4a3f75 CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-1of8.iso df40740df4a7ce856d274e3c4dc9f0e93787a98c CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-2of8.iso 43a6edb7c4acd521f8ce66f5cb04e4d1c320cd93 CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-3of8.iso 1addc401c013624b14225d37f7b87de82f5b4c22 CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-4of8.iso a9de8d8c4d136e82df3e91a341bdb178c7114fd0 CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-5of8.iso c015eb07aae8d8466e4e204fd1d2851272bcf15f CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-6of8.iso 6ea6b9af3dc2ae4d936fbcc9aea7f38bf5b972be CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-7of8.iso e0adb9991fe6dfa5012e22cfaf5ec6d1897f5744 CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-8of8.iso 0dd1f669f4ef6242a464e2dc4cfb4054e0c03893 CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2.iso e62a6538bb51db560d27b558bedbf2a5dc35eb0b CentOS-5.8-x86_64-bin-DVD-2of2.iso d692dc567d53f8f6e5e8cdc30acd1b85472cc218 CentOS-5.8-x86_64-netinstall.iso +++ Note about media: DVD #2 on both i386 and x86_64 only contain Openoffice langpacks for languages others than english. Therefore DVD#2 is only needed when doing a desktop install, with the openoffice components selected with other than English language support. +++ Sources and Debuginfo packages: SRPMS and debuginfo packages are no longer on the main CentOS mirrors. The are online now on the CentOS Vault (for SRPMS) or the CentOS Debug server (for debuginfo files). Here are the links: SRPMS (vault): http://vault.centos.org/5.8/ Debuginfo: http://debuginfo.centos.org/5/ +++ Getting Help: The best place to start when looking for help with CentOS is at the wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp ) which lists various options and communities who might be able to help. If you think there is a bug in the system, do report it at http://bugs.centos.org/ -
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0354 CentOS 6 createrepo FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0354
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0354.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
827ac863f884063dd1f10b3fccf1d64abed547133d1601e1d191699410585ca2
createrepo-0.9.8-5.el6.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
827ac863f884063dd1f10b3fccf1d64abed547133d1601e1d191699410585ca2
createrepo-0.9.8-5.el6.noarch.rpm
Source:
29a6bd85328e2314ce4bd6e3b941759d6c0997ca12992ec241eb562cf17736a4
createrepo-0.9.8-5.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0351 CentOS 6 fontforge FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0351
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0351.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
fffd85c96884f1b009ff1c146078eba440e402f13fd49190fc57243d321da12d
fontforge-20090622-3.1.el6.i686.rpm
39eb4ba6d51b7fa818eab3450ca8782fa4e0d864daf592f062448a2435b70527
fontforge-devel-20090622-3.1.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
fffd85c96884f1b009ff1c146078eba440e402f13fd49190fc57243d321da12d
fontforge-20090622-3.1.el6.i686.rpm
02594d17ee534072942106b73f4ec408d7889a796a08f251f264934f137107d9
fontforge-20090622-3.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
39eb4ba6d51b7fa818eab3450ca8782fa4e0d864daf592f062448a2435b70527
fontforge-devel-20090622-3.1.el6.i686.rpm
bff71d30e2408050cd64351875c69c92a9d8583899f5670034babf080b56fa4e
fontforge-devel-20090622-3.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
13bfb14b195bb4ada3d16b1ad26ff3fe2929d248ca2091e7e139491bbf8f1eb6
fontforge-20090622-3.1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-virt] routing problem with domU bridged to two networks
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 20:41 +0200, Peter Peltonen wrote: As I received no response on the general CentOS list, I'll repost it here as the question is about Xen virtual machine routing. This is my network setup: http://pastebin.com/kyWpTQYU Lets assume my dom0's eth2 public ip is 1.2.3.33 and my dmz network 11.22.33.96/255.255.255.224 . I have created NAT from my LAN with iptables. You can see my /etc/sysconfig/iptables here: http://pastebin.com/1FqSTvPH And this is my dom0 routing table: http://pastebin.com/gNjTFHp5 My goal: To access NFS shares on a (non-virtualized) file server in the LAN network from the domU web server in the DMZ network. What I tried: I attached the domU to both bridges using this Xen config: vif = [ mac=00:0c:29:de:3a:fe,bridge=xenbr0,mac=00:0C:29:76:19:85,bridge=xenbr1 ] and then created two eth interfaces inside the domU mapping to the MAC addresses above, giving eth1 an IP from the DMZ (11.22.33.111) and giving eth2 an IP from the LAN (192.168.0.12). After this I mounted the NFS share from the file server (192.168.0.2). My problem: If my domU web server is connected to both LAN and DMZ using the two bridges xenbr0 and xenbr1, I can access the NFS share from the domU web server and everything else works as expected, except for one thing -- my workstations in the LAN cannot anymore access the web server: web pages do not open anymore and from the workstations I cannot ping the domU. If the web server domU is only connected to DMZ via xenbr0, the workstations can access it ok. Any advice what I am doing wrong and I could fix my setup? The postrouting command uses -o eth2. To NAT LAN requests to your DMZ web server, shouldn't you be using xenbr0? Though, I would bridge eth2, as well, and create a virtual firewall with eth0 (DMZ?), eth1 (LAN) and eth2 (PUB). I wouldn't want the Dom0 to be directly compromised if my firewall was compromised. Regards, Peter ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] centos ,care2x y php
buenos dias, estoy instalando care2x en centos pero me sale un error: PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function sys_get_temp_dir() in /var/www/html/care2x/installer/config.php les ha ocurrido esto antes. saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] centos ,care2x y php
El día 7 de marzo de 2012 09:46, el linuxero linuxerodep...@hotmail.com escribió: buenos dias, estoy instalando care2x en centos pero me sale un error: PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function sys_get_temp_dir() in /var/www/html/care2x/installer/config.php les ha ocurrido esto antes. No porque nunca he instalado este programa, mas que es un aplicativo de PHP. Verifica tu versión de PHP, porque esta funcion esta definida para PHP 5 = 5.2.1 http://de.php.net/manual/de/function.sys-get-temp-dir.php y según comentan en versiones anteriores da el error que has encontrado. saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, cheperobert ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] No puedo descargar paquete centos-ds
Buenas noches!! No he podido descargar el paquete centos-ds en Centos 6.1. Acaso sera q el paquete cambio de nombre?? JOSE FERMIN ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] No puedo descargar paquete centos-ds
Alguien tendra un manual de como instalar un directory server en Centos 6.2. Solo he podido tener acceso a manuales de Centos 5.0. JOSE FERMIN --- El lun, 3/5/12, Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com escribió: De: Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com Asunto: No puedo descargar paquete centos-ds A: centos-es@centos.org Fecha: lunes, 5 de marzo de 2012, 08:13 pm Buenas noches!! No he podido descargar el paquete centos-ds en Centos 6.1. Acaso sera q el paquete cambio de nombre?? JOSE FERMIN ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] No puedo descargar paquete centos-ds
2012/3/5 Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com: Buenas noches!! No he podido descargar el paquete centos-ds en Centos 6.1. Acaso sera q el paquete cambio de nombre?? Es probable que no este para centos 6, Porque no te animas con 389-ds, creado por el proyecto Fedora http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Main_Page No hay mucha información, pero si te sirve esta guia para Centos 6.2 http://kura2gurun.blogspot.com/2012/01/part-i-389-directory-server-on-centos.html JOSE FERMIN ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, cheperobert ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] No puedo descargar paquete centos-ds
Gracias por tu respuesta chepeRobert!! disculpa, soy nuevo en Centos, pero con eso q enviaste se podra loguearse desde la parte grafica?? JOSE FERMIN --- El mié, 3/7/12, cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.com escribió: De: cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.com Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] No puedo descargar paquete centos-ds A: centos-es@centos.org Fecha: miércoles, 7 de marzo de 2012, 03:37 pm 2012/3/5 Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com: Buenas noches!! No he podido descargar el paquete centos-ds en Centos 6.1. Acaso sera q el paquete cambio de nombre?? Es probable que no este para centos 6, Porque no te animas con 389-ds, creado por el proyecto Fedora http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Main_Page No hay mucha información, pero si te sirve esta guia para Centos 6.2 http://kura2gurun.blogspot.com/2012/01/part-i-389-directory-server-on-centos.html JOSE FERMIN ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, cheperobert ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 63, Envío 3
buenos dias, estoy instalando care2x en centos pero me sale un error: PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function sys_get_temp_dir() in /var/www/html/care2x/installer/config.php les ha ocurrido esto antes. saludos. Este error en centos no me salio pero tuve un problema recuerdo que lo soluciones poniendo el Selinux en modo permisivo -- Saludos Paúl Vizuete ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
On 03/05/2012 04:45 PM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes: I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop integration needed some work. It is much easier to install on several systems from repository. And I created virtual packages to install localized environment that pulls all packages I wanted. And update is much simpler from repository, that is why I am trying to force people to use it that way so we can move it to regular repository. So Ljubomir, you have unpacked the official rpms and made a repo out of them? That might work, with a meta-package that would pull in the core stuff.. Still not very elegant. I really wish LO people would make a proper repo … I'll mention this in my letter to Santa this year. In the meanwhile we're probably going to have LO 3.4.5 in 6.3, so it's nice. Apparently 3.5.0 was not quite ready for (enteprise) prime time. Yes, I did that around CentOS 5.2 or 5.3, when Openoffice 3.1 came out, then upgraded to 3.2. I still have them in my repository for EL 5.x. Main reason was that OpenOffice installer from tar was not working, and tar for Serbian language was lacking desktop integration for RHEL/Fedora, so I had to unpack and install via yum/rpm manually using complicated commands I had to write down to remember, then separately adding Serbian Language support, and I hated that. Issuing yum install ooo3-sr to install it along with Serbian language support was much easier :D -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KVM CentOS i386
On 03/02/2012 06:28 PM, William Hooper wrote: On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Anton Zaytsevanton.zajt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys. I did search over internet but found nothing useful. Is there a way to install KVM on CentOS i386? To quote the FAQ: Upstream only provides KVM support on 64-bit (x86_64) so CentOS support is the same. You must do a 64-bit install to use KVM. http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS6 I used Farkas Levente's kvm-84 on CentOS 5.x i386 for several years without any issue. Still have them in my repository. But for CentOS 6.x there is no 32-bit packages, 64-bit only. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gdm in 6.2 missing keyboard menu?
On 02/28/2012 05:31 PM, James Pearson wrote: I have a box running 6.0 that gives a keyboard layout menu via gdm when logging in. I've just installed a 6.2 box, but there is no keyboard layout menu I've found a bugzilla entry at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746923 which says that with gdm in 6.2, it now only shows keyboard layouts listed in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard However, I've added a list of keyboard layouts as suggested by that BZ, but I still don't get a keyboard menu. Is there anything else I've missed? Have you rebooted after adding it, or restarted gdm service? If the answer is yes, then I suggest reporting it to that bugzilla entry. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.2 software raid 10 with LVM - Need help with degraded drive and only one MBR
On 03/03/2012 06:48 AM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: This was a raid 10, would the same apply? If I do a fresh reinstall how can I guarantee that the MBR is across all drives? I do not think you NEED to reinstall entire system. Check if there is /boot partition on the rest of the disks. If there is, they might have (even old) kernel and the rest of files, so your system could be booted. If there is no files on /boot partition, you could copy it from some other CentOS 6.2 system and edit the config files so the paths are correct. This will keep your system intact with all the custom config changes. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kickstart partitioning and cylinder boundary
On 03/06/2012 02:33 PM, Erez Zarum wrote: As I understand anaconda uses parted to partition (starting from centos 6), using this as example (kickstart configuration file): clearpart --all --drives=sda --initlabel part /boot --asprimary --size=200 --fstype=ext2 --ondisk=sda part swap --asprimary --size=16384 --fstype=swap --ondisk=sda part / --asprimary --size=512000 --fstype=ext4 --ondisk=sda part /scratch --asprimary --size=1 --grow --fstype=ext4 --ondisk=sda I can see no problems in parted: snip Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 26 204800 83 Linux Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda2 26 65297 524288000 83 Linux /dev/sda3 65297 6738616777216 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda4 67386 243069 1411177472 83 Linux As you can see, /dev/sda1 End at 26 and /dev/sda2 Start at 26. But, fdisk –lu report otherwise: snip I assume I can ignore it and it’s a bug on fdisk? This does not happen on 5.7. Are the disks of the same model? Parted is able to set the partitions so they are aligned to cylinder. maybe that is what is happening? ‘--align alignment-type’ -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Recent kernel update vs usb disk
From: wwp subscr...@free.fr When I plug the disk, this wakes it up and I see in /var/log/messages: kernel: usb 2-4.2: USB disconnect, address 11 kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 13 kernel: usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=1ca1, idProduct=18a9 kernel: usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 kernel: usb 2-2: Product: Usb Sata Bridge kernel: usb 2-2: Manufacturer: SYMWAVE kernel: usb 2-2: SerialNumber: 3559443452593133 kernel: usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice kernel: scsi11 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices but it's not getting mounted. Up to where did you cut the output...? Did you get the SCSI device at all? if not, is hald running and polling /dev/sd* (ps auxfw | grep hald)? kernel: usb 2-3: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3 kernel: usb 2-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice kernel: scsi9 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices kernel: Vendor: Corsair Model: Voyager Mini Rev: 0.00 kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 kernel: SCSI device sdg: 15771759 512-byte hdwr sectors (8075 MB) kernel: sdg: Write Protect is off kernel: sdg: assuming drive cache: write through kernel: SCSI device sdg: 15771759 512-byte hdwr sectors (8075 MB) kernel: sdg: Write Protect is off kernel: sdg: assuming drive cache: write through kernel: sdg: sdg1 kernel: sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi removable disk sdg kernel: sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg7 type 0 hald: mounted /dev/sdg1 on behalf of uid 2000 Maybe try to restart the usb_storage module... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Recent kernel update vs usb disk
Hello John, On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 05:25:55 -0800 (PST) John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: wwp subscr...@free.fr When I plug the disk, this wakes it up and I see in /var/log/messages: kernel: usb 2-4.2: USB disconnect, address 11 kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 13 kernel: usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=1ca1, idProduct=18a9 kernel: usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 kernel: usb 2-2: Product: Usb Sata Bridge kernel: usb 2-2: Manufacturer: SYMWAVE kernel: usb 2-2: SerialNumber: 3559443452593133 kernel: usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice kernel: scsi11 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices but it's not getting mounted. Up to where did you cut the output...? Did you get the SCSI device at all? if not, is hald running and polling /dev/sd* (ps auxfw | grep hald)? [snip] Thanks for your reply! I shown the lines that appeared in system log since the moment I plug the device, there's nothing after (and nothing before that matters, at least WRT to the plug event itself). No, the device is not even accessible using /dev/sdXX. Gparted and other tools don't even see it. But my laptop's internal disk and other externals USB (SATA or IDE) disks are accessible. The issue seems focused on that particular external USB disk, and I never get it as /dev/sdXX whatever I plug it directly to one of this laptop's USB ports or to a USB multi-port. The issue is not present with kernel 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6, it's present with updates 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6 and 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6. FYI it's a CentOS6 64bit installed on a DELL Latitude E6500. I tried unplugging all USB storage devices, unloaded usb_storage module, re-loaded it. Plugged in the disk and nothing better. I tried with another laptop (DELL D810) with an up-to-date CentOS6 (32bit) installed on it: same behaviour, the disk is not accessible w/ latest kernel but is accessible w/ 2.6.32-131. Regards, -- wwp signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.2 software raid 10 with LVM - Need help with degraded drive and only one MBR
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan Vomacka juvi...@gmail.com wrote: Essentially I guess the short question is, How do I make a non bootable drive bootable if the original MBR is no longer available? If you haven't gotten this to work yet, it is probably as simple as booting the Centos install disk in rescue mode and installing grub on the disk that is now the boot disk after the primary has failed. That is, you likely do have a raid1 /boot but either no grub on it or a misconfigured copy - or the bios isn't automatically failing to it. But, you'll also need to replace the failed disk, partition it to match, resync the raids and re-install grub on the new disk. You might want to practice that on a non-critical machine or a VM before trying it where you might lose data. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Recent kernel update vs usb disk
From: wwp subscr...@free.fr No, the device is not even accessible using /dev/sdXX. Gparted and other tools don't even see it. But my laptop's internal disk and other externals USB (SATA or IDE) disks are accessible. The issue is not present with kernel 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6, it's present with updates 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6 and 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6. FYI it's a CentOS6 64bit installed on a DELL Latitude E6500. I tried with another laptop (DELL D810) with an up-to-date CentOS6 (32bit) installed on it: same behaviour, the disk is not accessible w/ latest kernel but is accessible w/ 2.6.32-131. I was on a CentOS 5... I tried on a 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 and it still works fine with my USB key... usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 usb 1-4: New USB device found, idVendor=1b1c, idProduct=0b29 usb 1-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 usb 1-4: Product: Voyager Mini usb 1-4: Manufacturer: Corsair usb 1-4: SerialNumber: 37b47c25e57156 usb 1-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... scsi4 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage USB Mass Storage support registered. usb-storage: device found at 2 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning usb-storage: device scan complete scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access Corsair Voyager Mini 0.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg3 type 0 sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] 15771759 512-byte logical blocks: (8.07 GB/7.52 GiB) sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 00 00 00 00 sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sdc: sdc1 sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI removable disk So, apparently for you it stops just before the usbcore... Wild guess... USB3 drive? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:17 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 03/06/12 10:40 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: I've had to use inode64 on far smaller file systems (15TB) due to inode counts (many files) and not file system size. My understanding of it is, the inode number is its physical position on the disk. if the first 1TB (2^31 * 512) of the disk has no free space to create an inode for a new directory, then that inode requires 64bits. Ah, ok, if the inode's location on disk goes above the 1TB mark then inode64 is needed, but not the data it points to, that can exist anywhere. Problem is that both inode and data can exist in that 1TB and the data can push the inodes into 64-bit land. These days XFS should always be inode64 enabled, given the size of disks, and NFS should have been fixed a long, long time ago. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Recent kernel update vs usb disk
Hello John, On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:39:50 -0800 (PST) John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: wwp subscr...@free.fr No, the device is not even accessible using /dev/sdXX. Gparted and other tools don't even see it. But my laptop's internal disk and other externals USB (SATA or IDE) disks are accessible. The issue is not present with kernel 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6, it's present with updates 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6 and 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6. FYI it's a CentOS6 64bit installed on a DELL Latitude E6500. I tried with another laptop (DELL D810) with an up-to-date CentOS6 (32bit) installed on it: same behaviour, the disk is not accessible w/ latest kernel but is accessible w/ 2.6.32-131. I was on a CentOS 5... I tried on a 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 and it still works fine with my USB key... usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 usb 1-4: New USB device found, idVendor=1b1c, idProduct=0b29 usb 1-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 usb 1-4: Product: Voyager Mini usb 1-4: Manufacturer: Corsair usb 1-4: SerialNumber: 37b47c25e57156 usb 1-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... scsi4 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage USB Mass Storage support registered. usb-storage: device found at 2 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning usb-storage: device scan complete scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access Corsair Voyager Mini 0.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg3 type 0 sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] 15771759 512-byte logical blocks: (8.07 GB/7.52 GiB) sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 00 00 00 00 sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sdc: sdc1 sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI removable disk So, apparently for you it stops just before the usbcore... Wild guess... USB3 drive? No, USB2 drive with SATA disk inside. All other USB storage disks (keys, IDE or SATA disks) do work as expected) *but* this one. Regards, -- wwp signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. I think RH needs to take a cue in that areaI'm not going to reconfigure my entire array to accommodate centos in this instance. if i don't need MDRAID 10 boot then this machine will come back to centos6..:) Centos 6 is great but it's not right for this particluar machine..:( On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition? It has to load code before you have the kernel that understands raid or how to detect it. That's why they call it booting. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck debugging it when it breaks - it is very different. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] hardware issues? driver issues?
Got a bunch of servers from Penguin. Supermicro m/b's H8QG6. We put a 3tb
drive in for additional workspace for the users, and some of them won't
read, others will go for weeks, then spit out DRDY errors. lshw shows the
controller as an ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA.
I did notice that it shows
*-storage
description: SATA controller
product: SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode]
vendor: ATI Technologies Inc
snip
width: 32 bits
^^
clock: 66MHz
capabilities: storage pm ahci_1.0 bus_master cap_list
From /var/log/dmesg:
pci :00:0d.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci :00:0d.0: PME# disabled
pci :00:11.0: reg 10 io port: [0xd000-0xd007]
pci :00:11.0: reg 14 io port: [0xc000-0xc003]
pci :00:11.0: reg 18 io port: [0xb000-0xb007]
pci :00:11.0: reg 1c io port: [0xa000-0xa003]
pci :00:11.0: reg 20 io port: [0x9000-0x900f]
pci :00:11.0: reg 24 32bit mmio: [0xdfefa400-0xdfefa7ff]
...
ahci :00:11.0: version 3.0
alloc irq_desc for 22 on node 0
alloc kstat_irqs on node 0
ahci :00:11.0: PCI INT A - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 22
ahci :00:11.0: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 4 ports 3 Gbps 0xf impl SATA mode
ahci :00:11.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf ilck pm led clo pmp pio slum part
ccc
...
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xdfefa400 port 0xdfefa500 irq 22
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xdfefa400 port 0xdfefa580 irq 22
I've included the above, because I note the 32bit mmio, but the 64bit
flag; also the clock speed for the controller.
Now, I've been working on one with Penguin. I noticed one thing, that it
was set to native IDE. After googling, I saw that the most recent spec,
which included EIDE, should be good to petabytes... but I tried resetting
it to AHCI anyway.
The user ran one job, ok... then another last night, and it's spitting the
same errors.
In /var/log/messages, I see JBD: detected IO errors while flushing file data:
Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x3
SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2.00: cmd
61/08:00:72:4a:a4/00:00:ae:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 4096 out
Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: res
40/00:04:20:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2.00: status: { DRDY }
...
Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2: hard resetting link
Mar 7 00:53:33 server kernel: ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123
SControl 300)
Mar 7 00:53:33 server kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
Mar 7 00:53:33 server kernel: ata2.00: device reported invalid CHS
sector 0
Mar 7 00:53:33 server kernel: ata2: EH complete
Notice the device reported invalid CHS sector 0. The drive does have a
GPT rather than an MBR.
So, has anyone else seen similar problems, or have some suggestions as to
something I can try? Penguin's still waiting for a response from
Supermicro, and has escalated
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hardware issues? driver issues?
On Wednesday 07 March 2012 11.17.15 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Got a bunch of servers from Penguin. Supermicro m/b's H8QG6. We put a 3tb drive in for additional workspace for the users, and some of them won't read, others will go for weeks, then spit out DRDY errors. lshw shows the controller as an ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA. ... Now, I've been working on one with Penguin. I noticed one thing, that it was set to native IDE. After googling, I saw that the most recent spec, which included EIDE, should be good to petabytes... but I tried resetting it to AHCI anyway. The user ran one job, ok... then another last night, and it's spitting the same errors. ... Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED ... 40/00:04:20:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 (timeout) ... Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2: hard resetting link While writing the drive timed out and the link to it was then subjected to a hard reset. This is not normal and usually points to bad drive or buggy firmware. Have you had a look at smartdata for the drive(s)? (you may want to run the smart selftests) Also, I'd suggest you test it in a controlled environment. For example, can any of your drives survive a full surface write? (dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M of=..) Full surface read? Do the tests against /dev/sdX to be sure (excludes partitioning, filesystems, volume management, etc.) Do note that writing your drive full of zeros _will_ destroy your data (I really hope that's stating the obvious...). /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck debugging it when it breaks - it is very different. Plus it is very handy to have a /boot that is readable/mountable without LVM or MDRAID drivers loaded and configured. /boot is only 256-512MB partition that is read only during boot and updated only when there is a new kernel, so it ain't no big thing. Even when RH goes to grub2 I think I'll keep this setup by default. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Cloud on CentOS Server
I'm looking into adding a cloud to one of my servers. Criteria: security accessible via Windoze, Android Mobile Devices, iPhones, iPads, Macs Preferably something living under one of the better repos, such as epel An active project doing updates and adding features. I don't suppose any of you have ideas for this? ;) -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online Solutions ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
Ross Walker wrote: On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck debugging it when it breaks - it is very different. Plus it is very handy to have a /boot that is readable/mountable without LVM or MDRAID drivers loaded and configured. /boot is only 256-512MB partition that is read only during boot and updated only when there is a new kernel, so it ain't no big thing. Even when RH goes to grub2 I think I'll keep this setup by default. Don't make it less than 512M - we're debating between 512M and 1G here. Certainly, bleeding-edge fedora *needs* at least 256M *free* in /boot to do an upgrade in place, so I have to assume that's coming in the next few years for RHEL/CentOS. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hardware issues? driver issues?
Peter Kjellström wrote: On Wednesday 07 March 2012 11.17.15 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Got a bunch of servers from Penguin. Supermicro m/b's H8QG6. We put a 3tb drive in for additional workspace for the users, and some of them won't read, others will go for weeks, then spit out DRDY errors. lshw shows the controller as an ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA. ... Now, I've been working on one with Penguin. I noticed one thing, that it was set to native IDE. After googling, I saw that the most recent spec, which included EIDE, should be good to petabytes... but I tried resetting it to AHCI anyway. The user ran one job, ok... then another last night, and it's spitting the same errors. ... Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED ... 40/00:04:20:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 (timeout) ... Mar 7 00:53:28 server kernel: ata2: hard resetting link While writing the drive timed out and the link to it was then subjected to a hard reset. This is not normal and usually points to bad drive or buggy firmware. Have you had a look at smartdata for the drive(s)? (you may want to run the smart selftests) Also, I'd suggest you test it in a controlled environment. For example, can any of your drives survive a full surface write? (dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M of=..) Full surface read? Do the tests against /dev/sdX to be sure (excludes partitioning, filesystems, volume management, etc.) Do note that writing your drive full of zeros _will_ destroy your data (I really hope that's stating the obvious...). g Of course. Nahhh... I've run bonnie++ against it, but couldn't provoke it. It's this one user, who runs *large* jobs, with big o/p, when it hits. smartctl - I ran the short test just before lunch, and smartctl -H reports it passed, completed without errors. I saw that it timed out. One of the reasons for some of the stuff I included, above, was that kernel: ata2.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0 Also, I noticed that lshw showed the ATI controller having a width of 32 bits, and a clock of 66MHz, and wondered if there could be some sort of slip-through-the-cracks where the driver didn't handle this correctly. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
On 03/07/12 6:47 AM, Ross Walker wrote: These days XFS should always be inode64 enabled, given the size of disks, and NFS should have been fixed a long, long time ago. yes. problem is, we have clients that are running all sorts of OS's, including older versions of Solaris... this is a manufacturing environment, so many of the clients are actually test equipment and machine controllers and such, you can't just slap a new OS on those. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] hfs with extended attribute support
Hi all, I´ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i´m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl´s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the error in dmesg just gives me ¨hfs: unable to parse mount options¨. does anyone know what´s going on and what i should do to make this work? regards, Wessel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cloud on CentOS Server
On 03/07/12 10:06 AM, John Hinton wrote: I'm looking into adding a cloud to one of my servers. what does a cloud mean in this context ? to me, a cloud is a set of homogenous servers running distributed applications. classic cloud is google.the term has been degraded to also refer to a stack of servers running a virtualization platform such that the individual VMs don't care what hardware they are assigned to, classic example of a VM cloud is Amazon AWS. I don't understand how ANYTHING you do on a single server could be called 'cloudy'. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cloud on CentOS Server
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:06 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: I'm looking into adding a cloud to one of my servers. Criteria: security accessible via Windoze, Android Mobile Devices, iPhones, iPads, Macs Preferably something living under one of the better repos, such as epel An active project doing updates and adding features. I don't suppose any of you have ideas for this? ;) A cloud of what? Web services? That's still pretty generic. For personal access to a small number of things I just send them to my gmail account which works from anything with a browser. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
the problem with that is when your boot drive dies your can't boot...with ubuntu at least if any drive dies i can stilll boot off of the other 3..:) On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck debugging it when it breaks - it is very different. Plus it is very handy to have a /boot that is readable/mountable without LVM or MDRAID drivers loaded and configured. /boot is only 256-512MB partition that is read only during boot and updated only when there is a new kernel, so it ain't no big thing. Even when RH goes to grub2 I think I'll keep this setup by default. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
the problem with that is when your boot drive dies your can't boot...with ubuntu at least if any drive dies i can stilll boot off of the other 3..:) You don't need a boot drive, you only need a *boot partition*. So, you create a small *boot partition* with RAID1 and then allocate the rest of your drives to a RAID10 array. You will still have redundancy (RAID1) on your boot partition. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hfs with extended attribute support
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 01:17:15 PM Wessel van der Aart wrote: so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the error in dmesg just gives me ¨hfs: unable to parse mount options¨. does anyone know what´s going on and what i should do to make this work? Well, having used the in-kernel HFS+ filesystem driver before, and found it lacking in a number of areas (like massive corruption under heavy load or when unlinking lots of files) I bought the commercially supported Paragon NTFSHFS drivers. http://www.paragon-software.com/business/ntfs-linux-professional/ I have not tried extended attribute and acl support, but the Paragon drivers support full read and write on journaled HFS+ filesystems. It's $40 US, but worth every penny in my book for filesystem compatibility. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
i then have to redo my entire array...and loose space inside the array. Plus if i raid1 it then i only have two bootable disks..at least this way i have 4 bootable disks..:) Lose space? 100 or 200MB? Why the heck wouldn't you be able to spare 100 or 200MB of the gigantic size of today's drives? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On 7.3.2012 19:08, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Ross Walker wrote: On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikesell-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren hescominsoon-dGSttIWD7Blt2rXhg/qq1lelw3d7xbbmmrmqpfiv...@public.gmane.org wrote: well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck debugging it when it breaks - it is very different. Plus it is very handy to have a /boot that is readable/mountable without LVM or MDRAID drivers loaded and configured. /boot is only 256-512MB partition that is read only during boot and updated only when there is a new kernel, so it ain't no big thing. Even when RH goes to grub2 I think I'll keep this setup by default. Don't make it less than 512M - we're debating between 512M and 1G here. You may have noticed that redhat recommends 250M http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
Plus if i raid1 it then i only have two bootable disks..at least this way i have 4 bootable disks..:) No, you don't have 4. Please study the way a RAID10 array works. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
On 3/7/2012 11:16 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 03/07/12 6:47 AM, Ross Walker wrote: These days XFS should always be inode64 enabled, given the size of disks, and NFS should have been fixed a long, long time ago. yes. problem is, we have clients that are running all sorts of OS's, including older versions of Solaris... this is a manufacturing environment, so many of the clients are actually test equipment and machine controllers and such, you can't just slap a new OS on those. Why do those embedded systems have to see a whole 74 TB storage midden? Why not slice off a 1 TB or so LVM slice for them? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: the problem with that is when your boot drive dies your can't boot...with ubuntu at least if any drive dies i can stilll boot off of the other 3..:) You can make a raid1 with 4 members if you want - and you might as well since you'll want to make the partition layout match anyway. Does ubuntu actually install grub on all 4 mbr's? You'll have to do that manually, but it's not that hard. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
On 03/07/12 11:27 AM, Warren Young wrote: Why do those embedded systems have to see a whole 74 TB storage midden? Why not slice off a 1 TB or so LVM slice for them? LVM management blows chunks. each of these arrays (we have dozens of these 74TiB storage servers) will end up nearly filled up. trying to manage 74 separate 1TiB file systems or even 10 separate 7TiB systems, and figuring out where there's freespace? no thanks.there's 1000s of those clients writing files to this archival storage, and the goal is to fill up the storage. the operations folks at these production sites were using Solaris w/ ZFS for this in the previous (smaller) incarnation. one solution proposed by a field site is to use SMB instead of NFS, as it doesn't seem to have these issues. I personally find SMB for (l)Unix to (l)Unix distasteful. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
Markus Falb wrote: On 7.3.2012 19:08, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Ross Walker wrote: On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikesell-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren hescominsoon-dGSttIWD7Blt2rXhg/qq1lelw3d7xbbmmrmqpfiv...@public.gmane.org wrote: well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck debugging it when it breaks - it is very different. Plus it is very handy to have a /boot that is readable/mountable without LVM or MDRAID drivers loaded and configured. /boot is only 256-512MB partition that is read only during boot and updated only when there is a new kernel, so it ain't no big thing. Even when RH goes to grub2 I think I'll keep this setup by default. Don't make it less than 512M - we're debating between 512M and 1G here. You may have noticed that redhat recommends 250M http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html Yeah, well, some of us have many servers more than 4 yrs old; so I'm assuming that three, four years from now, with CentOS 8 or 9, it'll do the same, and want maybe 800M. Plan for the future, y'know. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: You may have noticed that redhat recommends 250M http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html Yeah, well, some of us have many servers more than 4 yrs old; so I'm assuming that three, four years from now, with CentOS 8 or 9, it'll do the same, and want maybe 800M. Plan for the future, y'know. If the future continues anything like the past, you'll be be able to buy something new with twice the speed and 10x the space by then and be better off starting over than allocating more than you need today. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: You may have noticed that redhat recommends 250M http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html Yeah, well, some of us have many servers more than 4 yrs old; so I'm assuming that three, four years from now, with CentOS 8 or 9, it'll do the same, and want maybe 800M. Plan for the future, y'know. If the future continues anything like the past, you'll be be able to buy something new with twice the speed and 10x the space by then and be better off starting over than allocating more than you need today. a) You think I, or a *lot* of other folks, are going to do that at home? (Please - I'm trying to get my fiancee to at *least* go from *shudder* Vista to Win7) b) I'm a federal contractor, on site. You think the Republicans in Congress are going to increase our budget, to replace all servers over three or four years old? mark clue: phat chance ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: If the future continues anything like the past, you'll be be able to buy something new with twice the speed and 10x the space by then and be better off starting over than allocating more than you need today. you are re-installing your servers permanently? For an unfortunately large number, yes. i do not, i move the VMware-Images to new hosts / SAN storages without any interruption and if you maintain them well this works over many years and dist-upgrades Our servers dealing with financial exchange data live on the bleeding edge of capacity and can't afford the overhead of virtualization. So we end up replacing the backend servers wholesale every few years, re-purposing the older generation for less demanding tasks. But, within the realm of hardware with compatible drivers there's not a whole lot of difference in the effort to copy a VM image or a hardware image with clonezilla or a similar approach. I agree that VMware is great where it works, though. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: If the future continues anything like the past, you'll be be able to buy something new with twice the speed and 10x the space by then and be better off starting over than allocating more than you need today. a) You think I, or a *lot* of other folks, are going to do that at home? (Please - I'm trying to get my fiancee to at *least* go from *shudder* Vista to Win7) If you leave them on, add up the power cost of running an old box for years. b) I'm a federal contractor, on site. You think the Republicans in Congress are going to increase our budget, to replace all servers over three or four years old? Yes, if someone does the report to show that it will save money in the big picture... But you don't necessarily throw out the 3 year old boxes, you can re-purpose them to something where people aren't waiting idly for their results, keeping some others for spare parts. In any case, someone should be accounting for the space/power/cooling that old hardware takes while accomplishing 10% as much as new. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Anyone recognize www-mysql?
I'm transitioning someone's quite old server [Debian] to a new CentOS6 host. All going pretty well. But they server up some functionality using CGI scripts via Apache that use something referred to on the Debian box as the www-mysql package? This a binary that executes HTML pages containing embedded SQL statements. Anyone know where the source for this can be found or if it has a more specific name? The 'helpfulness' of search engines is getting in the way of finding the provenance of this code. -- System Network Administrator [ LPI NCLA ] http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com OpenGroupware Developer http://www.opengroupware.us Adam Tauno Williams ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:46 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 03/07/12 11:27 AM, Warren Young wrote: Why do those embedded systems have to see a whole 74 TB storage midden? Why not slice off a 1 TB or so LVM slice for them? LVM management blows chunks. each of these arrays (we have dozens of these 74TiB storage servers) will end up nearly filled up. trying to manage 74 separate 1TiB file systems or even 10 separate 7TiB systems, and figuring out where there's freespace? no thanks. there's 1000s of those clients writing files to this archival storage, and the goal is to fill up the storage. the operations folks at these production sites were using Solaris w/ ZFS for this in the previous (smaller) incarnation. one solution proposed by a field site is to use SMB instead of NFS, as it doesn't seem to have these issues. I personally find SMB for (l)Unix to (l)Unix distasteful. I can see where zfs would be good for this... Does this data have some sort of life cycle where you could give the devices a small space to write with the data periodically processed (server-side) into the large archive? Or could they use an http post, database write, or some other application-level protocol instead of seeing the filesystem directly? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Anyone recognize www-mysql?
On 03/07/12 1:00 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: This a binary that executes HTML pages containing embedded SQL statements. I found the debian package here: http://archive.debian.net/etch/www-mysql ah, and peeking into the source tarball, www-mysql (and www-pgsql) build from www-sql, which comes from here http://www.jamesh.id.au/software/www-sql/ this stuff looks really old, like its not been touched since 1998. its a pretty simple cgi package written in C, so it probably can be built for newer systems. it also seems like an awful way of doing things. from the man pages, here's a sample cgi sql file... the ! SQL ... stuff is processed by this extension. html headtitleTelephone Numbers/title/head body H1Telephone Numbers/H1 !-- Let user change query -- form action=example.sql input name=sur input type=submitbr /form ! sql connect ! sql database telephone ! sql setdefault sur - ! sql setdefault ofs 0 ! sql query select * from numbers where surname like '?sur' order by firstname limit $ofs,10 q1 ! sql if $NUM_ROWS != 0 !-- Put in table -- table tr thSurname/th thFirst Name/th thNumber/th /tr ! sql print_rows q1 tr td@q1.0/td td@q1.1/td td@q1.2/td /tr\n /table !-- Put in navigation links -- center ! sql if 9 $ofs ! sql print a href=\example.sql\?sur=#surofs=! sql eval $ofs - 10! sql print \Prev/a ! sql else Prev ! sql endif ! sql if $NUM_ROWS = 10 ! sql print a href=\example.sql\?sur=#surofs=! sql eval $ofs + 10! sql print \Next/a ! sql else Next ! sql endif /center ! sql endif p centeremPage produced by WWW-SQL/em/center /body /html -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: If the future continues anything like the past, you'll be be able to buy something new with twice the speed and 10x the space by then and be better off starting over than allocating more than you need today. a) You think I, or a *lot* of other folks, are going to do that at home? (Please - I'm trying to get my fiancee to at *least* go from *shudder* Vista to Win7) If you leave them on, add up the power cost of running an old box for years. Sorry, that doesn't work either: *everything* new seems to need a lot more power than the older stuff. Certainly, last time I upgraded my own system, I had to buy one that was 150% the power of the old one. b) I'm a federal contractor, on site. You think the Republicans in Congress are going to increase our budget, to replace all servers over three or four years old? Yes, if someone does the report to show that it will save money in the big picture... But you don't necessarily throw out the 3 year old boxes, you can re-purpose them to something where people aren't waiting idly for their results, keeping some others for spare parts. In any case, someone should be accounting for the space/power/cooling that old hardware takes while accomplishing 10% as much as new. We already repurpose. There's a limit to parts - when something gets surplussed, it has to have pretty much what we bought it with (a different h/d's no big deal, though). And the budget won't *allow* say, 20 or 50 or 70 new servers in one year. I can give you, with a 98% confidence level, that our budget (we're not DoD) will *NOT* be upped by 10%. The sob's just saved money by a) taking away our water coolers (we can use the metal water fountains, y'know) and b) not refilling one of the three soap dispensers in the men's room on this floor. Mind-bogglingly petty? Damn straight. Cheap? Bet *their* offices still have the water mark and our people are trying to do real science ObDisclaimer: I speak only for myself, not for my agency or my employer. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Anyone recognize www-mysql?
Am 07.03.2012 um 22:18 schrieb John R Pierce: On 03/07/12 1:00 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: This a binary that executes HTML pages containing embedded SQL statements. I found the debian package here: http://archive.debian.net/etch/www-mysql ah, and peeking into the source tarball, www-mysql (and www-pgsql) build from www-sql, which comes from here http://www.jamesh.id.au/software/www-sql/ this stuff looks really old, like its not been touched since 1998. its a pretty simple cgi package written in C, so it probably can be built for newer systems. It's probably also riddled with buffer-overflows. Better let it go... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Anyone recognize www-mysql?
Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 07.03.2012 um 22:18 schrieb John R Pierce: On 03/07/12 1:00 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: This a binary that executes HTML pages containing embedded SQL statements. I found the debian package here: http://archive.debian.net/etch/www-mysql ah, and peeking into the source tarball, www-mysql (and www-pgsql) build from www-sql, which comes from here http://www.jamesh.id.au/software/www-sql/ this stuff looks really old, like its not been touched since 1998. its a pretty simple cgi package written in C, so it probably can be built for newer systems. It's probably also riddled with buffer-overflows. Better let it go... Why? I know that none of the zillions of lines of C I wrote in the late eighties and through the nineties were riddled with buffer overflows. Oh, sorry, it's not the N33t3st, k3wl language on the planet! mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: a) You think I, or a *lot* of other folks, are going to do that at home? (Please - I'm trying to get my fiancee to at *least* go from *shudder* Vista to Win7) If you leave them on, add up the power cost of running an old box for years. Sorry, that doesn't work either: *everything* new seems to need a lot more power than the older stuff. Certainly, last time I upgraded my own system, I had to buy one that was 150% the power of the old one. That was probably before power became a big thing for servers - in most cases now power and cooling are the limiting factors for expansion in a data center. Most of the new servers use 2.5 drives and while they might still use as much power per 1u of space due to using more blades in a chassis or having more CPUs and RAM, we get much more performance from the same space and power consumption. It's not such a big deal for desktops, but you can get small low power systems if you look around - or just use a laptop that will sleep when you close the lid. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: a) You think I, or a *lot* of other folks, are going to do that at home? (Please - I'm trying to get my fiancee to at *least* go from *shudder* Vista to Win7) If you leave them on, add up the power cost of running an old box for years. Sorry, that doesn't work either: *everything* new seems to need a lot more power than the older stuff. Certainly, last time I upgraded my own system, I had to buy one that was 150% the power of the old one. That was probably before power became a big thing for servers - in most cases now power and cooling are the limiting factors for expansion in a data center. Most of the new servers use 2.5 drives and while they might still use as much power per 1u of space due to using more blades in a chassis or having more CPUs and RAM, we get much more performance from the same space and power consumption. It's not such a big deal for desktops, but you can get small low power systems if you look around - or just use a laptop that will sleep when you close the lid. Heh. Many of the new servers we are getting are all on the order of 48 or 64 cores, and they eat and drink power. The same UPS that would handle six 4 or 8 core boxes can handle *three*, if we're lucky, when a clustering job's running mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: a) You think I, or a *lot* of other folks, are going to do that at home? (Please - I'm trying to get my fiancee to at *least* go from *shudder* Vista to Win7) If you leave them on, add up the power cost of running an old box for years. Sorry, that doesn't work either: *everything* new seems to need a lot more power than the older stuff. Certainly, last time I upgraded my own system, I had to buy one that was 150% the power of the old one. That was probably before power became a big thing for servers - in most cases now power and cooling are the limiting factors for expansion in a data center. Most of the new servers use 2.5 drives and while they might still use as much power per 1u of space due to using more blades in a chassis or having more CPUs and RAM, we get much more performance from the same space and power consumption. It's not such a big deal for desktops, but you can get small low power systems if you look around - or just use a laptop that will sleep when you close the lid. Heh. Many of the new servers we are getting are all on the order of 48 or 64 cores, and they eat and drink power. The same UPS that would handle six 4 or 8 core boxes can handle *three*, if we're lucky, when a clustering job's running mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Anyone recognize www-mysql?
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:26 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: It's probably also riddled with buffer-overflows. Better let it go... Why? I know that none of the zillions of lines of C I wrote in the late eighties and through the nineties were riddled with buffer overflows. Ummm sorry, but pretty much every C program back then would have inherited potential buffer overflow from the standard C libraries. Like if you put a sufficiently long unterminated string in the environment... -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On 03/07/12 2:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Heh. Many of the new servers we are getting are all on the order of 48 or 64 cores, and they eat and drink power. The same UPS that would handle six 4 or 8 core boxes can handle*three*, if we're lucky, when a clustering job's running yes but that 48 core server can easily handle 6 or more of those 4-8 core servers virtualized. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xfs, inode64, and NFS
On Mar 7, 2012, at 1:16 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 03/07/12 6:47 AM, Ross Walker wrote: These days XFS should always be inode64 enabled, given the size of disks, and NFS should have been fixed a long, long time ago. yes. problem is, we have clients that are running all sorts of OS's, including older versions of Solaris... this is a manufacturing environment, so many of the clients are actually test equipment and machine controllers and such, you can't just slap a new OS on those. I see, then here's hoping there is a server side fix for this somewhere. Otherwise, I suggest using Solaris/Nexenta and ZFS for this big storage. Not only do you get an almost unbreakable file system, but industry standard NFS server. That's where I'd go, especially given the heterogenous clients you have to deal with. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] md raid 10
On 03/07/2012 07:43 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote: Plus if i raid1 it then i only have two bootable disks..at least this way i have 4 bootable disks..:) No, you don't have 4. Please study the way a RAID10 array works. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos We are talking about *software* /boot partition on RAID1! that can have any number of member partitions. And the rest of the disk here discussed is *software* mdraid RAID10 with 1,2,3,4,... member partitions, not regular hardware RAID1+0!! Please first read up on it, then comment. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cloud on CentOS Server
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: I don't understand how ANYTHING you do on a single server could be called 'cloudy'. Well, if it catches fire and produces lots of white smoke ... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
