CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0509 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0509.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0518 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0518.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0515 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0515.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0516 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0516.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0516 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0516.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0518 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0518.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0515 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0515.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0516 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0516.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
hola
tengo habilitado la herramienta swat en centos 6.2 para configurar
samba pero a la hora de tratar acceder via el explorador mozila,no
abre.e inclusive deshabilite selinux pero ni aun asi responde
saludos
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Hola!!!
Has comprobado que están en funcionamiento oos servicios que necesitas?
httpd etc
El 24/04/2012 20:25, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió:
hola
tengo habilitado la herramienta swat en centos 6.2 para configurar
samba pero a la hora de tratar acceder via el explorador
On 04/23/2012 06:44 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use
case
LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs /
tutorials for CentOS available?
You dont need rpms: the libvirt directly use the LXC API.
A tutorial:
On 4/24/12 12:05 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 04/23/2012 03:44 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| pvs
|Found duplicate PV 5ZTDCmWHDH6M04nl58Wyyi3nYG8BOCRo: using
| /dev/mapper/mpathl not /dev/mapper/mpathi
|PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
|
hte main problem is that when I use pvchange -u it refuses to make
operation to clsutered volume
Volume Groups with the clustered attribute will be inaccessible.
Found duplicate PV 46dU6F2rU9xqqOaWf8eihFwbdGp672lS: using
/dev/mapper/mpathh not /dev/mapper/mpathk
Found duplicate PV
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
interfaces.
dmesg says:
bnx2: Can't load firmware file bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw
This is
On 04/24/2012 05:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/23/12 8:31 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
um, LVM can't see over 2TB of the drive either, unless its formatted
GPT, whereupon it can't be used as a boot device on a non-EFI system.
The idea is to create multiple 2TB partitions.
In one
On 04/24/2012 11:58 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 04/23/2012 06:44 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use
case
LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs /
tutorials for CentOS available?
You dont need
HI
I have something in /var/log/audit/audit.log like:
avc: denied { write } for pid=23739 comm=httpd name=renderd.sock
dev=dm-0 ino=1183752 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file
use audit2allow it generates something
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
interfaces.
dmesg says:
bnx2: Can't load firmware file
On 24/04/12 15:56, Lars Hecking wrote:
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
interfaces.
dmesg says:
bnx2:
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 04/24/12 4:46 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
I used the raid controller for this. On a regular disk you just create two
partitions I guess.
which part of MBR not supporting disks over 2TB do you not understand?
you have to use GPT to put a partition past 2^32 * 512 bytes == 2TiB
--
Hello listmates,
Bizarrely enough, I ended up with what I intended to be called eth1 being
called rename3. Would anybody have any idea what the cause could be of
this?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi all,
Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP
secondary?
Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility
to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6.
Hoping I can mix and match but it looks like I may not be able to.
My
On 4/24/2012 1:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/24/12 4:46 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
I used the raid controller for this. On a regular disk you just create two
partitions I guess.
which part of MBR not supporting disks over 2TB do you not understand?
you have to use GPT to put a
Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot
from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to boot of a USD device).
/boot usually only get access when you do kernel updates.
--
Gé
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Ge,
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Boris.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot
from that (assuming your BIOS
On 04/24/2012 02:10 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello listmates,
Bizarrely enough, I ended up with what I intended to be called eth1 being
called rename3. Would anybody have any idea what the cause could be of
this?
Thanks.
Boris.
This should help;
On CentOS 6.x:
2012/4/24 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
Ge,
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Boris.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
2012/4/24 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
Ge,
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Boris.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM,
24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume.
--
Markku Kolkka
markku.kol...@iki.fi
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Markku Kolkka
markku.kol...@saunalahti.fiwrote:
24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as
2012/4/25 Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@saunalahti.fi:
24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume.
Is it
2012/4/25 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
2012/4/25 Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@saunalahti.fi:
24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Don't partition it at all, assign
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ge,
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Any way you'd like. CentOS can't BOOT from a GPT partitioned device if
the BIOS does not support
Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable?
- Original Message -
|
| CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical
|
| Upstream details at :
| http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html
|
| The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
|
On 2012-04-24, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable?
A CESA about samba3x was sent out on the same day, IIRC.
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
___
CentOS mailing list
On 04/24/2012 05:00 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable?
- Original Message -
|
| CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical
|
| Upstream details at :
| http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html
|
| The following
Good afternoon/morning/evening everyone,
I've been running into
the problem of clients using Windows 7 with CentOS 5.X and file/printer
sharing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stand samba-3.0.33-x.x.x
packages DO NOT provide compatibility with Windows Vista/7. I've had to
manually compile
Hi All,
I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I
tried doing the minimal installation available with the installer, but it's
a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal
starting place. I'm pretty familiar with 5.x, but what I'm
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:22:17 -0700, listmail wrote
Also, any
ideas as to what would be launching cups would be appreciated.
I answered one of my own questions: cups was being started by the VMware tools
startup script. I fixed this for now by editing the VMware startup script and
removing
On 4/24/2012 7:22 PM, listmail wrote:
I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I
tried doing the minimal installation available with the installer, but it's
a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal
starting place. I'm pretty
I recently did a minimal 6.2 install recently, and it was annoying that it
didn't include the network stack.
What use is an install w/o the network?
=== Al
From: Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday,
On 04/24/2012 08:53 PM, Al Sparks wrote:
I recently did a minimal 6.2 install recently, and it was annoying that it
didn't include the network stack.
What use is an install w/o the network?
It has the network stack ... you must configure it during the install.
If you do not configure and
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:17 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 04/24/12 2:24 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Anyway, with 18TB of raid 6 might cause performance problems .. raid
60 or raid 10 looks much better solution.
18TB of raid6 is only 8 3TB drives (6 + 2 parity) thats
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:40 -0400, aurfalien wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP
secondary?
Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility
to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6.
Hoping I can
45 matches
Mail list logo
