CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1151 Low
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1151.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Buenos días!!
Me gustaría saber si algunos de ústedes tiene algún manual que explique como
configurar (ya sea de la manera tradicional que es modificando archivos o de
manera gráfica) CentOs 6.3 o Centos 5.8 para que sea el controlador de dominio
y puedan conectarse a dicho servidor Centos
Y si el o los manuales incluye como configurar un Domain Active Directory o
algo así sería mucho mejor!!
JOSE FERMIN
De: Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com
Para: CentOS-es@centos.org CentOS-es@centos.org
Enviado: Miércoles, 8 de agosto, 2012 9:25 A.M.
Siguiendo esto:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO
... con un poco de paciencia y otro de suerte, tendrás funcionando un
Centos como controlador de dominio Windows. La web no deja de ser bastante
espartana, así que seguramente tendrás que consultar otras fuentes si se te
complica la
Buenas Tardes
Configure un servidor proxy hace como 1 año y medio; no hubo problemas de
acceso al internet por parte de los usuario super rapido; pero hace 1
semana mi red se ha puesto demasiado lenta (tengo 150 usuarios), pense que
era problema de mi proveedor de Internet tengo un ancho de banda
Prueba borrando la cache del proxy.
Sls
El día 8 de agosto de 2012 13:05, Ricardo Saavedra Prescott
rsaaved...@diresalalibertad.gob.pe escribió:
Buenas Tardes
Configure un servidor proxy hace como 1 año y medio; no hubo problemas de
acceso al internet por parte de los usuario super rapido;
Deseo que me apoyen como saber que pc es la que me esta ocasionando la
congestion en el proxy haciendo mi acceso a la internet lento, existe algun
software que me permita realizar ese diagnostico y que herramientas
recomiendan.
puedes trabajarle en capa 1, con dos dedos tomas el conector del
Estimado
squid -k shutdown parando squid
rm -fr /var/lib/squid/cache/* Borrar cache de squid
squid -zReconstruir cache de squid
Saludos
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org
Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
The ZFS code base is stable, the problem is the VFS interface in Linux and
that
applies to all filesystems
Hello,
Care to explain what's the problem in Linux VFS layer ?
The VFS layer was introduced in 1980 by Bill Joy when he started the
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 10:21 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/04/2012 09:36 AM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
thank you. very usefull
i think i'll try btrfs or jfs,
i'll send you btrfs result for you.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 04.08.2012 15:19, ashkab
Hi everybody,
I am having issue with this xen update on Centos 5 :
Setting up Upgrade Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: xen-libs = 3.0.3-135.el5_8.2 for package: xen
--- Package xen-libs.i386 0:3.0.3-135.el5_8.4 set to be updated
-- Finished
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
hello,
I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except
user 'root' can do it, is that possible?
For my server, many users can log in with root from remote through
ssh, so I can not trace which guy do wrong things. So I decide to create
new account for every users
Use remote logging to a second machine which only you have access to.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/creating-centralized-syslog-server
Harold
8/8/2012 12:56 PM, Heng Su wrote:
hello,
I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except
user 'root' can do it, is
Greetings,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
For my server, many users can log in with root from remote through
ssh, so I can not trace which guy do wrong things. So I decide to create
new account for every users and let them use 'sudo' then I can
Heng Su wrote:
hello,
I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except
user 'root' can do it, is that possible?
For my server, many users can log in with root from remote through
ssh, so I can not trace which guy do wrong things. So I decide to create
new account
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except
user 'root' can do it, is that possible?
For my server, many users can log in with root from remote through
ssh, so I can not trace which guy do
Use sudo.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi mark,
Great! I think those you mentioned is exactly what I want.
Normally, I want to trace which guy got wrong things in server.
I tried the link that Harold provided find it's a good idea to
protect log files, however, I want to know is which guy type which command.
the
On 08/09/2012 01:54 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except
user 'root' can do it, is that possible?
For my server, many users can log in with root from remote
Greetings,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
this server, however, someone let say new guy overwrite wrong file. I
need to trace on it and inform him carefully.
SCMs like SVN, git etc. are exactly for such events.
You are taking backups, aren't you?
--
On 08/09/2012 02:14 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
this server, however, someone let say new guy overwrite wrong file. I
need to trace on it and inform him carefully.
SCMs like SVN, git etc. are exactly for
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except
user 'root' can do it, is that possible?
For my server, many users can log in with root from remote through
ssh, so I can not trace which guy do
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it is not a common situation. Normally you should not let anyone
you don't trust become root. For fairly obvious reasons...
Let said if you want get low price to set up multiple application
servers and outsource
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
Normal flow is get codes from SCMs repository or do CI server, however,
you know some small company got such thing messy (my current company,
lol ^_^). Sometime you have to update only one file of the project.
Why does it
Thanks for the warning. I am aware of that, but some things an
administrator has no control over.
They are behind a firewall and we take some further precautions, but I
can get this restricted any further.
_
He's no failure. He's not dead yet.
William Lloyd
We do a better job for those things that are outside of our firewall.
And this is some of what we do.
_
He's no failure. He's not dead yet.
William Lloyd George
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
On 08/09/2012 02:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
Normal flow is get codes from SCMs repository or do CI server, however,
you know some small company got such thing messy (my current company,
lol ^_^). Sometime you have to update
Hi Harald,
Thank you so much to guide to correct path and let me know how to
move on, learn more from you.
Indeed I am a developer not an admin, that's a good question for the
headers of my company why there is no admin to manage the server in our
company. Anyway this can not controlled by
Heng Su wrote:
On 08/09/2012 02:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
Normal flow is get codes from SCMs repository or do CI server, however,
you know some small company got such thing messy (my current company,
lol ^_^). Sometime you
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2012 02:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Heng Su ste.suh...@gmail.com wrote:
Normal flow is get codes from SCMs repository or do CI server, however,
you know some small company got such thing
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
flame, but not to you, Heng Su
VCS's that let multiple people check the same object out at the same
time You're *exactly* back where you were before people were using
VCSs.
/flame
Errr, what? No sensible VCS forces you to wait
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
flame, but not to you, Heng Su
VCS's that let multiple people check the same object out at the same
time You're *exactly* back where you were before people were using
VCSs.
/flame
Errr, what? No sensible VCS
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Errr, what? No sensible VCS forces you to wait for someone else to
finish their portion of the work.
You're wrong. I've worked in small and large teams, and *ALWAYS* we
checked out with locks. If two people need to work on one file,
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Errr, what? No sensible VCS forces you to wait for someone else to
finish their portion of the work.
You're wrong. I've worked in small and large teams, and *ALWAYS* we
checked out with locks. If two people need
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If you want to force your team to wait for your change, fine - and
sometimes it is even a good idea, but the tool should not make that
decision for you.
Yes, I do want to force them to wait for what one person's working on -
it's not
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 21:00:59 +0300
Mihamina Rakotomandimby miham...@rktmb.org wrote:
Use sudo.
Weak! Real fascists use sudosh!
Rui
ps: I'm sure there are some fascists who are more fascist so feel free
to point out even better options ;)
___
CentOS
See Red Hat Bugzilla bug #846852 for details.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852
FYI:
We discovered that after updating to EL 6.3 on our x86_64 server, autofs
5.0.5-54 broke our nightly backups that rely on automounting an NFS
share hosted on another EL 6 machine on our local
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:37 -0400, Cal Webster wrote:
See Red Hat Bugzilla bug #846852 for details.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852
FYI:
We discovered that after updating to EL 6.3 on our x86_64 server, autofs
5.0.5-54 broke our nightly backups that rely on automounting
39 matches
Mail list logo
