12.02.2013, 20:50, Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 2, 2013, at 19:27, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I do that as well. However, I run one on each host just to serve its
own guests and
Am 16.02.2013 19:19, schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 02/15/2013 06:07 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
[...]
That was of course my own fault for not looking in the right
places. But all this is long past. Today I just want to get
rid of these old reports.
I do not see any way that a user can do that ...
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Apologies in advance if this question is in poor taste. But I've really
fallen in love with learning about the cassanrdra database. The only
problem is that it doesn't run very well on an t1.micro instance at
Am 15.02.2013 19:27, schrieb Keith Keller:
On 2013-02-15, Tilman Schmidt t.schm...@phoenixsoftware.de wrote:
On my network management server I have
Name: nagios-plugins-nrpe
Arch: x86_64
Version : 2.13
Release : 1.el6
Size: 38 k
Repo: installed
I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config.
I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect
anything.
ifcfg-eth0:
GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
IPV6INIT=no
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
BOOTPROTO=none
NAME=
NM_CONTROLLED=yes
MACADDR=
Am 17.02.2013 14:36, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config.
I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect
anything.
ifcfg-eth0:
GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
IPV6INIT=no
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
On 02/17/2013 08:36 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config.
I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect
anything.
If you want to turn off IPv6 for all interfaces, make the needed changes
to
On 2/17/2013 3:45 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Perhaps you are confused by the link local address (Prefix fe80::) which
is always present on an IPv6 enabled interface.
HTH
T.
Sorry This is what I was aiming for.
The link local address..
But it's also the autoconf:
#sysctl -a |grep
I could have written a script to remove IPV6 link local address but
there should be a basic option for that.
You can set: echo options ipv6 disable=1 /etc/modprobe.d/noipv6.conf
But more and more apps then log problems or get confused if ipv6 is
completely disabled, so keeping the link local
I could have written a script to remove IPV6 link local address but
there should be a basic option for that.
Just to emphasise this as I guess it hasn't been clear enough yet...
An IPv6 config with no FE80:: address is a broken config.
This address should always be on an IPv6 enabled
hi,
I need to deploy an internal CA to our hosts. Fedora is planning
something I could use now
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SharedSystemCertificates but it
is not there yet ;-)
I already have a deploying infrastructure (cfengine), so my question
is: what files do I need to move around
On 2/17/2013 8:10 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
Just to emphasise this as I guess it hasn't been clear enough yet...
An IPv6 config with no FE80:: address is a broken config.
This address should always be on an IPv6 enabled interface, being generated
automatically, and is not the same thing as
On 2/17/2013 11:00 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
I need to deploy an internal CA to our hosts.
you say a CA, then you talk about PKI, and finally LDAP which is a
Directory Server. these things are all interrelated, but remain three
separate entities.
For a fullblown LDAP directory server, you
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:13 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 11:00 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
I need to deploy an internal CA to our hosts.
you say a CA, then you talk about PKI, and finally LDAP which is a
Directory Server. these things are all interrelated, but
On 2/17/2013 2:29 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
So the question is: where do you add the CA information in
centos/redhat servers for those kinds of applications?
sadly, just about everywhere. each application tends to have its own
store. apps written in Java (tomcat, etc) can't use the same
fred.c:
static void sfunc(int *p) { *p=1; }
static int x;
void fred(void)
{
... sfunc(x); ...
}
greg.c:
static void sfunc(int *p) { *p=2; }
static int x;
void greg(void)
{
... sfunc(x); ...
}
Once the object files from fred.c and greg.c are linked,
how does ELF distinguish the sfunc's and the
Hi List,
Is there any rpms for centos 5 available?
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
17 matches
Mail list logo
