CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0690 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0690.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0689 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0689.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
El 27/03/13, Alberto Contreras alconma...@yahoo.es escribió:
Saludos a todos.
Tengo un servidor con CentOS 6.4. He buscado en internet como instalar y
configurar postfix (ya viene instalado por defecto), dovecot y
squirrelmail.
El problema esta en squirrelmail que cuando escribo en el
El 27/03/13, Alberto Contreras alconma...@yahoo.es escribió:
Saludos a todos.
Tengo un servidor con CentOS 6.4. He buscado en internet como instalar y
configurar postfix (ya viene instalado por defecto), dovecot y
squirrelmail.
El problema esta en squirrelmail que cuando escribo en el
Mil disculpas a la comunidad, pero, me animé a escribir acerca de estos dos
tópicos ya que en las últimas semanas he pasado leyendo páginas y revisando
algunos videos referentes y creo que al igual que a mí a muchos sino a todos
podría interesarles.
Aquí una minúscula muestra de lo que hay.
Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
and nothing more happens. With the old kernel (2.6.32-279) it boots
fine. The
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm
markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
On 28 March 2013 08:42, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm
markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
screen
On 2013.03.27 16:59, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:01 AM, Paul Norton wrote:
On 27 March 2013 13:09, ign...@vault13.lt ign...@vault13.lt wrote:
Hello,
how do people cope with constant SELinux errors like this from Fusion
Passenger:
36886. 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps
Hi Markus
could probably the legacy vga kernel parameter help you? or is the
frame-buffer mode no longer used by up-to-date boot processes?
vga = 791 : 1024x768@64K means: screen resolution 1024x768 pixels with
64K colors
vga = 788 : 800x600@64K means: screen resolution 800x600 pixels with 64K
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:14 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
yes, they are ghost files, not really included
On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
use -v or -w for all
Most of my users are on kde, as am I (I really don't like gnome). I've got
one on gnome, though, CentOS 6.4, and I have a problem: I have to start an
agent running -on login-, so that the same one is in the environment of
every term window he opens. In kde, no problem, I modify
On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump:
On 3/28/2013 10:13 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
worth a try?
On 3/28/2013 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since
Robert Benjamin wrote:
Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
worth a try?Bob
you can always install KDE and
On 03/28/2013 07:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Most of my users are on kde, as am I (I really don't like gnome). I've got
one on gnome, though, CentOS 6.4, and I have a problem: I have to start an
agent running -on login-, so that the same one is in the environment of
every term window he
On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Robert Benjamin wrote:
Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
worth a
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
desktop and there will be more people with similar configurations to
help sort out any
On 3/28/2013 1:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
desktop and there will be more people with
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
that's probably not the real solution. So when you established that
your network and DNS was working, Gnome was working too? Can you log
in on a
I have 2 CentOS servers that are both authoritative DNS for several
domains and local resolvers.As configured, they are publicly visible
resolvers, which I've known for awhile is not a good thing.
whats the appropriate way of configuring the bind on CentOS 5.current to
not allow recursion
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
Yes. That's basically it.
--
Jorge
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:25:31 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[]
And Usenet is effectively gone.
It's still there. And some newsgroups are still busy, though not like in
the good days of the early nineties.
Indeed, alas! But there is Gmane, which is a huge
On 3/28/2013 11:11 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
Yes. That's basically it.
k, thanks, looks like its working!
--
john r pierce
Max Pyziur wrote:
The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
It's a packaging trick, those files are marked
%ghost %config
-- rex
___
CentOS mailing list
On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
that's probably not the real solution. So when you established that
your network and DNS was working, Gnome
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
that's probably not the real solution.
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/28/2013 10:13 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
snip
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
that's probably
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Finally, I've seen so many issues over the years, that at home, I run at
runlevel 3, and have startx in my .bashrc. Doing it that way, if you have
problems, when you hit ctlaltbkspc, you're back at your command
line, and you can look
On 3/28/2013 3:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
Things never work very well for me
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Thought it was not a good idea to use yum remove but had to
try. In my head I could see you asking me to try it and I should have
TRIED something, not just sit here. Well, hopefully I can put those
packages back
I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what
about two PCI
video cards? The system seems to recognize them as shown by the lspci -v
output below, but
I can't get Xorg
On 03/28/2013 05:08 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what
about two PCI
video cards? The system seems to recognize them as shown
On 3/28/2013 3:08 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time,
actually with newer systems, the hardware does allow you to use builtin
and pci-express video concurrently. I had 3 monitors briefly on my
home (MS Windows 8)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com wrote:
I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what
about two PCI
video cards? The system
41 matches
Mail list logo
