CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1148
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1148.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
No entiendo, por lo que deduzco es que cuando decís entrar via web te
referís a administrar el router por medio de un navegador web? es correcto
o es la wan? si es asi veo que el server al cual pusiste como dmz esta en
otro rango de ip uno esta en 0 y la red es una 100 si no creas un gateway
para
estimado, si bajas el iptables en tu maquina e intentas entrar desde tu lan
al http llegas? o tampoco. tambien baja el selinux para verificar esto. si
llega abrir es cosa de configurar tu firewall en tu centos.
Saludos
El 9 de agosto de 2013 09:38, Nahuel
la primera prueba que tienes que hacer son las pruebas locales , conecta tu
servidor a un switch y otra pc a este mismo switch luego configuralas en el
mismo rango de red , has todas las pruebas de conectividad y si puedes acceder
via web al servidor.
Hecho esto puedes continuar con lo
corre mejor este comando:
netstat -anp y chequea quien es el que esta escuchando puerto 25...
porque segun veo solo esta en el localhost, por ende no es un proceso
que este prestando servicio Creo...
Saludos,
David
El día 8 de agosto de 2013 15:27, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin
Hola amigos esperando que todos se encuentren bien, acudo a ustedes
haber si me ayudar con una configuración de sendmail, tengo un servidor
de correo centos 5.9 con sendmail envia y recibe bien emails, el
problema es que envia un email a una dirección que no existe y me
imagino que por defecto
On 08/09/2013 10:03 AM, César Martinez wrote:
En que parte se puede cambiar esto para que si no llego simplemente
retorne pero no intente volver a enviar.
busca las opciones de timeout warning y return.. le pones que envíe el
warning a los 4d , y que retorne a los 15 minutos.. y listo.
On 09/08/13 11:11, Ernesto Pérez Estévez, Ing. wrote:
On 08/09/2013 10:03 AM, César Martinez wrote:
En que parte se puede cambiar esto para que si no llego simplemente
retorne pero no intente volver a enviar.
busca las opciones de timeout warning y return.. le pones que envíe el
warning a
Yo soy partidario de ir dejando de lado Sendmail. Quizas Postfix te
sea más poderlo configurar a tu gusto.
Es posible incluso en ambos sistemas aceptar mail solo para usuarios
reales de tu sistema, cosa que te ayudara con los falsos-positivos.
Imagino que Hotmail o todos los MTA que se respeten
On 08/09/2013 11:17 AM, César Martinez wrote:
On 09/08/13 11:11, Ernesto Pérez Estévez, Ing. wrote:
luego tendrás problemas con los reenvíos, estás violando el protocolo
smtp que indica que se reintente, y los sistemas de greylisting te
obligan a reintentar para ver si eres spammer o no...
On 08/09/2013 01:58 PM, David González Romero wrote:
Yo soy partidario de ir dejando de lado Sendmail. Quizas Postfix te
sea más poderlo configurar a tu gusto.
Es posible incluso en ambos sistemas aceptar mail solo para usuarios
reales de tu sistema, cosa que te ayudara con los
Hi all,
I set up an ADSL connection using rp-pppoe/pppoe-setup.
The setting is to persist the connection, so that when the link goes
down, it's re-up'd by pppd.
The interface is ppp0 and it appears /sbin/ifup-local is not called
when re-uppping the ADSL link.
It is a problem for me, as I have
hi,
I am trying to find out what compile flags and environment variables were
used when compiling the python package. Is there an easy way of figuring
this out? perhaps a website which shows the RPM specs?
--
--- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.--
On 08/09/2013 12:54 PM, Rita wrote:
hi,
I am trying to find out what compile flags and environment variables were
used when compiling the python package. Is there an easy way of figuring
this out? perhaps a website which shows the RPM specs?
You can download and unpack src.rpm pf the
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
I am asking this on behalf of the HIPL developers;
http://infrahip.hiit.fi/
https://launchpad.net/hipl
They have been working on getting their code consistant to the new
libnetfilter architecture. Finally have Fedora 18 and 19 available, but
have hit a stumbling block with Centos 6. They
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a
clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely
related to the current RHEL/CentOS release as you and I. RHEL/CentOS6 is
closer to Fedora 12, as
On 08/09/2013 08:48 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a
clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely
related to the current RHEL/CentOS release as you
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/09/2013 08:48 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a
clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely
related to the current
I just did a clean net install of CentOS 6.4 and when I run virt-manager it
says that qemu-kvm is missing, but when I try to install it with yum it
says that there isn't a package with that name. Is something wrong with my
configuration? Or what is causing this package to appear as not available?
From: Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
I just did a clean net install of CentOS 6.4 and when I run virt-manager it
says that qemu-kvm is missing, but when I try to install it with yum it
says that there isn't a package with that name. Is something wrong with my
configuration? Or what is
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:15 AM, lists-centos
replies-lists-c9y6-cen...@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Original Message
Date: Friday, August 09, 2013 08:04:08 AM -0700
From: Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Cc:
On 09.08.2013 17:21, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:15 AM, lists-centos
replies-lists-c9y6-cen...@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Original Message
Date: Friday, August 09, 2013 08:04:08 AM -0700
From: Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
To: CentOS
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:04:08AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I just did a clean net install of CentOS 6.4 and when I run virt-manager it
says that qemu-kvm is missing, but when I try to install it with yum it
says that there isn't a package with that name. Is something wrong with my
From: Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
I just did a clean net install of CentOS 6.4 and when I run
virt-manager it says that qemu-kvm is missing, but when I try to
install it with yum it says that there isn't a package with that
name. Is something wrong with my configuration? Or
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann
patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de wrote:
On 09.08.2013 17:21, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:15 AM, lists-centos
replies-lists-c9y6-cen...@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Original Message
Date:
On 09.08.2013 17:39, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann
patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de wrote:
On 09.08.2013 17:21, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:15 AM, lists-centos
replies-lists-c9y6-cen...@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
On 2013-07-30 11:30, Jake Shipton wrote:
Personally, I use EasyTAG. Used it for a fair few years now, works fine
I've used Linux for 12 years (not so old compared to some early geeks)
now and I remember the pack of software I used:
* Netscape communicator + navigator,
* XMMS
* KSCD
* Easytag
*
Does autofs take completed control of directories mentioned in
auto.master? The examples with /home show that you can specify
individual users instead of * and , but even then it seems to take
over the whole /home level so you can't see or add local subdirs.
I have a small group of users/hosts
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 09.08.2013 17:39, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann
patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de wrote:
On 09.08.2013 17:21, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:15 AM,
Thanks!
This was very helpful and I am testing something and writing on the
dovecot mailing list about it.
Eliezer
On 08/07/2013 09:42 PM, Matti Aarnio wrote:
On 08/07/2013 03:58 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
OK so back to the issue in hands.
The issue is that I have a mail storage for more
On 08/09/2013 05:35 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
I just did a clean net install of CentOS 6.4 and when I run
virt-manager it says that qemu-kvm is missing, but when I try to
install it with yum it says that there isn't a package with that
name.
On 08/09/2013 08:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Does autofs take completed control of directories mentioned in
auto.master? The examples with /home show that you can specify
individual users instead of * and , but even then it seems to take
over the whole /home level so you can't see or add
On 08/09/2013 04:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/09/2013 08:48 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a
clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 08/09/2013 08:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Does autofs take completed control of directories mentioned in
auto.master? The examples with /home show that you can specify
individual users instead of * and , but even
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What I want is to automount /home/user1 from a different server when
user1 logs in (to any of sereral other servers), but leave the local
copy of /home/user2 accessible.It looks like this is possible
using the
36 matches
Mail list logo
