On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gajanan Kankal grkan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am new here and wants to contributes and my area of expertise as follow.
GajananKankal
System admin, Networking, Authentication, Anaconda and shells
Pune (India)
Thank you,
Regards,
Gajanan
Thank you
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:2015
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-2015.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:2014
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-2014.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:2010 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2010.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:2018
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-2018.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:2021 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2021.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:2021 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2021.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Il 18/12/2014 11:29, Karanbir Singh ha scritto:
On 16/12/14 16:04, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I just joined the CentOS-virt call yesterday for the first time and it was
a pleasure to meet you there.
My name is Sandro
On 12/18/2014 02:59 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 18/12/2014 11:29, Karanbir Singh ha scritto:
On 16/12/14 16:04, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
sbona...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, I just joined the CentOS-virt call yesterday for the
first time and it was a
Hola Colegas.
Me han pedido implementar un Servidor de Impresión para tener
un control de todos los usuarios que usan las 2 impresoras Laser (Brother y
HP) para ver que cantidad de impresiones realizan y de donde están
imprimiendo.
Como no tengo mucha experiencia en el
Hello Les,
Wednesday, December 17, 2014, 3:54:36 PM, you wrote:
LM if the NAS offers nfs
It does, but I'm waiting for an answer from Zyxel as to why the data rate
is limited to about 3.5Mb/s as opposed to 60-70Mb/s to a CIFS share
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Nov 17, 2014 12:13 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 11/17/2014 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 11/17/2014 10:05 AM, Darr247 wrote:
On 17 November 2014 @15:19 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I (we, the CentOS Project) can not distribute flash
Is it because Adobe said no, or
Hello Guys…
I need to revert the X11 graphical server to Console 7.
and enable VT1 as normal text as it was on the old distr..
Sincerely
AndyBe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
+1
It can be quite annoying when the X console is changed from one Virtual Console
to another as happens with almost every release of CentOS and Fedora. I would
really like it to be always consistent at Console 7. And the real system
console should always be Console 1.
I am OK with change,
On Thu, December 18, 2014 00:31, Jake Shipton wrote:
Hi Alex,
In this situation 2.2.29 actually does offer an advantage over CentOS
version 2.2.15.
The version provided by CentOS does not support Forward Secrecy for SSL
or TLS 1.2.
Version 2.2.24+ of upstream Apache includes patches
I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
single big file creates a very large single point of failure.
Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
failure, but probably better handling).
Kai
___
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:20 AM, David Both
db...@millennium-technology.com wrote:
+1
It can be quite annoying when the X console is changed from one Virtual
Console to another as happens with almost every release of CentOS and
Fedora. I would really like it to be always consistent at
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:51:31 +0100 Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
single big file creates a very large single point of failure.
Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:41 AM, wwp subscr...@free.fr wrote:
I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
single big file creates a very large single point of failure.
Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
failure, but probably better
ran routine updates on the lernel this morning and got this:
WARNING: No module xenblk found for kernel 2.6.18-400.1.1.el5,
continuing anyway
The only references I can find are a year or so old. Anyone able to
comment? or refer me? Have not rebooted.
uname -a
Linux bulkley.bvserver.ca
On 12/15/2014 03:01 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
Is there a way to reboot temporarily into one of the other kernels listed
in grub.conf, without changing the default= line, so that a subsequent
reboot will default back to the original kernel?
Use grub2-reboot. There's no man page, but --help
On 12/18/2014 08:11 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
ran routine updates on the lernel this morning and got this:
WARNING: No module xenblk found for kernel 2.6.18-400.1.1.el5,
continuing anyway
i'm not sure that i can help you, i have currently no centos5 vm on xen.
But i guess the warning is from
On 12/19/2014 08:11 AM, Dave Stevens wrote:
ran routine updates on the lernel this morning and got this:
WARNING: No module xenblk found for kernel 2.6.18-400.1.1.el5,
continuing anyway
You've installed kernel instead of kernel-xen. In CentOS 5 you must
install kernel-xen for Xen dom0 or pv
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 17:00 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
that before
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 16:31 -0800, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-12-17, Bill Maltby (C4B) centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
that before I reported the bug.
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 22:00 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 12/17/14 19:31, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-12-17, Bill Maltby (C4B) centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 23:53 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2014-12-18, Mark LaPierre wrote:
snip
Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to
it
Does a crash
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
Gmail conveniently hides list emails that you send from appearing as
new in your inbox because you've obviously already seen them.
Opinions may differ on that matter of course If you are using the
web
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to
it
Does a crash report and bug filing qualify? The silence on that one has
deafened me! :-))
Only if someone else has seen the
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 08:20 -0500, David Both wrote:
+1
It can be quite annoying when the X console is changed from one Virtual
Console
to another as happens with almost every release of CentOS and Fedora. I would
really like it to be always consistent at Console 7. And the real system
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 18:23 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to
it
Does a crash report and bug filing qualify? The silence on that one
On 12/19/2014 03:52 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
what you say makes sense, but leaves me with two problems - what to do
and how did this happen?
You never mentioned if this is for a dom0 or domu, if it's a domu is it
a pv or hvm domain and does it use pvgrub, pygrub or does it boot
directly to a
33 matches
Mail list logo
