At Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:55:20 -0400 Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
I posted this to the comp.lang.tcl newsgroup, but it might relate to a
possible bug in the Mingw32 cross-build environment under CentOS 6 (or EPEL).
OK, it is a CentOS 6/EPEL problem. I installed the
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:49:41PM +, bobby Orellano wrote:
nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on
the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
There's also no place that states that CentOS is a flotation device
to be used in the event of a water landing. Your point?
On 2015-04-27, Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
--SNIP--
And I guess the other piece of this would be finding individual
packages that are not encompassed by the groups - or pulled in by
dependencies.Is there some database-like approach to take the full
list of packages, then
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
CentOS is not approved for DOD use. In fact, CentOS is not now, nor has
it ever been *certified* for anything. Certifications require people to
PAY to certify a product.
Specifically, EAL4 Certification, a requirement
On 04/28/2015 06:05 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
CentOS is not approved for DOD use. In fact, CentOS is not now, nor has
it ever been *certified* for anything. Certifications require people to
PAY to certify a product.
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 18:10
On 04/28/2015 02:30 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote:
nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in
DoD. it is not on
the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
Sometimes when I save a file in emacs, it thinks that the buffer is
still dirty. If I use C-x C-w to write the file, I get an overwrite
warning but the buffer always goes clean.
Perhaps this is related to the file atime? My /home is btrfs with
relatime. I always thought emacs was smarter than
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Mike - st257 silvertip...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi CentOS-Docs Team!
I got distracted and didn't re-read the contribute to the wiki
instructions before sending off a message to this list
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:17:24PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 04/27/15 19:24, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
a GPU, or two,
This thread has spiraled out of control and will be dealt with. I will
again speak with people privately. Some are repeat offenders and may
have their contributions to the mailing list moderated.
Please keep to the topic posted by the original author, and keep the
list technical in nature.
--
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
There was no court
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Mike - st257 silvertip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi CentOS-Docs Team!
I got distracted and didn't re-read the contribute to the wiki
instructions before sending off a message to this list (I'm subscribed to
Docs now for sure!). So my initial message hit the bit
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0895 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0895.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0913
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0913.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0913
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0913.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0913
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0913.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On 04/28/2015 02:30 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote:
nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on
the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
DoD approval requires spending lots of money jumping through arbitrary
hoops. Do you wish to
-Original Message-
From: bobby Orellano
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 12:50
nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD.
Nowhere is a very large place, and I can say that is incorrect.
it is not on
the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
If you would like assistance in
Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be
legal as
this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under
GPL
in order to make the whole be
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
There was no court case, but VERITAS published a modifed version of gtar
where
additional code was added by
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
No, you posted some ranting misconceptions about why you don't see a
need for it. But if you actually believed any of that yourself, then
you would
On 04/26/2015 08:28 PM, Peter Larsen wrote:
Strange - you may have a dhcp server that accepts host names from the
clients - which of course would fit your use case. Just realize that not
all dhcp servers are setup to be that lenient when it comes to
preserving the host name picked by a client.
Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
If you did read the CDDL, you did of course know that the CDDL places work
limits at file limits and that the CDDL does not try to impose any
restriction on sources that are not in a file marked as CDDLd. So the CDDL of
course does
On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote:
nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on
the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
DoD approval requires spending lots of money jumping through arbitrary
hoops. Do you wish to pay for this?
skimming the requirements, it also
nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on
the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
So what? If that is so important to you, you can go and buy a RedHat
license.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on
the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
26 matches
Mail list logo
