Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 3 mars 2016 08:20 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Sorin Srbu

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > > Do you have a sound reason for not using elrepo's packaged nvidia driver? > > I'm guessing the OP's using Nvidias 3D-vision features, which at least over > here never worked properly with the elrepo package. > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 19:50 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > Because I was looking late Friday afternoon,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 17:55 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > > Fully updated 7.2 system. I installed the

Re: [CentOS-docs] wiki addition for AWS

Unfortunately, I don't have edit access in the wiki. I can't even create my own personal info page. wt On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 22/02/16 22:58, Warren Turkal wrote: > > My wiki name: WarrenTurkal > > > > Page for addition:

Re: [CentOS-docs] Access to ConfigManagmentSig

On 2 March 2016 at 22:06, David Murphy wrote: > As per the new Config Management SIG > > 3. Send a message to centos-docs@centos.org with the following information: > - your FirstnameLastname username > > DavidMurphy > > - inform them that you are a member of the

[CentOS-docs] Access to ConfigManagmentSig

As per the new Config Management SIG 3. Send a message to centos-docs@centos.org with the following information: - your FirstnameLastname username DavidMurphy - inform them that you are a member of the ConfigManagementSig member of ConfigManagementSig - Ask to have access to 1. your

[CentOS-virt] CentOS 6

Will Xen4Centos on CentOS 6 be supported all the way through its EOL (November 30th, 2020)? If not when will it stop being supported/updated under this SIG? Thanks. -Gene ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] problem restoring ssl and vlc

Steve, thank you for reply. it made my long night shorter. On 03/02/2016 05:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: <<>> -- > You can use rpm -v -V -a to check the validity of all your packages or > rpm -v -V pkgname to check a single package. > -- never used '-V'. "one is never too old to learn

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0346 Important CentOS 7 postgresql Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0346 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0346.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:37:05PM -0500, Jason Brooks wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" > > To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" > > Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 12:09:47 PM > > Subject: Re:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0347 Important CentOS 6 postgresql Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0347 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0347.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

Am 02.03.2016 um 17:42 schrieb Mark Milhollan : > I understand that some people might be trying to cherry-pick their > updates and the assertion that doing so is not supported. But that is > not the only way in which --security can be used and it is a bit boring > to

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 03/02/2016 10:42 AM, Mark Milhollan wrote: > I understand that some people might be trying to cherry-pick their > updates and the assertion that doing so is not supported. But that is > not the only way in which --security can be used and it is a bit boring > to continually see whining

Re: [CentOS] C7 minimal (1511) firewalld is not installed: logical?

On 03/02/2016 08:49 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > I just installed a host with CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1511.iso > > It seems that firewalld is not included in the minimal set. I wonder why? > > If I recall correctly CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1503-01.iso did include it. > > And, this could be a

Re: [CentOS] C7 minimal (1511) firewalld is not installed: logical?

On 03/02/2016 08:49 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > I just installed a host with CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1511.iso > > It seems that firewalld is not included in the minimal set. I wonder why? > > If I recall correctly CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1503-01.iso did include it. > > And, this could be a

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

I understand that some people might be trying to cherry-pick their updates and the assertion that doing so is not supported. But that is not the only way in which --security can be used and it is a bit boring to continually see whining about the assumptive use. For me it is about scheduling

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On Wed, March 2, 2016 9:57 am, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Valeri Galtsev said: >> We are talking here CentOS and RHEL Linux. yum is an abbreviation of: >> "Yellowdog Update Manager". It was originally created by YellowDog Linux >> project for their Linux

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

Once upon a time, Valeri Galtsev said: > We are talking here CentOS and RHEL Linux. yum is an abbreviation of: > "Yellowdog Update Manager". It was originally created by YellowDog Linux > project for their Linux distribution. Actually, yum is Yellowdog Updater,

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

One more voice on this: we actually run the yum security plugin, several times a week, and it does report things... and almost all our systems are CentOS. When I see something in there, just as when I see an announcement where there are updates marked important, and esp. critical, we roll them

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On Wed, March 2, 2016 5:24 am, Anthony K wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 21:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 03/01/2016 09:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > BUt the security plugins do not work for CentOS and they never have, >> > Peter is correct, you need to run yum update or call out the

[CentOS] C7 minimal (1511) firewalld is not installed: logical?

I just installed a host with CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1511.iso It seems that firewalld is not included in the minimal set. I wonder why? If I recall correctly CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1503-01.iso did include it. And, this could be a very stupid question, am I running without a firewall or just

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 07:33 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Hopefully this makes sense. > > You can instead just look at this: > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ > > (or subscribe to the CentOS announce mailing list to get emails) > > Both of those places will tell you when

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 03/02/2016 05:24 AM, Anthony K wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 21:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 03/01/2016 09:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> BUt the security plugins do not work for CentOS and they never have, >>> Peter is correct, you need to run yum update or call out the specific >>>

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 03/02/2016 03:24 AM, Anthony K wrote: On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 21:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/01/2016 09:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: BUt the security plugins do not work for CentOS and they never have, Peter is correct, you need to run yum update or call out the specific packages you

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On 2 March 2016 at 11:24, Anthony K wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 21:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 03/01/2016 09:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > BUt the security plugins do not work for CentOS and they never have, > > > Peter is correct, you need to run yum update

Re: [CentOS] RasPi 3.x and RH-based Distro (Slightly OT)

On 29/02/16 18:59, Benjamin Smith wrote: > With the release of the Rasberry Pi 3.x, I think we have a platform I could > jump on board with. Performance has just been lacking until now! > > But I really don't want to jump the "RH ship" - I'd rather stick with an > environment I am comfortable

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 133, Issue 1

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] problem restoring ssl and vlc

On 03/01/2016 10:24 PM, g wrote: to pass time waiting for reply, went thru kde application launcher. found this progs have no icon: cheese audit logs media player note pad regedit wineconfig winefile winehelp wine software uninstall wine wordpad audio cd

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 21:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/01/2016 09:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > BUt the security plugins do not work for CentOS and they never have, > > Peter is correct, you need to run yum update or call out the specific > > packages you want updated. > > I totally