Re: [CentOS] Preferred mail client

2017-01-28 Thread Rob Kampen
On 29/01/17 18:02, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 01/28/2017 04:03 PM, TE Dukes wrote: What is the preferred remote mail client for 7.3? I'm a fan of SOGo. never heard of it - looks interesting BUT the production versions are only available with a support contract the begins at $US 750 / annum -

Re: [CentOS] Preferred mail client

2017-01-28 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/28/2017 04:03 PM, TE Dukes wrote: What is the preferred remote mail client for 7.3? I'm a fan of SOGo. https://sogo.nu/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Preferred mail client

2017-01-28 Thread Fred Smith
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:03:31PM -0500, TE Dukes wrote: > Hello, again, > > What is the preferred remote mail client for 7.3? > > I have used openwebmail in the past, was using usermin and roundcube most > recently. Never cared about squirrelmail but that was years ago. > > I don't use my serv

[CentOS] Preferred mail client

2017-01-28 Thread TE Dukes
Hello, again, What is the preferred remote mail client for 7.3? I have used openwebmail in the past, was using usermin and roundcube most recently. Never cared about squirrelmail but that was years ago. I don't use my server as a workstation. It mostly just sits over there collecting dust on the

[CentOS] mail delivery in 7.3

2017-01-28 Thread TE Dukes
Hello, Still don't have mail working. It seems to be stuck in /var/spool/postfix/incoming It's not getting to ~Maildir or whatever 7.3 uses. I am clueless. Probably need a little break. TIA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.cen

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 1/27/2017 6:01 PM, TE Dukes wrote: I can't figure out all these zones. I opened imap, imaps, pop3, pop3s, smtp, smtps in zones internal, trusted and public. I still get connection refused. I telnet localhost 143, I get connection refused. the firewall is more likely to give you connection

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread TE Dukes
-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James Hogarth Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 10:43 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld On 28 January 2017 at 13:44, Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote: > firewalld isn't the only thing that w

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread James Hogarth
On 28 January 2017 at 13:44, Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote: > firewalld isn't the only thing that will prevent services from accessing > the internet. I found that I needed to do a relabel before postfix could > access DNS and I have seen other issues as well. Have you tried > disabling the firewall t

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread James Hogarth
On 28 January 2017 at 12:01, TE Dukes wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James >> Hogarth >> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 4:18 AM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld >> >> On 28 Jan 2017 3:02 am, "T

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread TE Dukes
-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mike McCarthy, W1NR Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 8:45 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld firewalld isn't the only thing that will prevent services from accessing the internet. I fo

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread Mike McCarthy, W1NR
firewalld isn't the only thing that will prevent services from accessing the internet. I found that I needed to do a relabel before postfix could access DNS and I have seen other issues as well. Have you tried disabling the firewall to see if you can get connections to work? Then try to disable SEl

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Pete Biggs > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 6:02 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld > > > > > > The zone apparently means something because an interface can only be on > one.

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James > Hogarth > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 4:18 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld > > On 28 Jan 2017 3:02 am, "TE Dukes" wrote: > > > > > -Original Message

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread Pete Biggs
> > The zone apparently means something because an interface can only be on one. > Moving it to a different zone results in the same error (same services/ports > opened in each zone). The "zones" are just labels and are used to create kernel iptables. Each zone has a default set of open and clos

Re: [CentOS] firewalld

2017-01-28 Thread James Hogarth
On 28 Jan 2017 3:02 am, "TE Dukes" wrote: > -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon > Messmer > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 9:23 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld > > On 01/27/2017 06:01 PM, TE Dukes wrote: