Re: [CentOS] RAID questions

2017-02-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/16/2017 9:18 PM, Keith Keller wrote: On 2017-02-15, John R Pierce wrote: On 2/14/2017 4:48 PM,tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: 3 - Can additional drive(s) be added later with a changein RAID level without current data loss? Only some systems support that sort of

Re: [CentOS] RAID questions

2017-02-16 Thread Keith Keller
On 2017-02-15, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/14/2017 4:48 PM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: > >> 3 - Can additional drive(s) be added later with a changein RAID level >> without current data loss? > > Only some systems support that sort of restriping, and its a dangerous >

Re: [CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug

2017-02-16 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/16/2017 01:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote: look very closely at a USB 3.0 port, with the 'blue' tongued A connector, and you'll see 5 additional pins in there behind the standard USB1/2 4 pins. I will be a monkey's uncle. Thanks for the pointers.

Re: [CentOS] GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??

2017-02-16 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/16/2017 04:45 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: The source RPMs for devtoolset don't appear to be there, but I did find them here: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHSCL/SRPMS/ Possibly a result of an unspecified "accident"

Re: [CentOS] GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??

2017-02-16 Thread Dave Johansen
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/05/2017 06:37 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > >> Where are src.rpm's ? >> > > > Same place as everything else: > > http://vault.centos.org/7.3.1611/sclo/Source/ The source RPMs for devtoolset don't appear to be

Re: [CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug

2017-02-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/16/2017 1:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 02/16/2017 12:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote: USB 1 and 2 used 4 pins.USB 3 ports have an ADDITIONAL 5 pins, the original 4 are used for USB 1/2 operation, the new 5 only for USB 3 operation. they are effectively two completely independent

Re: [CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug

2017-02-16 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/16/2017 12:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote: USB 1 and 2 used 4 pins.USB 3 ports have an ADDITIONAL 5 pins, the original 4 are used for USB 1/2 operation, the new 5 only for USB 3 operation. they are effectively two completely independent controllers. Do you mean USB type C? USB 3 is

Re: [CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug

2017-02-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/16/2017 9:58 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: When I plug in my device which is USB 2.0 into a 3.0 slot (cause that is all I have) [495042.943074] usb 5-2: new low-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd [495043.100076] usb 5-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 I receive the above error. Is

Re: [CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug

2017-02-16 Thread Fred Smith
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:58:09PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > When I plug in my device which is USB 2.0 into a 3.0 slot (cause that is > all I have) > [495042.943074] usb 5-2: new low-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd > [495043.100076] usb 5-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 > > I

[CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug

2017-02-16 Thread Jerry Geis
When I plug in my device which is USB 2.0 into a 3.0 slot (cause that is all I have) [495042.943074] usb 5-2: new low-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd [495043.100076] usb 5-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 I receive the above error. Is there a flag or setting that tells the USB to

Re: [CentOS] About the flash-plugin

2017-02-16 Thread m . roth
Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:39 PM, wrote: > >> Y'all may remember I posted here weeks ago, that flash-plugin was >> crashing. There was an update this morning, which I did on my >> workstation... and it hasn't crashed all day on either of the two radio

Re: [CentOS] About the flash-plugin

2017-02-16 Thread Istimsak Abdulbasir
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:39 PM, wrote: > Y'all may remember I posted here weeks ago, that flash-plugin was > crashing. There was an update this morning, which I did on my > workstation... and it hasn't crashed all day on either of the two radio > stations who I listen to via

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/16/2017 04:34 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 04:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/16/2017 04:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 03:28

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: On

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 144, Issue 5

2017-02-16 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:17,

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 09:09,

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Mike McCarthy, W1NR
Having used Linode and CentOS for years I have never had a problem quite like this. Sure sounds like the IPv6 is misconfigured in the DHCP server or is in use somewhere. Some things I would try are: 1. Set "Auto configure networking" in your config profile and reboot. 2. Try to assign the

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, Alice Wonder wrote:

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Pete Biggs
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 00:37 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19=14570=72785 > > I can not figure out what I need to do. > > Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to grab an IPv6 > address with some privacy stuff enabled by default causing

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >> >> In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, Alice Wonder wrote: https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19=14570=72785 I can not figure out what I need to do. Apparently according to linode support,

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, Alice Wonder wrote: > https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19=14570=72785 > > I can not figure out what I need to do. > > Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to grab an IPv6 >

[CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

2017-02-16 Thread Alice Wonder
https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19=14570=72785 I can not figure out what I need to do. Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to grab an IPv6 address with some privacy stuff enabled by default causing it to not grab the IPv6 address that is assigned to me. Nothing