Re: [CentOS-virt] Running graphical applications from CentOS headless vm

2017-02-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:49 PM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > Hi all, > > I have installed a CentOS7 vm in my home server with all graphical tools > installed: Gnome, Chrome, Tor Borwser, etc. My idea is to run these graphical > applications from two MacOSX desktops. What I

[CentOS-virt] Running graphical applications from CentOS headless vm

2017-02-25 Thread C. L. Martinez
Hi all, I have installed a CentOS7 vm in my home server with all graphical tools installed: Gnome, Chrome, Tor Borwser, etc. My idea is to run these graphical applications from two MacOSX desktops. What I am looking for is something similar like Microsoft RDP services that supports copy and

Re: [CentOS] Installing support for Chinese text in Centos 7

2017-02-25 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:51:41PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:42:43PM -0500, H wrote: > > I have just done a minimal installation of Centos7 followed by X Windows > > and the Mate desktop on a workstation. Although the default language is > > English, I would like

Re: [CentOS] Installing support for Chinese text in Centos 7

2017-02-25 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:42:43PM -0500, H wrote: > I have just done a minimal installation of Centos7 followed by X Windows and > the Mate desktop on a workstation. Although the default language is English, > I would like to be able to write Chinese text in various applications. > > I seem to

[CentOS] Installing support for Chinese text in Centos 7

2017-02-25 Thread H
I have just done a minimal installation of Centos7 followed by X Windows and the Mate desktop on a workstation. Although the default language is English, I would like to be able to write Chinese text in various applications. I seem to remember this was very easy to do in Centos 6 and Gnome:

Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor pierde conectividad

2017-02-25 Thread Ricardo J. Barberis
El Miércoles 22/02/2017, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac escribió: [ ... ] > Ya resolví el problema que tenía con la perdida de conectividad del > servidor, pero me queda la duda de qué causa esa situación y como > eliminarla. Les comento: Me di cuenta de algo, las dirección MAC del > dispositivo de red

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 speculation ???

2017-02-25 Thread Alice Wonder
Never been a fan of static linking. Exploit in a library and you have to rebuild everything that links against it. That's one of the problems in the android world. Some library is found to be vulnerable, it gets fixed, but a lot of apps on the play store remain vulnerable simply because the

[CentOS] Problem loading the VM after reboots.

2017-02-25 Thread Subscriber
I had a strange problem. After restarting the VM can not always run. The last line in the console (virsh console): init: Re-executing /sbin/init Please stand by while rebooting the system... Restarting system. machine restart At this time, one of the CPU core is loaded 100% (qemu-kvm process,

[CentOS-virt] Problem loading the VM after reboots.

2017-02-25 Thread Subscriber
I had a strange problem. After restarting the VM can not always run. The last line in the console (virsh console): init: Re-executing /sbin/init Please stand by while rebooting the system... Restarting system. machine restart At this time, one of the CPU core is loaded 100% (qemu-kvm process,

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 speculation ???

2017-02-25 Thread Yan Li
We use GCC 6 from SoftwareCollection 6 and build our own Boost libraries with static linking. The result binaries work on all C7 instances just fine without the need to install any extra packages. The binary size isn't bloated too much by statically linking Boost, because many Boost functions

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0323 Important CentOS 5 kernel Security Update

2017-02-25 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0323 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0323.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Would this be considered a packaging bug?

2017-02-25 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/25/2017 07:27 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/25/2017 06:33 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/25/2017 06:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 The source RPM there uses %if 0%{?rhel} # not

Re: [CentOS] Would this be considered a packaging bug?

2017-02-25 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/25/2017 06:33 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/25/2017 06:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 The source RPM there uses %if 0%{?rhel} # not upstreamed Patch500:

Re: [CentOS] Would this be considered a packaging bug?

2017-02-25 Thread Alice Wonder
On 02/25/2017 06:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 The source RPM there uses %if 0%{?rhel} # not upstreamed Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch Patch501:

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 speculation ???

2017-02-25 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/25/2017 02:20 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Is there any blog that has information on a potential RHEL 8 release date? > > boost in 7 is now too old for some things, in addition to gcc. There are > solutions in 7 to those issues but it's starting to feel like 6 felt > shortly before 7 came out,

Re: [CentOS] Would this be considered a packaging bug?

2017-02-25 Thread Jonathan Billings
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to have the > %if macro where the patch is applied, but should not be where the source for > the patch is defined. It could be that the packagers did

Re: [CentOS] Would this be considered a packaging bug?

2017-02-25 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 > > The source RPM there uses > > %if 0%{?rhel} > # not upstreamed > Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch > Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch >

[CentOS] Would this be considered a packaging bug?

2017-02-25 Thread Alice Wonder
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 The source RPM there uses %if 0%{?rhel} # not upstreamed Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 144, Issue 8

2017-02-25 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 speculation ???

2017-02-25 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/25/2017 12:20 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm working on a major project bitcoin related and it would be frustrating to deploy a bunch of CentOS 7 virtual machines only to have 8 come out fairly soon afterwards. I'd expect the release of RHEL 8 no less than 6 months after a beta was

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 speculation ???

2017-02-25 Thread Jos Vos
Hi, On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 12:20:22AM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > boost in 7 is now too old for some things, in addition to gcc. There are > solutions in 7 to those issues but it's starting to feel like 6 felt > shortly before 7 came out, so I wonder if it is getting near to time. > > I'm

[CentOS] RHEL 8 speculation ???

2017-02-25 Thread Alice Wonder
Is there any blog that has information on a potential RHEL 8 release date? boost in 7 is now too old for some things, in addition to gcc. There are solutions in 7 to those issues but it's starting to feel like 6 felt shortly before 7 came out, so I wonder if it is getting near to time. I'm