[CentOS] GnuPG 2.0.16?

Hello all -- Does anyone know where I can find GnuPG 2.0.16 for CentOS 6.9 32-bit? I've already looked in the normal repos. I have 2.0.14 now and my Enigmail addon has stopped working. Thanks. -- -- MzK "Ring out the false, ring in the true." -- poem

Re: [CentOS] tftpd server S not responding

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Steven Tardy wrote: > A STATEFUL firewall with “ip any any” can and will still block asymmetric > communications due to the firewall keeping track of state (hence tha name > stateful firewall). > > Tcpdump on your servers /other/ NICs and

Re: [CentOS] tftpd server S not responding

A STATEFUL firewall with “ip any any” can and will still block asymmetric communications due to the firewall keeping track of state (hence tha name stateful firewall). Tcpdump on your servers /other/ NICs and you’ll see the tftp traffic leaving your server on some other NIC (probably on with the

Re: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Am 29.03.2018 um 09:38 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: > Le 29/03/2018 à 06:44, Keith Keller a écrit : >> I wonder how much support there is for NIS any more in recent distros. Is it >> possible CentOS 7 doesn't support NIS, or does but is buggy? > >

Re: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?

Am 2018-03-29 09:38, schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: Le 29/03/2018 à 06:44, Keith Keller a écrit : I wonder how much support there is for NIS any more in recent distros. Is it possible CentOS 7 doesn't support NIS, or does but is buggy? I'm planning to test this very soon, probably during the next

Re: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?

Le 29/03/2018 à 06:44, Keith Keller a écrit : > I wonder how much support there is for NIS any more in recent > distros. Is it possible CentOS 7 doesn't support NIS, or does but is > buggy? I'm planning to test this very soon, probably during the next week, and I'll report back. Cheers from