Re: [CentOS] Audacious broken on CentOS 7.6
Le 06/12/2018 à 23:41, Frank Cox a écrit : > (Did you forget to install audacious-plugins?) No, it's installed. See the result of rpm -qa | grep audacious in the initial post. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2018:3763 CentOS 6 kernel BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:3763
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3763
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
5a15040b5ef3d1b949dac4637a2c62f69e5805631ce38c250f6606a05b208814
kernel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
1fadf377d58410b7e36a6333f709bba2d9759556307554b6fcef27e81fa0f05c
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.noarch.rpm
c0392a390c32697a3d5bda7c3a7648b322052481278d22ed70eb25a4cf829dd7
kernel-debug-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
148d80dda15b063582bc4b02f6c48f8cf062091076b6a219b40a02706728f256
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
d8a174d46d97e7251e3fbefd8c39288bb869db2a7e860b50cf3c9b45ca7fe8e7
kernel-devel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
fe3059960b7bf1b6d275d75f22f193d76ff32e57a96d42be2b84e93e314eaecb
kernel-doc-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.noarch.rpm
f01c904f66e3796a30e0ac1c234b02a727b54560bde28749749585eaf3c63772
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.noarch.rpm
2db28e20b49c3b9d19794ceec524c9f1f183864892a2f21a6ce8296d760b1659
kernel-headers-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
2198349f24fe4385795047f06062d9cb35c140d4533bf0c3a8c72583c0e0bc62
perf-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
56e00c0d5437edc9392e16aa3462b5b8867cb62f3209a708c62deec78dde5cd9
python-perf-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
bad191a1989a5fddc655572e416b51d595641bca1d25d5eabf252376e13ad18c
kernel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
1fadf377d58410b7e36a6333f709bba2d9759556307554b6fcef27e81fa0f05c
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.noarch.rpm
8b86bc92a2d3bc678d70b7732a431b7a44838fa335fb611c0fc55f677b3130e0
kernel-debug-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
148d80dda15b063582bc4b02f6c48f8cf062091076b6a219b40a02706728f256
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.i686.rpm
adf7ea19dec94a3699d86162d5ea2aa6c8e4ba6ca73dd4240d9aee0c65a149e6
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
53d497ff03349f0f8beec4bd21002d428075cf33c992fe7bca018fc1c1510282
kernel-devel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
fe3059960b7bf1b6d275d75f22f193d76ff32e57a96d42be2b84e93e314eaecb
kernel-doc-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.noarch.rpm
f01c904f66e3796a30e0ac1c234b02a727b54560bde28749749585eaf3c63772
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.noarch.rpm
96d4ad2072af82715af88222e624ae23b497a5bd1faf403e5d23da20cf2d1402
kernel-headers-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
ab3759e81fcf875c224e137eb28d469903536e3b961cf8bd70d522e6185180e8
perf-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
9da15820ad1dc7098ba2de8fec5d8656a4ec4c50c90831de6c76186933d44a79
python-perf-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
818f3b8454a9d5d2a8b8f84ccbf8c8cef1e5025017e9307665aa43adb98fffe9
kernel-2.6.32-754.9.1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:3760 Important CentOS 6 ghostscript Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:3760 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3760
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c36615c920876eac97cb2c380bc110c62341d39f1b879c3d3cdca4fba49fc7ee
ghostscript-8.70-24.el6_10.2.i686.rpm
dd9ba47147d807446ed2e3935b71d76164c96a99c11ac787f7ad76f1319992be
ghostscript-devel-8.70-24.el6_10.2.i686.rpm
5f69430bc40d9b91189c3c7841df6549b192517ce629ae88ff69ccc05f347679
ghostscript-doc-8.70-24.el6_10.2.i686.rpm
3c326d4e33df045f6d89e872b402482dcbe43b651106f51db3ae9407c9d91b63
ghostscript-gtk-8.70-24.el6_10.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
c36615c920876eac97cb2c380bc110c62341d39f1b879c3d3cdca4fba49fc7ee
ghostscript-8.70-24.el6_10.2.i686.rpm
c95ebe2583ea33a9180183c5fe7c57cef8819775c83dd81d06acfffea0d8acea
ghostscript-8.70-24.el6_10.2.x86_64.rpm
dd9ba47147d807446ed2e3935b71d76164c96a99c11ac787f7ad76f1319992be
ghostscript-devel-8.70-24.el6_10.2.i686.rpm
95f55bb977e479fda9af2450eb477c2cb7d237c0e10e9db1630583f91d3aec18
ghostscript-devel-8.70-24.el6_10.2.x86_64.rpm
b668480fb643a8423b47eb6a3fff804070553ca902df72a74c9dd1b7bfc1bd68
ghostscript-doc-8.70-24.el6_10.2.x86_64.rpm
10726b9ee480cbb21b68b83c143cb74698fbd68b4e954f79e8e1d4f18d13cc24
ghostscript-gtk-8.70-24.el6_10.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
9cce9e502b90bc5134e443b02d3b68b85a94052a8108f36e423531046dc4a707
ghostscript-8.70-24.el6_10.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2018:3764 CentOS 6 autofs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:3764
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3764
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d660466cb85f3feb7fb5b4454ee9848a9a83a3641f518e35a97248a34c1bab93
autofs-5.0.5-140.el6_10.i686.rpm
x86_64:
7bedf3ad300477d712b766cf5ad5a254b6277ab54d075827c28d8ca57a293e00
autofs-5.0.5-140.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
c121e4521dfb34b87cdb2f3e0bc2d5e9efd557548e54942a0d56bf84b6db
autofs-5.0.5-140.el6_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] ZFS fails with C7 957
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:23 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2018, at 17:45, david wrote: > > > > Folks > > > > I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in ZFS. > > It's been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos > > from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64 > > to 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 > > > > The import of the pools didn't happen at boot. When I tried executing: > > zpool list > > I got the diagnostic suggesting I do /sbin/modprobe zfs > > And that command claimed the module didn't exist. > > You need to go wherever you got your ZFS kernel module and rebuild it for the > kernel included in CentOS 7.6.1810. I had to rebuild several of my kmods for > the -957 kernels too. If you use a kmod that relies on kernel symbols that > are not on the kabi whitelist, you need to rebuild the kmod for every minor > release, and probably several times mid release. If you get the ZFS from the zfs.repo, they just published the EL7.6 package: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS fails with C7 957
On Dec 6, 2018, at 17:45, david wrote: > > Folks > > I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in ZFS. It's > been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos > from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64 > to 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 > > The import of the pools didn't happen at boot. When I tried executing: > zpool list > I got the diagnostic suggesting I do /sbin/modprobe zfs > And that command claimed the module didn't exist. You need to go wherever you got your ZFS kernel module and rebuild it for the kernel included in CentOS 7.6.1810. I had to rebuild several of my kmods for the -957 kernels too. If you use a kmod that relies on kernel symbols that are not on the kabi whitelist, you need to rebuild the kmod for every minor release, and probably several times mid release. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ZFS fails with C7 957
Folks I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in ZFS. It's been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64 to 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 The import of the pools didn't happen at boot. When I tried executing: zpool list I got the diagnostic suggesting I do /sbin/modprobe zfs And that command claimed the module didn't exist. YUM claims my updates are all up-to-date. I had to revert back to 862. Help? David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Audacious broken on CentOS 7.6
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 17:21, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > > Hi, > > Looks like the Audacious audio player from EPEL (which has worked fine > in previous versions) is broken under CentOS 7.6. It refuses to start, > and when I try to start it from the command line, here's what I get. > > [microlinux@bernadette:~] $ rpm -qa | grep audacious > audacious-3.9-1.el7.x86_64 > audacious-libs-3.9-1.el7.x86_64 > audacious-plugins-3.9-1.el7.x86_64 Probably needs a rebuild due to Cairo update. Have opened up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657046 to track > [microlinux@bernadette:~] $ audacious > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/Effect/ladspa.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/skins.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/statusicon.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/alarm.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/delete-files.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/notify.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/gtkui.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/hotkey.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/gnomeshortcuts.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/playlist-manager.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/search-tool.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/albumart.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/aosd.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/General/lyricwiki.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/Visualization/blur_scope.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/Visualization/cairo-spectrum.so could not be > loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: > FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: > /usr/lib64/audacious/Visualization/gl-spectrum.so could not be loaded: > /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates > ERROR plugin-init.cc:147 [start_required]: No interface plugin found. > (Did you forget to install audacious-plugins?) > Abandon > > Any idea what's wrong here ? > > Cheers, > > Niki > > -- > Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables > 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat > Site : https://www.microlinux.fr > Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr > Mail : i...@microlinux.fr > Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Audacious broken on CentOS 7.6
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:20:57 +0100 Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Any idea what's wrong here ? (Did you forget to install audacious-plugins?) -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Audacious broken on CentOS 7.6
Hi, Looks like the Audacious audio player from EPEL (which has worked fine in previous versions) is broken under CentOS 7.6. It refuses to start, and when I try to start it from the command line, here's what I get. [microlinux@bernadette:~] $ rpm -qa | grep audacious audacious-3.9-1.el7.x86_64 audacious-libs-3.9-1.el7.x86_64 audacious-plugins-3.9-1.el7.x86_64 [microlinux@bernadette:~] $ audacious ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/Effect/ladspa.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/skins.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/statusicon.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/alarm.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/delete-files.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/notify.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/gtkui.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/hotkey.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/gnomeshortcuts.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/playlist-manager.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/search-tool.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/albumart.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/aosd.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/General/lyricwiki.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/Visualization/blur_scope.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/Visualization/cairo-spectrum.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-load.cc:72 [plugin_load]: /usr/lib64/audacious/Visualization/gl-spectrum.so could not be loaded: /lib64/libcairo.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Design_Coordinates ERROR plugin-init.cc:147 [start_required]: No interface plugin found. (Did you forget to install audacious-plugins?) Abandon Any idea what's wrong here ? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-docs] CentOS Wiki Contribution
your FirstnameLastname username: MichaelMcMahon the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s): Fixing the VNC section for CentOS 7 and systemd the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s): https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/VNC-Server ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
Le 06/12/2018 à 18:54, John Hodrien a écrit : > > Do you remember just how bad Gnome3 was in RHEL 7.0? It was unstable > and insecure, certainly when used with nvidia drivers. I can't see > how you could justify the effort it would have required to > effectively support an unsupported version of Gnome3, and backporting > I think would have been more than deeply unpleasant. Or they could simply have gone with KDE 4, a stable and mature desktop at the time RHEL 7.0 was out. And not an abomination that had to be potty-trained from scratch again while steadily losing features every other minor upgrade. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] invalid base url
I have a number of updates to C7.6 but now I am getting Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo base/7/x86_64 Did something happen? What do I do ? This machine has internet access and appears to resolve other sites. I get a list when trying to access mirrorlist... Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] Announcing the release of Gluster 5 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64
I am happy to announce the General Availability of Gluster 5 for CentOS 7 on x86_64. These packages are following the upstream Gluster Community releases, and will receive monthly bugfix updates. Gluster 5 is expected to receive updates until the end of October 2019. The maintanance and release schedule can be found at: https://www.gluster.org/community/release-schedule/ Users of CentOS 7 can now simply install Gluster 5 with only these two commands: # yum install centos-release-gluster # yum install glusterfs-server The centos-release-gluster package is delivered via CentOS Extras repos. This contains all the metadata and dependency information, needed to install Gluster 5. The actual package that will get installed is centos-release-gluster5. Users of Gluster 4.1 can stay on that release until June 2019. Users of Gluster 4.0 and earlier will need to manually upgrade by uninstalling the centos-release-gluster-legacy package, and replacing it with either the Gluster 5 or 4.1 version. Additional details about the upgrade process are linked in the announcement from the Gluster Community: https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-October/000115.html We have a quickstart guide specifically built around the packages are available, it makes for a good introduction to Gluster and will help get you started in just a few simple steps, this quick start is available at https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/gluster-Quickstart More details about the packages that the Gluster project provides in the Storage SIG is available in the documentation: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Gluster The centos-release-gluster* repositories offer additional packages that enhance the usability of Gluster itself. Utilities and tools that were working with previous versions of Gluster are expected to stay working fine. If there are any problems, or requests for additional tools and applications to be provided, just send us an email with your suggestions. The current list of packages that is (planned to become) available can be found here: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Gluster/Ecosystem-pkgs We welcome all feedback, comments and contributions. You can get in touch with the CentOS Storage SIG on the centos-devel mailing list (https://lists.centos.org ) and with the Gluster developer and user communities at https://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo , we are also available on irc at #gluster on irc.freenode.net, and on twitter at @gluster . Cheers, Niels de Vos Storage SIG member & Gluster maintainer signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] Update failure: Mate requires libgtop-2.0.so.10
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:59:22AM -0500, Jason Edgecombe wrote: > In addition, there is a bugzilla report for this: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644519 I think I'm going to just lie low for a while until the upgrade to 7.6 stabliizes a bit. I have several machines, mostly personal, but a couple at work, too, running 7.5, one of them with an Nvidia card (and the elrepo drivers, not nouveau), that one is also raid1. And they also all use the Mate desktop. Given the issues I've seen raised here and elsewhere about upgrading to 7.6, I'm going to just wait a while at least for my home desktop (which also runs a mail server for my personal domain) and my systems at work. Have a new-to-me (aka: used) laptop that was just installed with 7.5 no more than a month ago that I may risk to try the upgrade, though, on the theory that it'll be easier to put back together than any of the other ones. Fred -- --- Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community. --Roger Ebert, December, 1996 - The Boulder Pledge - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, Alice Wonder wrote: I don't understand why Red Hat makes these kind of changes in point releases - yet they won't update OpenSSL or PHP or Postfix in a point release. Rebasing Gnome3 regularly I think has been one of Red Hat's best decisions, and one I can easily imagine a committee deciding against for reasons of wanting to minimise risk. Do you remember just how bad Gnome3 was in RHEL 7.0? It was unstable and insecure, certainly when used with nvidia drivers. I can't see how you could justify the effort it would have required to effectively support an unsupported version of Gnome3, and backporting I think would have been more than deeply unpleasant. They made a mistake in omitting a patch that wasn't caught in qa, and that's a shame. But then let's be honest, how many Red Hat customers actually use this feature? I do use it, and I didn't pick it up in my own testing, as our deployment must have created the directories as we had no issues. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
On 12/06/2018 08:10 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 06/12/2018 à 15:24, James Pearson a écrit : I suspect it might be something that has been left out in the rebase to GDM 3.28.1 - an earlier change log for GDM has: On a side note, I've now spent a day and a half trying to recover my wrecked desktop profiles, with only a partial success. As it looks now, I'll probably move all my desktop installations to openSUSE Leap 15 and KDE 5 in the near future. As far as I can tell, rebasing GNOME in the middle of a minor update was not a good idea. Cheers, Niki They did a similar thing with NetworkManager few releases ago that caused all my servers to start grabbing randomized IPv6 addresses instead of static they previously grabbed. I don't understand why Red Hat makes these kind of changes in point releases - yet they won't update OpenSSL or PHP or Postfix in a point release. It's like they use /dev/random to determibe where they require API stability between point releases. -- For signature trust anchor (paranoid only need worry 'bout this): https://ca.pipfrosch.com/pipfrosch-cacert-pem.crt Webmail clients, sorry, out of luck, you can't import it. Get an actual e-mail app. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
Le 06/12/2018 à 15:24, James Pearson a écrit : > I suspect it might be something that has been left out in the rebase to > GDM 3.28.1 - an earlier change log for GDM has: On a side note, I've now spent a day and a half trying to recover my wrecked desktop profiles, with only a partial success. As it looks now, I'll probably move all my desktop installations to openSUSE Leap 15 and KDE 5 in the near future. As far as I can tell, rebasing GNOME in the middle of a minor update was not a good idea. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Now with CentOS 7.6 this doesn't work anymore. The /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d >> directory is nowhere to be found, and I'm currently mildly cursing the >> GNOME developers' (and Red Hat's) policy of releasing moving targets. >> Until now, the whole purpose of Enterprise Linux seemed to be low-risk >> updates. > > While the /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/ directory doesn't exist, I've got many > RHEL7.6 and CentOS 7.6 systems where GDM behaves the same way as > before, as long as you create /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/ and put the files > in there, and as soon as you run 'dconf update', you see it change. > > I'm not sure why the /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/ and > /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/locks/ directory aren't owned by a package > anymore, that seems like a bug, but as far as I can tell, GDM > continues to get its information from there. I suspect it might be something that has been left out in the rebase to GDM 3.28.1 - an earlier change log for GDM has: * Thu Jun 25 2015 Ray Strode 3.14.2-4 - Make sure user customizations to gdm via /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d continue to work following rebase. Related: #1174564 So, I'm guessing that something similar was left out with this change from 3.26 to 3.28 ? Maybe a bug report to https://bugzilla.redhat.com is needed ? James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Now with CentOS 7.6 this doesn't work anymore. The /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d > directory is nowhere to be found, and I'm currently mildly cursing the > GNOME developers' (and Red Hat's) policy of releasing moving targets. > Until now, the whole purpose of Enterprise Linux seemed to be low-risk > updates. While the /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/ directory doesn't exist, I've got many RHEL7.6 and CentOS 7.6 systems where GDM behaves the same way as before, as long as you create /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/ and put the files in there, and as soon as you run 'dconf update', you see it change. I'm not sure why the /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/ and /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/locks/ directory aren't owned by a package anymore, that seems like a bug, but as far as I can tell, GDM continues to get its information from there. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bastion server
wow Great thank you Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 à 19:23, Alexander Dalloz a écrit : > Am 04.12.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Ilyass Kaouam: > > . And of corse log activity users > > > > For me, In resume I want : > > 1. One acces point to all my servers > > 2. log activity user (login with active directory) > > > > Regard's > > Look at FreeIPA and KeyCloak. Maybe those tools do most of what you like > to get. In addition configure the auditd service which comes by default > with CentOS. > > Alexander > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- *Ilyass kaouam* *Ingénieur System OpenSource* *Mastère européen Manager de Projets Informatiques* ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Firefox showing bogus sites after 'yum update'
I have just done a yum update for the first time in a while, and as part of that I believe Firefox got upgraded. After the reboot I restarted Firefox which had been closed down with the option to retain all open tabs/windows. However, when I restarted Firefox it had three new tabs, one being the ususal Firefox upgrade page. The other two were Phishing sites, one pretending to be Amazon the other I cannot remember. Has anyone else experienced this? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.6.1810 UEFI/Shim issue .. feedback wanted !
Hi Fabian, I was affected by this. After an update, one Dell R710 server that I maintain, failed to boot. The error I saw was the same as someone else who also posted here. I didn't know how to fix it, and needed the server to be running, so I just reinstalled it, and switched to biosboot while at it. Fortunately, this was a backup server, so the impact was low. It has a production counterpart, but I don't dare update it, and I cannot risk it failing to boot after an update. Regards, Anand On 06/12/2018 10:44, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > We got some reports from people unable to reboot their nodes after > updating to 7.6.1810, and basically to newer shim (v15). > It seems to affect only nodes in UEFI mode, but without SecureBoot. > > We wrote that in the ReleaseNotes, including a link to the bug report : > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15522 > > We have now a workaround in that bug report, and also a new interim > build (not signed by Microsoft yet) but we need feedback , as the only > node on which I could test this myself is my old 2008 iMac computer .. :-( > > Once we'll have enough positive (but also negative) feedback about this > new build, we'll be able to send to Microsoft for signing and so > consider that bug closed. Worth also noticing that if we can have that > ready in the updates, we'll be able to spin a monthly iso that will then > work on such uefi nodes too. > > Kind Regards, > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7.6.1810 UEFI/Shim issue .. feedback wanted !
We got some reports from people unable to reboot their nodes after updating to 7.6.1810, and basically to newer shim (v15). It seems to affect only nodes in UEFI mode, but without SecureBoot. We wrote that in the ReleaseNotes, including a link to the bug report : https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15522 We have now a workaround in that bug report, and also a new interim build (not signed by Microsoft yet) but we need feedback , as the only node on which I could test this myself is my old 2008 iMac computer .. :-( Once we'll have enough positive (but also negative) feedback about this new build, we'll be able to send to Microsoft for signing and so consider that bug closed. Worth also noticing that if we can have that ready in the updates, we'll be able to spin a monthly iso that will then work on such uefi nodes too. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Still getting Dropbox warning at login after uninstalling Dropbox
Lke many people I have received the message from Dropbox about their changes including the non-support for the old Linux RPM. As I no longer use Dropbox I thought I would just remove the nautilus-dropbox RPM. However, I am still receiving the warning every time I log in. Can anyone tell me what I need to do to stop this please. Gary ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Can't configure GDM after update to CentOS 7.6
Hi, It looks like the upgrade to CentOS 7.6 has been unusually disruptive with the GNOME desktop version bump and a series of moving targets under the hood. The result is some wreckage at my client's desktop installations, which I've been busy to repair since yesterday. First things first. I have a custom configuration of GDM, which consists mainly of two things. 1. Display my company's logo instead of the CentOS logo. 2. Disable the user list (since I have about 100 users here). Until CentOS 7.5, here's what I did. 1. Create a file /etc/dconf/profile/gdm : user-db:user system-db:gdm file-db:/usr/share/gdm/greeter-dconf-defaults 2. Create a file /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/01-logo : [org/gnome/login-screen] logo='/usr/share/pixmaps/microlinux-logo.png' 3. Create a file /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/00-login-screen : [org/gnome/login-screen] disable-user-list=true 4. Update dconf : # dconf update Now with CentOS 7.6 this doesn't work anymore. The /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d directory is nowhere to be found, and I'm currently mildly cursing the GNOME developers' (and Red Hat's) policy of releasing moving targets. Until now, the whole purpose of Enterprise Linux seemed to be low-risk updates. I've documented the whole GDM customization process until CentOS 7.5 in a short article on my french blog : * https://blog.microlinux.fr/gdm-centos/ Any idea how I can configure GDM with the new version ? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
