> On 11/05/19 2:05 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>>> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! :
I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a
year
or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading
stuff from it.
It's a bit
On 11/05/19 2:05 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! :
I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year
or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading
stuff from it.
It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are
Hi,
I use the wifi adaptor, Edimax AC1200, and its driver can be downloaded from
'http://www.edimax.com.tw/edimax/download/download/data/edimax/tw/download/for_home/wireless_adapters/wireless_adapters_ac1200_dual-band/ew-7822ulc'.
I fail to compile its GPL Source Code on CentOS 7.4.
Where
> Shame that "security experts" regularly recommend using another name for
> the root account - security through obscurity anyone?
>
Unfortunately anyone can call themselves an "expert".
If your protection against a UID 0 login is to change the username,
then you need to seriously look at (a)
On 2019-05-13 16:55, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:
On 13/05/2019 22:25, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 16:20 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
It may not be "just another user", but it *is* a user as much as your
login username is a user. You could assign your own username a UID of
On 13/05/2019 22:25, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 16:20 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
>
> It may not be "just another user", but it *is* a user as much as your
> login username is a user. You could assign your own username a UID of
> 0, and it would have the same privileges as 'root', but
On 2019-05-13 16:25, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 16:20 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
On May 13, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
First, the ~ which might not apply to root.
Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home
directory.
root quite often isn’t
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 16:20 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
> > On May 13, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > > First, the ~ which might not apply to root.
> >
> > Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home
> > directory.
>
> root quite often isn’t recognized as a
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:20:17PM -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
> > On May 13, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home
> > directory.
>
> root quite often isn’t recognized as a proper user. ~/.bash_profile
> isn’t loaded because
> On May 13, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>> First, the ~ which might not apply to root.
>
> Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home
> directory.
root quite often isn’t recognized as a proper user. ~/.bash_profile isn’t
loaded because it’s not a normal
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1022 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1022
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:39:27PM -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
> $ man bash (INVOCATION)
You might also benefit from reading the man page for 'su', which will
explain why running 'su -' is different from running 'su'.
--
Jonathan Billings
___
CentOS
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1017 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1017
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1024 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1024
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
> ~/.bash_profile
> The personal initialization file, executed for login shells
>
> First, the ~ which might not apply to root.
Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home
directory.
> Second, it’s a “personal” init file, which also might not pertain to
OK that’s exactly what I just was questioning. The documentation wasn’t clear
on the ‘man bash’ (INVOCATION) notes.
So I entered my inclusion of my aliases file (it’s my own) inside .bashrc.
Thank you
> On May 13, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> .bash_profile will not be read
$ man bash (INVOCATION)
When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a non-interactive
shell with the --login option, it first reads and executes commands from the
file /etc/profile, if that file
exists. After reading that file, it looks for ~/.bash_profile,
~/.bash_login,
Once upon a time, Bee.Lists said:
> No, this isn’t a case of multi partitions, clusters, or anything silly. I
> just want a set of aliases loaded for su. /root/.bash_profile isn’t loading,
> and there isn’t any obvious choice as to where the loaded .bash* were loading
> from.
No, this isn’t a case of multi partitions, clusters, or anything silly. I just
want a set of aliases loaded for su. /root/.bash_profile isn’t loading, and
there isn’t any obvious choice as to where the loaded .bash* were loading from.
> On May 13, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
OK, I haven’t tested for that loadup yet, and the .bashrc is indeed there. I
thought .bashrc was loaded first, then .bash_profile. This is for normal user.
Just tested it again, and /root/.bash_profile is not loading. Tried this in
/root/.bashrc:
source /root/.bash_profile
That created
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 13:06 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
> Ah thank you. Having forgotten this, I already had all my aliases
> and instructions in there. For some reason they aren’t loading. If
> I do this, then everything loads:
>
> source /root/.bash_profile
>
> So there’s an indication this
Ah thank you. Having forgotten this, I already had all my aliases and
instructions in there. For some reason they aren’t loading. If I do this,
then everything loads:
source /root/.bash_profile
So there’s an indication this isn’t loading upon entry into su. Is this
normal?
> On May
On 2019-05-13 07:38, Nux! wrote:
Hi,
The $home of root is /root, just copy it there.
It is $HOME not $home ;-)
Valeri
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: "Bee.Lists"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Monday, 13
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 02:11:42PM +, Denniston, Todd A CIV USN NSWC CD
CRANE ID (USA) wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 21:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I'm getting:
> > >
> > > Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run
> > > this
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:50:31PM +0800, qw wrote:
> I use CentOS 7.4, And where to find wifi driver?
I suggest you start by using the latest CentOS 7, 1810 (based on RHEL
7.6). Anything older isn't supported and most likely won't work with
any 3rd-party kernel drivers.
Also, which wifi driver
Hi,
I use CentOS 7.4, And where to find wifi driver?
Thanks!
Regards
Andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Wyett
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2019 10:16 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] JavaFX on C7 ?
>
> On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 21:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm getting:
> >
> > Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and
On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 08:28, Bee.Lists wrote:
> Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile
> for root. I have to load my user .bash_profile every time I get into root,
> and I would like a better solution. There is no /home/ for root, so I’m a
> bit confused if
The following one liner should display root's home directory:
grep -w ^root /etc/passwd | cut -d: -f6
Which finds the line beginning with the word root, and returns the sixth entry
(the home directory of that entry).
On 5/13/19, 8:39 AM, "CentOS on behalf of Nux!" wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:39 AM J Martin Rushton via CentOS <
centos@centos.org> wrote:
> Hi Nux,
>
> The number will be higher than that. Some large systems just download
> once to their own private mirror and install from there. Where I used
> to work each download went to at least 6 systems,
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 08:28 -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
> Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile for
> root. I have to load my
> user .bash_profile every time I get into root, and I would like a better
> solution. There is no /home/
> for root, so I’m a bit
Hi,
The $home of root is /root, just copy it there.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Bee.Lists"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Monday, 13 May, 2019 13:28:24
> Subject: [CentOS] root .bash_profile?
> Hi folks.
Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile for
root. I have to load my user .bash_profile every time I get into root, and I
would like a better solution. There is no /home/ for root, so I’m a bit
confused if this is even allowed.
Any insight appreciated.
33 matches
Mail list logo
