On Tue, 01 Oct, 2019 at 13:57:19 -0400, MAILIST wrote:
> After 40 years of upgrading many different operating systems,
> Windows (from 3.1 to 10), CentOS 6 to 8, Ubuntu, Fedora, Red Hat,
> AT Unix, VAX VMS; I have never observed an upgrade from one major
> version to the next to work. The last
Le 01/10/2019 à 19:57, MAILIST a écrit :
> After 40 years of upgrading many different operating systems,
> Windows (from 3.1 to 10), CentOS 6 to 8, Ubuntu, Fedora, Red Hat,
> AT Unix, VAX VMS; I have never observed an upgrade from one major
> version to the next to work. The last one I tried
> Am 01.10.2019 um 22:19 schrieb Valeri Galtsev :
>
> I routinely upgrade FreeBSD. Last time it was 11.3 to 12.0. Always smooth.
> Maybe I'm just lucky...
No, it works very well.
But it’s designed with an eventual upgrade in mind.
___
CentOS
On 2019-10-01 12:57, MAILIST wrote:
Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which is related
to upgrade method and not condition for reinstalling without loosing
data.
After 40 years of upgrading many different operating systems,
Windows (from 3.1 to 10), CentOS 6 to 8,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:57:19 -0400
"MAILIST" wrote:
> > Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which is related
> > to upgrade method and not condition for reinstalling without loosing
> > data.
>
> After 40 years of upgrading many different operating systems,
> Windows (from
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:32 PM Elliot wrote:
> In my career, I've managed many Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, and CentOS
> systems, and I found that in-situ upgrading of Debian, Ubuntu, and
> Fedora are usually easy and convenient.
I'll concur in my experience. I've upgraded a number of Ubuntu
On 10/1/19 10:57 AM, MAILIST wrote:
>> Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which is related
>> to upgrade method and not condition for reinstalling without loosing
>> data.
>
> After 40 years of upgrading many different operating systems,
> Windows (from 3.1 to 10), CentOS 6
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 14:00, MAILIST wrote:
>
> > Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which is related
> > to upgrade method and not condition for reinstalling without loosing
> > data.
>
> After 40 years of upgrading many different operating systems,
> Windows (from 3.1 to
> Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which is related
> to upgrade method and not condition for reinstalling without loosing
> data.
After 40 years of upgrading many different operating systems,
Windows (from 3.1 to 10), CentOS 6 to 8, Ubuntu, Fedora, Red Hat,
AT Unix, VAX
Your answer has nothing to do with the original question which is related to
upgrade method and not condition for reinstalling without loosing data.
Sometimes you need to keep your configuration and want to avoid reconfiguring
everything, and reimaging your computer keeping /home is not an
On 2019-10-01 11:14, Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
I am using kickstart to install CentOS 8. Course I started with my
kickstart from 7.
Some packages are not found on the kickstart install (not present on the
DVD I guess) like:
ImageMagick
sox
libogg-devel
libssh2-devel
So again - I know they
Hi all,
I am using kickstart to install CentOS 8. Course I started with my
kickstart from 7.
Some packages are not found on the kickstart install (not present on the
DVD I guess) like:
ImageMagick
sox
libogg-devel
libssh2-devel
So again - I know they are not present on the DVD but they are
On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 09:36 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On 2019-10-01 08:17, david wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> > I find the Lynx browser does not appear in any of the repositories
> > used
> > during default installation of Centos 8 (x86_64). Is this program
> > no
> > longer supported? I
KM via CentOS wrote:
> I searched a bit to see if there is a way to upgrade from CentOS 7
> directly to CentOS 8. I found RHEL instructions but not CentOS. Â
> Although they probably should be/would be similar, the instructions I
> found enable a rhel repository to get the leap command, which I
I searched a bit to see if there is a way to upgrade from CentOS 7 directly to
CentOS 8. I found RHEL instructions but not CentOS. Although they probably
should be/would be similar, the instructions I found enable a rhel repository
to get the leap command, which I can't seem to do in CentOS.
Need to start a virtual machine but missing nic is preventing this:
I have need to recover some data from a guest on host which has been
shutddown for some time. The host had one of it nic removed at some
point. It is not likely to be replaced either.
When I try to start the guest in question
On 2019-10-01 08:17, david wrote:
Folks
I find the Lynx browser does not appear in any of the repositories used
during default installation of Centos 8 (x86_64). Is this program no
longer supported? I didn't see a reference to it in the notsupported list.
Did you try to
yum search lynx
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 10:17, Georgios wrote:
>
> First of all thanks for your fast reply.
>
>
> Second.
> The server im trying to use is https://dav.mailbox.org/caldav I dont
> think its a problem with my configuration (although i can always be
> wrong). I suspect a bug in evolution because
First of all thanks for your fast reply.
Second.
The server im trying to use is https://dav.mailbox.org/caldav I dont
think its a problem with my configuration (although i can always be
wrong). I suspect a bug in evolution because sometimes it works.
Sometimes i manage to create an event
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 09:20, david wrote:
>
> Folks
>
> I find the Lynx browser does not appear in any of the repositories
> used during default installation of Centos 8 (x86_64). Is this
> program no longer supported? I didn't see a reference to it in the
> notsupported list.
>
The lynx
Folks
I find the Lynx browser does not appear in any of the repositories
used during default installation of Centos 8 (x86_64). Is this
program no longer supported? I didn't see a reference to it in the
notsupported list.
David
___
CentOS
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 05:56, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>
> In article ,
> Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> > Le 01/10/2019 à 09:05, Liam O'Toole a écrit :
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6
> > > https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard
> >
> > And this all
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 03:40, Georgios wrote:
>
> Hi there!
> I recently installed centos 8 on my laptop.
>
> I have the following problems
>
> 1. I tried the use the default evolution 3.28.
> The problem with 3.28 is that when i try to create an event i get the error
> "Failed to create an event
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Klaus Kolle writes:
> I've been running Centos for different purposes in a VirtualBox
> environment for quite long now. But the newest kernels miss something so
> I can get the VirtualBox Extensions linked in.
>
> I can see in the virtualbox log file that I shall run maken oldconfig
> and make,
I've been running Centos for different purposes in a VirtualBox
environment for quite long now. But the newest kernels miss something so
I can get the VirtualBox Extensions linked in.
I can see in the virtualbox log file that I shall run maken oldconfig
and make, but I get these errors:
# make
In article ,
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 01/10/2019 à 09:05, Liam O'Toole a écrit :
> > [...]
> >
> > FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6
> > https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard
>
> And this all begs the question: who's flying this plane?
According to that page, the
Hi there!
I recently installed centos 8 on my laptop.
I have the following problems
1. I tried the use the default evolution 3.28.
The problem with 3.28 is that when i try to create an event i get the error
"Failed to create an event in the calendar “CalDAV : Calendar”"
"Cannot create calendar
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:00 AM Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/squidguard
> 1.6.0 as of today :D
so where is that coming from ?
here's debian changelog on that package,
https://sources.debian.org/src/squidguard/1.6.0-1/CHANGELOG/
--
-john r pierce
recycling used
Le 01/10/2019 à 09:05, Liam O'Toole a écrit :
> [...]
>
> FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6
> https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard
And this all begs the question: who's flying this plane? According to
the official website, SquidGuard is dead in the water. Apparently
On Mon, 30 Sep, 2019 at 23:47:02 -0700, John Pierce wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> > Le 30/09/2019 à 17:53, Gwaland a écrit :
> > > looks like it was updated due to a segfault.
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550
> > >
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:47:02PM -0700, John Pierce wrote:
...
> >
> > Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site:
> >
> > * http://squidguard.org/index.html
> >
> > This page hasn't been updated in ages and sports the "NEW" version 1.3.
> >
> > So apparently the
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 30/09/2019 à 17:53, Gwaland a écrit :
> > looks like it was updated due to a segfault.
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662
>
> Now I'm even more puzzled.
>
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
