Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 and DELL 7540 Intel AX200 WIFI

2019-10-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 7:33 PM John Pierce  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:50 PM David Summers 
> wrote:
> > .
>
> > 70:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2723]
> > (rev 1a)
> >
> > I believe the Intel AX200 Wifi card is the device 8086:2723 (rev1a) entry.
> >
> > Is there something I can do to enable it or is this a bug I need to file
> > with RedHat?
> >
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/05511/network-and-i-o/wireless-networking.html
>
> says that the AX200 is supported with Linux Kernel 5.1+, and the firmware
> linked on that page.
> --
> -john r pierce

Device ID pair [8086:2723] is not in the current CentOS kernel
4.18.0-80.11.2.el8_0. However, it is found in the CentOS Stream kernel
4.18.0-144.el8. So, you may want to give it a try.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 and DELL 7540 Intel AX200 WIFI

2019-10-25 Thread John Pierce
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:50 PM David Summers 
wrote:

> .



> 70:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2723]
> (rev 1a)
>
>
> I believe the Intel AX200 Wifi card is the device 8086:2723 (rev1a) entry.
>
>
> Is there something I can do to enable it or is this a bug I need to file
> with RedHat?
>
>
>
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/05511/network-and-i-o/wireless-networking.html

says that the AX200 is supported with Linux Kernel 5.1+, and the firmware
linked on that page.



-- 
-john r pierce
  recycling used bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8

2019-10-25 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, October 25, 2019 6:39 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter 
 wrote:



I may have to pull the coreutils-8.30-6.el8.x86_64 sources to see how ls
makes these decisions.


I pulled the coreutils SRPM and it won't build because it wants texinfo and 
dnf says it doesn't exist, using either the builddep or search subcommands. 
(There may be other builddep issues but texinfo is notable for being in the 
vault's SRPMs but not on the mirrors.)


I think the problem likes in the strmode API used in ls.c and it seems like 
that comes from libbsd, but I can't be sure until I get a workable build 
tree so the coreutils SRPM will install.


BTW, another data point: I chmod'd a file to  and now all I get is "-." 
for the mode string. It completely chops everything but the file type and 
the ACL indicator. OTOH, if I set it to 0660, I get the full string. It 
doesn't truncate the last octet.


[ken@rocinante src]$ chmod  yes.c
[ken@rocinante src]$ ls -l yes.c
-. 1 ken ken 3895 May 13  2018 yes.c
[ken@rocinante src]$ chmod 0006 yes.c
[ken@rocinante src]$ ls -al yes.c
-rw-. 1 ken ken 3895 May 13  2018 yes.c
[ken@rocinante src]$ chmod 0060 yes.c
[ken@rocinante src]$ ls -al yes.c
rw. 1 ken ken 3895 May 13  2018 yes.c
[ken@rocinante src]$ chmod 0600 yes.c
[ken@rocinante src]$ ls -al yes.c
-rw-. 1 ken ken 3895 May 13  2018 yes.c


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 8 and DELL 7540 Intel AX200 WIFI

2019-10-25 Thread David Summers


Hello all,


I recently bought a brand new Dell Precision 7540 laptop.  Before buying 
I checked the specifications from the RedHat hardware list and they said 
that it was "fully RedHat 8 Certified" and listed all the hardware that 
was "certified" to work with that laptop.



https://access.redhat.com/ecosystem/hardware/3979771


I have had good results the last few years with Dell and CentOS, all the 
equipment has worked fine.



However, this time, I got the laptop, installed CentOS 8, and the 
built-in ethernet port works fine but the Intel AX200 Wifi is not 
recognized and doesn't show up, so I can't use WiFi, but everything else 
seems to be working fine.



I verified that it *does* work under Windows 10, so the hardware is 
there and works fine, it just is not recognized and configured under 
CentOS 8.



I called Dell Tech Support and they said "since you didn't buy RedHat 8 
from us then we can't help you".



Is this just a temporary problem that an update will soon solve or is 
this something that needs to be brought to the attention of RedHat?  
Should I file a bug report with bugzilla.redhat.com or is there 
something I'm not doing or need to do correctly to get it to work?



Or is there some package I'm missing that will enable it?


I was a bit flabergasted because I've gone for so many years without 
having to do anything special, it all "Just Works (TM)" on my previous 
computers.




For technical details, here is what I get when I run "lspci -nn":

00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:3e20] (rev 0d)
00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 
v5/6th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller (x16) [8086:1901] (rev 0d)
00:04.0 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Xeon 
E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 v5/6th Gen Core Processor Thermal Subsystem 
[8086:1903] (rev 0d)
00:08.0 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/v6 / 
E3-1500 v5 / 6th/7th Gen Core Processor Gaussian Mixture Model [8086:1911]
00:12.0 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Cannon 
Lake PCH Thermal Controller [8086:a379] (rev 10)
00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH USB 3.1 
xHCI Host Controller [8086:a36d] (rev 10)
00:14.2 RAM memory [0500]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM 
[8086:a36f] (rev 10)
00:15.0 Serial bus controller [0c80]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH 
Serial IO I2C Controller #0 [8086:a368] (rev 10)
00:15.1 Serial bus controller [0c80]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH 
Serial IO I2C Controller #1 [8086:a369] (rev 10)
00:17.0 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake Mobile PCH 
SATA AHCI Controller [8086:a353] (rev 10)
00:1b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH PCI Express 
Root Port #17 [8086:a340] (rev f0)
00:1b.4 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH PCI Express 
Root Port #21 [8086:a32c] (rev f0)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH PCI Express 
Root Port #1 [8086:a338] (rev f0)
00:1c.5 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH PCI Express 
Root Port #6 [8086:a33d] (rev f0)
00:1c.6 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH PCI Express 
Root Port #7 [8086:a33e] (rev f0)

00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:a30e] (rev 10)
00:1f.3 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH cAVS 
[8086:a348] (rev 10)
00:1f.4 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH SMBus Controller 
[8086:a323] (rev 10)
00:1f.5 Serial bus controller [0c80]: Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH 
SPI Controller [8086:a324] (rev 10)
00:1f.6 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet 
Connection (7) I219-LM [8086:15bb] (rev 10)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation Device 
[10de:1f36] (rev a1)
01:00.1 Audio device [0403]: NVIDIA Corporation TU106 High Definition 
Audio Controller [10de:10f9] (rev a1)
01:00.2 USB controller [0c03]: NVIDIA Corporation TU106 USB 3.1 Host 
Controller [10de:1ada] (rev a1)
01:00.3 Serial bus controller [0c80]: NVIDIA Corporation TU106 USB 
Type-C Port Policy Controller [10de:1adb] (rev a1)
02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller [0108]: Samsung Electronics Co 
Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981 [144d:a808]
03:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller [0108]: Samsung Electronics Co 
Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981 [144d:a808]
04:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 
Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06)
05:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 
Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06)
05:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 
Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06)
05:02.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 
Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06)
05:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 
Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06)
06:00.0 System peripheral 

Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?

2019-10-25 Thread David G. Miller
The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to 
work.  Not the best solution but a solution.


Cheers,
Dave

On 10/25/19 5:33 PM, Frank Cox wrote:

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:17:53 +1100
Bill Maidment wrote:


I have also got MATE 1.22.2 running, but I don't have access to Printer
configuration in MATE.

I think it's missing.  On Centos 7 that functionality is provided by the 
system-config-printer rpm, as seen here:

system-config-printer-1.4.1-21.el7.x86_64
system-config-printer-libs-1.4.1-21.el7.noarch

system-config-printer is the actual gui program.

On Centos 8 the only system-config-printer rpms appear to be this:

system-config-printer-udev-1.5.11-13.el8.x86_64
system-config-printer-libs-1.5.11-13.el8.noarch

Neither of those is the system-config-printer gui.

So it appears to be missing.



--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve 
neither safety nor liberty."

-- Benjamin Franklin

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8

2019-10-25 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, October 25, 2019 6:13 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter 
 wrote:



Found it. It happens from the process buffer inside Lugaru Epsilon. I
think ls thinks it's doing a DIRED output instead of a shell output. Now
I need to figure out why it thinks that. This wasn't happening in CentOS
7.


I'm puzzled. I can't find anything in the Gnu coreutils manual to describe 
this format. I do note that outside Epsilon, the sort order changes, 
ignoring leading dots and the case of filenames. So it seems like a locale 
thing.




Notable environment variable differences:

Outside, LS_COLORS has a very long string. LANG=en_US.UTF-8. TERM=xterm.

Inside, LS_COLORS is present but empty. LANG=C. TERM=dumb.

Changing these doesn't seem to fix the abbreviated permissions field. 
Setting LANG does change the sort order so at least I understand that.


I may have to pull the coreutils-8.30-6.el8.x86_64 sources to see how ls 
makes these decisions.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8

2019-10-25 Thread Kenneth Porter
Found it. It happens from the process buffer inside Lugaru Epsilon. I think 
ls thinks it's doing a DIRED output instead of a shell output. Now I need 
to figure out why it thinks that. This wasn't happening in CentOS 7.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8

2019-10-25 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Saturday, October 26, 2019 1:07 AM +0200 Alexander Dalloz 
 wrote:



Not sure what you were doing.


An example:

[root@rocinante ~]# ls -al
total 76
dr-xr-x---.  8 root root 4096 Oct 25 14:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x. 18 root root 4096 Oct 21 09:36 ..
-rw-.  1 root root 1481 Oct 24 10:35 .bash_history
-rw-r--r--.  1 root root   18 May 11 08:33 .bash_logout
-rw-r--r--.  1 root root  176 May 11 08:33 .bash_profile
-rw-r--r--.  1 root root  176 May 11 08:33 .bashrc

[more output follow]

Note the permissions on .bash_history.

It seems to be system-wide as it also happens when I use a mortal 
(non-root) account.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?

2019-10-25 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:17:53 +1100
Bill Maidment wrote:

> I have also got MATE 1.22.2 running, but I don't have access to Printer 
> configuration in MATE. 

I think it's missing.  On Centos 7 that functionality is provided by the 
system-config-printer rpm, as seen here:

system-config-printer-1.4.1-21.el7.x86_64
system-config-printer-libs-1.4.1-21.el7.noarch

system-config-printer is the actual gui program.

On Centos 8 the only system-config-printer rpms appear to be this:

system-config-printer-udev-1.5.11-13.el8.x86_64
system-config-printer-libs-1.5.11-13.el8.noarch

Neither of those is the system-config-printer gui.

So it appears to be missing.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?

2019-10-25 Thread Bill Maidment

On 16/10/2019 9:17 am, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

On 10/16/19 12:07 AM, Fred Smith wrote:

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:11:50PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

On 10/15/19 10:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

This is interesting and promising:

"The official unofficial repository for MATE for EL8.":
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neonman/MATE/


The previous link is forked repo (I do not know why) and here is
original repo:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stenstorp/MATE/


Oh good! I'm going to have to try that on my experiemtal C8 VM.
I have for the moment given up on it because I can barely navigate
my way through Gnome and it became just too painful.

Thanks!




I just rebooted fresh CentOS 8 VM after installing MATE and it is
1.22.2, everything looks good.


I have also got MATE 1.22.2 running, but I don't have access to Printer 
configuration in MATE. I have to go back to the standard gui to do that. 
My printers are Brother MFC-J6520DW and MFC-J6930DW installed from the 
Brother supplied software using cups. Have I missed something in the 
install of MATE?


--
Cheers
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8

2019-10-25 Thread Alexander Dalloz

Am 25.10.2019 um 23:44 schrieb Kenneth Porter:
When I use "ls -al" on a directory, for files with only owner read/write 
permission, the displayed attributes are "-rw-", not "-rw---". That 
means the file names don't line up with other files in the directory, 
which makes the listing harder to read. What changed where and how do I 
fix that?


Hm?

[adalloz@centos8 ~]$ touch foo
[adalloz@centos8 ~]$ chmod u=rw,go= foo
[adalloz@centos8 ~]$ ls -Al
insgesamt 12
-rw-r--r--. 1 adalloz adalloz  18 11. Mai 02:16 .bash_logout
-rw-r--r--. 1 adalloz adalloz 141 11. Mai 02:16 .bash_profile
-rw-r--r--. 1 adalloz adalloz 312 11. Mai 02:16 .bashrc
-rw---. 1 adalloz adalloz   0 26. Okt 00:02 foo
[adalloz@centos8 ~]$ LANG=C stat foo
  File: foo
  Size: 0   Blocks: 0  IO Block: 4096   regular 
empty file

Device: fd02h/64770dInode: 788575  Links: 1
Access: (0600/-rw---)  Uid: ( 1000/ adalloz)   Gid: ( 1000/ adalloz)
Context: unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0
Access: 2019-10-26 00:02:37.707079231 +0200
Modify: 2019-10-26 00:02:37.707079231 +0200
Change: 2019-10-26 00:04:26.920196480 +0200
 Birth: -


Not sure what you were doing.

Alexander



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8

2019-10-25 Thread Kenneth Porter
When I use "ls -al" on a directory, for files with only owner read/write 
permission, the displayed attributes are "-rw-", not "-rw---". That 
means the file names don't line up with other files in the directory, which 
makes the listing harder to read. What changed where and how do I fix that?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Have "system"/Hunspell dictionaries stopped working in CentOS 7 Firefox?

2019-10-25 Thread Toralf Lund
Until quite recently, multiple spell-checker languages were available in 
Firefox on my CentOS 7 system. (They could be selected from "Languages" 
under the right-click menu in text boxes.) After a recent system 
upgrade, there is only "English (United States)".


I don't think I had installed any extra Firefox dictionaries as such, 
but the "global" spell-checking support is set up to support a few extra 
languages via hunspell- software packages. I believe Firefox used 
to be able to pick these up - probably through a link from 
/usr/lib64/firefox to /usr/share/myspell that the CentOS firefox package 
provides.


Did I get that right? Has the mechanism stopped working? Is there any 
way to re-enable the system dictionaries?


Note that I get all the expected dictionaries in Thunderbird, which 
appears to rely on a similar hack.


My Firefox is "firefox-68.1.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64".

Thanks.

- Toralf

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 - no freeIPA servers

2019-10-25 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 09:52, lejeczek via CentOS  wrote:
>
> On 25/10/2019 14:46, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> > hi, anybody knows why?
> >
> > many thanks, L.
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> or rather why not in default steam but in a separate dnf module?

That is how Red Hat ships the product. I expect that it is not a
default stream because of internal rules on what is a default stream
or not. [My guess** is that default modules can not be updated
'rapidly' so if FreeIPA 8 were shipped in 8.0 it would need to be long
term maintained but if it is shipped as a non-default they can put out
a FreeIPA9 whenever they wanted to.]

** While I work at Red Hat, I do not know what the rules for
default/non-default are. I would have to go look at access.redhat.com
like anyone else which I haven't :).


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 apcupsd or nut and duplicity

2019-10-25 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:41, Ian P.  wrote:
>
> It looks like Fedora 28 is past EOL and I am not able to locate a
> source for package downloads.
>

It is past EOL, but it is available at a few mirrors. They mirror a
lot of content so it would be slower and may be better if you are
going to use it to mirror it locally from them.

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/mirrors/Fedora/28





> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:22 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic  wrote:
> >
> > On 10/19/19 9:08 PM, Ian P. wrote:
> > > Hello Again,
> > > Is there any update on nut or apcupsd for CentOS 8?
> > >
> > > Also, I noticed that duplicity is not currently available for CentOS
> > > 8. I got the Fedora 30 SRPM for duplicity to build on CentOS, but ran
> > > into a dependency issue and cannot find python-devel. Any suggestions
> > > on alternatives or how to get duplicity going on CentOS 8?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ian P.
> > > ___
> > > CentOS mailing list
> > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > >
> >
> > Have you tried duplicity srpms from Fedora 28 (source of CentOS 8
> > packages) instead?
> >
> > Also, I noted there mmight be issue with pythonn version 2 or 3,
> > depending on what distro is used. I am not sure this happens between F28
> > and C8, I haven't had time to see if it was only my mistake or something
> > should be done.
> >
> > --
> > Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> > (Love is in the Air)
> > PL Computers
> > Serbia, Europe
> >
> > StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] smart card auth

2019-10-25 Thread Alessandro Baggi

On 10/25/19 1:27 PM, Stephen Berg (Code 7309) via CentOS wrote:
I updated my work desktop to kernel-3.10.0-1062.4.1.el7.x86_64 yesterday 
as I was leaving. This morning booted into that new kernel I was unable 
to login using my common access card.  Rebooted in the previous kernel 
(3.10.0-1062.1.2.el7.x86_64) and smart card login works fine. Anyone 
else seeing any similar problems?  I haven't had time to dig deeply into 
the logs yet but I did a bunch of pcscd restarts overnight, about once 
per hour according to monit.




Hi Stephen,
I never used pcscd and card login and I don't know how it works. Without 
any type of error/message/warning from system logs I cannot help much 
but I will try.

I would ask:

1) You need a kernel module to use your drive?
2) If yes to the previous, this modules was compiled manually(a) or is 
shipped by centos(b)?
2a) if compiled manually, you need to compile it again because kernel 
local version is changed to -1062.1.2.el7.x86_64 so the previous module 
will not load (you can try to load using --force-modversion). This 
happens to me when I update the kernel and the module that manage my 
waterblock led does not work anymore.

2b) Check if you module is loaded and if not try to load it and check again.

3) Can you boot your workstation and make the login without the card 
reader? If yes you could check what differs from the previous and the 
new kernel when running pcscd (maybe using strace or similar tool).


5) What report logs? This is the first thing that I will check before 
try actions and before ask in ML and if I can't solve then ask help 
reporting errors found. Maybe someone could help you with more detailed 
informations.


My 2 Cent(O)s.

Alessandro.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] UEFI and PXE

2019-10-25 Thread isdtor
Cracked it.

Failure to boot was the result of including tboot in the install package set, 
for some reason or other. It's not needed and removing it does the trick.

https://access.redhat.com/articles/2217041

And I thought I was going spare when it worked with one install package set and 
not another ...

When using a kickstart file, the bootloader, clearpart and zerombr directives 
also need attention. Used without the correct options they will install an MBR 
which is not exactly desired.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] fresh C7.7 install

2019-10-25 Thread Thomas Stephen Lee
Hi,

gpt  is newer partition
table format.

fdisk started supporting gpt recently, while parted has better support for
gpt.


thanks

---
Thomas Stephen Lee

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:22 PM Jerry Geis  wrote:

> Results for parted:
>
> parted /dev/sda print
> Model: ATA KINGSTON SUV5001 (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sda: 120GB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
> Partition Table: gpt
> Disk Flags:
>
> Number  Start   End SizeFile system Name  Flags
>  1  1049kB  1050MB  1049MB  fat32   EFI System Partition  boot
>  2  1050MB  53.5GB  52.4GB  ext4
>  3  53.5GB  57.7GB  4194MB  linux-swap(v1)
>  4  57.7GB  120GB   62.4GB  ext4
>
>
>
> So this shows what I'm expecting. What is the issue with fdisk ???
>
> Jerry
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 - no freeIPA servers

2019-10-25 Thread lejeczek via CentOS
On 25/10/2019 14:46, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> hi, anybody knows why?
>
> many thanks, L.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

or rather why not in default steam but in a separate dnf module?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Centos 8 - no freeIPA servers

2019-10-25 Thread lejeczek via CentOS
hi, anybody knows why?

many thanks, L.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] fresh C7.7 install

2019-10-25 Thread Jerry Geis
Results for parted:

parted /dev/sda print
Model: ATA KINGSTON SUV5001 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 120GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number  Start   End SizeFile system Name  Flags
 1  1049kB  1050MB  1049MB  fat32   EFI System Partition  boot
 2  1050MB  53.5GB  52.4GB  ext4
 3  53.5GB  57.7GB  4194MB  linux-swap(v1)
 4  57.7GB  120GB   62.4GB  ext4



So this shows what I'm expecting. What is the issue with fdisk ???

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] smart card auth

2019-10-25 Thread Stephen Berg (Code 7309) via CentOS
I updated my work desktop to kernel-3.10.0-1062.4.1.el7.x86_64 yesterday 
as I was leaving. This morning booted into that new kernel I was unable 
to login using my common access card.  Rebooted in the previous kernel 
(3.10.0-1062.1.2.el7.x86_64) and smart card login works fine. Anyone 
else seeing any similar problems?  I haven't had time to dig deeply into 
the logs yet but I did a bunch of pcscd restarts overnight, about once 
per hour according to monit.


--
Stephen Berg, IT Specialist, Ocean Sciences Division, Code 7309
Naval Research Laboratory
W:   (228) 688-5738 <- (Preferred contact)
DSN: (312) 823-5738
C:   (228) 365-01

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 & AMD hardware?

2019-10-25 Thread Dave Pawson
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 11:05, Ljubomir Ljubojevic  wrote:
> > Does Centos repo's hold these drivers or do I download after
> > the install please?
>
> CentOS 8 is bassed on Fedora 28. It has open source radeon version in
> kernel. If should recognise it and give default usability until you
> download and install AND's driver.

Thanks for that. Useful to have!

regards


> (Love is in the Air)
> PL Computers
> Serbia, Europe
>
> StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 & AMD hardware?

2019-10-25 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 10/25/19 11:49 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Putting together a system build, AMD based.
> Ryzen 5 CPU on X570 chipset with Radeon RX480
> GPU.
> Guessing this will be supported by Centos OK?
> (Unless you know different! :-)  )
> 
> https://www.amd.com/en/support/graphics/radeon-400-series/radeon-rx-400-series/radeon-rx-480
>   Shows driver support.
> 
> Does Centos repo's hold these drivers or do I download after
> the install please?

CentOS 8 is bassed on Fedora 28. It has open source radeon version in
kernel. If should recognise it and give default usability until you
download and install AND's driver.

> 
> 
> TiA
> 


-- 
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Centos 8 & AMD hardware?

2019-10-25 Thread Dave Pawson
Putting together a system build, AMD based.
Ryzen 5 CPU on X570 chipset with Radeon RX480
GPU.
Guessing this will be supported by Centos OK?
(Unless you know different! :-)  )

https://www.amd.com/en/support/graphics/radeon-400-series/radeon-rx-400-series/radeon-rx-480
  Shows driver support.

Does Centos repo's hold these drivers or do I download after
the install please?


TiA
-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos