I have chased up SFTP since then. Thank you.
> On Sep 6, 2018, at 12:42 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't recommend Samba for this use case. The way it does permissions
> is like it's been grafted on from a Windows world. Fine for NAS stuff. But
> for editing system files, is look
Hi folks.
I’m looking for an email server. I have a C7 box already with nginx,
PostgreSQL, Sinatra and Ruby. So I don’t want to install PHP, Apache, MySQL,
etc.
Are there any ways/tutorials to set up a mail server under those restrictions?
It would serve multiple domains.
Cheers, Bee
Thank you for the input. And to the others as well. I hate this type of chase
where it seems never-ending, for a technology I can’t stand. Managing my
current solution has been a problem for ages. I’m not getting any younger.
Maybe hosting is the best solution, and I do agree with you
I’ve been using it for years. I know the difference. You run FreeBSD and you
install ports. The two come hand-in-hand.
There’s no confusion. The maintainers, the admins, are far and few between on
FreeBSD. The very reason I’m here is due to to just that. That, cannot be
said of the
I’m fresh out of FreeBSD world. Depending on the port, it can be easy and
predictable, or an absolute confusion-fest.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
> Thanks for this. I haven't looked at FreeBSD since the 1990's or there
> abouts,
> but I'll give it a look.
OK, got it working somewhat. I can see files and get them open in my text
editor on my workstation.
Do these services offer read/write abilities on remote workstations?
> On Sep 2, 2018, at 3:59 PM, Bee.Lists wrote:
>
> For some reason my smb.conf tests just fine, but it isn’
Hi folks.
For some reason my smb.conf tests just fine, but it isn’t showing up at my Mac.
The box is showing, but I can’t see anything. It gives me an error as well.
All is below.
https://www.unixmen.com/install-configure-samba-server-centos-7/ is the setup
I’m trying.
The smb.conf:
Hi folks.
postgresql fresh install, roles, users, databases, all done. I can log in
after I SSH to the box.
I entered my user (myself) in pg_hba.conf:
hostall rich192.168.1.4 255.255.255.255 md5
When I nmap the CentOS box, I can’t see that port open. I’ve turned off
Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile for
root. I have to load my user .bash_profile every time I get into root, and I
would like a better solution. There is no /home/ for root, so I’m a bit
confused if this is even allowed.
Any insight appreciated.
OK, I haven’t tested for that loadup yet, and the .bashrc is indeed there. I
thought .bashrc was loaded first, then .bash_profile. This is for normal user.
Just tested it again, and /root/.bash_profile is not loading. Tried this in
/root/.bashrc:
source /root/.bash_profile
That created
OK that’s exactly what I just was questioning. The documentation wasn’t clear
on the ‘man bash’ (INVOCATION) notes.
So I entered my inclusion of my aliases file (it’s my own) inside .bashrc.
Thank you
> On May 13, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> .bash_profile will not be read
$ man bash (INVOCATION)
When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a non-interactive
shell with the --login option, it first reads and executes commands from the
file /etc/profile, if that file
exists. After reading that file, it looks for ~/.bash_profile,
~/.bash_login,
No, this isn’t a case of multi partitions, clusters, or anything silly. I just
want a set of aliases loaded for su. /root/.bash_profile isn’t loading, and
there isn’t any obvious choice as to where the loaded .bash* were loading from.
> On May 13, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
> On May 13, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>> First, the ~ which might not apply to root.
>
> Why do you think that? '~' is just shell shorthand for user's home
> directory.
root quite often isn’t recognized as a proper user. ~/.bash_profile isn’t
loaded because it’s not a normal
Ah thank you. Having forgotten this, I already had all my aliases and
instructions in there. For some reason they aren’t loading. If I do this,
then everything loads:
source /root/.bash_profile
So there’s an indication this isn’t loading upon entry into su. Is this
normal?
> On May
But it is different. Significantly different.
I’d rather just use ‘su’ and have the login sequence trip the loading of my
aliases. Moving this to .bashrc has solved that. That’s what I was asking.
> On May 13, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> The 'su' man page explains
OK I think you need to read previous posts on this.
I’m not looking for any other command.
> On May 14, 2019, at 5:10 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>
> You misunderstand. su behaves the same when switching to root as to any
> other account.
>
> su -
>
> is probably the command you're looking
su does not load .bash_profile and therefore is a completely different
application than with any other user. This one is different, considering
.bash_profile is indeed used for logins for other users.
> On May 13, 2019, at 5:25 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>>
>> man su doesn’t apply to root
> On May 14, 2019, at 6:06 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>> OK I think you need to read previous posts on this.
>>
>> I’m not looking for any other command.
>
> How are 'su' and 'su -' different commands?
>
> If you really dislike typing the extra " '-'", then setup an
> alias so you only have
> On May 14, 2019, at 6:02 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> su is NOT the same as logging in with that user ID. If you login as
> root at the console, root's .bash_profile would be read.
I can count those instances on one hand over the last 40 years. Hence the
question of switching from another
> On May 14, 2019, at 5:50 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 05:19:57AM -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
>> OK I think you need to read previous posts on this.
>>
>> I’m not looking for any other command.
>
> Please stop top-posting, thank
> On May 14, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 07:45:55AM -0400, Bee.Lists wrote:
>> I addressed this in the thread.
>
> And we continue to tell you that you're wrong. su behaves the same
> way when switching to any other user as
> On May 14, 2019, at 10:13 AM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
> Sorry, Jonathan, that I replying _your_ message, my reply has nothing to do
> with it of any of your other posts, but rather with some posts by some other
> posters. I really have to say this:
>
> This whole thread - some posts in
> On May 14, 2019, at 10:23 AM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
> Look, in the following four command lines executed in the shell:
>
> su
>
> su fred
>
> su - fred
>
> su -l fred
>
> - in all four of them:
>
> "su" is a command
>
> "fred" is an argument (wherever it is present)
>
> "-"
Yeah I was still having some issues so I set a cron to rsync the directory out
to another directory that I rsync to another machine to, where I do the
analysis.
As per the “7” comment, I always listen to good advice, but usually that advice
gets completely derailed with someone saying
Hi folks.
Just wondering if I can change the ownership on the nginx logs folder so I can
access them easier for analysis on a regular basis and cronjobs.
/var/log/nginx is owned by nginx:nginx which shuts me out.
Cheers, Bee
___
CentOS
Just did that, and I still can’t do this:
$ cd /var/log/nginx
-bash: cd: /var/log/nginx: Permission denied
> On May 3, 2019, at 7:22 PM, John Pierce wrote:
>
> Add group nginx to your user... usermod -G nginx,... username
> (Where Is any other groups you're a member of, not counting
I will give 770 a try. Nobody going to flip now that a single “7” has been
posted?
> On May 6, 2019, at 12:06 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS
> wrote:
>
> What's the access mode of it? Should probably be mode 770 then.
Cheers, Bee
___
CentOS
Infected Chromium apps are all over the place now. They auto-install and make
themselves preferred browsers that auto-start after reboots.
Very bad.
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 7:11 PM, Michael Hennebry
> wrote:
>
> Something I just remembered because I saw it again:
> When I start chromium,
>
Sequel ORM
> On Feb 16, 2020, at 7:28 PM, H wrote:
>
> I am looking for an open-source SQL modeling tool to use with MySQL, MariaDB
> and PostgreSQL. Does anyone have a favorite?
Cheers, Bee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi R C.
The resulting installation is smaller than the image that you download through
FTP, etc. When I first installed this OS during version 5, I was amazed that
the installation took a mere fraction of the time it took to go through the
menu. Heh.
Anyway, give it a whirl as it’s
Oh please. It was all in light of people being anal.
Therefore…
I highly suggest that people refrain from being anal on the list. People can
also go to the archives to see that top or bottom posting…nobody cares.
> On Mar 27, 2020, at 8:46 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> --On Friday,
Then I care that others stop harassing people on remedial stuff. Because I
care. So that means you need to follow suit.
It’s like being married.
> On Mar 28, 2020, at 7:29 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS
> wrote:
>
> This is valid as also that somebody cares is valid.
Cheers, Bee
I’ve installed pgbouncer on CentOS7 and it’s reliant upon a .pid file:
2020-07-31 04:58:34.082 EDT [3682] DEBUG parse_ini_file: 'logfile' =
'/var/log/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.log'
2020-07-31 04:58:34.082 EDT [3682] DEBUG parse_ini_file: 'logfile' =
'/var/log/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.log' ok:1
34 matches
Mail list logo
