On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr wrote:
Le 19/02/2015 11:03, Chris Murphy a écrit :
This is a false dichotomy. I reject it. There's too much fact to the
contrary. My mom has done an OS installation, she is most definitely
not an admin.
I'd say your mom
to change both user login and encryption passphrase passwords, to keep
them in sync, and remove the old one. And currently LUKS has this 8
slot limit, which is probably not a big problem, but might be a
sufficient barrier in enough cases that this needs extending.
And so on...
--
Chris Murphy
things right, they really face plant in
other areas. Most of their open source effort is languishing.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
kahlil.hodg...@dealmax.com.au wrote:
On 20 February 2015 at 05:25, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
I'd say your mom is an admin in the sense that chickens fly and horses swim.
It's a confusing analogy. Chickens don't fly. Horses do
value in the lower left hand corner.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
that the user
expectations re-align with the end goal in mind, not how to get there.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr wrote:
Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
installer is organized around mount points is correct, and what gets
mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions.
Says who?
Because it's ambiguous. A partition might
a good
reason for it to be in X slot always, for everyone, including
anticipating future use, then that's a feature request and it ought to
get fixed. But if it's a specific use case, well yeah you get to
pre-partition and then install.
--
Chris Murphy
. But for general purpose data, it's nice. It'll use
different sized drives in a raid56, no fuss, no having to tell it how
to do that. Online addition of yet another (unlike sized) drive and it
just starts using it with a single 'btrfs device add' command. No
restripe/resilver needed.
--
Chris Murphy
explanation. If there's no recent software changes,
then it must be hardware.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
a
hardware problem given the numerous identical setups not having this
problem. But, seeing as it panics every 30-40 hours, it can hardly be
much worse with a new kernel running for a couple days... but my bet
is there'd be no change.
--
Chris Murphy
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Murphy
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 20:48
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
I'd post the entire dmesg somewhere
http://client.pdinc.us/panic
or replace cables, usually it's the connectors that
are faulty not the cable itself. Or replace the drive.
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on a many disk linear/concat arrangement. This extends
to using raid1 + linear instead of raid10 if some redundancy is
desired.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il
wrote:
I am unsure I understand what you wrote.
XFS will create multiple AG's across all of those
devices,
Are you comparing md linear
drive at a time
(unless using one of the striping raid-like profiles).
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
all of them. It's often quite a
bit better performing than raid0 specifically because of the many
thousands of small files in many directories workload.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
I'd like to think you will want to avoid the use of swap at almost all
costs because it'll slow the system down by a lot. So really you don't
need 1:1 for a server that isn't using suspend to disk. You only need
enough swap so that things can chug (slowly) without totally
imploding, giving you
A neat trick for a server with less than idea memory requirement
compared to the storage it has, is a pile of swap on an SSD. Having
xfs_repair use swap on SSD is a lot faster than its fallback behavior
when memory is low and there's no swap. Whereas swapping to a HDD...
brutal.
Chris Murphy
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:12 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 2/10/2015 6:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Why I avoid swap on md raid 1/10 is because of the swap caveats listed
under man 4 md. Is possible for a page in memory to change between the
writes to the two md devices
a $40 book on Amazon, chances are each author is
making much less than $1 in royalties per book. So who's being ripped
off the most by downloading a bootleg PDF? The publisher. The authors
aren't being injured that much.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing
like this, then I get to say you sir, may kindly kiss my ass.
Legal point 7: You are unproductively using your own, and other's, time,
interest and energy.
So are you, and this is your informal invitation to stop.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
- I would not put swap on an md device, I'd just put a plain swap
partition on each device; first create two swap mountpoints,
If one
bought an
ebook, not merely renting it, then I should have the right to give
that ebook to a library, school, friend, leave it in an estate to
children. And quite a number of publishers deny this doctrine applies
to ebooks. Not good.
--
Chris Murphy
additional swap, making sure each is on its own drive.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On my first attempt doing this with 2x disk, GPT partition scheme,
precreated md devices, and LVM, rebooting, upon entering the installer
and choosing a language, I get a crash. Looks like it's this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103452
Chris Murphy
to understand the installer's UI is mount point
centric, it kinda deemphasizes the specifics of how that mount point
gets assembled.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
easier to use.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
) on sandboxing functionality and constant policy adjustments
over the past few years. If it were worth it, it'd be a lot easier to just
say, shift the burden to the user, and make them pick a 10 character
password.
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
I used to manage ~150 Linux desktop and would have to do one off scripts
to make updates. Fortunately I found Puppet and now I never have to do
things like this any more but here's the Bash/Expect combo that I used
to use:
chris$ ./mass_copy.sh:
#!/bin/sh
export ROOTPW='secret1'
export
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Do you have anything running that would try to read all the files and build a
search index - like beagle? There's also the nightly run of updatedb but that
just reads the filenames and normally nfs mounts are excluded.
There is no package beagle
201 - 231 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
