it from, and either use priorities to give that repo priority over the
other 3rd party repos ... OR use exclude=clamav* in the .repo file (in
the applicable sections) to exclude those RPMS from the repo you don't
want to get them from.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
know, centosplus kernels are released only when the distro
kernel is updated. However, only Johnny Hughes or CentOS devs can
give you an official answer to your question. Johnny, where are
you? Wake up :-D
Sorry,
I have been busy with trying to roll out puppet on the centos
infrastructure
Olaf Mueller wrote:
Hello,
in my CentOS-Base.repo file there is a line
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch
and yum update said 'nothing to do'. Then I change this line to
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.1/updates/i386 and yum
updates firefox, squid,
from our updates repository which contains
/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 and it has all the right things for the other GUI
apps.
I have no idea how you installed zenoss or if it needs a custom libpng
library, but the one you have installed is not working with CentOS.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
On Mon
alt or ctrl with a check mark.
Shift-F10 seems to pass through OK for me using the CentOS-5 VNC Viewer
without any problems though and not need any help.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing
,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
as root, you also want to probably change that as
bad things can happen as root if an RPM is not properly written (bad
things as in it can install things to the system when it builds). Here
is an example of how to build as a non root user:
http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/
Thanks,
Johnny
... then you can manually
update the kernels and kmods together separately.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
to be
as fast as the Base and Updates repos. That is just how it goes.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Doug Tucker wrote:
This is linked from the CentOS FAQ:
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
Akemi
LOL! This is just TOO good.
1. Because it is proper Usenet Etiquette.
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is over 4000...
2.We use a good
David Hláčik wrote:
Hello,
in system-config-date i have checkbox synchronize date before service
startup.
Which config switch,file does it affect? I want to turn it on on my CentOS
machine without xauth , just editing config files , i was hoping it could be
in /etc/sysconfig/ntpd but no.
ok
it :D
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and was wondering if
maybe it was preferable to Fedora-ds at this point.
it is a rebuild of rhds 8.0 ... it seems to work as well as that does
from all the testing I have done.
However, if I were you, I would look at freeipa:
http://freeipa.org/
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
I fixed that patch.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
. But
there are much better ways (IMHO) to achieve Primary-Primary effect with
other clustering technologies like LVS or RHCS/RHGFS.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
- What does our upstream think about this?
- What do the OpenSSH developers think about this?
Someone is going to need to ask those questions of the people...
I don't think the OpenSSH devels really do care about that - there is no
discussion
Matthew Kent wrote:
Been a week, any eta? :)
Thanks!
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to
get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the
5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Alfred von Campe wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try
to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have
the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
Does the 5.2 kernel
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Joe Pruett wrote:
so, has anyone seen ipsec get messed up with the latest kernel?
i have verified that dropping back to the 53.1.19 kernel makes ipsec
function again. with the new 5.2 kernel coming soon, i'm not sure if it
makes sense to try and
Markus Hetzenecker wrote:
We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck)
and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage
to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos
extras (or addons) repository with
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere
I don't have time to look at the
Jerry Geis wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ // I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
is the cpu i686 compatible?
yes this is the
Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
/
// On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
// / // I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
// /http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
//
// you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
// is the cpu
Jerry Geis wrote:
now do:
i586 text mem=128
when I do i586 text mem=128 it says cant find kernel
so I do linux i586 text mem=128 and I get the same behavior
Loading vmlinuz
Loading initrd
and reboot.
Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?
Are you sure this is a CD-1 and
Alfred von Campe wrote:
Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been getting
reports from users about all their windows disappearing. A little
digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows. Since
there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all your
MHR wrote:
I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on
CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems.
I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and
32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot.
I've
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org
Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi All,
I've a question on upgrading Centos with the least downtime...
The best way to accomoplish this is to backup all data and not upgrade
the install at all. That is how Red Hat recommends that you do it for
RHEL and how CentOS recommends it be done as well.
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:37:58PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz enlightened
us:
I just got a 8Gb flash drive and went to copy a bunch of files onto
it. I wanted to perserve everything, so I just took my archiving
rsync command and altered it to go to
sbeam wrote:
I have an existing in-production LAMP server running Centos 5.1. It uses
physical partitions on top of hardware RAID1, having / /home /var and /boot
on separate partitions.
We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a
DRBD/Heartbeat companion. One solution
sbeam wrote:
Thanks guys for the info. I understand that the secondary machine needs a /var
too while in standby, and since it can't also mount it as part of the DRBD
array, then it has to be a vanilla partition on both machines. Thanks for
clearing that up.
On Saturday 31 May 2008 09:28,
Linux wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also normally build all the extras kmods while I build the centosplus
kernel, so they were also not yet done ... however I did go ahead and build
I dont intend to blame anybody but kmod_xfs was a couple
,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
David Hlác(ik wrote:
RPM build errors:
File not found by glob:
/var/tmp/inn-2.4.3-12-I31464/usr/lib/news/bin/filter/*.pyc
File not found by glob:
/var/tmp/inn-2.4.3-12-I31464/usr/lib/news/bin/filter/*.pyo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]#
Take out *.pyc and *.pyo from
MHR wrote:
I just used a Live CD for the first time today, in part to show what
CentOS can do for a co-worker who is looking at using it at work and
home, but I got the strangest result.
We booted the CD and let the centos user log in. It took a really
long time to load the desktop and there
Kevin C. Abbey wrote:
Hi,
Where can I find the automated procedure to rebuild the CentOS
distribution?
I'd like to optimize for the AMD barcelona.
There is no automated procedure to rebuild the distro ... there is
gentoo for that though.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
have zero issues here ... but I do NOT use yum-updated or any of its
applets.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
be disrespectful to
our employees. You will instead have to be polite in your disagreements.
If this is a problem, I suggest that you find a paid for service
contract where you can be rude to the people with whom you interact.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:19 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
snip
i have a little familiarity with open source, perhaps more than noted,
and i what i am seeing here is centos saying that since we're not paid,
we dont care. i think there are many projects that would not
Jerry Geis wrote:
nate wrote:
/ Jerry Geis wrote:
// I created a i586 install image with qemu.
// I downloaded the SRPMS package for the kernel and installed it.
// I cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
// rpmbuild -bp --target i586 kernelXXX.spec
// I does a bunch of things but it did not build a new
Ruslan Sivak wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
The ones on their standard download page are not compatible with Xen
kernels according to the release notes. The ones to be used for Xen
kernels on x64 is this one:
will use that name.
I don't have anything listening on that port, but you might.
This command should give you more info:
netstat -apn | grep 10009
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Timothy Kesten wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'd like to install my USB-WLAN-Stick Netgear WG111v3.
Ndiswrapper works correct after installing Kernel-Modules from atrpm
ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.centos.plus-1.52-16.el5.i686.rpm.
But by calling wpa_supplicant with
wpa_supplicant -i wlan0 -D
Victor Padro wrote:
Hello all!
I was wondering if you can help me a little bit...
My boss wants me to do some research in finding which hardware is most used
under Linux(ex. Dell servers, Barebones Kits, HP Compaq servers, etc.)
This is just for budgeting issues...he wants to get rid of some
Scott Silva wrote:
snip
I know this has never been brought up before, certainly not in the
last month or so, but this list has some conventions:
1) Trim your replies
2) Bottom post
I thought I heard that somewhere! ;-P
oh boy ... I feel another 100 post thread coming :D
signature.asc
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Matt Hyclak wrote:
If it were me, I would download the latest yum+dependencies and
install them
via rpm before trying to debug an old yum.
Absolutely. Make sure you get the newer yum with the yum-metadataparser,
That helps a lot with ram usage and also speed of the
MHR wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you do not need CentOS for the reasons that most here use it then why
don't you use Fedora if that gives you what you want? No one will be angry
about you ;-)
Heh, heh, as in, don't let the door hit you on
Johnny Hughes wrote:
MHR wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you do not need CentOS for the reasons that most here use it then why
don't you use Fedora if that gives you what you want? No one will be
angry
about you ;-)
Heh, heh, as in, don't
and c4.
However, it is a couple updates behind.
The version is openldap-2.3.27-4.el4.centos
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
rajeev sharma wrote:
nbsp;
Hi All,
nbsp;
I am Rajeev. I have download centOS 5.1 i386 files for installing Linux. I tried my ways but my DVD is not getting recognised while booting. I have windows XP SP2 32-bit. Let me know the files that need to be burned for installing centOS 5.1 i386.
nbsp;
home.local
Note: use also used the domainname command, that command has nothing to
do with dns names, but with the system’s NIS/YP domain name.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Ted Miller wrote:
Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a
directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory on
the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same files
from the client? Clients will be Centos5, Win2K, WinXP. Server is
Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 15:20 +0300, Sergej Kandyla wrote:
Hi all,
Is there some way to upgrade from Fedora Core 6 to Centos 5 (on remote
serv) ?
Thanks in advice!
I would expect a migration similar to that described under Migration
from RHEL5 to CentOS5 on
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a
directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory
on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same
files from the client? Clients
snip
Arghh, system-config-securitylevel had security enabled. So what does that do
to start iptables? That was a lot of wasted time :)
chkconfig iptables off
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
MHR wrote:
I need to get a wireless device for an upcoming trip (USB is
preferable to PCMCIA for a long list of reasons) and I'm wondering if
anyone has any experience with or recommendations for such items,
particularly which ones work with Linux/CentOS. Right now I'm
debating between a
.
This is not meant to be negative about apt use, just point out that yum
is the official way to do updates.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
fabian dacunha wrote:
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine
now i have a query with apache
1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of
centos 5
cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl
also
httpd
does with unbreakable linux.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and their newer products
require GNOME 2.too_new_for_CentOS.x or
gtk-2.too_new_for_CentOS-x (also same potential issue for QT and KDE).
So, that newer version may or may not work.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
for this, well we can't be certified.
Note, only one version of Ubuntu (6.0.6 LTS) and no Debian or Fedora
versions are certified.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
John Thomas wrote:
Gary wrote:
My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not
just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS
program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high
port, but
I am sure just about any program will allow
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a few servers that I really have to build already. Got to buckle
down and get it done; no more waiting for 5.2 as a 'reason' to put it
off for another day.
I will be building a local repository for 5.2 as soon as the ISOs are
posted (well as soon as my 768Kb
ceejay cervantes wrote:
Hi,
Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki
page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin.
I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter
any problems. I used
Matt Harwood wrote:
All,
Apologies for cluttering the list, but I just wanted to say hello and
prepare all for a barage of silly discussions from a tech-hypochondriac!
We have recently purchased two servers running CentOS, and as I'm from
more of a Debian based background, it would be good
fred smith wrote:
I'm using Centos 4.x (fully up to date) on a system at work. I have also
been using firefox 2 (directly from mozilla.org) on it for a long time,
and it tends to work just fine.
yesterday I installed the new FF3 release. It works fine too, with one
exception: The print dialog
. The redhat
bug report has the kernels built for 3ware performance. Once 5.2 is
rolled out, Johnny Hughes has stated he would consider building a
kernel for the 444759 bug.
OK, there is a kernel for this in the Testing repo , the version is:
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.bz444759
This kernel is compiled
Jerry Geis wrote:
Is there a method to get a 586 (i586 text) install to a 486 level?
I am looking for information guidance on this.
I have looked into using debian/386 which stinks in my opinion,
slackware doesnt quite have it either.
So I am wishing/hoping there is a NOT TO painful way to
nate wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
I still think Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, or one of the BSD's will be your best
option on that hardware. But Gentoo would take forever to compile/install on
that hardware.
I thought I read at some point that Debian etch dropped 486 support.
Another option may be
John R Pierce wrote:
Hemraj S wrote:
Hi,
I m currently running my production servers on RHEL 4.6 would like
to migrate to Centos4.6 as it has more benefits advantages. I looked
at the Centos release notes available at
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.6/os/i386/RELEASE-NOTES-en.html and
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
Why don't you check? :)
On a 5.1 machine ready for 5.2:
# yum update /tmp/update.log
n
# yum upgrade /tmp/upgrade.log
n
# diff /tmp/update.log /tmp/upgrade.log
2c2
Setting up Update Process
---
Setting up Upgrade Process
Looks to me that
openoffice.org-writer
openoffice.org-math openoffice.org-calc openoffice.org-graphicfilter
openoffice.org-draw openoffice.org-xsltfilter openoffice.org-base
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
This will be the first version change with my local repo so I want to
check the steps out.
I have a /Centos/5.1 directory with all the contents of the ISO CDs.
I have a /Centos/5 directory with a symbolic link to the 5.1 directory.
I ASSUME that I will create a
Michael wrote:
After failing to install on two different machines that were running
Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other
bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and
installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Hi,
has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't
find it.
The version of php for centos is 5.1.6-20 ...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
i have the following setup
CentOS 5 server running as a primary DNS server for a long time and is
working perfectly fine
the server is on public IP and we have abt 5 zones apart from the reverse
n local zone
now our sister company have recently setup their own
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5.
Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500
Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a frozen point in time of CentOS-5.
I think
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS-5 is the Release
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a frozen point in time of CentOS-5.
Yum upgrades will always get you all
A.B. wrote:
I've been trying to create a Linux distribution based on CentOS 5, similar
to (actually, exactly like) how CentOS is based on RHEL. I have been unable
to find any information about this. Most of what I find are tutorials and
instructions on using Kickstart. Sometimes I've found
Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the real yum
upgrade doesn't have to download the packages)
yum upgrade --upgradeonly
it fails with these messages:
Error: Missing Dependency: libegroupwise-1.2.so.12 is needed by package
evolution
Error:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Thanks! The new yum seems a bit different - maybe it's the
fastestmirror plugin. Would you recommend doing a 'yum update yum rpm'
before the complete run?
It should work OK either way, but I would do:
yum upgrade yum\* rpm
(just to make sure you get the newer
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that it's
running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to downgrade, however you can install from a centos-5.1
tree, but
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that
it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to downgrade, however you
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
connection to the server. Now when I rerun the yum upgrade it fails due
to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig
kfx wrote:
Hi list,
Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account
I have these 2 errors messages:
-bash: [: =: unary operator expected
-bash: [: -le: unary operator expected
After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d:
the number of major issues are fairly small compared to that.
We have identified several upstream issues that we have put in the
Release Notes (see the known issues section) and for most we have
testing packages to fix them.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dunc wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2??
I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I thought the 'updates' directory contained updates for everything from
5.0 forward ?
No.
updates/ gets emptied out on a new point release and then is rebased on
the os/ tree for the new release.
Right ... BUT, base + updates are all the latest
Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03,
CPU1 the same).
I get kernel panic at
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot
process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai)
stepping 03, CPU1 the same).
I get kernel
Bernd Bartmann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Bernd Bartmann wrote:
Hi,
the latest updates for perl, xorg-x11, net-snmp, openoffice.org for C4
were announced for the ia64 and s390(x) archs, but not for i386 and
x86_64 altough they are available on the updates
tech wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Me thinks they call that yum-fastestmirror :)
Me thinks that doesn't work.
fastest mirror give me the lowest values for .tw sites. Which, I think
mean the fastest. They are in fact, the slowest. Here are some real
numbers:
base 856 kb 27:38
updates 91
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 10:51:18 pm Harry Sukumar wrote:
Dear All
But even after adding him to wheel, sys and adm group he is unable to
install using yum
Ok, I'm new to CentOS and yum, but it seems to me that installing software
would need to have write
Brett Serkez wrote:
All,
I have a fresh CentOS 5.2 server that I am just starting to customize,
it is very close to stock.
This morning I ran yum update:
=
Installing:
kernel-xen i686
. Here is the list of public mirrors:
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=13
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is there a way to coax several hosts behind the same caching proxy to
use the same URL as the 1st choice but still fail over and try others if
there is a problem? And preferably without having to manually edit
files on each machine or coordinate
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is there a way to coax several hosts behind the same caching proxy to
use the same URL as the 1st choice but still fail over and try others
if there is a problem? And preferably without having to manually
edit files on each machine or coordinate
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
My update to 5.2 fails on one machine because of this error:
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with
file from package AcronisAgentLinux-9.5.8076-1
file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with
Brian wrote:
On Sat, June 28, 2008 2:02 pm, AnneWilson wrote:
Just type 'yum' without parameters, to get a list of possibilities. I
think 'yum list' may be what you are looking for. (I don't have Fedora or
CentOS on this laptop so I can't check.)
No CentOS or Fedora ... is there any other
1 - 100 of 13379 matches
Mail list logo
