Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.6 - dhcp issue

these are not virtual machines? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.6 - dhcp issue

Tom Brown wrote on Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:40:21 +0100: Why should that make any difference? The conversations looked a bit like you had several clients with the same MAC in the LAN. This can happen if one copies existing config files. Also, I know there are cases where a DHCPOFFER (or any DHCP

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

Jim Perrin wrote on Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:16:54 -0400: Directory /change/this Jim, you forget that he's using .htaccess, the above cannot work there. He has to leave that out. Pam: if you can access the directory just fine this does *not* mean that you misconfigured your .htaccess file

Re: [CentOS] What is wrong with yum?

Olaf Mueller wrote on Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:14:35 +0200: Does yum sometimes forget it's release version? what is the version string in your centos-release file? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

Pam Astor wrote on Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:54:17 -0400: That you got a server error is good. Here are the last two log file entries for that httpd request: you want to look in the *error* log if you look for errors! I could not access the site, which means exactly what? ;-) Kai -- Kai

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org Pam Astor wrote on Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:03:16 -0400: Options not allowed here Please, by now you should know what this means, even after obstinately neglecting to look in the documentation. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at

Re: [CentOS] GUI

Hamood Iqbal wrote on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:11:12 -0400: yumex: /opt/zenoss/lib/libpng12.so.0: no version information available So what should i do? I remember someone posting about problems with Zenoss very recently. It seems I deleted those postings, but I think it was you. AFAIR, everyone

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

Les Mikesell wrote on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:39:24 -0500: But oddly enough, the documentation does say that the Options directive is permitted in .htaccess context: Yes, I was wondering about that myself, I think it is not correct. But None is not an Option, anyway. He/She should just remove

[CentOS] fdisk partition table plus sign

What does the plus sign after the blocks value exactly mean in the fdisk output? Some research reveals that it indicates that not all the blocks are included in the fdisk value. But what does this exactly mean? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

Re: [CentOS] fdisk partition table plus sign

William L. Maltby wrote on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:06:06 -0400: As to loss, maybe yes. When you allocate using multipliers, (10GB, 100MB, etc.) the bytes per cylinder is used as a divisor. This *may* leave some part of a cylinder unused at the end. With todays drive sizes, even anal me doesn't

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

Les Mikesell wrote on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:00:48 -0500: Isn't there an old joke that when the documentation and code differ they are probably both wrong? ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] fdisk partition table plus sign

thanks for the explanations, folks! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] dd backup of lv

Joseph L. Casale wrote on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:07:00 -0600: dd if=/dev/vgname/lvname of=/dir/name.img if you want to save space you could gzip/b2zip them dd if=/dev/vgname/lvname | gzip /dir/name.img.gz Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart network settings problem

Dean Plant wrote on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:28:34 +0100: #network --bootproto=static --device=eth0 --gateway=192.168.10.1 --nameserver=192.168.10.1 --netmask=255.255.255.0 --onboot=on network --bootproto=static are the first two lines a line that you tried and commented out and got broken in

Re: [CentOS] TCPWrappers + Sendmail = not working

Jeffrey Tadlock wrote on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:48:19 -0400: This means that sendmail is a valid option for hosts.allow or hosts.deny as sendmail has been compiled with support for libwrap. Sure. The point was that the poster expected tcpwrapper to take and process the connection and not

Re: [CentOS] DKMS

John wrote on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:52:03 -0400: But 75% don't know how to. All they know is they downloaded the cds. Took them a week to figure out how to make a bootable install disk. Then finally 24 hours to install the OS. Six hours to get on the Internet. Another 5 hours to setup email.

[CentOS] sendmail and cups gets installed although not chosen in kickstart file

I setup a kickstart file that contains only @core and several packages explicitely listed. postfix is listed, sendmail is not. And there's no package where I would think it needs cups. Nevertheless, after the install I now have postfix *and* sendmail on the machine and sendmail even being

Re: [CentOS] sendmail and cups gets installed although not chosen in kickstart file

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:24:21 +0200: cups gets pulled in by the redhat-lsb package which has /usr/bin/lpr as a requirement. It came in even after removing redhat-lsb. It stopped after using -- nobase. sendmail is in the core group. If you kickstart, you can say

Re: [CentOS] Linuxtag 2008 - call for meeting

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:04:09 +0200: Linuxtag 2008 in Berlin is coming closer by the minute (May 28th to May 31st 2008) I might have liked to help you out at the booth, but unfortunately I'm on vacation during that time. Have fun! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany

Re: [CentOS] case insensitive file system

Ruslan Sivak wrote on Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:29:25 -0400: And inside index.php it does something like ? include($_GET['page']..php) ? This is a gross simplification, but it's my understanding that if the file was named 'foo.php' and someone typed in

[CentOS] determining correct size for LV copy operations

I have some problems with copying LV volumes and determining correct size. For instance, if I want to copy an LV from one machine to another. I dd the LV to a file on the other machine, then dd the file to the new LV. That fails, because a few MB are missing. source: LV Name

Re: [CentOS] determining correct size for LV copy operations

John R Pierce wrote on Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:56:32 -0700: I'd probably use dump ... | restore ... to copy it, assuming its an e2fs/e3fs on that logical volume. then the volume sizes are immaterial. Well, these are mostly xen volumes with xvda. It's indeed the difference in physical extent.

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

*Have* you verified that you are not already on the latest kernel? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: Subject: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 07:28:10 -0500: Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 Ok. I just asked because you never mentioned you had actually checked. Just a kernel missing when you update is not proof ;-) I see that you have priority protections in place. Disable all your extra

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting failed drive.

Andrew @ ATM Logic wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 23:02:23 -0500: Anyhow I rebuilt a 2nd server, and tested and notice the same, even on a working systems I cannot mount the drives in another system?? It may help if you showed what you actually do. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your

Re: [CentOS] Watching Netflix movies on CentOS

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Sun, 4 May 2008 10:22:11 +0200: In other words: They don't want your money. If I were you, I'd respect that. Make yourself heard over at Netflix, though. I remember about the Netflix format from before 2000. It's a very low bandwidth format with really bad quality.

Re: [CentOS] Watching Netflix movies on CentOS

Morten Nilsen wrote on Sun, 04 May 2008 12:55:08 +0200: I believe there are two entirely separate things called netflix Yepp, must be so. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy

Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 14:57:05 -0700: VirtualHost www.tobyhouse.com:* this is very old-fashioned and unreliable syntax, use this instead: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html RedirectPermanent / http://cms.tobyhouse.com It sent ALL traffic over to the

Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy

Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 16:38:00 -0700: that's what I ended up doing...you took the first message in the thread I see. That message wasn't here when I wrote that. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] httpd reverse proxy

Les Mikesell wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 23:49:11 -0500: Its actually very useful to access backend hosts on private networks or to transparently spread the load across several machines. If you proxy it, not with a Redirect, yes. It seemed he wanted just a redirect. Kai -- Kai Schätzl,

Re: [CentOS] centOS xen domU kernel

David Hláèik wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 11:07:10 +0200: Hi, how can i make actual xen kernel to work under my domU virtual machines? There is nothing special. Just install CentOS host with virtualization support and then install your first DomU with virt-install or virt-manager. There's a

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 05:27:25 -0500: I just installed kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 again. Was that correct or not? As you removed it earlier, yes. There doesn't seem to be any dependancy for it. AFAIK it's not necessary for operation, anyway, it's only necessary if something has to

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

Michael Simpson wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 12:15:35 +0100: do you have any mention of the new kernel in /etc/grub.conf? Note, this is only a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf ! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 08:53:01 -0500: -rw--- 1 root root816 May 7 05:08 grub.conf got changed 5:08 today. Are you sure you booted after that? What does uname -a show now? default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,2)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS (2.6.18-53.1.14.el5)

Re: [CentOS] Irritant

Sam Drinkard wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 14:28:55 -0400: Is this perhaps caused by the wrong terminal setting in putty probably or is there something with Centos man pages that cause this to happen? works fine here. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet

Re: Subject: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

Mhr wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 09:53:23 -0700: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I have never found this particular man page to be bad enough not to consult when needed, even for the first time (like I did, lo these many eons ago, when it was even harder to read than now) and the effort

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 13:13:13 -0500: On compaq1300, I do *not* have the three boot options (original kernel, latest kernel and Windows XP). I have two (2) options, if I interrupt grub: (a) the original kernel (b) other, which is Windows XP Ok, that explains it. I bet you

Re: Subject: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

mail.gmail.com X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org Mhr wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 14:04:55 -0700: Not being familiar with 'locate,' I found its man page rather intimidating at first glance. I'll have to study it a little more carefully, but I should also note that I ran locate to find my kernel rpms

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500: Kai: I am not using Windows Boot Manager. Grub comes up, as on the 2 boxes, where things are working properly. Just to be sure, it's really grub? You get a somewhat blueish screen that says booting centos in x seconds, press any key to

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

wrote on Thu, 8 May 2008 09:39:15 -0500: Ah. This is where the problem on her box probably comes from! Last November, when I installed Windows XP, in English, my native language, I did not understand something in Microsoft's English. There were four (4) partitions for Windows (C,D,E,F) and

Re: [CentOS] OT, but just a quick question.

Jimmy Bradley wrote on Thu, 08 May 2008 23:27:38 -0500: And a crappy day to you too. This kind of reply is unacceptable, please stop it! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500: Mount it and have a look at that partition, does it contain the same stuff as your /boot partition? And this question? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 10:52:16 -0400: The proper location of the grub.conf is: /mnt/hda8/grub/grub.conf right, if that is the boot partition, there won't be a boot directory. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 10696956 4597688 5547128 46% / /dev/hda3

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

Sergio Belkin wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 23:07:20 -0300: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: even then please write a senseful subject next time! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___

Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box

[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org wrote on Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:21 -0500: LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 LV Size10.53 GB And the output of pvdisplay. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pvdisplay --- Physical volume --- PV Name

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 08:53:05 -0400: I thought Outlook does a pretty good job on references. It's okay if used standalone. You may have lost references because of the way you are connected to Exchange. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive

[CentOS] Change from gnome to KDE desktop

What's the best way to do this? Remove the yum group gnome (does this set default init to 3?), install the yum group KDE and then set default init to 5 again (as I assume installing KDE not during the setup will not automatically set the system to start the gui?). Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin,

Re: [CentOS] Change from gnome to KDE desktop

Mark Weaver wrote on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:30:46 -0400: unless there's a space issue on the machine you're talking about why not install the KDE group, run switchdesk in a terminal, set your default desktop to KDE and not even worry about removing Gnome. There are some dependency issues

Re: [CentOS] syslog - python

David Hláèik wrote on Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:12:13 +0200: so how can i relalize it? :) Probably not at all. You would have to redirect .err or .warn for a facility, but this would redirect all other input to that channel as well. You can change facilities for some applications, but I don't know if

Re: [CentOS] Help, PHP/Mysql connections are so slow.

Pro Green European wrote on Mon, 9 Jun 2008 03:37:33 -0700 (PDT): I also have the same identical site accessing the same database on the same mysql server, running on a CentOS4 server without any problem. How did you move the database? You moved from PHP4 to 5 and from MySQL4 to 5. You *have*

Re: [CentOS] iptables starting while disabled

Joseph L. Casale wrote on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:46:03 -0600: Somehow it gets turned on after a reboot, how can I deduce what is activating it? AFAIS iptables is active all the time in CentOS 5. Deactivating the service just means that queues are empty. Starting libvirtd and creating xen

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

Ray Leventhal wrote on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:48:22 -0400: increase in the log level produced lines like this in /var/log/maillog: Jun 9 09:28:51 gungho sendmail[13243]: m59DRxV2013243: gungho [172.16.0.106] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to smtp 172.16.0.106 is the

Re: [CentOS] iptables starting while disabled

Peter Farrell wrote on Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:33:15 +0100: By the way - what does 'AFAIS' stand for? In concordance with AFAIK: AFAI SEE ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

Ray Leventhal wrote on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:42:27 -0400: Do you think it's wise to replace the sendmail.cf and sendmail.mc files from the snapshot (after backing them up, of course)? If you did not change the files: no. As I said: go thru a manual send and check *where* the timeout occurs

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

Ray Leventhal wrote on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:02:43 -0400: I made that change you suggested in the webmin interface (sendmail.m4) and rebuilt it from there. You can m4 rebuild the sendmail.cf from the sendmail section in webmin? I wouldn't be to sure about that. I haven't ever noticed that

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:49:09 -0500: A 'make' is run when the sendmail init script starts that will rebuild sendmail.cf from sendmail.mc if it is newer, and all the databases if their corresponding text file is newer. I was aware about the latter, not the former. You are

Re: RE: [CentOS] Confirming grub installati on

Bowie Bailey wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:19:34 -0400: I'm looking for a way to determine whether grub is installed on a drive WITHOUT having to actually attempt to boot from it. If I redo the installation, then I can be sure it's installed, but if it's already there, I'd rather leave it

Re: [CentOS] Help!

Sam Drinkard wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:33:39 -0400: Please, use subjects that make sense! And as a general hint, it's really not good style to lament about missing dependencies with telling more. The files are coming from sourceforge Please elaborate. There are several repo's that have

Re: [CentOS] Help!

Sam Drinkard wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:20:24 -0400: As I said: you are mixing repo's: rf=rpmforge, kb=Karanbir Singh (dag = rpmforge) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___

Re: [CentOS] Help!

Sam Drinkard wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:23:05 -0400: Anyhow, it works well if I don't try to update the machine Your problem comes probably from mixing repos. As I said: read back on the list, has been discussed here already several times this spring/summer. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin,

Re: [CentOS] Help!

Sam Drinkard wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:57:20 -0400: How do I make sure all the stuff comes from rpmforge and not somewhere else? By using the priorities plugin, make kbs a lower priority or just disable it. or at least from what I see on the screen says it all came from rpmforge.

Re: [CentOS] Newer GNOME than base release

Mhr wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:48:05 -0700: I have trouble believing that the ONLY ways to get a newer GNOME are to wait for CentOS 6, run a different distro (not likely) or build it myself. This is Linux, after all, isn't it? If you do not need CentOS for the reasons that most here use it

Re: [CentOS] Newer GNOME than base release

Mhr wrote on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:24:07 -0700: Heh, heh, as in, don't let the door hit you on the way out? :-} No, I meant it in a friendly way. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [Fwd: [CentOS] School Server Setup]

Matt Hyclak wrote on Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:18:25 -0400: Not to pick nits, but in Columbus, OH, USA the fire trucks are (or were) all an awful shade of fluorescent yellow :-) I'm sure that's why he wrote *favorite* color ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive

Re: [CentOS] Reg. setting Domain name on Cento 5 pc

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:39:44 +0530: /etc/sysconfig/network sure, this would help? I think his problem results from the fact that he's using a domain name as the hostname. Use a real hostname like hostname.sipx.com as the hostname and your problem will be gone. Kai

Re: {Phishing} {Disarmed} [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

Rob Townley wrote on Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:57:05 -0500: Why do distributions put in very old versions of Firefox - 1.5 when 2.0 has been out for a year or more and 3.0 was just released. Because at *that time* when the distribution was finalized it seemed to be the best decision and a newer

[CentOS] updating to 5.2 from local repo

This is my first major version update after using a local repo. It seems that before I can yum update I have to fetch the complete new 5.2 base? Is this correct? When I run yum update it now fails with various strange dependency errors although all the updates are synced. When I change to using

Re: [CentOS] updating to 5.2 from local repo

Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:37:32 -0400: You can build your base repo from the iso images via Nautilus. Well, I don't have the iso here ;-) I install via http from local repos since 5.1 came out. But I didn't sync base since then as it wasn't necessary (nothing's going to

[CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

I'm having a bit of a problem with what I can see over nfs. I have two machines that nfs their root to each other and it seems to work. However, I now found out that some of the root directories that are listed are fake ones. A comparison of the root on both machines shows that some directories

Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

Jason Pyeron wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:42:40 -0400: This option is based on the option of the same name provided in IRIX NFS. Normally, if a server exports two filesystems one of which is mounted on the other, then the client will have to mount both filesystems explicitly to get access to

Re: [CentOS] updating to 5.2 from local repo

Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:24:23 +0200: Once my base sync is finished I'm gonna clean again and then try the update again. Dependency resolution works now, but I hold with upgrading until I get some feedback from people who updated (hopefully) fine with Xen 3.2 installed

Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

Jason Pyeron wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:16:51 -0400: This is what I did. Ok, I finally got it right. - you have to *export* all filesystems that should be usable (not just /) - you have to nohide each single one of them then you can mount hostname:/ and get all the other remote mount points

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 Install - lvcreate failed for ...

Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:39:06 -0400: Any idea on what the real error is, how to find out more, what to try next? It did take me a bit to walk through the packet selection. Anaconda doesn't have good error handling, so it likes to bomb out when doing complex custom

Re: [CentOS] is centos update safe

William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:48:48 -0400: 2. yum upgrade # not update that's supposed to be the same. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] is centos update safe

You are right, there is a difference: upgrade Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set. See update for more details. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

Jason Pyeron wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:03:49 -0400: Any ideas what the dangerous inode confusion is about? Is it relevant today? I have no idea. I think the proposed problem is that the client doesn't know that it's traversing filesystems, so, the same inode number on filesystem / and /b

Re: [CentOS] Missing update announcements for C4 i386 / x86_64

Johnny Hughes wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:41:56 -0500: but I can only work 24 hours a day then you are still ahead of most of us ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___

Re: [CentOS] is centos update safe

Mogens Kjaer wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:55:58 +0200: The yum.conf file will have this line unless manually removed And you are right, too :-) William mentioned the config file, btw, he just didn't mention the flag. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet

Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:54:56 -0400: I don't understand your talk about fake directories. They are not fake, they truly exist in the filesystem. They are nevertheless fake. Consider the following: - system A has mount points / and /home - system B nfs mounts / on A without

Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:00:45 -0400: Again, it's not fake, it's not artificial. It's both, really. artificial = it doesn't exist before the first nfs mount fake = from the remote machine it's an imitation of the real /home filesystem on the other machine. It looks like /home,

Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine

Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:46:43 -0400: It should only be used if you know how it works and what you are doing. Isn't that right for everything? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Clamd not working

Anne Wilson wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:43:06 +0100: I'm guessing that daily.cld main.cld and mirrors.dat are being sought somewhere other than /var/clamav. did you test if clamscan works? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

[CentOS] chkconfig update fails

My update to 5.2 fails on one machine because of this error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with file from package AcronisAgentLinux-9.5.8076-1 file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with file from package

Re: [CentOS] chkconfig update fails

Shade-GE wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:50:15 +0200: I had similar problems, the only way i found out quick and dirty was to remove the acronis packages and install it again after yum finished. Doesn't the removal create dependency problems as it should try to remove /etc/init.d? I forced the

Re: [CentOS] chkconfig update fails

Johnny Hughes wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:58:49 -0500: Install that single file via rpm with force? rpm -Uvh --force pkg_name That's what I was asking ;-) have done so in the meantime after I had confirmed that yum really doesn't have it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web

Re: [CentOS] Kernel - pata_via

Grzesiek wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:21:14 +0200: Why standard Centos 5.2 kernel does not have a module pata_via. I have an old motherboard and IDE drive. FYI: I just upgraded a machine with old motherboard (VIA KT400 chipset), Athlon XP and IDE drives with no problems and no pata_via driver

[CentOS] New yum search behavior is awful/useless

Anyone already tried yum search after the 5.2 upgrade? yum search perl-MIME-tools skipped some stuff perl-MIME-tools.noarch : Perl modules for parsing (and creating!) MIME entities perl-MIME-tools.noarch : Perl modules for parsing (and creating!) MIME entities perl-MIME-tools.noarch : Perl

Re: [CentOS] New yum search behavior is awful/useless

AnneWilson wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:02:02 +0100: I think 'yum list' may be what you are looking for. It's close, but lacks functionality that search had. You have to enable showdupesfromrepos=1 and even then you get not all info: yum list perl-MIME-tools Installed Packages

Re: [CentOS] New yum search behavior is awful/useless

Brian wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:48:09 -0400 (EDT): yum provides how does this provide any old functionality of search? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] spam filtering with centos 5.2

John R Pierce wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:59:38 -0700: In the past I've used a combination of spamhaus combined RBL's and Spamassassin with Mailscanner as my spam recipe, but this stopped working very well for me well over a year ago. How come? I have several MailScanner machines with

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail with Google Apps SMTP

AnneWilson wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:04:53 +0100: I use sendmail.postfix, simply setting KMail with the settings listed in http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78799. Doesn't that supply what you want? He wants to use sendmail with Google as a smarthost, you are not using

Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages

Sorin Srbu wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:37 +0200: I use Gmail too. What is it that Gmail does that might cause this behaviour?? They probably skip duplicate message-ids. Some mail clients allow this to be configurable, maybe there's an option at Gmail as well? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin,

[CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

The upgrade to 5.2 creates /etc/pam.d/system-auth.rpmnew. I see that /etc/pam.d/system-auth actually is a symlink to system-auth-ac. Is it recommended to replace that symlink with the rpmnew file? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

William L. Maltby wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:09:17 -0400: IMO, it's never OK w/o first examining the effects. The rpmnew is provided specifically because replacing the previous one may be highly destructive to the aims of that system's users/admins. I've not looked, but I suspect the

Re: [CentOS] system-auth.rpmnew

Toby Bluhm wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:54:29 -0400: rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/pam.d/system-auth pam-0.99.6.2-3.27.el5 rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac authconfig-5.3.21-3.el5 So, possible conclusion: they want to make pam self-sufficient, thus replacing the symlink to a

Re: [CentOS] Problem with Sendmail + Apache

Daniel Bruno wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:01:06 -0400: and in other server works fine with the permissions 770. Probably, on that other server you don't have a web application that wants to access the local client queue directly. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at

Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

Next time you want to present such a massive amount of logs put them up on the web and warn people ;-) Thanks. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.co ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] INIT 5 and system is gone

You do realize that it's almost impossible to recognize what it is that you answered? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] INIT 5 and system is gone

Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:54:11 -0400: Is this formatted better? Were you referring to my remark about unreadability? I replied to John. Your's are always good to read, although you could trim a bit ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >