be in order for a
server, it all depends on your individual needs, it's just that on a
server I don't automatically create a massive /home like I would on a
desktop.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
had in mind when I added
the 2nd paragraph to my comment (that you snipped).
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.
You can thank Fedora for making that rather pointless change and
breaking that capability.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
This should work.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
other partitions you explicitly don't
want wiped) are not selected for formatting. The installer will take
care of the rest.
Make sure you are backed up just in case you muck things up, but it
shouldn't be an issue.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
does not match metalink for epel
EPEL is having network problems right now. A workaround is to comment
out mirrorlist in /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo and add a baseurl line
pointing to a known good mirror.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 06/15/2015 03:54 PM, Peter wrote:
On 06/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Does anyone have a working rpm of mpv for rhel6 or centos6?
Would appreciate a download link.
No, but it's in Fedora so rebuilding it for CentOS should be pretty easy.
I should clarify, it's in RPMFusion for Fedora
/repos.html
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 06/15/2015 03:17 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Does anyone have a working rpm of mpv for rhel6 or centos6?
Would appreciate a download link.
No, but it's in Fedora so rebuilding it for CentOS should be pretty easy.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On 06/15/2015 04:24 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Problem with the nux repo is that it really screws
up dependencies for other packages that depend on
slightly older versions and so I have enough headaches
as it is :)
Can you be more specific? I haven't had issues with nux.
Peter
of time or gracefully shutdown the server in the event of a
power failure, it simply protects the write cache on your RAID.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
are security-conscious enough to want a 3 day password expire?
Do yourself a favor and yum update, that will help you to secure your
system way better than your password policy.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
HVM?
The CentOS 7 stock kernel is Xen PV enabled.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
in the CentOS CR repository and will be released when
CentOS 6.7 drops soon. If you want it now then just enable cr and
you'll get it with yum update:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On 07/30/2015 07:13 AM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote:
BTW do you have any news about the CentOS 7 32-bit, discussed some time
around CentOS 7 release?
Yes, there's a beta out for the past month or so:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html
Peter
On 07/30/2015 11:20 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I'm pretty sure that I posted this back when the beta was announced, but
it seems to work just fine on my fanless VIA C7 firewall/router/proxy/
IPA/CUPS/Asterisk box. I've been waiting impatiently for this to go GA
ever since, so I can start
On 07/28/2015 08:42 PM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
And that 1 important above is quite important. See RHSA-2015-1482
(CVE-2015-3245, CVE-2015-3246) pkg libuser: local root with exploit in
the wild.
(as a side note c5 is also affected but no update exists or is planned
afaict).
For CentOS 5
a feature
than nothing at all.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
precedence once it is released.
CentOS is, in as much as is reasonably possible, a clone of RHEL, but it
cannot be an exact duplicate of all the packages.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
source code with the fewest changes possible to meet the
trademark/branding requirements as the goal.
Fair enough, clone is a bad word in this regard. Rebuild is
definitely a much better word.
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVwt30AAoJEAUijw0EjkDvkvwH/j9
ps://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/index.html, that should tell you
everything you need to know.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Remove index.html, add centos-noindex.tar.gz
- change vstring
- change symlink for poweredby.png
- update welcome.conf with proper aliases
...
Note that it is possible for there to be changes that aren't listed in
the changelog, nobody's perfect. If you want to know for sure exac
ver understood how a
commercial business would not only voluntarily put themselves into
such a position but often times want to seek it out over the freedom
that FOSS offers. Anyways, the vendor is also free to support
whatever OS they want, and you're free to choose not to use their
software.
before the reach the company
firewall and get dropped, that means configuring each box though so it
may be easier to get your IT admin to make the change to the company
firewall, or he may refuse in which case you're left with the local
option at least.
permissions etc on the .ssh directory on the
remote machine.
So you're re-inventing ssh-copy-id?
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
the Host: line)
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
blacklist.
That could work better, but I would still say be careful, you could
certainly end up wih false positives doing this.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 09/07/2015 02:32 PM, Robin Lee wrote:
> Can you re-paste this cfg? The url is outdated.
I'll paste mine in here for posterity (altered to remove my private
repos, and personal info, etc):
config_opts['root'] = 'epel-7-i386'
config_opts['target_arch'] = 'i686'
config_opts['legal_host_arches']
prompting for a password.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-y update" commands.
>
> epel needs to fix that package, probably.
They did, as of yesterday (when I ran into the same problem) I found it
in koji, build completed, waiting to be placed into -testing. I
installed it directly from the koji link and it solved the issue:
http://koji.fedorapr
and data over testing as you go.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and run something that is supported and not full of major
security holes.
If you choose to run something years out of date such as CentOS 3,
regardless of the reason, you are quite on your own, it is already
broken and you get to keep the pieces.
Peter
___
ean
contacts with a pencil eraser, just re-seat the boards and they'll
make contact again.
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWnYXFAAoJEAUijw0EjkDv+4EH/0wbRnoM9KePC0UUhViIdFZ1
cpaVvNqre+zVd6qBhnzbcPT+lXINHZ5Mm/Rw0tcBqx8nYzYab5qS5hTRaZOTm6H/
aX
are live DVD,
please note that CentOS also offers live DVD images which are 1.2 and
1.7G for GNOME and KDE respectively (for CentOS 7). The installation
DVD not only contains *both* GNOME and KDE (each live DVD image only
contains one of these), but also other programs that are not on the live
ireFox, etc).
> Isint it too huge for an OS ?
ummmm, no?
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ages from Fedora rawhide
which have a 2015 version.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
expected to update your
entire system, not to do so will leave you with an unsupported system.
Also there will be other packages as well that have security issues that
need updating.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.or
e advice for an alternative setup
>of greylisting for postfix on CentOS 6?
Postgrey is largely obsoleted by postscreen which comes with postfix
versions 2.8 and up. You can get the latest postfix (including
postscreen) for CentOS 6 from GhettoForge (www.ghettoforge.org).
Peter
signat
On 17/05/16 17:51, jd1008 wrote:
> I installed the nux repo just now. I ran
>
> yum -y install mplayer-common-1.1-33.20150505svn.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm
> mplayer-1.2-92_snap20130920.el7.x86_64.rpm
...
This is insane, just do: yum install smpl
to build it, but IIRC he had to stop
for reasons that you can find by searching this mailing list.
Note that I'm personally not interested in getting chrome to work for
CentOS 6, but I have a vested interest in keeping it working in 7, so
when the time comes
On 08/05/16 01:53, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 07/05/2016 14:57, Peter a écrit :
>> Rather than remove them and add them back use yum shell to just remove
>> the packages not in base or core:
>>
>> yum shell
>> remove *
>> install kernel @core @base
>&
ssing culprit(s) must have been somewhere in the "Base" package
> group, or at least a dependency to one or more of its packages.
Rather than remove them and add them back use yum shell to just remove
the packages not in base or core:
yum shel
nyone have any ideas?
That's a hardware RAID controller, so it won't (by default) see single
drives and pass them directly to the OS like a normal disk controller
would. You need to go into the RAID config (you should see an option to
do this at boot) and configure a RAID with a singl
one from a similar rpm to use as a template makes this much easier.
Other than that I highly recommend mock, which you can get from the EPEL
repository. Google for "fedora mock" for more info about mock.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
repos you'll want as well, such as epel and nux.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ld
go all the way and max it out.
I would also recommend that you go for a light weight DM such as XFCE
which you can install from EPEL, this will help a fair bit on that older
hardware with the performance as opposed to gnome 3.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing li
an you let us know when it's finished building? I am very interested
in this.
Thanks,
Peter Ajamian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ey retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read
> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6
You incorrectly attempted to install epel already and it's interfering.
Try this:
yum --disablerepo=epel --enablerepo=extras install epel-release
Peter
_
On 12/08/16 13:51, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
> now, what is command to install nux-dextop?
https://li.nux.ro/repos.html
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
are simply broken in that model.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
s based on a RHEL6 kernel (and
I'd guess it was) then it's affected.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 14/08/16 01:43, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> as Ned has already explained the version of Postfix on CentOS 6 will
> most certainly stay what it is. If you want to use a more current
> release then consider switching to Potfix 3.1 provided by the
> ghettoforge repository. Peter who is
iles on 6 / no need to upstart job files on 7.
%if 0%{?rhel} > 6
# Stuff for CentOS 7 here
%else
# Stuff for CentOS 6 here
%endif
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ix comes with it's own lda (local(8)) which
fills this role. It is true that it can use a 3rd party lda but it is
not necessary.
To the OP:
Set: "home_mailbox = Maildir/" in main.cf.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ildir format (which is likely what you want), if you would rather
that local(8) deliver in mbox format then omit the trailing slash.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
that were posted.
your log from earlier showed it working, it would normally be delivered
to the default location of /var/mail.
You asked how to get it to show up in ~/Maildir. That requires you set
the home_mailbox setting as I previously stated.
Peter
__
ally need to build to the lowest common
denominator. What you seem to want is just the opposite, so short story
is that it's bad planning to build to such a new version of glibc.
You're not going to get around this, it just won't work.
Peter
___
CentOS m
On 01/09/16 17:33, Sidharth Sharma wrote:
> When we can expect Security Update for Perl Vulnerability CVE-2016-1238 on
> CentOS 6.8 and 7.2?
I came up with a mitigation here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355695#c21
Peter
___
get it from the CentOS Plus Repository:
Thanks so much Johnny!
Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
equiring a different build host for each.
This is what many (if not most) projects use to build for CentOS.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
a DNS issue and
turning off DNS for ssh is just masking the real problem. I prefer to
leave DNS on for ssh as it's a good indicator for me of when I have to
fix something.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
d by yum.
The old 32 bit version in the Nux repo won't be working for much longer
as skype is changing it's protocols. There is a new 64 bit alpha
version you can get directly from skype that works:
https://repo.skype.com/https://repo.skype.com/
The instructions for
ce install skypeforlinux. I would only recommend this just to
test the package out before trying 1 or 2 above.
Personally I would try force installing the package first (yuk) and see
if it works. If it does then I would do (2) above so that updates would
install without
affected
It is mentioned because RHEL4 is in extended life phase, so not EOL yet.
CentOS 4 is EOL as CentOS does not track the extended life phase of Red Hat.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
oing this:
Don't use nslookup:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160304065708/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/nslookup-flaws.html
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dns.bind/msg/6de73c9eaa37137f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dns.bind/msg/39ffce8e8
l and Microsoft. I
highly doubt that Microsoft would make such a collaboration with CentOS.
There is a minute possibility that it could happen with Red Hat.
Please note that Ubuntu on Windows is *not* Linux.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
he latest version is currently in the gf-testing repo,
it should be pushed out to gf-plus in a day or two.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 24/12/16 16:11, geo.inbox.ignored wrote:
> any hints beyond what is there?
yum install yum-utils
show-installed -f kickstart
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
you can quite
literally copy and paste the output into your kickstart file.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ClamAV with Postfix?
There are many guides online that tell you how to do this.
> Are there migration guides for moving one's Sendmail anti-spam and AV
> configurations to Postfix?
Let me google that for you:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sendmail+to+postfix
Peter
__
you won't find in Sendmail and you may find that
alone is worth the switch.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
xed
> 11 years ago in Postfix 2.2.11 and later.
2.10.1 is way later than 2.2.11, this bug was never in any version of
postfix that shipped after CentOS 4.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
This is great, thank you very much!
Did you make it parallel-installable to the 64 bit wine from epel?
Peter
On 09/10/17 07:43, Richard Grainger wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
>
> https://harbottle.gitlab.i
was looking for answers to the GLIBCXX dependency
issue. It looks like the skype-stable repo just got updated to 8.11.0
which fixes both the dependency issue and the crackling one.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
you'll
need to move any scripts you put inside it to /etc/rc.d.init.d. The
damage you're seeing here is because they have somehow become separate
directories on the server.
> But, right now, the box is stable for what it will be doing,
I would not call that stable, I can just ab
gt;
> Sadly, no one from M$/Skype team bothered to point us in the right
> direction.
I'm impressed that they listened at all.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
You are much better off getting the skype from the insider
channel which was built without the newer library requirements. After
installing it you can disable the insider repo and then you'll get newer
updates from the stable repo instead (which should hopefully work in the
future).
Pe
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
> There's the unstable version that installs and works:
> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer
GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand?
sion of openssh. I assume this is by
> mistake, but please correct me if I am wrong.
os contains all the latest patches up to the 6.9 point release. It does
*not* contain package updates that have been released *after* 6.9. for
those you need to loo
install will pull the
most recent package from either os or updates. In the case where there
was not any updated package since the point release the most recent
package will be in os, otherwise it will be in updates.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
ce to process and send the
message, then break out of the tail command and copy/paste the output
into your reply.
Then also copy and paste the output of the following:
$ postconf -nf; postconf -Mf
If I need any more info after that I'll let you know.
Peter
_
see what happens next. I am not so much of a
dovecot expert myself (I use it but I don't know it in as much detail as
I know postfix, for example). I would suggest posting to the dovecot
mailing list, or you can join the freenode IRC network and ask in the
#dovecot channel where you should get some relevant help.
Good Luck,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
e postfix
local(8) delivery agent, but you have postfix configured to use dovecot
so this setting does not actually do anything.
> Still can't login to roundcube.
Check roundcube settings, check dovecot logs. See my previous email for
where to get more help with dovecot.
Peter
__
I don't think this checks selinux contexts, but it should find any other
permissions issues.
You can fix by re-installing postfix:
yum reinstall postfix\*
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
use linuxefi and initrdefi you need
a kernel that is new enough to have efi support. If you have an older
kernel (such as that which comes with CentOS 6) then you need to use
linux16 and initrd16.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
shown here this is a package from a
3rd-party repo, and as such is not supported by the CentOS project. If
Nux can't help you then I suggest you look for the package elsewhere or
try to (properly) build it yourself. Unfortunately neither of these
options is supported here.
Peter
___
the
brother website, but my experience with them have been exemplary. My
current printer is an MFC-J4620DW and I wouldn't trade it for the world.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
shouldn't work in KDE as well, it will just
pull a few of the XFCE libraries when you install it.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
older versions of CentOS but none between CentOS 6 and 7.
So in summary, it would probably work just fine, but I wouldn't do it,
recommend it or support it.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
Libreoffice RPMs for any version
other than what is stated above.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ee the following for additional info:
perldoc -f -X
perldoc filetest
access(2)
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
the baseurl lines,
then try the update again.
Later on you should try changing them back, but it appears as if for now
at least you're having issues downloading the metalink file.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org
tory: epel/x86_64. Please verify its path
and try again
I would try this:
yum clean all
yum --disablerepo=epel update
yum --disablerepo=epel --enablerepo=extras reinstall epel-release
yum update
If that doesn't work show the complete output from the above commands
and we'll go from there
and slow the system to a crawl.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
JS and will not run or display correctly without it.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
or KDE.
2. Run out and buy more RAM. Max your system out at 4G or 8G or
whatever it will take. You will need it and appreciate it.
Good Luck,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 21/09/19 10:15 PM, Peter wrote:
On 21/09/19 1:25 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote:
Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is
the default choice?
I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore.
Correct
where Red Hat has dropped
the ball. Sendmail is available for el8 from epel.
That said, there is nothing wrong with switching to postfix if that's
what you want, postfix is an excellent MTA. It's just that if you want
to continue with sendmail then epel provides a solution for you.
Peter
d additional processing specifically from postfix after
amavisd-new, that is.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and MUAs connecting on the same ports to the same services. Then you
can write separate smtpd_*_restrictions in master.cf for submission and
submissions that don't include things such as reject_unknown_helo_hostname.
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
101 - 200 of 1058 matches
Mail list logo
