If you want to go deeper into zfs, Jeff Bonwick's blog has a lot of different
articles about it
http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/category/ZFS
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I will be out of the office starting 2007-12-21 and will not return until
2008-01-07.
If you have any questions or technical issues please contact the support at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or call +46-(0)413-19280.
Cheers,
//Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
I have been running Centos 4.5 on one of my servers and have a custom
kernel to handle some hardware issues. Is there a kernel version change
included in the 4.6 update? If so, what version?
Thanks,
--peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 7:17 AM, Peter Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been running Centos 4.5 on one of my servers and have a custom
kernel to handle some hardware issues.
Wonder what hardware issues...
I had an Nforce mb with onboard NIC that wasn't working at Gigabit
Problem is I want a REAL router/firewall with little work.
Run a smoothwall installtion and replace your CentOS install.
http://www.smoothwall.org/
-Peter
On 31/12/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 12:13 AM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well FWbuilder
one it will probably burn out.
http://www.playtool.com/pages/psurailhistory/rails.html
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
)
Is anytone else with CentOS 5 experiencing this kind of problems?
Should I try downgrading?
Regards,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Jan 5, 2008 6:48 PM, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a yum update my two guests that had been shutdown do not start
any more. I have two other guests running that seem to work okay but I
am now afraid that they won't come up again if I restart them.
I solved my problem
.
What would you recommend? What is the best practice for doing that?
Unfortunately SAN and NAS are not really an option due to some financial
restructions. I'm thinking SMB...? Would that work?
Thank you
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
to leave it loaded and ignore
the error (I'd actually call it a warning). If the functionality is very
important to your then you might want to do as EDAC suggests and investigate
BIOS upgrades (or just have a look at the relevant BIOS settings).
/Peter
Please advice on what to do next?
Thank you
mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc
This part lists all the features of the CPU and the one that means x86_64 is
callled lm (long-mode). This Semperon CPU should not be able to run an
x86_64 linux dist.
/Peter
signature.asc
addressing, you're just
slowing the system down, making it deal with larger addresses for no
benefit.
Not quite true either, x86_64 brings with it, for example, more registers.
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
either
multiple replicas (probably not what you want) or a storage system that can
do cheap snapshots and keep a weeks worth of daily snapshots alive.
Good luck,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS
that gave me 2TB volume
group. Googling around it looks like there is 2TB limit and there should be
some kernel parameters to tweak but I still can't get a clear answer.
Thanks
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
Hi -
It was recommended to me on the Fedora list that I consider upgrading to
CentOS 5 from my present FC5 - the machine is used only as a light-duty
CLI-only server. I have a couple of quick questions in that regard:
1. Is now a bad time to install CentOS 5, what with the root exploit out
Garrick Staples wrote:
I guess this implies that you don't currently have a regular backup system in
place?
When you say load, you mean a giant 'cp'? That technically works, but is not
the ideal. When you mount it in the new install, you'll find a bunch of broken
uid/gids. Best is an archive
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Peter Blajev wrote:
...
- fdisk creates partitions up to 2.1TB in size. Use parted instead.
The difference is not fdisk vs. parted. It's MSDOS-MBR vs. GPT (different
types of partition tables). But since fdisk doesn't support GPT you'll have
to use parted. Note
to the point that you SHOULD NEVER use fedora RPMS
directly on CentOS.
I completely agree and would just like to add that what you _should_ be
looking for when repo/rpm-hunting is rpms/repos for el5. Repos don't provides
different builds for different el-clones...
/Peter
If you really want
in as root into your box and figure it
out for you. :)
That was the dumbest piece of advice so far.
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
that it thinks the machine is an i586
(or atleast not i686).
/Peter
Can you include the output of these commands:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
# yum list installed '*yum*'
# cat /etc/yum.conf
# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
checksums and signatures:
$ rpm --checksig perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm
perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
/Peter
Suggestions welcome.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
yourself a lot of trouble by just using Solaris 9 as the
model for pre-10 Solaris.
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
it quick and stable. (but I tend to only view
text based reports) I haven't used evince on my setup but I have used
kpdf remotely with no issues as well.
-Peter
-Cardiff - UK
On 14/03/2008, Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William L. Maltby a écrit :
Is there an alternative?
I use
).
Also, these counters are wrapping counters (32-bit on i386 (wraps every now
and then), 64-bit on x86_64 (never wraps)).
/Peter
, so won't match exactly
to a file length. Not an expert explanation, but adequate, I think :-)
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
have that much bandwidth, you will anyway end up running a
lot of things in parallel.
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
way to deal with this?
SSH question. Can I setup a group of users who can access SSH from the
local network. Then a separate list of users that can access SSH from
the internet?
Yes, see /etc/security/access.conf (it's well commented).
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
-$(uname -r)). grep for 4KSTACK. If it's not set it's 8K
(afaik).
/Peter
Thanks for your help.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Monday 07 April 2008, Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 07/04/2008, Peter Kjellstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way I know of is to look at your kernels .config (typicall found
at /boot/config-$(uname -r)). grep for 4KSTACK. If it's not set it's 8K
(afaik).
Correct. For example
, in place, etc.).
For example rsync functions.
It won't work automatically anymore in cron if we use passphrase.
Then please do use a restricted key. More specifically, add the key to the
authorized_keys with restrictions (see man pages)
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Peter Kjellstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Clint Dilks wrote:
1. Currently all of the key pairs we are using have empty passphrases
is it worth the effort of changing
(with lots of disclaimers
not to use it outside of testing...).
/Peter
1. Can I have that feature on the other CentOS 5 machines too?
The machine in question has yum version 3.2.27-12.el5_from_el6
while all others have version 3.2.22-39.el5.centos.
Where did that el5_from_el6 version come from
what you could gain is maybe another 512 byte in
swapspace by adding -f.
You could write a meg of zeroes to the device first and see if the mkswap
warning goes away.
/Peter
(If that matters, the swap is intended for a virtual machine, and
the host where I am using mkswap is a CentOS-6 server
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13.20.01 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13.41.53 Philippe Naudin wrote:
Hello,
I am confused by a warning from mkswap :
When making a swap on a LVM volume, I see the following warning :
mkswap: /dev/vg_SDB1
, it
could have excluded lvm-devices from its list...).
If you want to get to the bottom of this I suspect the easiest way is to look
at the mkswap source code (under which circumstances it prints that message).
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
://iuscommunity.org/Docs/ClientUsageGuide#Upgrading_Stock_RHEL_Packages_to_IUS_Packages
I am running their php 5.2 on one of my centos5 servers without no
probs. I upgraded from the php in the testing repo.
Best,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
).
I can also add that I've successfully managed to shrink ext3 before but a
verified backup is probably good advice..
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On Tuesday 20 March 2012 10.25.38 Markus Falb wrote:
On 19.3.2012 10:14, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Sunday 18 March 2012 19.40.21 Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Markus Falb wrote:
What filesystem? Assuming ext3, this cannot shrunk without unmounting.
I
to be backed up.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
anything else, set up proper incoming and outgoing IPv6 port
filtering rules on your perimeter routers. It will save you a hell of a
headache.
Peter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAk93AW4ACgkQ+8TW1Xhd1gcs
address are. So there is a static address that you can put into your DNS
and configure on your firewall.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
, that's as is *should* be, and most of the time it is).
Everything else is up to you and how the software you use binds to outgoing
addresses and lets you specify it.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
Or you assign the rule to the interface, rather than the address.
Nothing new, that is how firewalls work on DHCP clients today.
that will be pretty difficult on the perimeter router ...
Best regards,
Peter.
-BEGIN PGP
are fairly old and not on the latest
firmware level.
Best regards,
Peter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAk95e5YACgkQ+8TW1Xhd1geRyACeKimmjPrrrYtSee/wNJmLP1NZ
k9gAoI8yGvEeVmfjXtqeEqMHx6PfrTUv
=kus4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
Typically the routing table does a lot of work. Much like 127.0.0.0/8
the mask of a link-local will make it unprefered by 'public' traffic.
There is also a syntax for specifying the outbound interface for
traffic.
Routing tables
to
using a proxy.
If you're interested, RFC4864 expands on some of the aspects of IPv4/NAT vs.
IPv6: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4864
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
are generated, anything less than /64 (except, in rare
circumstances, /128) is just bull.
You might want to rethink the /64 concept!
I think you might want to rethink the choice of your provider.
Bests,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
on the external interface because
of single-address restrictions on the external server. I'd say, either don't do
it (filter on /64 instead), or remove all addreesses but the one required from
the external interface and let routing tables handle the rest.
Bests,
Peter
,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
(either something
else went wrong or nothing really went wrong). In my experience hardware fault
error messages are quite unreliable and at the end of the day DIMMs are
magnitudes more likely to fail than CPUs...
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
install /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
/listinfo/centos
Bye,
Peter
--
Peter Hopfgartner
web : http://www.r3-gis.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
under CentOS5. For CentOS6 the
situation is a bit more problematic, as RH switched to KVM and left
Xen behind.
Best,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.
But if KVM would offer improvements for performance over Xen, I should
perhaps try it out, as sometimes when doing backups and other things
that require a lot of disk I/O a better performance could be wished
for...
Regards,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
. For desktops I've been happy with
Parallels and VirtualBox.
But from comments it sounds like KVM is maturing and I should perhaps
give it a try.
Regards,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
remove the kmod-bnx2 package
from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal kernel
package.
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 15.56.09 Lars Hecking wrote:
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 16.05.26 Ned Slider wrote:
On 24/04/12 15:56, Lars Hecking wrote:
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
...
bnx2: Can't load firmware file bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw
This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which
.
For that to happen, I need to exclude kmod-cnic as well or the bnx2 rpm
gets pulled in anyway.
Interesting, are you saying that any standard install package selection
includes these updated drivers?
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wednesday 25 April 2012 12.48.43 Lars Hecking wrote:
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
On Wednesday 25 April 2012 10.53.46 Lars Hecking wrote:
...
yum remove kmod-bnx2 is suggested way to remove packages in a
dependency-
aware way.
Slightly different situation here - I'm
in lots of
legitimate mail being blocked, because SPF is by no means ubiquitous.
You can set up your mail server to block mail if the SPF record suggests it,
but I would never filter mail originating from domains having no SPF record at
all.
Best regards,
Peter
using
your address to send mail. So it's not futile at all, it's just not planned to
be used the way you intend to do it.
Which SPF implementation are you using? And on which CentOS release?
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
fix:
$ yumdownloader httpd (yumdownloader is in the yum-utils pkg)
$ rpm -qp --changelog httpd*.rpm | less (search for your CVE)
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
) may be the best idea (but
requires more work).
/Peter
If I sync the repositories for eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 separately in
Spacewalk and only allow access to the ones I want to give access to,
would that work ?
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thursday 10 May 2012 03.58.17 Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update
either in core centos 6 or epel. Where did it go?
Look at the resource-agents SPEC file, the ldirectord is not built
anymore. Some tweaking in the SPEC will give you the package back.
However, upstream (RH) has decided to not support ldirectord any more.
Regards,
Peter
Am Wed, 16 May 2012 15:06:15 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn:
On 05/16/2012 08:52 AM, Peter Hinse wrote:
Am Tue, 15 May 2012 21:11:00 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn:
I'm looking for the ldirectord package but can't find it. Previously
this was available as heartbeat-ldirectord
on what you are connecting to.
You are now done.
Good luck,
-pete
--
Peter Brady
Email: pdbr...@ans.com.au
Skype: pbrady77
Mobile: +61 410 490 797
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
for ext4 and other
filesystem related oddities..
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
----
Why does the wins option not work in nsswitch.conf?
What should I do to get automount working with CentOS + Win7 shares?
Regards,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
= [ r|/dev/vg_\d+/lv_virt_\.*| ]
to ignore all the guest's PVs. Is there any downside in doing that, or are
there any advantages in using partitions instead of raw 'devices' for the PVs?
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
strike me as a particularly good idea to insert a ':60' second -
software that does proper sanity checks on date/time values is supposed to barf
on that.
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Keith,
My Centos 5.8 box is running ntpd, and I did not notice any
problems with it.
I did not have any problems on CentOS 5.8, but on one CentOS 6.2 box running a
Java application.
Kind Regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
for the smear
interval. I doubt it, because I would not really like the time to differ from
the real time for more than a day.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
kernel-debug-debuginfo[-common..].
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
living room be built without any doors and a sign on the wall
'the exit is in the kitchen'.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 30.08.2012, at 11:52, C. L. Martinez wrote:
I am searching some lightweight tool to control when rsyslog didn't
receive events from a
specific host or group of hosts for x minutes/seconds.
Only a simple tool to send an email when an alert is triggered, I
don't need flat tools like
Hi,
Uhmm .. I am reading the docs about SEC, but it only speaks about
event correlation ... How do you do to check if syslog is receiving
data??
essentially you set up SEC to watch for the syslog log file where the data are
supposed to go, set up a 'Single' rule that creates a context with
the documents available on the CentOS documentation pages are mostly the
ones for RHEL anyway that shouldn't make too much of a difference.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
it waits for the request to time out.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
GSSAPIAuthentication no in the host /etc/ssh/sshd_config
else
put your server ip and server name in the client /etc/hosts
xxx.xxx..xxx yourserver.name
:)
I'd rather put the client IP address in the server's /etc/hosts ...
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS
. I've also seen people using the Windows trash can for the very same
purpose.
In the IT business, there is a word for that kind of people. We call them
'stupid'.
Cheers,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
reproducable with one command, even in cron. So it's not what I
would call 'valuable data'. It's redundant, kind of a cache.
By the way, what's wrong with 'yum search'? Too slow?
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
/slave DNS servers
under selinux no problems. Any updates on the master propagates happily
to the slaves. Mind you these are low traffic DNS servers that sit
behind a firewall.
Cheers
-pete
--
Peter Brady
Email: pdbr...@ans.com.au
Skype: pbrady77
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
/usr/bin/wc
[root@n1 ~]# rpm -V coreutils
[root@n1 ~]#
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
own machine (iptables?).
Regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10.03.2013, at 16:14, Arek Czereszewski arekc...@gmail.com wrote:
Put this in a zone file:
netcloudjob.com. IN A 173.201.189.43
Just after a MX line
Austin already did that, and it doesn't help.
The name can already be resolved, and the address cannot be pinged either. I
checked
: Haftra Andrana
I'm not a specialist on EXIM, but obviously your system resolves 'localhost' to
the IPv6 address ::1.
Probably you have allowed EXIM to relay for 127.0.0.1/8, but not for ::1, so it
will allow relay access on IPv4 localhost, but not on IPv6 localhost.
Cheers,
Peter
it by accident because I run yum-cron and pull daily updates.
Best regards,
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
used
user daemon to create it.
Any suggestion how can I get this ownership in sync?
Thanks,
-- Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
of problems most likely
caused by a failing motherboard or the memories?
Regards,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
segmentation fault:
# edac-util --report=simple
Segmentation fault
# edac-util -s
Segmentation fault
# rpm -qv edac-utils
edac-utils-0.9-6.el5
Regards,
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Replying to myself:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.comwrote:
The EDAC error msg reports problems with bank0. Can I trust this? I tried
installing edac-utils to get more information, but after installation it
only generates segmentation fault:
# edac
05f0bfd3030db4d4f4deb0fdc71b7fa3 perf_event_blocker.stp
/Peter
--
-= Peter Kjellström
-= National Supercomputer Centre
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CN=UVWXYZ_DATA.OU=UVWXYZ.O=CO
some text3
some text4
I guess that's what you need.
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
be
perl -pne 's/(CN=)(DATA\.OU=)((.*?)\.O.*)$/$1$4_$2$3/' /file/name
Best regards,
Peter.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and tagged
interfaces. Test and see what you need.
Cheers
-pete
--
Peter Brady
Email: pdbr...@ans.com.au
Skype: pbrady77
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
as the times drop to essentially zero after the first run.
Cheers,
-pete
--
Peter Brady
Email: pdbr...@ans.com.au
Skype: pbrady77
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
and/or system board...).
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
file and directory:
File not found:
/home/peter/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/myapp-5.2-1el6.x86_64/opt/myapp/bin/exec01
I tried to override buildroot:
rpmbuild -bb --define=buildroot / myapp.spec
error: %{buildroot} can not be /
As a workaround I can manually create
/home/peter/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/myapp
701 - 800 of 1058 matches
Mail list logo
