On Thu, 19 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
started holding my breath when RHEL 6 Beta was released, and my face is
not blue any more but totally black :-)
Yowzer -- Zombies!!!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
The main fear the developers have is that somebody could
steal their work and come up with another RHEL clone easily
if they release their build system scripts.
I think this is obvious by now.
'obvious' to you or not, such is not the case with
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ...
bug number please
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ...
bug number please
Jeff_S knows. He filed a bunch at upstream bugzilla
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
in-place upgrade of C5 to C6 will be most likely impossible. To many
changes of how thing work.
In local testing built from the anaconda and related sources
that will become CentOS 6, the offer to upgrade an existing
install is made during a
quick answer: even paranoids have enemies
On Sun, 8 May 2011, Jason wrote:
So I turned on Apache ReWrite and I created a file and I put in rules like:
(just a small subset)
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/php(.*) [NC,OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/phpmy(.*) [NC,OR]
.snip
2. I know
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
herrold:
I'll try to blog about it, but once one knows the 'secret' it
is not all that hard to predict -- This unit has three NICs
(two onboard of the same type and an addon) which do NOT
'wander around' through reboots
But can you swap the disk into
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I do not have personal experience with CentOS, but I have seen different
X86-PC MB's on embedded units/routers recognizing LAN and Wireless NIC's
differently ones from PCI1 to PCI5, others from PCI5 to PCI1, one MB
even without any order at all.
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 29.04.11 18:32, schrieb Alex Goffe:
Ok, changes made! If you could move it that would be great.
Okay, done. Could you please explain in the document
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Fog why you are truning off iptables?
My thought, reading the
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Amos Shapira wrote:
Does anyone have instructions on how to go through the
entire process from downloading source RPM's from RedHat's
servers through to building the entire distribution?
I've searched through the web and CentOS' own web sites and couldn't find
such
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine
that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and
don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that
would install httpd without including it?
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Thanks for pointing out that it really is abnormal because
it takes about 2 hours for virt-install to create a 190G
disk for me.
As you are having issues with the install, I might suggest
creating a more modest sized disk image, at least
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Does anyone have the .iso image of virt-p2v? It is not available anymore
through that link. The source is available, but building it requires a
*lot* of packages, some of which seem to be hard to find.
I have a copy in my archive, but how about
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
RJ's website says he is (was?) in the process of rewriting virt-p2v.
I have a copy in my archive, but how about contacting Richard
Jones, and asking him for an update or replacement?
I'll shuttle it out into public bandwidth and advice you
privately
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
But Johnny's postings seem pretty insistent on never releasing the
actual scripts in a form that can be used elsewhere or by anyone outside
the project, so maybe a more productive approach would be some way of
oh horse puckey, troll -- it is just
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 12:51 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
off the top of my head, here is the meta-code
Would you really repeat those steps by hand if someone gave
you a new server to add to what you use? Maybe things are
worse than I'd guessed.
You did
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Brian Mathis wrote:
packages, etc... but how? From the tone of the messages it seems like
it was either via IRC or personal email, which effectively counts for
zero in this context as we are talking about things that take place in
public. Those things need to go into
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
I also don't see what the size of my (past) contributions to CentOS has to
do with this whole discussion. I would much rather discuss why the QA
process needs to be closed, why you think opening up the process will not
help fix issues faster (while
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Tom H wrote:
This is the kind of answer that CentOS as a project
shouldn't allow (KB's recent use-something-else email is
another example) because it makes the developers look like
rank amateurs.
It is _so_ easy to tell others what they should or should not
do.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
day (and I mean every complainant every day) and saying SL is better,
raising blood pressure to devs (which is why they are loosing their
temper), but keeps bashers wanting CentOS over the SL? I do not get it
Actually I just finished an email to
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
rebuilding RHEL src rpms under RHEL, it should be made
public and either fixed or acknowleged as the intended
outcome.
Off topic here as to what RHEL and its vendor should or should
not do, Les.
And 'self-hosting' has NEVER been a goal of the
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
hair is best cut. My bakery has refused to sell me sliced bread because it was
too hot to slice... however, they kindly explained when I should come back if
I
wished such that the bread would suitably be ready. No drama.
and so we should tell people:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote:
As I've finally got around to mentioning the above, I look west to the
US of A, wave at the ORC and ask if Russ would please make an
appropriate adjustment.
I am not the project's attorney and disclaim any such role
---start
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote:
I think he did too, but I can't access or edit it.
You are not allowed to view this page.
I've just checked and see that there is a typo on the acl line.
Unfortunately I can't correct it . . .
umm -- E_NEED_CONTEXT ;)
What page URL and perhaps a
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
OK guys. Why don't you fork the CentOS project and build your own???
Why don't ANYBODY fork CentOS project? What are you/they waiting for?
Whining is easy, build something on your own.
Too strongly stated. I am aware of at least two private
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Digimer wrote:
As an aside, does the CentOS build environment (understanding that it
needs to be built, too), able to tweet something like last build; X
packages OK, Y packages failed?
This was done on a trailling basis for a couple side arch's
builders by me and another.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the
SL notes on the srpms that don't build with the listed
dependencies as shipped - and they aren't being picky about
the library linkages matching the RH binaries like CentOS
is.
If the
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, cornel panceac wrote:
2011/3/23 R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com
This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
'doing' rather than
talking in the cloister
as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
became harder
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
It is just hard for an outsider to reconcile the statements about the
build process not needing any changes or more resources with the lack of
a target time. Or that binary compatibility is the critical thing with
the distribution becoming
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Drew wrote:
Most likely because of relative cost and/or perceived value of SLES vs RHEL?
Novell is essentially offering to help you while you switch existing
kit over to SLES. If you're already paying for a RHEL subscription,
Novell's offer may have a lower cost or offer
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components.
Sad that -- that the dependent partial Red Hat adjunct project
is not compatible
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
TANSTAAFL
... long overdue free lunch
I get it -- you dont (or choose not to) understand the written
word
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
True. You cannot have multiple PTR records for an IP. I did not mean
to suggest that you could.
Not saying you are wrong here, but have you an RFC reference
to this effect? We previously held this belief from our prior
practice, but cannot find a
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jason Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Would anyone have thoughts?
don't reinvent the wheel
inotify builds and works fine on CentOS 5
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote:
Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things
only you can do . . .
well, not exactly .. the page and acl for GaoHu is now present
http://wiki.centos.org/GaoHu
and he should be able to edit it
-- Russ herrold
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, robert mena wrote:
yeah but he wants to hear from the horse's mouth
Who knows what the guy really said when a reporter quotes something
The 'pull quotes' attributed to me (the horse in question) by
the Reg are accurate and carry good context
Anyone who follows
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
I installed the packages and libp11 engine_pkcs11
to allow me to recover the rpm of bind depositing unofficial CentALT.
is the only way to properly recompile the source rpm
this in order to to safety the last holes in bind
there is a fake bind that runs a
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Cal Webster wrote:
java-1.6.0-sun
non FOSS, non-source provided, no? This is in an addon
channel in RHEL, and so far as I know we have never shipped
such
Of the others the wireshark update is a periodic update of
some edge case dissectors [these developers are quite
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote:
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
x% of a million or more) on this list who compile from current source
in order to minimize their risks and are therefore the subject
audience.
and it is on topic in this venue, just
The question was:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
and one reply asseted:
On Wed,
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
# rpm --import Fedora6-GPG-public-key.asc
and then that objection will be silenced
Thanks Russ.
That has cured the problem.
Do I need the .gpg subdirectory in my rpmbuilder homedir?
no - that was created by GnuPG for maintaining a keystore,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
gpg --import-key yourkey.asc
Thanks for your reply Tim. It still does not work though.
[rpmbuil...@karsites qps]$ gpg --import
Fedora6-GPG-public-key.asc
[rpmbuil...@karsites qps]$ rpm -K qps-1.9.18.6-1.fc6.src.rpm
qps-1.9.18.6-1.fc6.src.rpm:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, A T Williams wrote:
*But* I am the primary developer of a large Python application
http://www.ohloh.net/p/coils [113K lines and growing] and it *is( an
interesting trendlines there [soft economy, or loss of
interest in FOSS oritented languages, I wonder] -- I tinkered
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Have a look at Lua (www.lua.org). Imo it's quite readable and less
snip
Don't. I have literally never heard of it before, and I at least have
heard of everything else folks have mentioned. Learn something that
there's a *large* base of folks who
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/9/2010 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Also, Apple dictates style; to a lesser degree, so does M$. There's no
dictated style guide for Linux.
That's outdated thinking. Apple's acquired some infamy among its fanboy
How about this long since OT
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
... troubleshoot any problem that SELinux might cause with
any app, ...
would you like a fixed price on that quote as well?
- R
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, James B. Byrne wrote:
make. Everything built without error. I then ran
checkinstall ...
checkinstall is a third party solution and does not keep up
too well
Running Transaction
Installing : ruby-1.8.7
1/1
Error unpacking rpm package
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
you should ask that on the ius repo mailinglist (if theres one..)
I'm using repo from http://dl.iuscommunity.org/ and I want use php5.3
there is such:
List-Subscribe: https://launchpad.net/~ius-community
List-Unsubscribe:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Robert Heller wrote:
160 lines of largely untrimmed quoted cr*p
You know better, Robert and by your action you say you just
don't care. This kind of behaviour is the best way I can
think of to drive people away from reading the list
My prior working rule on this list
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
I think it's a fair bet to say it will be at least 4-6 weeks
out.
When it comes, will I be able to upgrade by sudo yum update?
Probably a casual one off user
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wonder if it's that they charge for support, from them, on
InnoDB, not for the engine itself. I mean, it was GPL'd
what, five or more years ago.
As to already fielded sources under the GPL, they will persist
under the GPL, or course
BUT ... you
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND
list recommends against running a DNSSEC master zone on anything less
than 9.6 and you really should be on
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The[y] just announced customer only RHEL 5.6 beta notes:
bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
So is there a Centos 5.6 beta with bind 9.7 or should I
switch to FC13/14? :)
I inadvertently sent that under a @centos.org email address -
that
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, David S. wrote:
No one know about this issue? :D
On 11/05/2010 01:11 AM, David S. wrote:
EXT3-fs: md1: orphan cleanup on readonly fs
ext3_orphan_cleanup: deleting unreferenced inode 2010087
ext3_orphan_cleanup: deleting unreferenced inode 259361
ext3_orphan_cleanup:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Thuo Wilson and John Dennison wrote:
It's not a matter so much of where to get the sources as it is
that since it is an OpenVZ container you don't have direct
access to the hardware, nor the ability to load kernel modules
as the kernel is
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Matt wrote:
Is there a way to tell rm -f to only remove a file if its owned by say mail?
find . -user $USERMATCH-name $FILENAME \
-a -exec rm -f {} \;
or such ...
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Sean Carolan wrote:
Maybe someone can help me sort this out. I want to block outbound
mail from my network based upon the recipient address. Internal
servers should still be allowed to send emails, but not to a few
specific addresses. I've tried creating some rules in
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Bo Lynch wrote:
Just recently bought a Dell E6410 with a Intel® HD Graphics with
ExpressCard with I7-640m processor. Having some issues getting a graphical
env to work. By just the looks of lspci X is wanting to use the VGA
Compatable controller: Intel Corp Core Processor
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, R P Herrold wrote:
where bug number include: 004363 and
640421 and 639146 comment 4
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Paul Ortega wrote:
I have installed CentOS 5.5 (2.6.18-194.17.1.el5PAE) on a number of Acer
Veriton X498G desktop computers. They seem to randomly hang when nobody
is logged in at the console, i.e. I notice a hanged computer but have
not heard complaints about computers
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Ski Dawg wrote:
from that repository, it is missing the dependency,
perl-mime-construct, which I am not able to find packaged anywhere.
I see it in F 13 and RawHide, but it in turn needs:
perl(Proc::WaitStat) [which was in RHL 6.2 ;) and is back in
F13 ]; which in turn
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Ausmus, Matt wrote:
Yeah, this issue’s been brought up in the past. One of the
maintainer of FC 13 made the srpm available (I believe he
prepped the spec file) for RHEL/CentOS 5 for dhcpd 4.1. We
started looking at it and the problems are the dependencies
and the
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Done! I then restarted postfix and there seem to be no new errors in
the logs. However, I still cannot telnet into port 25:
✈dcl:~$ telnet mail.sharingcenter.eu 25
Trying 178.63.65.136...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Bob Beers wrote:
I'm trying to create an asterisk 1.8 rpm with SRTP.
I found mention of a libsrtp rpm,
http://qutecom.ipex.cz/RPMS/srtp-1.4.4-1.i386.rpm
first google hit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509619
I seem to remember another packaging of
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Bob Beers wrote:
following on myself
'find' indicates it is also carried in FreeSwitch
/home/herrold/rpmbuild/BUILD/freeswitch-20101012/libs/srtp
/home/herrold/rpmbuild/BUILD/freeswitch-20101012/libs/srtp/srtp-1.42.pc
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote:
Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL?
Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released
years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current.
ehh??
mock-1.1.5-1orc.src.rpm from upstream Raw Hide
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/11/2010 05:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
The mock inplementaion is a moving target --- I do not
know the particulars of why the other party recommmended
using THE ONE CENTOS BUILT ON for CentOS, but ...
Sorry but I don't get it. Are you saying
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Why the F*** does everybody think he has to do his own
docs page instead of working with CentOS to have that
documentation in one place? *SIGH*
Probably the same reason that some in CentOS feel a need to
maintain a local wiki chock full of
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
so, these days, is that the canonical way to download source rpms?
I am substantially certain we have a wiki article on
mirroring, and certainly I've written about mirroring over and
over again from many approaches [my most recent blog post,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, R P Herrold wrote:
WHAT? you don't want to handle that load RIGHT NOT and for
s/OT/OW/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, JohnS wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:36 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
There is very little to explain, if all you want to do is examine the
source.
Install rpmdevtools. Run rpmdev-setuptree
Warning: No matches found for: rpmdevtools
No Matches found
As I recall,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
As Russ has said, they are not.
More context (said in our back archive, but recapped recently
[and it should have crossed http://planet.centos.org/ when I
issued this update] at
http://orcorc.blogspot.com/2010/08/chickens-coming-home-to-roost.html
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
ehh -- The version in RawHide will build and run under C5,
with some tedious gathering and packaging of buildchain work
[herr...@centos-5 zoneminder]$ rpm -q zoneminder
zoneminder-1.24.2-5orc
[herr...@centos-5 zoneminder]$ ls *src.rpm | grep orc
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i asked for those rights once and was told i wasn't getting them.
so i'm just posting suggestions.
ehh? Where? Not that I see, cruising this, but I may be
missing something
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2010-September/thread.html
;)
I'll try to remember to write this up more formally. Hope
this helps
--
end
==
.-- -... ---.. ... -.- -.--
Copyright (C) 2010 R P Herrold
herr...@owlriver.com
My words are not deathless prose,
but they are mine
On 22/09/10 11:39 AM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I have zoneminder 1.24.4 running under 5.5. The docs/support
sucks. There is one comment you need to add to ./configure
to get it to compile. It took me months to figure it out and
find it on the zoneminder website.
ehh -- The version in RawHide
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
Agreed that it's good to know how - but 'there isn't any rpm' should
really mean there isn't any rpm at any well-maintained location, not
just in the base system or that you didn't bother to look. Every time
you build something yourself you are taking
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Actually, my manager just laid something on me this morning: the new
release of Adobe's 64-bit flash for Linux. I suppose I need to get it from
Adobe, then find who's running 64 bit and not 32 bit
On 64 bit, the [manual] install was as simply
the certificate chain
in your local browser. This chain is present in Windows 7
Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari
16. All done
--
end
==
.-- -... ---.. ... -.- -.--
Copyright (C) 2010 R P Herrold
herr...@owlriver.com
My words are not deathless
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
So, I'm quite keen on finding out what is it that is causing
the breakage for you
Karanbir, in the middle of the thread from the archive:
James B. Byrne at Mon Sep 13 12:59:25 EDT 2010
Did that via webmin's command interface and nothing changed
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Could you offer a precise command for copying the system
from / to /mnt/hd , say?
Would one exclude /dev or /proc , for example?
I've not updated this in years nor for a 2.6 kernel and
grub, but the process is basically unchanged:
and AJB kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm
[I see AlanBartlett as the last editor on that page]
I have installed the given ajb source rpm
kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm, and verified that it is intact:
[herr...@kernel-bleeder linux-2.6.35.i686]$ rpm -Vp
On largish files, on a CentOS 5, 64 bit arch, openssl seems to
work fine here
[herr...@centos-5 SRPMS]$ time openssl bf -in \
freeswitch-0.0.20100729.git-1.src.rpm -out \
freeswitch-0.0.20100729.git-1.src.rpm.bf
enter bf-cbc encryption password:
Verifying - enter bf-cbc
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Anyone know a way around this? I am using the mirror option so I don't
have to keep track of what to get making it simple.
my apology in advance for suggesting another tool, but, there
you are ...
use lftp for mirroring? wget can do mirroring but
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
my apology in advance for suggesting another tool, but, there
you are ...
What about rsync ?
That requires co-operation from the remote end to set up an
anonymous rsync server .. doable, but as I understood the
scope of work, not within it
-- Russ
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
That requires co-operation from the remote end to set up an
anonymous rsync server .. doable, but as I understood the
scope of work, not within it
Well, doesn't need to be anon, but none the less I am SOL wrt
to ftp or rsync as none of these
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, didi wrote:
http://projects.centos.org/ is still out of date. :)
projects.centos.org uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate expired on 07/17/2010 01:23 AM.
It is quite unclear to me WHY a redirect into the wiki runs
out from a SSL startpoint, but ...
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
It may yet be too early to get a definite answer about this, but I'm
wondering what the status of the formerly patented bytecode interpreter
in freetype will be in RHEL/Centos 6 and possibly future updates to
RHEL/Centos 5.
CentOS just rebuilds sources
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:24 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
While this may induce a reluctance to change matters too
much, a closer to the 'leaf node' package such as freetype may
be 'doable' if you ask, and as I recall, RFE it in their
Bugzilla;
Upon
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 07/20/2010 10:26 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
Reading that and the companion mentioned in the last comment,
my takeaway is that fonts in fedora are (or were) bad [I trust
m miller's judgment here, and have for a long time, as he is
a thoughtful
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Mike Putnam wrote:
I hadn't seen mention of it on the mailing list yet so I
thought I'd post it.
We are aware of the matter and needed for the weekday to start
to get to computers holding the needed (and protected) access
credentials. As the issue was not disabling
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Much the easiest to manage is just having the virtual machine use a file
in dom0 as its disk. Without pre-allocating, this lets me over-commit
somewhat to cover unknown future needs, for example.
One sees this a lot in the writeups; one assumes
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
That's the entry. But reports are some systems need to be
fully powered off for the entry to be effectively changed -
some BIOSes evidently are flakey about it.
Now *there's* something I wouldn't have thought of trying on my own.
Okay, I can
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
continues to issue them while it remains in support,
particularly for the PowerEdge series
This is a brand-new R310, received from Dell and installed this week.
Which doesn't mean it's for sure at the latest BIOS level of course.
* chuckle *
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
This is an implicit contract that runs across all open
source software projects.
implicit contract ?
You know 'Whit' -- you deserve congratulations
You were just promoted into the 'hot air windbag' 'internet
lawyer' 'I am entitled to it, just
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Stephen Harris wrote:
I have a 500Mb ATA Flash drive in my machine. If I deselect everything at
install time (CentOS 5.0 - just for testing) it still requires 524Mb. Is
there any way of doing an even smaller install?
Run a pre 5 series install and it is straightforward
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 06:33:57PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
There are lower thresholds one cannot go below and still stay
wih current updates. My article on 'tiny centos' provides
'slimming scripts' to trim away coherent sets to taste
while still
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Y'know, I sorta like that idea - say, a script or program that you can
hand it info, such as if you've just built PHP the way I mentioned, and
have it be added to the rpmdb. That would also let you know if you did a
yum updgrade, and if a newer
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
and this random guessing and recordatation to pollute the RPM
database varies from ** and ** is better than using a
package built from a pre-defined recipe driven by a .spec
file, just how?
Well, when it insists on building
101 - 200 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
