On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 08:02 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> I managed to install F28 MATE packages to CentOS 8, so all is needed
> is
> to recompile those in EPEL.
I too am a solid fan of MATE. F28 had v1.16. F30 has the latest v1.22.
Is there any reason I should not try the latest?
When RHEL8 and CentOS8 were released, I was looking forward to setting
up SAMBA as a AD DC server for CentOS8. But when I lifed the hood on
the samba.spec file I found the option to build the samba-dc binary rpm
has been disabled for rhel family builds.
Apparently Red Hat does not want to support
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 10:59 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
> > > update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 9/24/19 10:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox
> > wrote:
> > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
> > > update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has
On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 10:47 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 10/5/19 3:14 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
> > On 10/4/19 6:59 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 04:52:28PM -0600, David G. Miller wrote:
> > > > On 10/3/19 1:37 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > > > > On 10/3/19
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> As of now, I have a working MATE DM on CentOS 8. It's a hack though,
> I
> used Fedora repositories. But that means compiling MATE in EPEL
> should
> be straightforward, just recompile Fedora 28 packages.
>
>
> I used Fedora 28
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 13:03 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:57 AM Chris Card
> wrote:
>
> > I have built a CentOS 8 base image from a kickstart, for use in
> > OpenStack.
> > This image boots fine but the problem I have is that I can't stop
> > udev
> > from renaming
I'm building a new storage server. I was unable to use the CentOS-8-
x86_64-1905-dvd1.iso image written to a 256GB thumb drive. It kept
failing the integrity check. I had to use the much smaller CentOS-8-
x86_64-1905-boot.iso image and do a network install from a mirror site.
That's a first for
I need some C8 troubleshooting help with MATE.
I'm building a ZFS storage server with a SuperMicro H11SSL motherboard,
EPYC 7232 CPU, and 32 GB ECC SDRAM. I installed CentOS 8.1.1911 from
the iso as soon as it was released. I'm using the on-board ASPEED VGA
video. I installed MATE v1.22 from
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 10:32 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 05:30:26 -0400
> Eddie O'Connor wrote:
>
> > Are there .conf files for the desktop?what about
> > logs?something's
> > got to be amiss somewhereand Linux always complains when it
> > is.in
> > logs. Just
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:26 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> wrote:
> > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing
> > MATE
> > from scratch from the GNOME3
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 16:12 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 05:24:13AM -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via
> CentOS wrote:
> > > > If you look at the listing attached to my last message, you'll
> > > > see
> > > > three different gro
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 08:18 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:26 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via
> > > CentOS
> > > wrote:
> > > > I
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
wrote:
>
> I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing MATE
> from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without
> ripping
> the heart out of C8 by deleting other critical
-Original Message-
From: Stephen John Smoogen
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:57:49 -0400
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 10:20, david wrote:
> >
I agree it is a lot of
As if last weekend's UEFI debacle wasn't bad enough, it now seems the
latest C8 kernel (4.18.0-193.14.2) is incompatible with the current
ZFSOnLinux packages (0.8.4-1). When booted to the latest kernel, ZFS is
inaccessible on my C8 storage server. When I back off to the prior
kernel
A client's (truly ancient) file server running CentOS 7 suddenly
started misbehaving, and I believe the ext4 filesystem on
/dev/mapper/cl-root may be corrupted. A reboot fails with a file system
check and drops me into maintenance mode. I tried booting from a live
C7 DVD and as root running
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 15:43 +1100, Anthony K wrote:
> On 7/12/20 12:20 pm, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
> > A client's (truly ancient) file server running CentOS 7 suddenly
> > started misbehaving, and I believe the ext4 filesystem on
> > /dev/mapper/cl-root may b
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:58 -0500, Satish Patel wrote:
> Folks,
>
> What is going on here
> https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
>
> CentOS 8's future is not looking bright. Recently deployed CentOS8 on
> my production workload and now hearing this. What do other folks
>
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 10:44 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I stumbled on this today.
> https://www.hostwinds.com/guide/upgrading-from-centos-7-to-8/
>
> I understand the best is always a re-install But are these steps
> the
> next best thing to update from 7 to 8 ?
>
Jerry,
There is a formally
With the release of the vmlinuz-4.18.0-240.x and vmlinuz-
4.18.0.193.19.x kernels, ZoL cannot connect with a ZFS pool. I'm not
100% sure, but I believe the last CentOS 8 kernel to work with ZFS
0.8.5 was 4.18.0.6.x.
Obviously CentOS does not support ZFS, so this means the ZoL folks must
find and
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:18 +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Am 18.01.2021 um 20:08 schrieb Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> > :
> >
> > I'm
> >
> following
> https://www.linuxbabe.com/redhat/set-up-samba-server-on-centos-8-rhel-8-for-file-sh
Whenever I log into Cockpit, it flags mcelog as a service failure-to-
start failure. systemctl confirms this.
# systemctl status mcelog
* mcelog.service - Machine Check Exception Logging Daemon
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/mcelog.service; disabled;
vendor preset: enabled)
Active:
I'm
following
https://www.linuxbabe.com/redhat/set-up-samba-server-on-centos-8-rhel-8-for-file-sharing
to set up Samba 4.12.3-12 on my Storinator fileserver running CentOS
8.3. I am trying to share out /tank/Windows/ as a Samba share:
# ls -al /tank
total 61
drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 7 Dec 26
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:18 +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote:
>
> Anything in the samba logs? May be SELinux/Firewall issues?
Götz,
Unfortunately, no.
The nmbd log verifies that the fileserver's samba service is the local
master browser for WORKGROUP on both eth0 and virbr0.
[2021/01/17
ng AD/FreeIPA/LDAP.
--Robert Savage
Fairview Heights, IL
>
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:57, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> > wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:18 +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote:
> > >
> > > Anything in the samba logs? May be SELinux/Fi
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 08:26 +0100, José María Terry Jiménez wrote:
>
> Do you know guest access to shares is disabled in windows 10?
>
> https://docs.microsoft.com/troubleshoot/windows-server/networking/guest-access-in-smb2-is-disabled-by-default
The error message this link says I should be
If yumex is no longer available, please advise.
A few minutes ago when 'dnfdragora' failed for CentOS 8.3, I tried:
# yumex --root
bash: yumex: command not found...
Install package 'yumex' to provide command 'yumex'? [N/y] y
* Waiting in queue...
* Loading list of packages Failed to
On Sat, 2021-05-08 at 13:53 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 08 May 2021 14:46:58 -0500
> Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
>
> > CentOS 8.3,
> ...
> > yumex-3.0.15-1.el7.nux.noarch
>
> Centos 8.3 is not el7.
Frank,
Well rats. It seems dnfdragora didn'
On Sun, 2021-05-09 at 08:36 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On May 8, 2021, at 21:57, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS <
> centos@centos.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2021-05-08 at 13:53 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 08 May 2021 14:46:58 -050
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 06:32 -0600, Chris Weisiger wrote:
>
> I’m not exactly sure if this may be the same issue I experienced but
> Google smb1 and windows10 . Apparently Microsoft removed support for
> Ann version 1 from windows 10 after one of the release updates
>
>
After setting up /etc/samba/smb.conf and running "testparm" in CentOS
7.9.2011, I have noticed that the list of parameters echoed back for
the [global] section do not match those in the smb.conf file. Is this
normal?
[global] in /etc/samba/smb.conf:
unix charset = UTF-8
dos charset = CP932
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote:
> Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the
> capacity.
John,
Wrong answer. The server's optical drive doesn't support double-layer
disks. The CentOS developers made a mistake on their DVD iso, and they
need to fix
I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking
system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing
front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a
bug on my behalf? Particulars:
"CentOS 7.9.2009 DVD iso image too large"
ISO image:
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 20:41 +0100, André Verwijs via CentOS wrote:
>
> I blueray disk (25GB)?? works great :)
André,
I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have
never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the DVD iso was
released without any release notes
35 matches
Mail list logo