On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Johan Scheepers johans...@telkomsa.net wrote:
Scot P. Floess wrote:
Well - really isn't it all in what tool makes the most sense for the job
at hand? If one doesn't need the latest and greatest - CentOS as a
desktop is super stable...
Don't get me wrong, I
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi all
Anyone can help to let me know how to
ls -1 | lsattr
lsattr `ls -1`
ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
for i in
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
are some Intel NICs that are
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:47 AM, miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't
use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500
frames.
Jumbo frames have advantages other than reaching wirespeed. Its
On Dec 3, 2010, at 9:25 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:31:12AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 14:20 +0100, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Friday 03 December 2010 13:55:28 Keith Roberts wrote:
There was a similar thread about which is the best
On Dec 3, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 12/02/2010 04:28 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
IMO lots of people waste time on jumbo frames when there's really no (or
very little) need.
That depends on the protocols in use and your TCP window configuration.
On Dec 3, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 12/03/2010 03:48 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
If the protocol is latency sensitive then jumbo frames are BAD as it
adds more latency because frames take longer to fill, longer to
transmit and thus other conversations have
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO and NO! (*...@!^*...@$ @*^*$@ *...@^*@ How many
times does this have to be explained??? NAT *IS* *NOT* a @*(^*(^@(*@
security tool. It isn't. Stop saying it is. You use *firewalls* for
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
Bogus. The reason is that they haven't been pressured into adoption by
higher powers; so we will get into a nice scramble to migrate in a
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:20 PM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:37 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote
On Dec 9, 2010, at 10:41 AM, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:
We have several DELL R900 server with PERC 6/E adapter in it. O.S. is CENTOS
5.5. recently one of server continue pop-up messages on /var/log/message for
switch status between write back and write through.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 2:42 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 09/12/10 17:29, Steve Clark wrote:
On 12/09/2010 10:30 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 25/11/10 14:12, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
[...snip...]
Furthermore, openvpn is
On Dec 11, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
On Dec 11, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Go EMC. Support is solid and the units are well designed.
But-But - they run Windows on the low-end stuff, don't they?
;-)))
I think they run embedded windows on some of their high-end stuff as well.
If done
On Dec 12, 2010, at 5:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
wrote:
The other question is if it actually works.
Too many of the low-cost
On Dec 12, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
In one instance we need to host virtual machines, so we don't need
anything fancy. I'm happy with running iSCSI / NFS and even AOE.
Currently we have
On Dec 12, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
I do, but I have it easy because I am the IT management.
I have the following situation. I tried to promote CentOS to local bank. They
have now a couple
On Dec 13, 2010, at 5:02 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
They are OK with the roll-your-own style of Gentoo?
Especially with it's cutting edge versions, bugs, security holes and the
only way to overcome them is to upgrade to an even newer version that may
break compatibility,
On Dec 13, 2010, at 5:02 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
They are OK with the roll-your-own style of Gentoo?
Especially with it's cutting edge versions, bugs, security holes and the
only way to overcome them is to upgrade to an even newer version that may
break compatibility,
On Dec 13, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:01 AM, benedict dcunha
sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
We have a new SUN BLADE X6270 SERVER MODULES and i am trying to install
centos 5.5 64 bit . the installations starts fine but
On Dec 14, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/2010 5:14 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
But this only helps if you don't know where you will need to grow. If
you know it is going to be under /var, just give it all the space you
have in the first place and avoid
On Dec 14, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/10 9:41 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 14, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/2010 5:14 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
But this only helps if you don't know where you will need
On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:31 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Doesn't lvm comes late in the scene?
Not if you are putting swap and root on LVM.
2.6 kernels are capable of swapping to partition, file and logical volume with
the same performance plus or minus a small
On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/15/2010 8:49 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
LVM overhead is negligible. It is basically a kernel mapping of virtual
memory space into 4MB+ extents across drives.
It basically has the same overhead as Linux's virtual
On Dec 18, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Saturday, December 18, 2010 04:19:25 am Gerhard Schneider wrote:
The problem with VMWare Server is that it is a discontinued product for
longer time and they don't provide us with a suitable replacement.
VMware wants more
On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/19/2010, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 12/19/10 8:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
But the ESXi version isn't exactly fair to someone who would deploy on the
hardware intended. Also, the restriction to 1 CPU
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
ext3 for it?
Before committing to ext4 on a production server, it
would be good to
On Dec 23, 2010, at 3:03 AM, David Hrbáč hrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote:
Dne 23.12.2010 1:08, Les Mikesell napsal(a):
The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
browser to find the matching certificate, and the only way to do that
and stay on the standard port 443 with
On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:08 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Matt wrote:
Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
great
On Dec 23, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:08 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:12 AM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Matt wrote
On Jan 3, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Gabriel gabr...@impactteachers.com wrote:
Google xlaunch for windows – run that baby, with the same ssh command, and
it’ll work the same. A good ssh client for windows is Bitvise
On Jan 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Dave tdbtdb+cen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 01/01/2011 05:56 PM, Dave wrote:
Is there a best practice? People have to be doing something!
I think that's unlikely. If you don't oversubscribe
On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Dave tdbtdb+cen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 01/01/2011 05:56 PM, Dave wrote:
Is there a best practice? People have to be doing
On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Dave tdbtdb+cen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 01/01/2011 05
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
Here are our relevant specs.
sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade this due to too
many
On Jan 11, 2011, at 7:51 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
Lots of protection for your data? Let's see, super aggressive caching and
no data journaling only metadata journaling, what on earth are you
blabbering about?
Use XFS with anything that has no BBU cache support or barrier
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.com wrote:
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this system-wide? Many of my users forget to do this,
which
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.com wrote:
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this system-wide? Many of my users forget to do this,
which
On Jan 20, 2011, at 9:18 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.com wrote:
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver
On Jan 20, 2011, at 9:23 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:08 +0100, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 20/01/2011 13:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:05 +, John Hodrien wrote:
An account is a personal account that should not be
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 09:36:09 am Ross Walker wrote:
With Amazon's cloud services now I guess they'll have to cut it down to
7 days, or require finger print or retinal eye scans...
Fingerprints are too
On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
We've been wrestling with this for ... rather longer than I'd care to admit.
Host / initiator systems are a number of real and virtualized CentOS 5.5
boxes. Storage arrays / targets are Dell MD3220i storage arrays.
On Jan 21, 2011, at 7:20 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
We've been wrestling with this for ... rather longer than I'd care
On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:55 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need to install a virtual machine acting as a virtual storage server under
CentOS 5.x (using kvm, xen, virtualbox or vmware). This virtual storage
machine
needs to server storage to another ESXi server and at
On Jan 29, 2011, at 6:04 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/28/2011 03:21 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:55 AM, carlopmartcarlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need to install a virtual machine acting as a virtual storage server
under
CentOS 5.x (using kvm
On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/31/11 3:20 AM, carlopmart wrote:
On 01/31/2011 04:05 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message - |
|
| Correct.
|
| But I don't see how any of those things apply here. If the host fails
| your vm's
On Jan 31, 2011, at 12:20 PM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/31/2011 03:57 PM, Ross Walker wrote: virtual machines running on HP
ML115
server.
Where is the problem?? Problem is the storage. All storage resides on the
HP ML150
server. For that reason I need to install
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
on 13:56 Mon 07 Feb, Jason Brown (jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com) wrote:
I am currently going through the process of installing/configuring an
iSCSI target and cannot find a good write up on how to prepare the disks
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Jason Brown
jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com wrote:
I am currently going through the process of installing/configuring an
iSCSI target and cannot find a good write up on how to prepare the disks
on the server. I would like to mirror the two disks and present
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Jason Brown
jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com wrote:
On 02/07/2011 02:36 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
on 13:56 Mon 07 Feb, Jason Brown (jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com) wrote:
I am currently going through the process of installing/configuring an
iSCSI target and
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jason Brown
jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com wrote:
On 02/07/2011 03:26 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Jason Brown
jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com wrote:
I am currently going through the process of installing/configuring an
iSCSI
On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Jason Brown jason.br...@millbrookprinting.com
wrote:
In our configuration, we are going to have our iSCSI targets and
initiators all connected to the same layer 3 switch and isolate the
iSCSI traffic on separate networks. Would it be beneficial to also set
up
On Feb 13, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/13/11 1:21 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm trying to build a dense eSATA enclosure with say 16 or 24 drives :)
thats a stunningly bad way to go about
On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/13/11 1
On Feb 22, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Only joking. I take your point, but the critical fixes being held up for a
dot
release isn't really very Enterprise friendly either. I think it fair to say
that CentOS is not suitable for the enterprise unless the servers
On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:42 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:06 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
you should have a look at your I/O disk status.
try with iostat -dx 5 to see the disk utilization info over time.
when it comes to slowdown on a
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Trutwin, Joshua jtrut...@csbsju.edu wrote:
+1 for Virtualmin.
People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the job for
me
and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had security problems
because of it.
Thanks for all the posts.
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Machin, Greg greg.mac...@openpolytechnic.ac.nz
wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know why
CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
that other enterprise distributions exist that provide long term
stability without backports ... Unbuntu LTS is a free example. They
also provide
On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
mailto:joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
that other
On Feb 25, 2011, at 4:29 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:42 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:06 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
you
On Feb 25, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 02/24/2011 10:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 2/24/11 8:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
snip of good information
Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
up and running
On Feb 25, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/25/11 7:33 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:36:28PM -0800, David Brian Chait wrote:
I think you need to download the VI3 rather than 4.1 to use 32 bit support,
but it does work. I have it in
On Feb 25, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems dom0's memory got under pressure from the other domUs.
Make sure to set an absolute minimum of memory for dom0 in xend.conf or
using
On Feb 28, 2011, at 4:49 AM, Roland RoLaNd r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to find a way to automate checkdisk every 1 month on a weekend.
in other words i want checkdisk to run every saturday morning.
i can of course change the default mount/count though that wont let
On Mar 2, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
I am busy setting up some XEN servers on a SAN for high availability
and Cloud Computing, and thought it could be cool to setup
virtualization on a CentOS 5.5 Desktop, running on a Core i3 + 4GB
RAM, and use the SAN's storage to
On Mar 3, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Michael D. Berger m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
In a context where exceptions are caught, I ran
the fragment:
cerr allocating endl;
char*arr[100];
for (int jj = 0; jj 10; ++jj)
{
cerr jj = jj endl;
arr[jj] = new
On Mar 7, 2011, at 6:12 AM, wessel van der aart wes...@postoffice.nl wrote:
Hi All,
I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
setup i had in mind is as following:
All the data is already
On Mar 7, 2011, at 9:55 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
1Gbe can do 115MB/s @ 64K+ IO size, but at 4k IO size (NFS) 55MB/s is about
it.
If you need each node to be able to read 90-100MB/s you would need to setup
a cluster file system
On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring) suite.
Our current alerting is happening
On Mar 7, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
On my centos boxes whenever I try to install packages I get a mix of
packages from the repos that are both i386 and x86_64 in
archictecture:
Yum doesn't implicitly know if you want the 64 or 32-bit versions so it selects
On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11 8:32 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
Why wouldn't you want safe writes? Is that like saying, and if you care for
your data?
You don't fsync every write on a local disk. Why demand it over NFS where
the
server
On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:25 PM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
Well on my local disk I don't cache the data of tens or hundreds of clients
and a server can have a memory fault and oops just as easily as any client.
Also I believe it doesn't
On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:02 PM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
The absolute definiton of safe here is quite important. In the event of a
power loss, and a failure of the UPS, quite possibly also followed by a
failure of the RAID battery you'll get data loss, as some writes won't be
On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:44 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:02 PM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
The absolute definiton of safe here is quite important. In the event of a
power loss, and a failure
On Mar 10, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/10/11 12:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I thought there were also problems in layers like lvm that keep the OS
from knowing exactly what happened. And a lot of software that should
fsync at certain points probably
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:33 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/10/11 12:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I thought there were also problems in layers like lvm that keep the OS
from knowing exactly what happened
On Mar 11, 2011, at 12:33 PM, PJ pauljer...@gmail.com wrote:
This may or may not be CentOS related, but am out of ideas at this
point and wanted to bounce this off the list.
I'm running a CentOS 5.5 server, running the latest kernel
2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.
Almost everyday around 3:30 AM
On Mar 18, 2011, at 8:31 AM, MOKRANI Rachid rachid.mokr...@ifpen.fr wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking a wiki or share experience for replace NIS authentication by
an existing Active directory Server (W2003). The problem is on the
management of id and gid.
How to move 1000 actual NIS users to AD ?
On Mar 21, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Since your exporting the storage as iSCSI, the host machine will see
it as a raw disk, irrespective of how it's setup on the exported
server. So, yes, you can do this.
Sorry for my ambiguity, I meant that mdadm
On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Balaji balajisun...@midascomm.com wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD
Version is 8.3.10
DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2 Node testing with
Simplex Setup
Server 1 :
On Apr 2, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Dawid Horacy Golebiewski
dawid.golebiew...@tu-harburg.de wrote:
I pondered Solaris for some time, but as I do not intend to build the OS
from scratch and nexenta was to GUIed for me I started researching SME.
What puzzled me is the theory and the practice: RAIDz
On Apr 6, 2011, at 6:06 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I suppose this isn't strictly CentOS but I'm talking about some 5.5
servers so I thought someone else here may have had the same issues;
We power on servers at night via IPMI and shut them down the same way
for
On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:19 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
But ...
I've been reading about some of the issues with ZFS performance and have
discovered that it needs a *lot* of RAM to support decent caching ...
the recommendation is for a GByte of RAM per TByte of storage just for
the
On Sep 7, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
Perhaps a silly question, but why maintain patches ? Why not compile a
new version and discard all the patches ? Patches are a messy manner to
maintain programmes.
RHEL needs to keep the same ABI (application binary
On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:00 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
On Sep 7, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
Perhaps a silly question, but why maintain patches ? Why not compile a
new version and discard
On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
At some point, security updates for 6.1 will be released and then it
becomes a matter of deciding to install it based on the evidence that
security updates have been non-existent all this time.
I'm sorry I don't follow you
On Sep 19, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 18:41 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
At some point, security updates for 6.1 will be released and then it
becomes a matter
On Sep 21, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 09:18 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 18:41 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Craig White
On Sep 22, 2011, at 10:32 AM, fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:37:38AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 09/22/11 3:08 AM, Sebastian Schubert wrote:
Am 22.09.11 11:59, schrieb John R Pierce:
On 09/22/11 2:13 AM, John Doe wrote:
If you want to take the
On Sep 21, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
While this doesn't exactly answer your question, I was wondering what
scheduler you were using on your GFS2 (Note: I have not used this file
system before) block. You can find this by issuing 'cat
On Sep 23, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot.
If so, would you say how you did it, please.
I tried (on an HP MicroServer),
but gave up in the end and used a USB stick installation
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Paras pradhan pradhanpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lamar,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2011 04:29:39 PM Paras pradhan wrote:
This is a SAN drive mounted. I have checked with my storage
administrator if
On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Bear in mind that RHEL kernel is not stock kernel,
there are number of back-ported patches in it. It is safer to use a
package with applied RHEL specific patches (if necessary) done by people
working with RHEL kernel
On Nov 4, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello listmates,
We are currently running NIS for authentication but would like to
migrate to LDAP. Thing is, though, that some of the machines that
authenticate via NIS are so old I'd rather not even touch them.
Hence the
On Nov 9, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Mike VanHorn michael.vanh...@wright.edu wrote:
You'll probably need to add a pam_access.so reference to the stock
/etc/pam.d/password-auth. Make the first account line
account required pam_access.so
My CentOS system doesn't have a stock password-auth file.
On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've got two drives from a now-dead server, they were RAIDed, a mirror,
I'd assume. I need to see if there's anything on them I need to transfer
to the replacement, so I just shoved them into another Dell server, with a
PERC 5 controller -
On Nov 30, 2011, at 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've got two drives from a now-dead server, they were RAIDed, a mirror,
I'd assume. I need to see if there's anything on them I need to transfer
to the replacement
On Dec 9, 2011, at 7:08 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Vreme: 12/09/2011 03:02 AM, Mikael Fridh piše:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs wrote:
Vreme: 12/08/2011 08:31 PM, Alan McKay piše:
[...]
wondering if anyone has some recommended
1 - 100 of 577 matches
Mail list logo
