On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Scott Ehrlich srehrl...@gmail.com wrote:
You have a CentOS (for example) workstation that is a member of a
Windows AD domain courtesy of modified smb.conf and krb5.conf files.
There are, thus, no local user accounts on the linux workstation.
There is a network
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:47 AM, muhammad panji sumodi...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have a 4,1TB Logical volume consist of four disks with size of 2TB,
1TB, 1TB, and 500GB. The LV currently full. I plan to change the 1Tb
disks and 500Gb disks. I plan to remove one 1TB disk or the 500GB so
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
Seeing as IPV4 is near it's end of life
(http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm),
I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to
IPV6?
Is anyone using it in
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
David Sommerseth wrote:
On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift redsh...@pandora.be wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
Ryan Wagoner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
David Sommerseth wrote:
On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Tony Schreiner schre...@bc.edu wrote:
Does this mean I have to type in URLs like:
http://3ffe:1900:4545:3:200:f8ff:fe21:67cf/
I can only image phonetically calling these off on a support call, I'd get
half way through it and the other end would tell me to
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Only if you want to mirror the boot partition.
3. Create other mount points I might want i.e swap, /home, etc
4. Create RAID1 out of these partitions
Only if you want each directory RAIDed. DO NOT
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ryan Wagoner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
snip
3. Create other mount points I might want i.e swap, /home, etc
4. Create RAID1 out of these partitions
Only if you want
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
slackmoeh...@me.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the reply.
2. Create a RAID 1 out of that partition and use a mount point of /boot
Only if you want to mirror the boot partition.
Doesn't one want to mirror that partition?
Yes you want
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
What is the best tool for recovering files on really corrupted ext
filesystem? I already tried photorec, but are there any better
solutions available? (commercial software ?)
I haven't used it, but I would have
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the CentOS 5.5 install DVD and trying to install with software
RAID1 on two 2TB SATA drives. The CentOS install only sees one drive.
This is a Supermicro motherboard with fakeraid turned off in bios.
I tried the trick like
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Markandeya mrc55...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Friends of CentOS,
I read a reply by John R Pierce, Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk
December 04, 2010 01:30PM
do you realize that if any one of those 4 miscellaneous drives fails,
you lose the whole volume?
Can anyone
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Benjamin Smith
li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
IMHO, very few people really need RAID. In many (most?) cases, the added
complexity of RAID is as likely to cause an increase of failure rate similar
to or greater than the reduction of failure rate caused by the
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 08:47 -0500, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
Not to mention the speed increases from RAID 5 or 10.
Speed increase from RAID 10 yes, not RAID 5.
http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/BAARF2.html
RAID 5 does
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 12/25/10 6:42 AM, S Mathias wrote:
568A and B aren't straight vs crossover. they are simply two different
schemes for the order of the pairs to the connector. basically, they
swap the green and orange pairs.
I
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 5:22 PM, E Westphal enwes...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Have you experienced this? What's going on when this occurs? What do I need
to do to keep it from occurring? Please advise. Thanks.
Dec 4 10:18:17 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down
Dec 4 10:18:19
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:37 AM, robert mena robert.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
I agree that realtek are far from something we could cold call a good
product. But I have similar setup (with different motherboard) working
without a flaw.
Similar isn't the same. I will not buy a board with
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:51 AM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but
looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock
essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate classical
build
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Roland RoLaNd r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com wrote:
Secondly, i'm trying to setup a centos 5.4 to act as:
1. firewall # can you check my config below and tell me if i missed anything?
2. DHCP # already configured
3. transparent squid proxy # already configured
4.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Roland RoLaNd r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com wrote:
vim /etc/dhcpd.config
ddns-update-style interim;
ddns-rev-domainname in-addr.arpa;
Jan 1 01:25:58 dnalor dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.25.100 (192.168.25.25)
from 00:23:4b:cc:6c:b7 (oli) via eth0
Jan 1
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:21 PM, benedict dcunha
sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Now when it comes to the page for specifying the disk space i see the
following
as warning
(if you don't allocate the entire disk now , space will be allocated as
needed while the virtual machine is running)
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ritika Garg ritikagar...@gmail.com wrote:
I also want glibc 2.7 for a particular application to run. The first step
mentioned is :
Step1:download nasm src.rpm from official site
I did not understand what will this rpm do? I mean is that a substitute for
glibc
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net wrote:
I have been waiting for RHEL6/CentOS6 because, as I understand it,
CentOS5 does not have a statefull IP6 firewall - e.g. incoming traffic
would have to have a default ACCEPT policy or only specific applications
allowed (based
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:41 PM, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:
I would like listen to your opinion on follwoing:
1. which configuration have better performance?
2. put two MD1000 on same PERC 6/E adapter will cause battery life shorter?
3. other comment?
Thanks.
1. Configuration
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:58 AM, David Sommerseth
d...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
My experiences is that IPv6 in CentOS5 works very well, but is not
optimal due to lack of stateful firewalling. However, I'm certain that
is solved in CentOS6/RHEL6.
I will second that I have had no problems
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote:
I have an x86_64 box running Xen, so a paravirtualised guest has just
been ordered for building a Mock Environment. I'm going to have to run
to Google to learn more in the short space of time I have open to me,
you
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:26 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
My script files look like this:
#bridge0
DEVICE=bridge0
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=216.185.71.25
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
GATEWAY=216.185.71.1
ONBOOT=yes
#eth0
DEVICE=eth0
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=bridge0
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:26 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
wrote:
To start bridge0 should be br0
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
BRIDGE=br0
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Timothy Kesten centos-...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 11:27:22 schrieb John Doe:
Google for samba windows.7 and click on first answer...
I knew, that samba 3.3 is necessary.
I was more interessted in where can I get a suitable version from a
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net wrote:
I hope to be be getting some custom made 80 wire UDMA IDE
cables sorted ASAP. That should squeeze extra speed from all
the drives on the machine.
You shouldn't need custom cables. IDE 80 pin cables can be sourced all
over
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:55 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
undetected creeping bit errors due to lack of ECC would
be, in my book, unacceptable.
Where can one find info or studies on this sort of thing? I use non-ecc ram
in several servers, and of course most ppl use it in their
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:28 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
I see that there are many Realtek RTL8169S gigabit cards
going for a song on eBay.
I've always liked and used Realtek cards, and I use the RTL8169S in my
servers. However, the RTL8169S has one problem: overheating. If you
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 03:19:49 AM + Miguel Medalha
miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
The D-Links are NOT suitable for professional use. I used one of their
models and it hanged on me multiple times. Because it is
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2011/3/27 Drew drew@gmail.com:
Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was
formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.)
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
The DVD ISOs are available on my local mirror, so they should be
elsewhere, too.
Where is your local mirror?
As I said, I couldn't see them on any of the mirrors offered to me.
--
Timothy
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the /
partitition. I got the error
that cannot boot ext4 partition. bummer I know this is just a boot
issue and make the ext3 but I was disappointed.
Maybe 6.0
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
So 2 questions :
- how important is it to have it on its own network?
- is it OK to use an unmanaged switch (as long as it is Gigabit), or are
there some features of a managed switch that are desirable/required with
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey folks,
Is there any way to fake a yum update just to get yum to force a download
of all the files it needs, without actually installing them.
I finally have a RPM cache/proxy working and I just want to populate it.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:52 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
a pure firewall at gigE speeds really doesn't need that much ram and
only a fair-to-middling processor. more than 2 cores would likely be
wasted. Its when you start layering other server functionality on top
of the
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.ptwrote:
pfsense for a newbie?
A CentOS-like firewall would be ClearOS (formerly Clarkconnect) and
again would reduce the number of simultaneously-learned layers to wade
through. While it works very well, it is yet
If the SATA controller is supported then CentOS will be able to see
the drives. You might have a look at
http://linux-ata.org/driver-status.html
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:52 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have a server that is IDE drives and I dont have any so I wanted to
You don't need to have Comcast route all traffic to that IP. You just
need to put two NICs in the server and place it between Comcast and
your servers. Then using iptables you can configure CentOS to deny /
allow traffic to IPs on specific ports. I know this is a CentOS list,
but if you want
If you just want public IPs passed to downstream devices than bridging
two NICs will allow you to accomplish this. Otherwise you will need to
setup NAT port forwards or 1:1 NAT. You assign the external IP and
internal IP when creating the NAT rule.
The device only needs to be as fast to handle
The /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check script is new for 5.4. Read through
the mdadm list. You will find that small mismatch counts on RAID 1 is
normal. I don't remember the exact reason but it has to do with
aborted writes where the queue has already committed the one drive and
not the other. Since
If you want performance stick with RAID 10. In general the more drives
(spindles) the faster the array. The Western Digital RE3 500 GB drives
are a good deal. You should be able to get 4 of those in the low
$200s. In RAID 10 this would give you better performance than 2 x 1TB
in RAID 1.
Ryan
On
Looks like the price has gone up with the economy starting to recover.
I paid $68 per WD RE3 500GB drive on Amazon.com back in June.
I would still recommend going with 4 drives in RAID 10 over 2 in RAID
1 or even 3 drives in RAID 5. You will get almost double the
performance due to being able to
Edit /etc/grub.conf and add elevator=deadline to the end of the kernel
line. For example
title CentOS (2.6.18-128.4.1.el5)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 ro root=LABEL=/ elevator=deadline
initrd /initrd-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.img
Ryan
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
kaushalshri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI
Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details are as below
:-
Sounds like a hardware problem. I'm running CentOS 5.5
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Ross
rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI
Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details are as
below
:-
Sounds like a hardware problem. I'm running CentOS 5.5 with
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Hans Vos h...@laissezfaire.nl wrote:
Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from server 1 to
server 2. Then run yum update and all kinds of errors came flying at me.
So I just SCP'ed the whole /var/cache/yum directory of server 1 to
server 2.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 4/19/2011 11:16 AM Scott Silva spake the following:
on 4/19/2011 10:42 AM Matt spake the following:
On a running 64 bit CentOS 5.6 box is it possible to convert from Ext3
to Ext4 to improve performance? Right now I can
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:08 PM, John Beranek j...@redux.org.uk wrote:
That's not quite true, you can force files on a partition to be
re-created using extents with something like the below:
find /home -xdev -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chattr +e
find /home -xdev -type d -print0 | xargs -0
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Guy Boisvert
boisvert@videotron.ca wrote:
Hi!
I have upgraded my servers yesterday to CentOS 5.6 via yum update.
Everything went smoothly except that i have client workstations not part of
the domain that are not able to access the samba server
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:28 PM, David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm running a CentOS 5.6 server through linode. I am atempting to
configure it for ipv6, previously this had been done though not by me
on a ubuntu box so the hardware can take it. I've got an ipv6 tunnel
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
A bit OT, but I'm running CentOS-5.6 on this machine
(in fact on two of them)
and it seems to run perfectly -
I've had no problems at all.
Except that I'd like to add a second ethernet port,
and am not sure where one
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi List,
I am looking for 1U firewall hardware, any ideas? Something like that
(http://www.applianceshop.eu/index.php/firewalls/opnsense/opnsense-pfsense-ghz-19-appliance-1.html)
but at least with 5GBit nics and more
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:38 PM, William Warren
hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
On 5/15/2011 5:26 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
You can use something like this Atom 525 dual core motherboard:
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NF99.html
Or this Atom C550 dual core board:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
pci is a shared bus with a max of 2 gigabits. you'll see a gigabit but
never see two or more.
I am aware of that. But as I said it depends on your particular needs in
*concurrent* traffic. Although it cannot sustain
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
I was assuming the same. That's why I suggested the Jetway solution. I
is economic and works very well in many scenarios.
Not, of course, if you need *concurrent* Gigabit access on several
interfaces. I stress
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
where there are occasional thunder-storms.
There was one yesterday, when the electricity
went off 3 times, for a second or so on each occasion.
My server, an HP
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:52 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Alexander
good suggestions, ill monitor I/O and mysql code, sounds like a code
related issue and not a centos issue after all.
it runs on ext3 ,i could only guess how to code deals with the dir,
as it seems
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
im good with mysqltuner.pl,
as it seems there are slow queries on mysql and i have adjusted all
values in my.cnf according to the application needs.
looks like it's all in the code and the way the CMS handles the
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
If one stays with Centos 5.x (currently on 5.6) is the
problem/enhancement/incompatibility involving PHP53 likely to be
resolved by general updates and/or the introduction of Centos 5.7 ?
Paul.
You can download the
For anybody interested Apcupsd maintains official RH EL 5 RPMs on
their download page. It works great on CentOS.
http://apcupsd.org/dl.php
Ryan
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
That said, I do prefer NUT because I've been using their tools for a
Hi! From where
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Slack-Moehrle
mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
Hi,
How do I stop this from happing? Do I need to buy an SSL cert? Aren't
these really expensive per server and I have 5 servers I would need to do
this too.
The *only* way is to buy certs. And it'll be one
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions I will give mock a go and see what
happenswill need to go read up and understand what mock is doing
though
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Tom Diehl tdi...@rogueind.com wrote:
On Sun,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Thom Paine painet...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a brand new Dell Poweredge T310 server with 4G ram and 1TB
raid-5 hard drive in it. I Really only need to be able to run a copy
of CentOS 5.4 on it, but I'm wondering if in the build process should
I stick on ESXi 4
Do an ls -lha public_html in the user's folder and look what group
the files are owned by. Then do chown username:group -R public_html.
Ryan
2010/4/2 cahit Eyigünlü cahit.eyigu...@gmail.com:
the main problem that i have copied files directly to public_html folder and
it is returnin 500
I've successfully rebuilt Red Hat EL PHP 5.2.10 RPMs using mock on a
CentOS 5.4 i386. I wanted to be able to build both x86_64 and i386
versions so I reinstalled my builder system with CentOS 5.4 x86_64.
Now I can build the PHP RPM successful for x86_64, but i386 fails with
the following during
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:40 PM, CList centosl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a Intel SR1530SHS, Intel S3200SH
mainboard.. It has a 3 x 1TB sata hotswap drives with LSI software raid
onboard.
I had configured the LSI to have Sata0 and Sata1 with raid 1
2010/5/21 Jakub Jedelský jakub.jedel...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I changed a bad disk (automaticly disabled from software raid1 and system
for I/O error) in one of our servers and now have problem with adding new
one to system without reboot. Does anybody have an experience with this? Or
is it
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I am seeing the following behaviour on all my ix86 CentOS-5.5 hosts:
Downloading Packages:
(1/2): device-mapper-event-1.02.39-1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm | 20 kB
00:00
(2/2): device-mapper-1.02.39-1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Adryan Pop mareshal.2...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to run it with rpm -ivh but I get this error
jme-kmod-1.0.6.1-1.el5.elrepo.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature NOKEY, key ID
baadae52
1: jme-kmod warning: user ajb does not exist - using root
and so on until
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Ski Dawg cen...@skidawg.org wrote:
Hello all,
I have been doing some searching for information about disabling
services within a CentOS 5.5 install. I have found a few different
opinions, and wanted to ask for some feedback.
First off, the system is running
I asked this question on the list a few months back. You need to use
setarch to change to i386. Otherwise inside mock the arch command will
return x86_64.
setarch i386 mock mockargs
Ryan
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
Maybe this shoul have been on the
I am using stateless auto configuration for most of my clients. For
the servers I prefer to manually assign the address. I have defined
the IPv6 address in the ifcfg-eth0 file and set IPV6_AUTOCONF=no.
However ifconfig shows both the auto configured and manually assigned
address.
Looking around I
I think you should be able to do this using BIND views with
match-destinations. Have one view match destinations for 1.1.1.1 and
1.1.1.2 and the other for 1.1.1.3 and 1.1.1.4. Create a zone in one
view for exampleA.com and one in the other for exampleB.com
Ryan
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:08 PM,
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
I have installed Postfix, Dovecot, and Squirrelmail on a CentOS 5.5
machine. In Squirrelmail a user can send mail, but he is not receiving
replies. There is nothing relevant in the maillog other than the
user's
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
servers acting
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
servers acting
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@alice.it wrote:
I have a CentOS-6.2 server in Italy.
Every few months the server gets into a strange state
and stops working after a power outage.
I should say that this does not occur after every power outage;
I suspect, but have no
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Peter Eckel li...@eckel-edv.de wrote:
And recent computer or distributions is sitting their quietly waiting
for it's IPv6 address to arrive - probably automatically, via auto
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:31 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
- Original Message -
|
| On 1/4/2013 12:21 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
| On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
| I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a
| brand new
| CentOS 6.3 system.
Anyone know the reason RHEL bumped Samba from 3.5.10 to 3.6.9? This version
has a regression with BackupExec and Veeam backing up to network shares. I
receive access denied errors. Samba is in security=user mode and not joined
to a domain. If I downgrade just the Samba packages to the CentOS 6.3
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey,
http://zfsonlinux.org/epel.html
If you have a little time and resource please install and report back
any problems you see.
A filesystem or Volume sits within a zpool
a zpool is made up of vdevs
vdevs are
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 03/06/2015 11:00 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/06/2015 10:55 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
IPV6INIT=no
But I am still getting a global IPv6 (and of course local scope).
What else do I need to do to
87 matches
Mail list logo
