On 12/01/2010 07:19 PM, cybernet wrote:
centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that
use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops
Sorry, but this is nonsense. I myself run CentOS on my workstation at
the office (heaviest duty network admin, I wouldn't
On 12/01/2010 08:12 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello listmates,
As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with
Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224
So now my question is, what PCI 1
On 12/01/2010 08:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste
seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however
On 12/02/2010 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Bent Terp wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the
whole life.
Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay
On 12/10/2010 05:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ritika Garg wrote:
Whenever the system boots there is sound ( beep ). Is there any way to
disable it?
That's a firmware/BIOS thing, if it's the one I think.
mark
Pull the cable of the internal PC speaker. The annoying 'beep' is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus David S. spake:
Dear All,
I got a new project to build cloud computing base on centos clustering
(clustering and cluster storage). whether failover, load balancing can
be applied?
I've read about CentOS clustering and cluster storage but
://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-cloud_apache/
(don't let 'AIX' shock you, it's about Linux).
HTH,
Timo
-
--
Best regards,
David
http://blog.pnyet.web.id
On 12/14/2010 05:24 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus David S. spake:
Dear All,
I got a new project to build cloud computing
thus Andreas Reschke spake:
Hi Lisandro,
just look at
http://www.lsi.de.com/channel/products/raid_controllers/sata_sas/9280-24i4e/index.html
and read the readme.txt.
1. download the megaraid_sas-v00.00.04.31-CentOs5.5-all.img
2. insert a floppy
3. dd if=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Lisandro Grullon spake:
Thank u andrea for the response, but unfortunately a floppy its not
an option in my box. Can u guide me using a usb flash drive. Much
appreciated. Lisandro
Should work similar to writing to a FDD.
Maybe you have to
Network from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:33:22
To: CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Antwort
On 12/15/2010 10:05 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Hi,
What is the best tool for recovering files on really corrupted ext
filesystem? I already tried photorec, but are there any better
solutions available? (commercial software ?)
Hi,
maybe CAINE
http://www.caine-live.net/
is worth a look...?
thus John R Pierce spake:
On 01/18/11 10:51 PM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
Wrong on the demise of the Sparc. Oracle just posted a massively
record breaking TPC-C benchmark using their new Sparc T3 servers,
something like 30 MILLION TPM.
Oracle has very publically committed to keeping SPARC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there anybody here who has access to such a machine and could test
e... 'some software' there?
Please mail me privately.
Thanks best,
Timo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
thus Peter Peltonen spake:
I have now partially solved my problem:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com
wrote:
I need to do a new CentOS net install on a new server having the
Supermicro X7DVL-3 motherboard:
[...]
So I assume the controller is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus James A. Peltier spake:
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
I have yesterday after some typos, sent my ext3 RAID5 array to the
void...
I want to recreate it now, but I read on
On 07/30/2009 07:26 PM, thus Robert spake:
some recent comments speculation border on slander.
slander is simply anything that can lower one's view of a person in
another's eye.
the centos team has already done this, yet may i suggest to all that it
would be best to give Mr Davis every
thus nate spake:
MontyRee wrote:
Hello, all.
When I execute arp -a -n, there are lots of arp caches like below.
Surely, I set netmask and Broadcast without problem and routing table also
no problem.
System is CentOS release 4.7 i386.
I know how to delete the arp cache,
but I don't
Dear Russ,
[huge snip]
Look ... if you understand how build work, and I know you do, then you
understand that one can not release updates that are built on 4.8
without releasing 4.8.
If you need the updates faster, feel free to pay Redhat for them.
There - I feel so much better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Michael Kress spake:
| przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
| I'd like to clone existing CentOS server. Can anybody
| recommend any working solution to achieve that ?
|
| 1) virsh shutdown vmxx
| 2) cp /etc/libvirt/qemu/vmxx /etc/libvirt/qemu/vmyy
| 3) cp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Johnny Hughes spake:
| R-Elists wrote:
| Don't know if that is really true ... Anyway:
| Install a minimal system and then rsync everything over.
|
| Kai
|
| --
| Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
| Kai
|
| for list purposes, would you consider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
| However, we are NOT accepting monetary donations at this point. We will
| not accept monetary donations until there is something in place where
| more than one person has to approve any spending and some kind
thus Tim Nelson spake:
- Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd want know get thermal information on Centos 5.3 but get
nohting. If I run acpitool -e, it outputs:
...
Am I doing something wrong?
You'll want to check out lm_sensors. Not sure off the top of my head
if its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I have an IBM xseries 345, running CentOS 5.3, hosting a few Xen domUs.
However, I need more RAM -- but cannot remember if all (four) RAM
sockets are populated (which would mean to buy higher capacity modules)
or if there are two slots left
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Marko A. Jennings spake:
On Wed, September 30, 2009 12:56 pm, Timo Schoeler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I have an IBM xseries 345, running CentOS 5.3, hosting a few Xen domUs.
However, I need more RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64
(and OpenVZ, and some home-brew L2TP daemons, RIPd, BGPd, etc).
There's a (VE in OpenVZ speak) virtual machine that has two ethernet
interfaces, seen as eth0 and eth1,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Giovanni Tirloni spake:
| On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Timo Schoeler
| timo.schoe...@riscworks.netwrote:
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Hi list,
|
| I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus ML spake:
Nate,
ifconfig ethX IP_ADDRESS netmask NETMASK
route add default gw IP_OF_GATEWAY
OK, so I was correct,
I am doing
ifconfig eth0 172.16.254.80 netmask 255.255.255.240
route add default gw 172.16.254.1
I am getting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Brian Mathis spake:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Shawn Everett sh...@tandac.com wrote:
Thanks to everyone for their comments so far.
The server in question is a basic 2 node cluster connected to an MSA500.
It runs a variety of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Marcelo M. Garcia spake:
ML wrote:
HI All,
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
-Jason
Hi
There are some options, like Debian or Fedora 11 in case of Linux or
something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:44 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus nate spake:
| Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
| If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
| made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
| the entire file would be available as soon as possible after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Stephen Nelson-Smith spake:
| Hi,
|
| Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
| postfix, mysql, etc.
|
| Do you have a specific reason not to use Solaris?
|
| If you don't want to do that I've had excellent results with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Morten Torstensen spake:
| I am looking for yum-priorities or any info on any changes here for
| CentOS 5.4. There is also a forum post for this here:
|
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22798forum=37
|
| Is this missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Niki Kovacs spake:
| Timo Schoeler a écrit :
|
| I don't see it (any more!) running 5.3... But need it desperately.
|
|
| It got forgotten, obviously.
Hm.
| But in the meantime, you can do this:
|
| # wget -c
|
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Ross Walker spake:
| On Oct 22, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Bernhard Gschaider bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at
| wrote:
|
| On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:36:06 -0700
| AY == Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
|AY On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bernhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus James B. Byrne spake:
I visited http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
which tells me to install the package yum-priorities available from
extras. I try this and it fails.
# yum install yum-priorities
Loaded plugins:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus ML spake:
Hi All,
How does one best turn of X-Windows? I dont need it, ssh works just
fine for me.
I seem to recall it was complicated and since I know enough to do my
stuf and not well versed yet in fixing things I break, I dont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Antonio da Silva Martins Junior spake:
Hi,
We had received a new EMC storage (Clariion CX4) and the EMC analist has
told us that CentOS aren't on their support list, but RHEL are :)
Well anybody on the list has a CentOS host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Neil Aggarwal spake:
We had received a new EMC storage (Clariion CX4) and the
EMC analist has
told us that CentOS aren't on their support list, but RHEL are :)
I have always taken the stance that if something works with
RHEL, it will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Jussi Hirvi spake:
| Are there any adverse effects to yum clean all? Does the system
| lose its memory of what is installed/updated?
|
| Regards, Jussi H.
Hi Jussi,
from the manpage:
clean
Is used to clean up various things which accumulate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus ken spake:
| Subsequent to trying to yum update-- it failed--, I tried to resolve
| the dependencies piecemeal:
|
| # yum update faad2
|
| -- Processing Dependency: libfaad.so.0 for package: ffmpeg
| --- Package faad2.i386 0:2.7-1.el5.rf set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Kai Schaetzl spake:
| Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:19 +:
|
| After the London Beer event seams to become a regular thing I was
| wondering who in Berlin would want to participate in such a thing. I
| am visiting for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann spake:
| On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Timo Schoeler
| timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
| thus Kai Schaetzl spake:
| | Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:19 +:
| |
| | After the London Beer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus ken spake:
| On 11/11/2009 02:26 AM Timo Schoeler wrote:
| thus ken spake:
| | Subsequent to trying to yum update-- it failed--, I tried to resolve
| | the dependencies piecemeal:
| |
| | # yum update faad2
| |
| | -- Processing Dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I need to remove an entry of inittab which is used to (re)spawn a process:
mydemon:2345:respawn:/usr/sbin/mydemon /dev/null 21
So, I would comment out that entry and reload init running ``telinit
q''. IIRC, this would lead to the currently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus William L. Maltby spake:
| On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:56 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Hi list,
|
| I need to remove an entry of inittab which is used to (re)spawn a
process:
|
| mydemon:2345
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Timo Schoeler spake:
| thus William L. Maltby spake:
| | On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:56 +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote:
| | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| | Hash: SHA1
| |
| | Hi list,
| |
| | I need to remove an entry of inittab which is used
thus Susan Day spake:
Hi;
I don't want sendmail. What's a good secure email server that I can yum?
I really only need smtp right now, but who knows what the future will bring?
TIA,
Suzie
postfix rocks. :)
HTH,
Timo
___
CentOS mailing list
As others have already suggested, consider Postfix.
I'm putting in my $0.02(US) so I can add my experience when I first had
a need for a decent MTA. I had used Sendmail in the past, but I didn't
want to fight with the arcane syntax of the config files, and at that
time the add-on management
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate
the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC. Those
screenshots show windows and buttons that exactly match my CentOS GNOME
Desktop [1]. AFAIK,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Eduardo Grosclaude spake:
| On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Timo Schoeler
| timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Hi list,
|
| I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Karanbir Singh spake:
| On 11/24/2009 09:10 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
| I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate
| the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC.
| Probably Scientific Linux:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Jim Perrin spake:
| On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
wrote:
| On 11/24/2009 10:19 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
|
http://www.seoexpertconsultants.com/index.php?linuxrelease=Scientific%205.1
|
| So no way to decide
thus Eero Volotinen spake:
Probably not, or someone would have found them in the last five years.
Probably yes, it's hard to security audit complex software packages.
Yes; my bet would be that OpenBSD's smtpd will be the most secure MTA
(when it hits the streets for production). That does
thus Eero Volotinen spake:
An IP stack which is part of the kernel *is* (more or less) directly
exposed to the internet as long as there's the appropriate cable
connected to that machine.
Yes, I hope that IP-stack is not so buggy. Anyway, I think that is
easier to exploit systems via
thus Robert Moskowitz spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Eero Volotinen spake:
Probably not, or someone would have found them in the last five years.
Probably yes, it's hard to security audit complex software packages.
Yes; my bet would be that OpenBSD's smtpd will be the most
thus Eero Volotinen spake:
IP machinery is simple enough, but then there is ICMP and ICMP6, and
IPv6 Neighbor discovery, and
Yes and lot of firewalls even lacks IPv6 support even nowdays..
Don't buy them, so vendors get aware it's already 2009.
Let's talk off-list. We're getting very
thus John R Pierce spake:
RedShift wrote:
Burning at a slower speed usually does NOT increase burn quality.
You may have a bad writer or bad DVD R's. Use DVD-R's for maximum
compatibility.
not quite. with modern high speed DVD burners, like 16X and such,
burns faster than 8X are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
yesterday I sent this eMail to quagga mailing list, however I didn't
receive an answer yet. Unfortunately, I really need this stuff running
or have to switch to another strategy achieving the goals.
Maybe one of you has some experience on
thus Gilbert Sebenste spake:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
Yap. I'm seeding ISO images for four hours already.
My machine at home (this one) is 5.3 already (clean install from DVD):
[t...@dragon ~]$ uname -a
Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Tom Diehl spake:
| Hi,
|
| Has anyone tried upgrading xen domu's from 5.2 to 5.3? I just did a
| yum upgrade glibc yum upgrade yum. All appeared to go well but when I
| rebooted and tried to connect to the network, I could not. Looking at
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
just installed their NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.44-pkg2 driver. I had it
running on my CentOS 5.2 x64 machine, and I'm happily surprised that it
builds and runs okay on 5.3 also.
Cheers,
Timo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5
For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
you have a fat pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
I have a chubby pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly
earlier today.
Hi,
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
good points)
Thank you,
Adrian
I personally would go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tthus Rainer Duffner spake:
| Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
| Rainer Duffner wrote:
|
| Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
|
| Hi,
| What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
| This is for an production server (that is, no ext4
thus Pasi Kärkkäinen spake:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Drew spake:
| Hi there,
|
| I'm in the process of installing Centos 5.2 on an IBM x236 w/
| ServeRAID 7k I recently acquired to act as a samba file server. The
| hardware has all passed various stress tests I could throw at it so
| we're okay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Ralph Angenendt spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
To make it short: Have a x345 here with ServeRAID ?? (Adaptec
ASR-2020S). As soon as I realized I have to install additional SW and
the HBA has no decent BIOS, I ripped it out of the machine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Drew spake:
To make it short: Have a x345 here with ServeRAID ?? (Adaptec
ASR-2020S). As soon as I realized I have to install additional SW and
the HBA has no decent BIOS, I ripped it out of the machine and went mdadm.
The x345 seems to be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Marcelo M. Garcia spake:
| Dmitry Zaletnev wrote:
| Hi!
| I have a question to ask: where can I download CentOS 5.3 for
| Cell Broadband Engine Architecture, and if this is impossible -
| ppc64 version. I want to install it onto my Sony PS3.
|
|
thus Dmitry Zaletnev spake:
What about
http://us.fixstars.com/products/ydl/
There's two versions of YDL 6.1 iso: 112008 and 022009 (NEW),
the first is fulfilled with bugs (rpc bind doesn't work, PS3
forget IP after power down...) and the second with bug fixes
is suitable only for newer
thus Karanbir Singh spake:
On 08/30/2011 11:33 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Someday, perhaps we'll end up back on an authenticated version of NNTP,
with support for bbcode, images, and the front end reader of your choice...
Thats quite a good idea - and something that we explored at length when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there any time frame foreseeable for KB providing an update for httpd?
Upstream provided their SRPM yesterday, i.e. Aug 31 19:40. [0] [1]
It builds flawless on several machines I tried (Scientific Linux 6,
CentOS 5 and 6).
Question is:
thus Karanbir Singh spake:
On 09/01/2011 11:15 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
is there any time frame foreseeable for KB providing an update for httpd?
the rpm is already pushed, should be on the mirrors now'ish.
That's exactly what I mean about the 'transparency' aspect. This was a
very very big
thus Always Learning spake:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:29 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
That's exactly what I mean about the 'transparency' aspect. This was a
very very big issue with impact on many many machines. Administrators
sitting there waiting for that update, maybe sleepless because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho spake:
| Timo Schoeler wrote:
| Hi list,
|
| yesterday I sent this eMail to quagga mailing list, however I didn't
| receive an answer yet. Unfortunately, I really need this stuff running
| or have to switch to another
thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
Miguel Medalha wrote:
I am about to install a new server running CentOS 5.4. The server will
contain pretty critical data that we can't afford to corrupt.
I would like to benefit from the extra speed and features of a ext4
filesystem but I don't have
thus Miguel Medalha spake:
For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though.
I also thought about using xfs, but I don't like the idea of it being
dependent of an external kernel module that is always lagging behind the
current kernel version.
OTOH XFS never was
thus John R Pierce spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though.
I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in RHEL
anyways, and B) I've heard far too many stories about catastrophic loss
problems and day long FSCK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Alan McKay spake:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Anyone got a reco on a package that can collect netflow data and accept user
defined queries
for specific data, like what an ip did every
thus Alan McKay spake:
Well, netflow is the appropriate technology for this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netflow
Oh hey, look at that - I had no idea that was a specific thing :-)
I've seen something like that before - not Netflow obviously - but
I've seen it. Now I'll just have to
thus Christopher Chan spake:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org
wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in
RHEL
anyways, and B) I've heard far too many stories about catastrophic
loss
thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Christopher Chan spake:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org
wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported
Hi list,
during the last days there was a discussion going on about the stability
of XFS; though I myself used XFS heavily and didn't run into issues yet,
I'd like to ask something *before* we create our next generation data
storage backend...
Les Mikesell wrote in [0] about issues in the
thus Ross Walker spake:
On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:05 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
Hi list,
during the last days there was a discussion going on about the
stability
of XFS; though I myself used XFS heavily and didn't run into issues
yet,
I'd like to ask something
thus Ross Walker spake:
On Dec 9, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
thus Ross Walker spake:
On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:05 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
Hi list,
during the last days there was a discussion going on about the
stability
thus Christopher Chan spake:
Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
after a crash. XFS seemed to me to fit perfectly as
[off list]
Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
after a crash. XFS seemed to me to fit perfectly as I never had
Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully?
Yup, running on 5.4 x86_64, connecting to i386 and FreeBSD
7.2-STABLE/i386. No problems.
Timo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective
firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to
forward huge traffic. Any idea?
Hundreds?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html
A table is used to hold a group of IPv4 and/or IPv6
after quick search in google:
http://postfactum.pl.ua/pf/
I will test to patch latest linux kernel with pf.
What do you thing?
Get OpenBSD. Honestly -- all the porting stuff of relatively
kernel-close stuff is just braindead.
Timo
sadas sadas wrote:
I can't find information is
Hi list,
after some discussion on #IRC on PowerPC I was waiting for some
commitment on supported architectures in RHEL 6. As I just learnt,
Itanic will be dumped, but there will be a PowerPC release:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/18/redhat_rhel6_itanium_dead/
Best,
Timo (happy PowerPC
What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSDs out
there); however, as can be read on
http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/pf.html
there's the 'usual lag':
On 12/18/2009 10:05 PM, Peter Serwe wrote:
I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in
bare stock PF without the gui in front of it is about as easy as it gets.
The PF configuration file syntax was designed from the ground up to be sane,
unlike iptables, which
On 12/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Serwe wrote:
You can't patch the Berkeley Packet Filter into Linux. Linux kernel doesn't
support it.
and...
Despite a cacophonous chorus of replies directing you to the right tool for
the job, you insist on sticking with Linux.
If you want to use the
thus Pasi Kärkkäinen spake:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:36:57PM +0200, sadas sadas wrote:
I will explain more deeply. I need to deploy a firewall(s) in front of web
server farm because I need to do billing - I will use CentOS with iptables
+ ipset to store a list if my clients so when
thus Pasi Kärkkäinen spake:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:17:48AM +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Pasi Kärkkäinen spake:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:36:57PM +0200, sadas sadas wrote:
I will explain more deeply. I need to deploy a firewall(s) in front of
web
server farm because I need
thus Mike A. Harris spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
Hi list,
after some discussion on #IRC on PowerPC I was waiting for some
commitment on supported architectures in RHEL 6. As I just learnt,
Itanic will be dumped, but there will be a PowerPC release:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/18
On 12/22/2009 07:22 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
I followed the Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall posting and as
some posters wrote pf is soo sooo sso mutch faster, I was thinking
to give it a try. But I'm not familier to BSD so I was looking for some
tools and
On 12/23/2009 07:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity
no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some) spin at
a constant RPM, so the
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
