Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I am trying to determine the root of an issue I am having.
How can I watch traffic destined to a specific port on my CentOS 5.1
box to see if its even hitting it? It would be udp traffic.
# yum install wireshark
# tshark udp port 1234
John R Pierce wrote:
raid50 requires 2 or more raid 5 volumes.
with 4 disks, thats just not an option.
for file storage (including backup files from a database), raid5 is
probably fine... for primary database tablespace storage, I'd only use
raid1 or raid10.
RAID-10 has only one perfect
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I get pings around 60ms.
Pings within the same LAN? If so, that's slow even for 100BaseT. It
should be under 10 ms.
When I switch the cards around, the addon card attached to my
network, I get pings that alternate with one being ~1488ms and the
next 488ms! This
Ron Loftin wrote:
I'm considering a color laser printer
instead of the inkjets that I've been using, and I'm dithering back and
forth over the question of direct-connect or networked printer.
In that case, I'd get something with Postscript support. The native
printer language driver will
lingu wrote:
1) How file systeem get corrupted on linux?
The same way any file system gets corrupted: data gets damaged or lost
on its way to the physical media.
2) why,when and how fsck to be run without lossing data?
The purpose of fsck is to bring the file system back into a
On 12/3/2010 6:20 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
What about the XFS admin tools - do these get installed when
you format a partition as XFS from anaconda, or are they a
seperate rpm package, installed later?
They are in a separate rpm (xfsprogs, repository: extras).
On that topic, there are
On 12/8/2010 7:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Such [periodic failures] are fairly common
I'd say the main reason someone chooses CentOS (or another Linux flavor
with similar policies, like Ubuntu LTS) is that the distro provider has
made a long-term support commitment with minimal churn
[I'm guessing from the dozens of quoted lines per reply that many of
y'all aren't as lucky as I am. I have a threading email reader with
backing store, so I can go back and read past messages in a thread if I
need more context than a brief quote can provide. I have been so lucky
since the
On 12/8/2010 3:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
it is still not recommendable to trade security for simplicity.
Security is never an absolute, is *always* a tradeoff against simplicity.
We could store our servers 16 feet underground and encased in concrete
to prevent tampering and accidental
On 12/8/2010 8:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 06:29:44 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
And if you can't get the simple version right, how can you hope to
do it right with something wildly more complicated?
Alright, pray tell how I, a desktop Linux user,...
Let's not drag the
On 12/8/2010 3:26 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there any central reporting concept in SELinux so a multi-machine
admin doesn't have to go check each for all of the one-off cases and
knowledge can be shared about the fixes needed for 3rd party RPMs?
No. But then, there's not one for file
On 12/8/2010 5:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 05:00 AM, Warren Young wrote:
I assume you mean to advocate running updates infrequently,
No, I advocate setting up SELinux properly which will take care of the
automatic updates.
That's great if you are wise enough
On 12/8/2010 3:55 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:11:23 pm Warren Young wrote:
Let's not drag the desktop user into this discussion, too.
Why not?
I thought my reason was clear, but apparently not. You talk the talk of
security, but I guess we hang in different
On 12/9/2010 1:54 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
For the vast majority of issues with SELinux, it possible to overcome
them using the provided tools.
Of course, but I think you're mistaking possible for practical.
Everyone has different incentives and constraints.
Allow me build an analogy with
On 12/9/2010 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Also, Apple dictates style; to a lesser degree, so does M$. There's no
dictated style guide for Linux.
That's outdated thinking. Apple's acquired some infamy among its fanboy
base for violating their old style guidelines, which AFAIR were last
On 12/13/2010 9:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/13/2010 10:14 AM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
A friend said that C-Sharp (Mono) is very simple. Is this true?
I doubt you'll find it any less complex than Java. The two are very
similar, conceptually. C# exists more for political and business
reasons
On 12/13/2010 12:08 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
As the thread was for a newbie recommendation, I'd really
consider Ruby before any of the others,
Yes, Ruby can work for much the same reasons I gave for Perl in my
previous post in this thread. I'd say it has a bigger mismatch w.r.t.
shell script
On 12/13/2010 3:02 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:49 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
C# exists more for political and business
reasons than technical ones; it fills the same space Java could fill, in
a platform-agnostic world.
False. C# has significant technical
On 12/13/2010 3:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Have a look at Lua (www.lua.org). Imo it's quite readable and less
snip
Don't. I have literally never heard of it before,
It's quite popular in some areas, particularly as an embedded scripting
engine in games.
Having written one substantial
On 3/27/2011 3:07 PM, Jure Pečar wrote:
It's interesting that nobody so far mentioned openVZ
I wouldn't use it since being bitten by its lack of swap support.
I run a couple of web sites on a fairly heavy web stack which loads up
a bunch of dependencies that don't actually end up being used
On 4/2/2011 2:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote:
I do want to
use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse
implementation and unclear hints that there is another way.
Here are some benchmark numbers I came up with just a week or two ago.
(View with fixed-width
On 4/4/2011 9:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
try iozone
Maybe on the next server. This one can't be reformatted yet again.
bonnie++
That's what I used. I just reformatted its results for readability.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 4/5/2011 11:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Dropping to 16.37 TB on the RAID configuration by switching to
RAID-6 let us put almost the entire array under a single 16 TB XFS
filesystem.
You really, really, really don't want to do this.
Actually, it seems that you can't do it any more. I tried,
On 4/5/2011 11:24 AM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
Afaik 32-bit binaries do run on the 64-bit build and compat libraries
exist for most everything. You should evaluate if you really *really*
need 32-bit.
Yes, thanks for assuming I don't know what I was talking about when I
wrote that we had a hard
On 4/6/2011 11:40 AM, Finnur Örn Guðmundsson wrote:
Just a shot in the darkbut can't you have a x86_64 NFS server export
a fs larger then 16TB and mount that on your x86 machine for use with
your application?
I already ran the two-server idea past the decision makers. It was
rejected,
On 4/6/2011 1:16 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
There are other issues with XFS and 32-bit; see:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3364
and
http://www.mail-archive.com/scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov/msg05347.html
and google for 'XFS 32-bit 4K stacks' for more of the gory details.
Thanks
On 4/6/2011 12:25 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Don't scream: I'm using RedHat 7.3 for related reasons.
Yep, we've still got a bunch of those running in the field, too, and
many older besides. We still build new boxes using CentOS 3, also for
legacy compatibility reasons.
can a 64-bit
Brian Mathis wrote:
Messing with DNS is really the wrong way to go on this. You'd be
forcing all of the DNS servers involved to start messing with their
caches, update more frequently, etc.., pushing the problem out onto
everyone else, and you have no control over any of it really. Cache
time
Scott McClanahan wrote:
grep out the next 5 lines after the first and only instance
The scope of grep's view of the world is a single line. At any one
time, it knows nothing more.
If you need to deal with multiple lines, I suggest perl. Untested code:
#!/usr/bin/perl
while () {
Scott McClanahan wrote:
I'd like to skip those lines. I'd like to skip the line with bar and
the following five lines.
In that case, the perl code would be:
#!/usr/bin/perl
$eat = 0;
while () {
if (m/bar/) {
$eat = 6;
}
if ($eat) {
--$eat;
}
else {
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
- Have the script dump the results of the job to a text file. I tried
this with /path/to/dump my switches -v /home/me/dump.log
But that just produced an empty file.
Try appending 21 (without the quotes) to that command.
- Have the dump file be date-stamped with the
On 9/14/2011 1:26 PM, Edward Morbius wrote:
I'm looking for a capability similar to Debian/Ubuntu's pre/post up/down
network commands capability.
If you look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup, you'll see that it
will call /sbin/ifup-pre-local if it exists, before bringing up the
network
On 9/23/2011 1:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The one thing I don't understand is this: AFAIK, apache release not a
server update, but an update to the certificate chain, yanking Digitar's
CA.
What, pray tell, are you talking about?
I assume you mean DigiNotar, the defunct Dutch CA?
What
On 1/4/2012 12:30 AM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
this wasn't possible without a program like ChiliASP,
...which is now dead, apparently.
noow I heard
rumor that apache might have a plugin to allow it to read ASP.
Rumor, really? I don't think open source works like that. We're not
talking
On 1/11/2012 6:10 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
On 01/11/2012 06:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It is for devices with IP, but to find names that aren't officially
registered in a DNS server. For example if you have a Playstation 3,
or a newer blu-ray player that supports network streaming it will
On 1/11/2012 6:42 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
They did a great job with RHEL6 and I'm
curious what was changed in order to accomplish this.
It's probably the PowerTop work, primarily done to get better battery
life on laptops by throttling the CPU down when it's idle:
On 2/21/2012 5:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Things like boot process rarely break.
I can't remember the last time I caused a system to outright fail to
boot, but I *do* get unclean boots regularly.
Examples:
- Build and install some needed driver from source, yum upgrade
repeatedly,
On 2/21/2012 1:45 AM, Alex Walker wrote:
I've been looking into some ways to break a CentOS system so I can
perform some simulated disaster recovery
Bring up a fresh CentOS 6.0 system. Disable automatic updates. Add a
bunch of third-party software. Install at least one bit of hardware so
On 2/27/2012 9:31 AM, admin lewis wrote:
I need of to mount an XFS partition on Centos 6.2 .. but I cant find
the kernel module..
# rpm -ivh
http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm
# yum install kmod-xfs xfsprogs
On 3/7/2012 11:16 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/07/12 6:47 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
These days XFS should always be inode64 enabled, given the size of disks,
and NFS should have been fixed a long, long time ago.
yes. problem is, we have clients that are running all sorts of OS's,
including
Sean Carolan wrote:
For a back-of-the napkin calculation can we not assume that data equal
to the entire size of the file will be streamed to the client during
playback?
You can if you're using some of the fudge factors others have mentioned
here. The headers for IP + UDP + RTP take at
Amos Shapira wrote:
Is there a way to freeze a list of installed packages and exact
versions, then tell yum (or any other tool/script) to install exactly
these verions either on the same or another systme?
There isn't a need for an explicit feature. Just update one server,
test it, then copy
Amos Shapira wrote:
Assuming I take the approach you suggest and have to restore the cache
(with the tested versions) after it's lost in a disaster, is there a
way to do that (short of backing it up)?
I don't see why this is a big deal.
First off, even way out at the end of a RHEL/CentOS
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have to build my own rpms
For this I will have to work with the developers to find out where the
spec file is and how to change it without breaking something (or get
them to change it!).
If you can build the RPM, you do have access to the spec file. If
you're
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I await the developers help.
It's not hard to do it yourself.
First, find the .spec file:
$ cd the/source/trees/root
$ find . -name \*.spec -print
Then see if there is a top-level 'make' rule for building RPMs:
$ grep -l spec *akefile
Michael Simpson wrote:
GRC reports that ports are stealthed
Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open
ports
What advantages do they have, in your opinion?
there a better way than opening port 143?
ssh tunnelling?
I agree, though the default CentOS sshd
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
Hi Warren, Nice explanation.
Thanks!
I would like to ask what you
recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be traveling and
they know they will have to login from machines they have no
control over,
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
You are visiting the Otis Public Library in Norwich CT. They have Linux
based public workstations (w/Internet access).
(http://www.otislibrarynorwich.org/index.htm)
Do you trust the library, all of their employees, and every person who
has ever used the computer you
mcclnx mcc wrote:
we plan to setup our ORACLE database server (32 bits DB) and use dell
r900 server. This server can put up to 128GB RAM.
We are thinking use 32 bits CENTOS 4.7 or 5.2. My concern about
CENTOS 5.2 is it only support up to 16 GB RAM on 32 bits O.S.
Any suggestion?
To get
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
The comparison of PAE to EMS/XMS is completely bogus, the
technologies aren't alike at all.
They are alike in that they add an extra layer of indirection to work
around the fact that the pointer size cannot change.
PAE does *NOT* involve any bank switching;
I
James A. Peltier wrote:
CentOS 5 requires 512MB for installation
I had an EL5 install attempt fail on a VM with 512 MB of RAM. Big ugly
anaconda Python stack dump type error. Upped the RAM for the VM, and it
installed.
___
CentOS mailing list
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
CentOS 5 requires 512MB for installation
I had an EL5 install attempt fail on a VM with 512 MB of RAM. Big ugly
anaconda Python stack dump type error. Upped the RAM for the VM, and it
installed.
You need a combined
Scott Silva wrote:
USB I believe is not a DMA based port, so the processor has to do a lot of
work, especially at higher speeds. Rsync can also be a resource hog, as it
keeps most of the hash tables in memory it uses to compare files with.
True enough, though I wouldn't say USB is the whole
ML wrote:
Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re-
writing it for him
There used to be a project called ChiliSoft ASP that did this, but it
appears that Sun bought them and then killed the product.
As John R. Pierce noted, if his site is actually using
Dave wrote:
Has anyone got this combination working?
This was asked and answered on this very list just two weeks ago:
http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/348850-asp-pages.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Try fail2ban from rpmforge.
The main problem with fail2ban is that it's based on Python, so it takes
a fair bit of memory. This isn't a big problem on a dedicated server or
on a system with swap, but a lot of these attacks are made against
shared servers or those running
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I received at least one email suggesting a Windows-based rendering
farm - likely to consist of a few rack systems all running 64-bit
Windows. I read an article on Tomshardware which gave some decent
insight. What can list participants offer on this concept?
Well, since
mark wrote:
It's not anything I had ever looked into, or needed, but thanks for the
view into the heavy duty rendering field.
I'm glad you were able to extract some value from my incoherent
babbling. (No false modestyon re-reading the post it's clear the
caffeine isn't working
Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm still missing why you'd need to sudo inside the remote shell instead
of ssh'ing as the right user in the first place.
Perhaps he doesn't know the user@ syntax.
Tony, try this:
[localu...@host1 ~]$ ssh r...@host2 remotecmd
This requires that the public key
Ian Forde wrote:
You can always use the MySQL community RPMs.
http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.0.html#downloads
Second that. I'm not normally a big fan of replacing stock system
packages with third-party ones, but I've never had a problem with MySQL
AB's RPMs on CentOS.
A nice side
Dnk wrote:
Is there any real advantage to using 64 bit when I am right at the 4gb
ram threshhold?
Yes, unless you're not turning on swap. Once you add swap to a system
with 4 GB of RAM, you need either PAE or 64-bit to actually use the
swap. Since 64-bit CPUs became cheap last year,
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Most of the time, I find that the batteries are going
True, but a laptop makes a good low-power server, appliance or terminal:
- Hook a Drobo to it, and suddenly it's a media server for your house.
You just saved $200 by not having to buy a Droboshare.
- Does it
Jason Pyeron wrote:
0: we do not want the admin responsibility for the box. We even don't want to
change configurations.
But you do want to install software. It's possible to install some
kinds of software without root access, but you're cutting yourself off
from a huge world of software
Rainer Duffner wrote:
But you do want to install software. It's possible to install some
kinds of software without root access, but you're cutting yourself off
from a huge world of software that doesn't allow this.
I think you do not understand: he wants a managed VPS/manged root server.
Jason Pyeron wrote:
It's possible to
install some kinds of software without root access,
We will only need to push our web application
Are we talking about PHP or similar? In that case, you probably don't
need root access. I wouldn't really call that installing software. I
reserve
nate wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the rule of thumb for reboots after updates...
only with new kernels.
...and then only when you want what the new kernel provides.
I have my systems configured so yum is allowed to download and install
new kernels, but don't usually reboot unless I
Beartooth wrote:
Why do you want CentOS on an EeePC ?
I have a strong if perhaps irrational preference for the .rpm
family
Me, too, and it's rational in my case. I've experienced the whole range
of both sets of tools, from the ground up. RPMs are simpler to build
than DEBs, and
nate wrote:
(There are even some things the simpler Red Hattish tools can do that
the Debian ones can't, easily. rpm -qa, for one.)
rpm -qa typically just lists all of the packages on the system,
the equivalent in debian is dpkg -l.
Not really equivalent. The output is only sort of
R P Herrold wrote:
oh please -- move advocacy to a new thread raher than
hijacking.
It's just a natural evolution of the conversation. IMO, the answer to
the original question is No, so the obvious next direction to the
conversation is okay, what instead, then?
Nate's answer was
Justin Bull wrote:
I don't know if you can disable su -
Sure: usermod -L root. Before you do that, you need to have a user in
/etc/sudoers that has root equivalence. Ubuntu does this by default.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Robert Heller wrote:
(eg 'sudo su -' which is kind if redundant).
A shortcut that I just recently learned: sudo -s gives you a root
shell, like su. Not like su -, because it's not a login shell, so
you don't get root's .bashrc and such, but you can then su - from
within the root shell
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I still don't understand how using sudo instead of su makes it more secure.
Let's start with the simple case where only one person needs superuser
type privileges on a given machine. What, then, is the difference
between sudo and su -? There has to be one
Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:05:58 -0700
Gary Greene wrote:
. With sudo,
you get a record of what command was executed with superuser rights by whom
at whenever given hour.
sudo bash
If that's a problem for you, don't let people run bash via sudo.
There's an entire body of
On 4/13/2011 7:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So when is DEntOS 6.0 going to be released?
What's that? The latest electronic flossing toothbrush?
The fresh maker!
With the great new hot silicon flavor!
Hot silicon? I thought that smell was smoldering Nomex underwear, from
all the
On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems pointlessto me
The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops
Fast boots also matter for embedded systems.
We integrate a series of Linux-based boxes made by another company into
our
On 6/18/2011 8:51 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:13:00PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:00:25 PM Stephen Harris wrote:
But space is running out; I wondering if the new 3Tb disks would work
in this scenario; most importantly will
On 6/18/2011 8:00 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
I wondering if the new 3Tb disks would work in this scenario;
I've tried 3 TB disks on a 32-bit CentOS 5 box, plugged into generic
Intel PIIX on-board SATA ports. It seemed to work fine.
I only did it to see if it would work, so I currently have no
On 7/8/2011 4:40 PM, Lars Hecking wrote:
I'd also love to teach vim how sto how those pesky ^M characters.
It does, when the line ending style is mixed.
When the line ending style is consistent, you can make Vim show the file
type in the status line by adding something like this to your
On 7/13/2011 7:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Code bloat... ah, yes, the joys of OOPs
What does OOP have to do with this?
Doubling the pointer size affects C, awk
Consider Erlang, a functional language, not OOP in any way at all, not
even in the sidecar way of, say, Perl. The most
On 7/12/2011 9:19 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
how
are we to manage the DNS server? It is NOT trivial to create and
manage DNS records with a text editor.
If editing BIND zone files is too complex for you or it's just overly
complex for your situation, I recommend switching to dnsmasq. It
On 8/2/2011 11:21 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
Having said that, I can also use my USB flash drive to
transfer some files between those laptops and the
machine running centos. But it's quicker for me to use ftp
over the LAN.
Even faster is Dropbox. If you keep the frequently-synched files in
On 8/3/2011 6:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Current versions [of rsync] run over ssh by default
I didn't notice that change, thanks.
I tracked it down, and it happened in rsync 2.6.0, which was released
after EL3, which ships with 2.5.7. Alas, it appears I still need to
keep -e ssh in muscle
On 8/3/2011 10:11 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Rsync barely works well on Windows
So what does???
Please, can we drop the petty advocacy?
You're undoubtedly quite aware that there's a hell of a lot of software
that runs best on Windows. The fact that there's a lot of low-quality
ports from *ix
On 12/17/2009 3:59 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:37:52PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
what I meant was, without working video, how does he know what the error is?
POST beep codes I would think.
Yes, he confirmed that in a later message.
On 12/29/2009 11:49 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
You mean new to the concept of files and directories? This is not
Linux-only.
The . and .. existed even in MS-DOS back in the 80's.
having an actual . and .. file in a directory is a distinctly Unix
On 1/6/2010 2:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run under Linux
You should also consider FreeBSD 8.0, which has the newest version of
ZFS up and running stably on it. I use Linux for most server tasks, but
for big storage, Linux just doesn't have
On 1/7/2010 6:01 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
I'm not recommending OpenSolaris on purpose.
Serious system administrators are not Linux fans I don't think.
I think I must have been sent back in time, say to 1997 or so, because I
can't possibly be reading this in 2010. I base this on the fact
On 1/29/2010 2:53 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Idiot change battery led stays on.
By chance, I just did an RBC 23 change the other day.
The docs I got with it said to let it charge for 8 hours, then do the
self-test. On my UPS, that means holding the On button for a few
seconds. (A single
On 2/4/2010 7:10 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 02/04/2010 02:41 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
...
how about mounting that drive on rc.local ?
That's too late; I need it before /etc/init.d/mythbackend
starts.
# ls /etc/rc`runlevel | cut -c3`.d/*myth*
Then write a script in /etc/init.d to wait for
On 2/19/2010 1:38 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I have done that, but it seems that either these settings don't work on
CentOS5.4, or I'm doing something wrong.
Is the remote machine also CentOS 5? NFS v4 is a relatively recent
addition to Linux, so if your remote box is older, it might only be
On 3/6/2010 4:04 PM, nate wrote:
if you can upload source code,
you can upload a precompiled binary
True, but most attacks are automated, and try to attack as wide a range
of machines as possible.
If I were to write a bit of malware for *ix that needed a custom binary
on the target machine,
On 5/18/2010 10:59 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Yes, A is the first letter of the Alphabet ;)
Not for all values of the LANG environment variable. (Trying
desperately to keep it on topic. Not being funny. No, not at all.)
___
CentOS mailing list
On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
- VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't
specifically said so yet
Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is
now 8 months old, that seems plausible to me. But another plausible
explanation is that
On 6/28/2010 7:34 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
If you look on their site, they clearly specify that they do not offer a
paid support option for VMware Server, that it's community supported only.
Does that seem like an attitude towards a product they plan to update?
It fits completely with a
On 6/28/2010 7:59 AM, guillaume wrote:
Why would one use vmware Server 2.x when ESXi is available free of
charge, stable, small footprint, ... ?
I've thought about it, but it's not really the right thing for us.
Our VM host has some special hardware in it, driven by custom software
which runs
On 7/22/2010 3:25 AM, John Doe wrote:
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
Very few programs can use PAE to get at that extra RAM. Can the
programs you run do this?
Is your CPU 64-bit capable? That's generally a better idea than
On 8/5/2010 11:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
When someone says, I'm writing a shell script, and hereabouts I need
$TOOL to do such and such, a good answer is usually forthcoming.
When someone says, Tell me how to script this $PROJECT, the
commmunity usually points the OP off to Google/Manual.
On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
[r...@devserver21 ~]# cat /etc/ntp.conf | grep -v ^# | grep -v ^$
restrict default nomodify notrap noquery
restrict 127.0.0.1
server 192.168.1.67
server 192.168.1.66
server 192.168.1.65
Some HOWTOs tell you that more time servers is better, on a
On 8/12/2010 3:43 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Okay, I only have one timeserver,
I meant that your on-site time server should be relying on only one
other outside time server, one stratum up.
but the ntp clients cowardly refuse to use
less than 3.
Only one server on a given LAN should be
On 8/12/2010 4:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/12/10 2:51 PM, Warren Young wrote:
Only one server on a given LAN should be running ntpd. It's overkill
for every machine to keep themselves synced with such a complex and
fussy server. All the others should just call ntpdate or msntp
1 - 100 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
