mething like "Working on xyz package but
ran into this problem. Still have to look at packages abc and def"
would more than satisfy a vast majority of people complaining here.
It's mind boggling that the project just doesn't seem to understand
that.
// Brian Mathis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Brian Mathis
> wrote:
>> Appreciate your efforts, but let's make one thing clear:
>>
>> The SINGLE source of ALL the current community issues (or "whining" as
>>
true. Not one post has
"demanded" anything.
Everyone is here because they care about the project. That's what is
constantly missing in the replies by those who continue to browbeat
and deride anyone simply looking for information. It's a symptom of a
deeper pro
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Brian Mathis
> wrote:
>
>> Rudi,
>>
>> Cut the crap. You're intentionally changing the context of the
>> discussion, so please stop posting. No one has "demanded"
s" in
/etc/yum/yum-updatesd.conf, then you have installed something else
that is performing the updates automatically.
Are you sure the updates are actually getting installed, and it's not
just noise in the log from yum-updatesd?
// Brian Mathis
P.S. The yum log doesn't have th
were installed
>> last year.
>
> Hmm, is there a known fix for this?
Rotate the log file yourself once a year. You can check if you are
seeing this bug by looking at the /var/log/yum.log last modified time.
If it was yesterday, then I suppose the packages were installed.
As far as your other questions, how does it determine what packages to
update, I think you will find it's not actually doing any updating. I
have not used yum-updatesd to auto-update packages myself, but I would
think it would automatically install any updated package.
// Brian Mathis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
he obvious. When there's nothing new the project should
be focusing on improving things to become stronger to withstand the
storm of the next release cycle. It only becomes obvious that has not
been done at times like this when the storm has arrived.
// Brian Mathis
__
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> On 7.4.2011 16:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> While SL and other distributions are perfectly fine for almost all
>>> uses, there's a certain irony in the fact the
ent from Karanbir Singh:
"Just want to point out that CentOS does not use anything from that page
- and details / scripts on that page have nothing to do with the CentOS
process."
// Brian Mathis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I know you release when ready, so how can I help it be ready faster?
It really is an achievement to have alienated such a luminary as Dag,
especially when KB specifically mentions that the project only wants
to deal with such luminaries in the FLOSS interview.
// Brian Mathis
_
e "long tail" of
people who might have time to contribute 1 or 2 things, but not become
a complete owner of a subsystem. With many people contributing like
this, the main project committers would vet and incorporate changes,
maintaining the level of trust while reducing their workload. Eve
e tone of the messages it seems like
it was either via IRC or personal email, which effectively counts for
zero in this context as we are talking about things that take place in
public. Those things need to go into the wiki, with updated pages.
Not on blog posts, twitter, or email archives.
// Brian Mathis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:39 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Brian Mathis wrote:
>
>> packages, etc... but how? From the tone of the messages it seems like
>> it was either via IRC or personal email, which effectively counts for
>> zero in this context
only assume that the real reason behind keeping the dev process
closed is to maintain the egos of those on the inside -- since all
avenues of logic seem to have been exhausted.
// Brian Mathis
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/centos@centos.org/msg69365.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> mark
I think having a decent remote console is the solution to that. DRAC,
KVMoIP, Serial console, etc... I'm not sure how it could be
considered safe to start services like sshd before the filesystem has
been checked.
// Brian Mathis
_
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:28 PM, wrote:
> Brian Mathis wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:14 PM, wrote:
>>> My manager reminds me that "in the old Sun days", the ssh server came up
>>> first, *before* the fsck on boot, so that if there was a problem, a
_
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
t; Thanks,
>
> Jerry
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:06:25AM +, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:
> On 02/12/2020 23:32, Brian Reichert wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:17:04PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >>So ntpdate is no longer present past CentOS 7.
> >
> >What's wrong w
ut new workflows in CentOS Stream 9,
we will be able to provide more direct feedback on patch status at a
source code level. Just as a reminder you can view and participate in
development happening on Gitlab:
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/
<https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/
uirements on this sort of
workflow.
- RHEL 9 is not yet released, my understanding is that patch files for
RHEL proper will begin showing up after GA
--Brian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
illa:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037807
We're waiting for systemd-239-55.el8 sources to show up after which we
will build this and publish to CentOS Stream. Right now this appears
to be an infrastructure issue and the appropriate folks are working on
that,
ping utility.
--Brian
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:57 PM Robby Callicotte via CentOS
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 20, 2022 3:52:35 PM CST Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> > The change was intentional. So, this will stay ...?
> >
> > https://git.c
___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
Mirrors served by the mirror.stream.centos.org alias will remain accessible
only via https. You can find a mirror close to you that supports http on
this page:
https
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> I have a dedicated * CentOS box that shows today as uptime 543 days. I built
> from scratch as I needed to support a four port analog trunk card.
> This does not have internet access as I'm running it like an old fashioned
> PABX -
> just with
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
>
>> Uptime is a red herring and is generally meaningless. You'd be better
>> off performing updates and reboots at least once a month, so you don't
>> n
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:23 PM, wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Mathis
>
> The difference is that CentOS is a general-purpose OS that can be used
> for many things, and has a much bigger installed base. That makes it
> more of a target and would lik
Slightly OT...
Opensolaris has just had triple parity raid (raidz3) added to ZFS;
http://blogs.sun.com/ahl/entry/triple_parity_raid_z
Pity we can't get an in kernel version of ZFS for linux.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:52:08PM -
testing email delivery
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:17 PM, ML wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Can anyone explain why I might want to run my own DNS Server in-house?
> I have a comcast business circuit and use their DNS servers and when I
> need entries, I use GoDaddy where I buy my domains.
>
> Best,
> -ML
If you want to do more com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:01 PM, ML wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was trouble shooting why an rsync was taking over a day.
>
> I found the problem to be in in a directory in /home that has CVS
> backups in it.
>
> I browsed to find out that there are 7 .tar.gz archives that are each
> about
>
> 1,199,943,
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> Since you stated that your system is only having trouble at writes,
>> doing batch inserts, I would look at how you are doing these batch
>> inserts and see if you can optimize this by using techniques to delay
>> key writes or adjust locking me
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Shawn Everett wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for their comments so far.
>
> The "server" in question is a basic 2 node cluster connected to an MSA500.
>
> It runs a variety of applications including Oracle, Apache, Samba, and a
> proprietary app built by another vendor
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
>>> The better solution would be to make sure you are prepared for when
>>> the hardware does fail. Inform the client that you understand that
>>> they don't want to upgrade the server
You asked this question not even a week ago. It's off-topic, and not
one that you should be relying on people on a mailing list to answer.
Only you know your requirements and only your lawyer knows what's best
for them.
Also, there are many sites that go into detail about OSS licenses.
Going to a
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> You asked this question not even a week ago. It's off-topic, and not
>> one that you should be relying on people on a mailing list to answer.
>> Only you
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Carlos Santana wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I am having time-drift issues on my CentOS VM. I had referred to
>> following documentation:
>
> The issue I had with time drift was due to running NTP inside the VM.
> Don't do
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using Conky for some time, a nifty utility to monitor just
> about anything on the PC. Vital things like CPU, RAM, swap, disks,
> current song playing in MPD :o)
>
> Here's what it looks like :
>
> http://www.microlinux.fr/ima
ooking on the CentOS 5.4 wiki, which is still flagged as
DRAFT, and it gives a few steps to go through for an upgrade. Check it
out here.
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4/#head-29511ff6659f6463d444feb92326ed2232fc8c08
-Brian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Might I suggest the rpmforge repo instead? Check out the
following.
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge#head-20e1f65f19ccf2f5fbf5adb30dbaf5ea963a64ae
Others might disagree, but I've had good luck with rpmforge.
-Brian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on' on DVD install that
installs kvm-83.
It's also a difference between installing from network and DVD,
even when the same Kickstart file is used when kvm is selected.
What is the reason of the base-repo/media difference?
cheers,
Brian.
___
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM, wrote:
> It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with the
> exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support matrix
> for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to locate a
> CentOS 5.1 x86-64 copy. I can
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently setup a new server for our public libraries. For the last
> two years, this has been my first "big" job, since it involves
> networking eleven small to medium size public libraries.
>
> There was a hiccup some time ago when
) is switched
off.
Following versions are installed:
bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5
bind-libs-9.3.6-4.P1.el5
dbus-1.1.2-12.el5
Thanks,
Brian.
starting the bind causes following error:
[r...@t41 ~]# /usr/sbin/named -u named -D -t /var/named/chroot -g
04-Nov-2009 16:58:14.905 starting BIND 9.3.6-P1
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 15:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Craig White wrote:
>> > At that point, using OpenLDAP or CentOS-DS or Fedora-DS is more or less
>> > a matter of implementation details and utility. None of them are better
>> > than the
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:01 -0500, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> In my extremely limited experience with LDAP, it seem that the problem
>> is not "LDAP" itself, but how to structure it. Most howtos walk you
>> throu
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
[...]
> The problem with relying on documentation, even great documentation,
> is that it puts the responsibility on the admin to follow. Now we all
> know of the bad admins that can't follow directions, but in my
> experience, the culprit is often
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:19 AM, ankush grover wrote:
> Hi friends,
>
> I am running Nagios 2.7-1 on Centos 5.0 32-bit hosted on Vmware ESX
> 4.0. The issue I am seeing on the server is sometimes nagios is
> showing the below messages in /var/log/messages and as the system time
> gets changed som
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:57 PM, David McGuffey
wrote:
> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
> whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
>
> I installed AIDE and did a
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> David McGuffey wrote:
>>
>> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
>> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
>> whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
>>
>>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:52 PM, David McGuffey
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:31 +, John Horne wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
>> > Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
>> > following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guid
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Jonathan Garden wrote:
> This is really stupid question. But referring to:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083791.html
> I don't see any line related to ntpd in my /var/log/messages . Do I need to
> turn-on ntpd for timekeeping on VMs? Some
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> On 11/30/2009 11:34 AM, Jonathan Garden wrote:
>> This is really stupid question. But referring to:
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083791.html
>> I don't see any line related to ntpd in my /var/log/messages . Do I n
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Robert Bielik wrote:
> I'm converting Ubuntu startup scripts to work on CentOS (5.3), and I'm having
> trouble finding out how
> to start a daemon in a certain directory? For Ubuntu, start-stop-daemon has
> the option -d to set the
> working directory.
>
> TIA
> /
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Robert Bielik wrote:
> Brian Mathis skrev:
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Robert Bielik
>> wrote:
>>> I'm converting Ubuntu startup scripts to work on CentOS (5.3), and I'm
>>> having trouble finding out how
>&g
diff -y ?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Simon Banton wrote:
> At 08:54 + 2/12/09, hadi motamedi wrote:
> >Dear All
> >Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I compare two
> >files but not in line-by-line basis on my CentOS server ? I mean say
> >row#1 in file1 has the same data
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> I am about to install a new server running CentOS 5.4. The server will
> contain pretty critical data that we can't afford to corrupt.
>
> I would like to benefit from the extra speed and features of a ext4
> filesystem but I don't have any
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Lars Hecking wrote:
>>> Any ideas about how to go back in time and get the last 5.3 update batch??
>>>
>>
>> Grab a copy of centos/5.3/updates along with centos/5.3/os from your
>> nearest CentOS mirror and set up your own local repository.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:03 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Alan McKay wrote:
>
>>> I wish I had access to a Centos update folder AS IT EXISTED before
>>> Centos 5.4 was released. The last update set that applied to 5.3,in
>>> other words.
>>
>> Crap, I just removed one with no backu
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 07/12/09 23:19, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> Not true, and it's the thing that's most irritating about this policy.
>> The RPMs are still there, just not the sqlite repodata files that yum
>> needs. So if you g
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:50 PM, MHR wrote:
> I realize I'm not getting a lot of questions answered here lately, and
> I'm going to presume that this is for legitimate reasons (i.e., people
> don't know or are too busy to think about it), not because they seem
> stupid (if they do, please tell me,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Roland Roland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have a certain issue at hand that i'm trying to solve.
>
> there's a certain command that i need to execute 10 minutes after boot.
> how can i set that? im not very expert with cron jobs but can it be done
> that way? i know that
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ron Blizzard wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Rogelio wrote:
>>> Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a
>>> Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environmen
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Davy Leon wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> This question is about fetchmail running on my Centos 5.3 box.
> I need to fetch my email from different accounts living on remote servers
> and drop it on my local mailbox.
> The question is wich way is faster for fetchmail... usin
[Top post moved to bottom]
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Davy Leon wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Brian Mathis"
>> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:27 AM
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fetchmail
27;ve set it up, so I don't remember too many details. Perhaps check it
out if you feel you need an alternative to fetchmail, and if you need
any help, I can go back and see how it's set up.
-Brian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[Top post again moved to the bottom]
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Scot P. Floess wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> [Top post moved to bottom]
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Davy Leon
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> --
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> Rather off-topic, but I'm looking for IP-based KVMs (~16 ports) that can
> handle both PS/2 and USB hookups on the server side. All of the answers
> over at Slashdot are a few years out of date and it looks like prices on
> KVM head units h
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Thomas Harold wrote:
>> Rather off-topic, but I'm looking for IP-based KVMs (~16 ports) that can
>> handle both PS/2 and USB hookups on the server side. All of the answers
>> over at Slashdot are a few years out of date and it looks like pri
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:45:19 +0100:
>
>> Hmmm. The latter is LinkedIn - I don't really want to block that :)
>
> yes, and they have been spamming this list already several times. It's
> getting annoying over time.
>
>> I
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, nate wrote:
> Alan McKay wrote:
>
>> I want to do a reboot of a couple of systems during our maintenance
>> window and fsck them, but would rather try it from home first and not
>> go to the data center. Then of course rush there like a madman if
>> they don't com
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/6/2010 1:17 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, nate wrote:
> No out of band management?
>>
My thoughts exactly. All servers should have this these days, be it
an integrated card or an IP-base
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I just assumed that setting this in the httpd.conf to the expected
> /var/www/html and making all my sites actual virtual hosts would
> place any request made by ip in /var/www/html, but it goes to the
> first vhost?
>
> How can I get the a
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
>> I know of the issue using vmware server 2.0.2 and centos 5.4, but is their
>> any reason not to use the .rpm install of for centos? I have always used
>> the .tar file but this time used t
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we want to upgrade our infrastructure and are considering renting two
> different types of server by a provider:
>
> - A: one is with 80 GB SSD (and 12 GB memory)
> http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_ssd.xml
> - B: the other with 750
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
>>Of Barry Brimer
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:15 PM
>>To: CentOS mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>>
>>I use
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> Anyone got any actual comparisons between unison and rsync specifically
> related
> to the performance of synchronization of large data sets over slow links?
>
> I have a huge tree to start replication of Friday and know that if I sync th
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>>Of Benjamin Franz
>>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM
>>To: CentOS mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>>
>>If you
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Christopher Thorjussen
wrote:
> I've just updated a few CentOS 5.3 servers to 5.4. One of them were a Apache
> Webserver. Doing a diff/check on the new ".rpmnew" config files that are
> made, I saw that the logrotate command for apache was changed. In 5.3 it did
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Ivan Arteaga wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to download SME Server 7.4 from Internet and always got md5
> checksum problems... I know it sounds like connection problems but I tried
> from almost all the available mirrors, from different locations.. via
> wireless,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> Hoping someone can help me fix something that I apparently messed up, i have
> the issue that when I untar a file as root the uid and gid that get set are
> not roots'. I had change a user uid and gid to 1000 via usermo -u etc
> but somehow
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> Renato Botelho wrote:
>>
>>> My question is not *how* to update, but how the rpm detects a
>>> new version is available and automatically update to rpms from
>>> 5.4 version.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I believe it gets the updates
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I updated my secondary DNS server from 5.3 to 5.4 today. After the
> update, named would not start. A bit of investigation found that all of
> the files in /var/named/chroot/var/named/data had been turned into links
> to themselves!
>
> Fort
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> Trying to rsync a rather large file from a windows server to a centos server
> and all but this is working fine.
>
> As it's a 20 gig file I am trying to send the diff of with a -c, I suspect
> over
> the low bandwidth this presents an is
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:
>
>> I wonder now if the owner of
>> that directory should actually be named?
>
> Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in
> use it's excactly the same ther
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server
> as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked
> for instead of an ftp server.
>
> Anyone know of something/project that exists already?
>
> T
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Ian Blackwell wrote:
> On 30/01/2010 12:09 PM, Victor Padro wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if someone could help me,
> I'll try...
>> I want to use one array with the 2 500GB HDDs in RAID1 for the OS and
>> for some VMs,
> That will work OK.
>> and the othe
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently busy setting up a machine for use as an internet kiosk.
> Here's what I aim to do.
>
> - There's only one user on the system, 'invite'. One (very simple)
> password. The machine is to be used publicly and freely.
>
> - To
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:08 AM, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to monitor a workstation (Centos 5 x86_64).
>
> I need to obtain informations about :
>
> - cpu utilization per user, per a period, how many days per user,
>
> Any ideas about a good and simple free tool ?
>
> Regards.
In addi
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Matt Iavarone wrote:
>
> This is typical. There were probably files deleted from the file
> system that are still in use by a process. Restarting the process
> will release the files and df and du will jive.
>
That argument only holds until you reach the point i
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Warren Michelsen wrote:
> On Mac OS, in order to allow ssh using dsa keys, I would copy
> ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub from my machine into ~/.ssh/authorized_keys of the
> target machine. I've created .ssh directories in my account home as
> well as in /root and copied the res
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Peter Kjellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Clint Dilks wrote:
> > 1. Currently all of the key pairs we are using have empty passphrases is
> > it worth the effort of changing this and setting up ssh-agent compared
> > to what you gain
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Brian Mathis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Peter Kjellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Clint Dilks wrote:
> > > 1. Currently all of the key pairs we are using hav
Have you checked the cables you are using ?
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 12:36:19 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > a) have you checked
> > /var/log/message for memory or drive errors?
>
> Looked through the logs, there's *nothing* I can fin
people's
reaction to every problem was to turn it off (and many made it the
default setting). Some still repeat the mantra as if it is gospel,
but they are relics of a bygone era. If your first reaction is to
disable auto-negotioation, please update your ways. We are a decade
into the 21st cent
,
RAM, etc...) and/or memtest86+ on the RAM? This sounds like a
hardware issue to me.
-☙ Brian Mathis ❧-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Negative wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
>
>> Brian Mathis wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative
>> > wrote:
>> >> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP usin
you should be using the 'service' framework
for, instead of inittab. In CentOS 5 you would create a script in
/etc/init.d and start the service from there. I'm not yet familiar
with CentOS 6, but I would bet looking for docs on how to do that will
lead you in the right
entOS
5 and give you the ability to set the chroot by groups.
-☙ Brian Mathis ❧-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
so good because it does not provide proper rpm tags that
let other rpms know that php is installed. It announces itself as
"php53", and most package looks for "php", so they can't find it.
-☙ Brian Mathis ❧-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
101 - 200 of 683 matches
Mail list logo
