Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS-devel] What to do with wiki.centos.org ? (let's discuss it)

2022-08-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:42 AM Fabian Arrotin  wrote:
>
> On 25/08/2022 17:10, Trevor Hemsley via CentOS-devel wrote:
> > On 25/08/2022 15:28, Robby Callicotte via CentOS-devel wrote:
> >> On Thursday, August 25, 2022 8:46:18 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> I second this. Our quick docs could use MkDocs like the SIG stuff
> >>> does, and the RHELish stuff can use the Antora system the RHEL docs
> >>> folks want to use.
> >> I agree with Neal here.  This seems to offer a good balance.  At this
> >> point I
> >> would argue that the MR/PR nature of git is ubiquitous and is part of
> >> everyone's workflow.
> >
> > So far I've seen lots of "yes, use this" type comments so I'd like to
> > ask how this compares in user friendliness to the current wiki (assuming
> > that you can get to it because the spammers are taking a rest). I've
> > never used any of the alternatives that have been proposed so far. Are
> > they wikis? Are they usable for a non-technical user? The wiki, you
> > press a button and you can edit content directly and see what it will
> > look like before you save it. You can link to other pages easily, you
> > can format content how you want it easily, often just at the press of a
> > button.
> >
> > None of what I've heard so far sounds even remotely as usable as what we
> > have now.
> >
> > Trevor
>
> It seems I opened a "Pandora's box" last week before the weekend ... :-)
>
> To keep a long story short, I just wanted to announce that something
> needs to be done, and also explaining publicly why wiki is misbehaving
> on regular basis (so that people don't have wrong expectations about
> wiki online service)
>
> what I see so far for wiki.centos.org :
> - nothing is done and so it will just be deleted when centos 7 goes EOL
> in June 2024 (no, we'll not even consider having a c7 online past that
> EOL date)
> - centos-docs team is having a look at migrating content to another wiki
> (the sooner the better then), like mediawiki or else
> - or just consider moving to "static" sites (decision is up to people
> contributing content)
>
> FWIW, actually it's possible to edit/contribute to SIG guide *without*
> having to learn the git workflow (like PR/MR, fork, commit, push,
> rebase, etc).
>
> There is an "Edit this page" button/link on each page under
> https://sigs.centos.org/guide/ and it's just log you directly on
> git.centos.org (with SSO) to edit directly the page (if you have commit
> rights). It works also with github/gitlab
>
> PS : we don't have to migrate it next week (even if I'd like to see
> current setup moved/migrated to something else soon) but just keeping in
> mind some EOL dates approaching and not waiting for last minute
> discussion ;-)
>
> --
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab

Let's keep the centos-docs in the loop.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS-devel] What to do with wiki.centos.org ? (let's discuss it)

2022-08-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:41 AM Phil Perry  wrote:
>
> On 25/08/2022 16:32, Phil Perry wrote:
> > On 25/08/2022 16:10, Trevor Hemsley via CentOS-devel wrote:
> >> On 25/08/2022 15:28, Robby Callicotte via CentOS-devel wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, August 25, 2022 8:46:18 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote:
>  I second this. Our quick docs could use MkDocs like the SIG stuff
>  does, and the RHELish stuff can use the Antora system the RHEL docs
>  folks want to use.
> >>> I agree with Neal here.  This seems to offer a good balance.  At this
> >>> point I
> >>> would argue that the MR/PR nature of git is ubiquitous and is part of
> >>> everyone's workflow.
> >>
> >> So far I've seen lots of "yes, use this" type comments so I'd like to
> >> ask how this compares in user friendliness to the current wiki
> >> (assuming that you can get to it because the spammers are taking a
> >> rest). I've never used any of the alternatives that have been proposed
> >> so far. Are they wikis? Are they usable for a non-technical user? The
> >> wiki, you press a button and you can edit content directly and see
> >> what it will look like before you save it. You can link to other pages
> >> easily, you can format content how you want it easily, often just at
> >> the press of a button.
> >>
> >> None of what I've heard so far sounds even remotely as usable as what
> >> we have now.
> >>
> >> Trevor
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > Git-type work flows, pull and merge requests may be second nature to
> > those working within Red Hat, or other developers, but they are not
> > familiar technologies to most non-technical, regular users.
> >
> > The Wiki has served as a key point of entry for contributing to the
> > CentOS project for non-technical users for exactly the reasons Trevor
> > highlights. A user can easily read and follow the documentation
> > presented on the Wiki, and can easily update it to fix any errors they
> > may encounter at the press of a button. If we lose that ability then we
> > lose a valuable entry point for new contributors to the project.
> >
> > And lets not forget - developers do not write (or maintain) web-based
> > documentation. That is the reason documentation sucks on most open
> > source projects - developers want to do cool stuff, not spend all their
> > time writing documentation. So lets not give too much weight to the
> > opinions of those who have never contributed anything to the Wiki.
> >
>
> I think my point above is further highlighted by the fact this
> discussion is taking place on the centos-devel list, not the centos-docs
> list.
>
> > Fabian - please can you give us stats for the top contributors so we can
> > seek and appropriately weigh their opinions?

I wholeheartedly agree with Trevor and Phil.

Here is the list of current and past contributors to the wiki:

https://wiki.centos.org/EditGroup

It's a long list from many years ( > 15 years ) of the wiki history.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Compatible SATA controller needed

2022-03-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:55 AM Pete Geenhuizen 
wrote:

> I'm trying to install Centos 8 on an older PC but it fails because the
> SATA controller isn't supported.
> Anyone have a source for a PCI/ePCI controller card that is compatible
> with Centos 8?
> Thanks
> Pete
>

Your controller might be supported by one of the ELRepo's kmod packages.
This can be checked if you provide the device ID pairing [:] as
reported by 'lspci -nn'.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS Plus 8-stream support?

2022-02-11 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:02 PM Dan West  wrote:
>
> Are the centos-plus packages for 8-stream no longer supported?  I noticed 
> that all of the repositories have removed the packages, but I have not heard 
> any announcement that said they were going away.  For example:
>
> The last mention of the centos-plus repos I can find in the mailing list was 
> from November 18th and was just addressing the final release of CentOS 8:
> ```
> Note that older content, obsoleted by newer versions of the same
> applications are trim'd off from repos like extras/ and centosplus/
> ```
> While CentOS 8 EOL’d at the end of December, my understanding is that CentOS 
> 8-Stream will be supported until May 31st 2024.  Does that include CentOS 
> Plus for 8-Stream?
>
> I really just need CentOS Plus for the kernel-plus package for Wireguard 
> support.   The alternative would be to build it into kernel after each 
> release myself, but that isn’t easily maintainable with multiple servers.
>
> Let me know if anyone has any insights.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan West

If you need wireguard, then you can use the kmod-wireguard package for
CentOS Stream maintained by the CentOS kmods SIG.

http://mirror.centos.org/centos-8/8/kmods/x86_64/packages-main/Packages/k/

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki editing privs

2021-12-29 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 5:54 AM Thomas Doczkal 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'd like to (re-)request permission to edit wiki.centos.org. My username
> is ThomasDoczkal.
>
> I noticed that Cloud/Manage/Ansible is outdated and would like to update
> it where links to external pages are still available.
>
>  From there I'd like to update
>
> Cloud/*
> Documentation/*
> TipsAndTricks/*
> HowTos/*
>
> Best Regards,
> Thomas
>

Hi  Thomas,

You should be able to edit wiki pages now. Please let us know if you find
any problems.

Thanks for contributing to the wiki.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki editing privs

2021-11-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:58 AM Shaun McCance  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to get permission to edit wiki.centos.org. The Contribute page
> says I should email here. My username is ShaunMcCance. I intend to edit
> the Documentation SIG proposal page with input from the community, and
> from there edit pages under Documentation, TipsAndTricks, and HowTos.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaun McCance
> Documentation Community Architect
> Red Hat Open Source Program Office

Thank you for your contribution. You should be able to edit CentOS
wiki pages now.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Difference between CentOS Linux and CentOS Stream

2021-07-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 7:50 AM Ian Pilcher  wrote:
>
> On 7/19/21 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > If you are not doing anything special with the kernel, then there is
> > very little difference between CentOS Stream and CentOS Linux.
>
> Out of curiosity, do we yet know the frequency of reboot-required
> updates (kernel, glibc, systemd, etc.) in CentOS Stream?

You may want to go to git.centos.org. For example you can find the
kernel commits for CentOS Stream 8 here:

https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/commits/c8s

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki request

2021-07-13 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:03 AM Jeffrey Osier-Mixon  wrote:
>
> Thanks - it appears that I log in as "jefro". I can change this to FirstLast 
> if that is preferred.
>
> Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon  |  je...@redhat.com
> Red Hat Office of the CTO  |  Sr. Principal Community Architect, Automotive

Please do. CamelCase has a special meaning/function in the wiki.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki request

2021-07-13 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:20 AM Jeffrey Osier-Mixon  wrote:
>
> Hi all - I'm able to log in, but not yet able to edit the SIG proposal. Would 
> it be possible for me to have access to this doc?
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Automotive
>
> thanks
>
> Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon  |  je...@redhat.com
> Red Hat Office of the CTO  |  Sr. Principal Community Architect, Automotive
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 10:08 AM Jeffrey Osier-Mixon  wrote:
>>
>> Hello - we'd like to propose a CentOS SIG for Automotive, and thus would be 
>> grateful for edit access to the  area SpecialInterestGroups/Automotive. 
>> Please enable myself (wiki: jefro, email: je...@redhat.com) and Ian, on Cc.
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>> Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon  |  je...@redhat.com
>> Red Hat Office of the CTO  |  Sr. Principal Community Architect, Automotive

What is your wiki username in the form of FirstnameLastname ?

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] ACL for SpecialInterestGroup/Hyperscale

2021-04-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:19 PM Davide Cavalca via CentOS-docs <
centos-docs@centos.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tried adding MichelSalim to the ACL for
> SpecialInterestGroup/Hyperscale, but it fails because "You can't change
> ACLs on this page since you have no admin rights on it!". Could you
> please add him, or even better give me admin right on the page so I can
> maintain the ACL myself? My account is DavideCavalca. Thanks!
>
> Cheers
> Davide
>

Hi  Davide,

You should have admin rights now. Please let us know if you need further
assistance.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Transition test report going from CentOS8 to Debian 10.

2021-02-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:23 AM Warren Young  wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Lamar Owen  wrote:
> >
> > I posted a pretty complete rundown on the scientific linux users mailing 
> > list, so I won't recap it all here.
>
> Link?

https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind2102=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS=5275

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Access for Cloud SiG

2021-01-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:54 AM Amy Marrich  wrote:

> Akemi,
>
> The usernames for YatinKarel and JavierPena should be corrected now as
> well.
>
> Thanks for all your assistance,
>
> Amy
>
> *Amy Marrich*
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms
>
> Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> a...@redhat.com
>
> Mobile: 954-818-0514
>
> Slack:  amarrich
>
> IRC: spotz
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 5:52 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:12 PM Amy Marrich  wrote:
>>
>>> Ok updated to Camel Case - AmyMarrich. I'll let the others know as well.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Amy
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:22 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:38 PM Amy Marrich  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:58 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:50 AM Amy Marrich  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to request access to
>>>>>>> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud for the
>>>>>>> following people:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> amymarrich
>>>>>>> jpena
>>>>>>> AlfredoMoralejo
>>>>>>> yatinkarel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> AmyMarrich and AlfredoMoralejo should be able to edit the requested page.
>> Feel free to edit the homepage as well:
>>
>> https://wiki.centos.org/AmyMarrich
>> https://wiki.centos.org/AlfredoMoralejo
>>
>> Akemi
>>
>
OK, YatinKarel and JavierPena added and their homepages set up.

https://wiki.centos.org/JavierPena
https://wiki.centos.org/YatinKarel

Thank you,
Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Access for Cloud SiG

2021-01-24 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:12 PM Amy Marrich  wrote:

> Ok updated to Camel Case - AmyMarrich. I'll let the others know as well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amy
>
> *Amy Marrich*
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms
>
> Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> a...@redhat.com
>
> Mobile: 954-818-0514
>
> Slack:  amarrich
>
> IRC: spotz
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:22 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:38 PM Amy Marrich  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:58 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:50 AM Amy Marrich  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to request access to
>>>>> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud for the following
>>>>> people:
>>>>>
>>>>> amymarrich
>>>>> jpena
>>>>> AlfredoMoralejo
>>>>> yatinkarel
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Amy
>>>>>
>>>>
AmyMarrich and AlfredoMoralejo should be able to edit the requested page.
Feel free to edit the homepage as well:

https://wiki.centos.org/AmyMarrich
https://wiki.centos.org/AlfredoMoralejo

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Access for Cloud SiG

2021-01-24 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:38 PM Amy Marrich  wrote:

>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:58 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:50 AM Amy Marrich  wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to request access to
>>> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud for the following
>>> people:
>>>
>>> amymarrich
>>> jpena
>>> AlfredoMoralejo
>>> yatinkarel
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Amy
>>>
>>> *Amy Marrich*
>>>
>>> She/Her/Hers
>>>
>>> Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms
>>>
>>> Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>> a...@redhat.com
>>>
>>> Mobile: 954-818-0514
>>>
>>> Slack:  amarrich
>>>
>>> IRC: spotz
>>> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>
>> Apologies for not responding to you sooner.
>>
>> As stated in "https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#Contribute_to_the_Wiki;,
>> user name must be in the form of FirstnameLastname. I have added
>> AlfredoMoralejo to the ACL list, but need the wiki user names for other 3
>> people.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Akemi
>>
>> Akemi,
>
> I just verified my userid (amymarrich) works for the wiki and I have
> reached out to Javier and Yatin to confirm their userids.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amy
>
>
> *Amy Marrich*
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms
>
> Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> a...@redhat.com
>
> Mobile: 954-818-0514
>
> Slack:  amarrich
>
> IRC: spotz
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>

Amy,

Wiki username, by convention, is FirstnameLastname. In the wiki, CamelCase
words are treated as hyperlinks. So for example, AmyMarrich, wherever it
appears in the text, will be linked to wiki.centos.org/AmyMarrich
automatically.

However, I'm not here to force people to stick to the naming convention. If
you understand the potential consequences of not using the recommended
naming, I'd be happy to use any name of your choice.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Access for Cloud SiG

2021-01-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:50 AM Amy Marrich  wrote:

> I'd like to request access to
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud for the following
> people:
>
> amymarrich
> jpena
> AlfredoMoralejo
> yatinkarel
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amy
>
> *Amy Marrich*
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms
>
> Red Hat, Inc 
>
> a...@redhat.com
>
> Mobile: 954-818-0514
>
> Slack:  amarrich
>
> IRC: spotz
> 
>

Apologies for not responding to you sooner.

As stated in "https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#Contribute_to_the_Wiki;,
user name must be in the form of FirstnameLastname. I have added
AlfredoMoralejo to the ACL list, but need the wiki user names for other 3
people.

Thanks,

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Request: Remove Ralph from notifications

2021-01-21 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:21 AM Rich Bowen  wrote:
>
> Hi, folks,
>
> Ralph gets notified every time we update a wiki article. However, he has
> stepped back from the project, and no longer needs to receive these
> notifications.
>
> Is there a way, faster than clicking through every single page in the
> wiki, to remove him from the notification lists?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Rich

I believe whoever on the wiki superuser list should be able to edit
users' settings. Who installed the current wiki? Maybe Ralph?

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS wiki self-introduction: BenCotton

2020-12-13 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:45 AM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 6:56 AM Ben Cotton  wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to request access to edit the CentOS wiki. I am requesting
> > access so that I can add and maintain an FAQ page for CentOS Stream.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > BC
> >
> > --
> > Ben Cotton
> > He / Him / His
> > Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
> > Red Hat
> > TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>
> I assume your wiki username is BenCotton. You should have edit access to:
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ
>
> Please let us know if you find any issue.
>
> Thank you,
> Akemi

Hi Ben,

Sorry for not having asked this earlier but could you edit your wiki
homepage now that CentOS Stream is a hot subject?

https://wiki.centos.org/BenCotton

Thank you,
Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Future of CentosPlus?

2020-12-10 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 4:12 AM Gerhard Schneider  
wrote:
>
>
> Is there anything known about the future of CentosPlus after moving to a
> Pre-RHEL CentOS Stream?
>
> It would be of no interest to RedHat..
>
> Gerhard Schneider

As the maintainer of the plus kernel for the last 10+ years, I'd like
to know the answer ...

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-09 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:07 PM Lamar Owen  wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 12:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > While I'm not sure how we'll get there, it seems like the
> > mutually satisfying end result would be one where third party binary
> > drivers work with CentOS Stream kernels.  Let's see what we can do.
> >
> So, I want to address this part a bit.  In MANY cases, it's not a
> third-party driver that ELrepo packages; it's an in-kernel driver that
> Red Hat has decided to disable.  Such as the megaraid_sas driver I need
> for my servers.

And just to give you some more examples -- ELRepo offers DUD (driver
update disk) images for the devices whose support has been dropped in
RHEL 8:

https://elrepo.org/linux/dud/el8/x86_64/

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

2020-10-17 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 1:38 PM Robert Heller  wrote:

> I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78,
> and
> FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers.  Is there some magic I need to do?
> As
> a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68.  My system is
> otherwise
> up-to-date.
>
> --
> Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364
> Deepwoods Software-- Custom Software Services
> http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Linux Administration Services


This issue?

https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17767

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Requesting Access to the Wiki

2020-10-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:52 PM David Duncan via CentOS-docs
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My Wiki login is DavidDuncan
>
> I would like to have access to modify the wiki pages. Specifically, I
> would like to provide some additional support for the pages supporting the
> AWS pages and information to keep that accurate and updated to match
> availability of images and discovery methods.
>
> I would like to modify detail found here:
> https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS
>
> I would also like to add my name to the members list for the Cloud
> Instance SIG to signal my intent to participate in the SIG.
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/CloudInstance

You now have edit rights to both pages. Please let us know if you find
any problem.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] JFS for CentOS 7

2020-09-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H  wrote:
>
> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H  wrote:
> >> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I 
> >> remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs 
> >> module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available.
> >>
> >> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?
> > My suggestion is to use the centosplus kernel (kernel-plus) instead.
> > jfs is enabled in this kernel.
> >
> > Akemi

> Would I simply install it by using yum? Are there any downsides to installing 
> this kernel vs. relying on the standard kernel?

To install the kernel-plus:

# yum --enablerepo=centosplus install kernel-plus

Boot into the just installed kernel-plus and check to see if jfs is
working as expected. If all is fine, change the default kernel to
kernel-plus:

# yum-config-manager --setopt=centosplus.includepkgs=kernel-plus
--enablerepo=centosplus --save
# sed -e 's/^DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel$/DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel-plus/' -i
/etc/sysconfig/kernel

I would not say there is any downside, but I'm highly biased. ;)

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 LSI SAS2004 Driver

2020-09-19 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 8:04 PM William Markuske  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've recently been given domain over a number of supermicro storage
> servers using Broadcom / LSI SAS2004 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2
> [Spitfire] (rev 03) to run a bunch of SSDs. I was attempting to do fresh
> installs of CentOS 8 and have come to find out that RedHat deprecated
> support for a number of HBAs for 8 including all running the SAS2004 chip.
>
> Does anyone know if there is a driver available for this chip from a
> third party repo? My google searches have led me to believe that EPEL 8
> has a kmod-mpt3sas package but it does not seem to exist though multiple
> blogs have stated otherwise. If anyone knows if there is a solution for
> CentOS 8 that would be great or if I have to roll back to CentOS 7 for
> card support.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William

It is ELRepo, not EPEL. :)

http://elrepoproject.blogspot.com/2019/08/rhel-80-and-support-for-removed-adapters.html

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JFS for CentOS 7

2020-09-15 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H  wrote:
>
> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember 
> correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but 
> kmod-jfs does not seem to be available.
>
> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?

My suggestion is to use the centosplus kernel (kernel-plus) instead.
jfs is enabled in this kernel.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Viewing changelog for packages to be updated

2020-08-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:18 PM Simon Matter via CentOS
 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:54 PM Kenneth Porter 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there some way to see the RPM changelog entries for a prospective yum
> >> update? Ideally I'd like to see just the entries that are newer than the
> >> version of the package I already have.
> >>
> >> I saw a new kernel in today's yum-cron email and I'd like to know what
> >> it's
> >> about and how urgent the issue is for me.
> >
> > You may want to look into git.centos.org. For example, spec file diff
> > for the latest C7 kernel update can be seen here:
> >
> > https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/c/c53828b00fb26a7f96b149eef5e220a5ed4cc4e5?branch=c7#_5
>
> Hi Akemi,
>
> Thanks for the hint about git.centos.org.
> But, is there some yum/dnf utility which can show the changelog changes?
> If not, then I may expand one of my rpm tools to do it.
>
> Simon

yum -q --changelog xxx.rpm

will show the changelog.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Viewing changelog for packages to be updated

2020-08-26 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:54 PM Kenneth Porter  wrote:
>
> Is there some way to see the RPM changelog entries for a prospective yum
> update? Ideally I'd like to see just the entries that are newer than the
> version of the package I already have.
>
> I saw a new kernel in today's yum-cron email and I'd like to know what it's
> about and how urgent the issue is for me.

You may want to look into git.centos.org. For example, spec file diff
for the latest C7 kernel update can be seen here:

https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/c/c53828b00fb26a7f96b149eef5e220a5ed4cc4e5?branch=c7#_5

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Write permissions on NFV Sig page

2020-07-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:25 AM Dominik Holler  wrote:

> Hi,
> I am a new member of NFV SIG and
> I'd like to update
> https://wiki.centos.org/action/login/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV to reflect
> new goals and members, may I get write permissions on it?
> My username in the wiki is DominikHoller.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dominik
>

Please go ahead.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Write permissions on NFV Sig page

2020-07-21 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:33 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been appointed as new chair of NFV SIG.
>
> I'd like to update
> https://wiki.centos.org/action/login/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV to reflect
> new goals and members, may I get write permissions on it?, my username in
> the wiki is AlfredoMoralejo.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alfredo
>

Please go ahead.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

2020-06-17 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:53 PM Chris Adams  wrote:

> Once upon a time, Noam Bernstein  said:
> > Of course.   My only question is whether the observation that the gap
> for CentOS 8 is indeed larger than we have come to be used to for CentOS 7.
>
> So, I took a look... and the answer is "it's not" (with a small sample
> set).  I took dates from Wikipedia for RHEL and the archived release
> notes for CentOS.  I didn't bother with the .0 releases (since that's a
> lot of new work anyway).  Right now, CentOS 8 is far faster than CentOS
> 7 and 6 were at this stage.
>
> release RHEL date   CentOS date days
> 6.1 2011-05-19  2011-12-12  207
> 6.2 2011-12-06  2012-07-24  231
> 6.3 2012-05-20  2012-09-30  133
> 6.4 2013-02-21  2013-05-21  89
> 6.5 2013-11-21  2014-02-26  97
> 6.6 2014-10-13  2014-11-15  33
> 6.7 2015-07-22  2015-09-05  45
> 6.8 2016-05-10  2016-07-28  79
> 6.9 2017-03-21  2017-04-05  15
> 6.102018-06-19  2018-07-03  14
>
> 7.1 2015-03-05  2015-10-11  220
> 7.2 2015-11-19  2016-02-19  92
> 7.3 2016-11-03  2016-12-21  48
> 7.4 2017-08-01  2018-03-21  232
> 7.5 2018-04-10  2018-10-30  203
> 7.6 2018-10-30  2019-01-28  90
> 7.7 2019-08-06  (didn't find release notes)
> 7.8 2020-03-31  2020-04-27  27
>
> 8.1 2019-11-05  2020-01-15  71
> 8.2 2020-04-28  2020-06-15  48
>

 7.7 2019-08-06  2019-09-17  42
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] requesting edit/create page rights for wiki.centos.org/contribute

2020-05-28 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 3:00 AM Tomas Tomecek  wrote:

> Akemi, all is good now: I have the account in caps and have access to
> the Contribute tree of pages and my personal page.
>
> Thank you very much for your help and patience! I wish everyone was so
> nice and welcoming as yourself in this world.
>
>
> Tomas
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:51 AM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:55 AM Tomas Tomecek 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Akemi, thank you so much for your help.
> >>
> >> So, the case sensitivity bit me again: my actual account name is all
> >> lower case: https://wiki.centos.org/tomastomecek (b/c that's also my
> >> FAS account name)
> >>
> >> I guess I can try creating an account with initials in caps or I'd
> >> need the perms for my lower case account. Don't have a preference.
> >>
> >> I just read my original email and realized that I didn't mention the
> >> account name in there - my apologies.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you!
> >> Tomas
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:56 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:27 AM Tomas Tomecek 
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks, Akemi.
> >> >>
> >> >> I still need the permissions though: "You are not allowed to edit
> this
> >> >> page.", the same holds for my personal page.
> >> >>
> >> >> I also cannot find precise documentation how to contribute to the
> wiki
> >> >> itself: I can see on this ML that git diffs of changes are being
> >> >> posted - should I open a PR to some repo or edit the wiki page
> >> >> directly?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thank you,
> >> >> Tomas
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:30 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 6:19 AM Tomas Tomecek 
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Howdy,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> as you already know from my intro email, I'm working on CentOS
> Stream.
> >> >> >> I'd love to start publishing docs to wiki and therefore need edit
> >> >> >> access for the wiki.centos.org/contribute tree: could you grant
> it to
> >> >> >> me, please?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> My plan is to create a new document for it:
> >> >> >> wiki.centos.org/contribute/CentOSStream and then link to it from
> the
> >> >> >> contribute document - does that sound right?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Tomas
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Please go ahead. Let us know if you find any issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Akemi
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi Tomas,
> >> >
> >> > Please note it is https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute (case
> sensitive).
> >> >
> >> > Also, your homepage is ready to go:
> >> >
> >> > https://wiki.centos.org/TomasTomecek
> >> >
> >> > Akemi
> >
> >
> > About the wiki username, it has to be FirstnameLastname. According to
> section 3 of the Contribute page:
> >
> > "Create a login with a username in the format: FirstnameLastname. For
> example, if your name is John Doe, the username to be created would be
> JohnDoe. Other variations, such as johndoe, John Doe, John_Doe, John,
> johnny123numbers, Mister Doe, JustSomeEditor etc. will not be accepted"
> >
> > Could you create yours as TomasTomecek?
> >
> > Akemi


You are quite welcome.

Akemi

>
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] requesting edit/create page rights for wiki.centos.org/contribute

2020-05-26 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:27 AM Tomas Tomecek  wrote:

> Thanks, Akemi.
>
> I still need the permissions though: "You are not allowed to edit this
> page.", the same holds for my personal page.
>
> I also cannot find precise documentation how to contribute to the wiki
> itself: I can see on this ML that git diffs of changes are being
> posted - should I open a PR to some repo or edit the wiki page
> directly?
>
>
> Thank you,
> Tomas
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:30 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 6:19 AM Tomas Tomecek 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> as you already know from my intro email, I'm working on CentOS Stream.
> >> I'd love to start publishing docs to wiki and therefore need edit
> >> access for the wiki.centos.org/contribute tree: could you grant it to
> >> me, please?
> >>
> >> My plan is to create a new document for it:
> >> wiki.centos.org/contribute/CentOSStream and then link to it from the
> >> contribute document - does that sound right?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tomas
> >
> >
> > Please go ahead. Let us know if you find any issue.
> >
> > Akemi
>

Hi Tomas,

Please note it is https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute (case sensitive).

Also, your homepage is ready to go:

https://wiki.centos.org/TomasTomecek

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Edit CentOS Wiki for NetworkManager

2020-05-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:44 AM Milan Keršláger
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I saw that the page https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager 
> which is outdated. I created account MilanKerslager and now I'm asking for 
> permission to edit this page in Network section.
> Thank you.
> Milan Kerslager

You should be able to edit the requested page now.

Thanks,

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] New Wiki editor, would like to update HowTos/postfix_sasl_relayhost

2020-04-19 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:08 PM Jonathan Billings  wrote:
>
> Could I edit my WikiName page?  (https://wiki.centos.org/JonathanBillings)
>
> --
> Jonathan Billings 

Sure.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] New Wiki editor, would like to update HowTos/postfix_sasl_relayhost

2020-04-19 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 1:26 PM Jonathan Billings  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just signed up as a wiki editor (JonathanBillings) and I’d like to edit:
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix_sasl_relayhost
>
> … which is very out of date and could easily be updated with more accurate 
> information.
>
> --
> Jonathan Billings 

Go right ahead. Thanks for your contribution.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] I Need to Build a Custom Kernel - missing step

2020-04-07 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:34 AM Maciej Iwanowski
 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:17 AM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> > As stated in "step 1. Build preparations", users are supposed to
> > follow the instructions in "Section 2 of I Need the Kernel Source".
> > Running "rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec" is included in there.
> I must have completely missed it. My bad and thanks for pointing it out!
>
> > Could you explain why step 4 should precede step 2?
> It was my mistake - I completely forgot about reference to section 2
> of I need the Kernel source.
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam/Regards,
> Maciej Iwanowski

No problem. Comments are always appreciated.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] I Need to Build a Custom Kernel - missing step

2020-04-07 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:58 AM Maciej Iwanowski
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to build a custom kernel following the steps defined at
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel. It seems to me that:
> 1. Step 4 should precede step 2
> 2. At the beginning of the current step two you should execute:
> rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec (otherwise no kernel-related directory will
> exist in `/rpmbuild/BUILD/).
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam/Regards,
> Maciej Iwanowski

As stated in "step 1. Build preparations", users are supposed to
follow the instructions in "Section 2 of I Need the Kernel Source".
Running "rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec" is included in there.

Could you explain why step 4 should precede step 2?

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki edit: HowTos/Virtualization

2020-04-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:13 PM Mazzystr  wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> First time contributor ... long time listener!
>
> Your /FirstnameLastname/ username: ChrisCallegari
>
> I am working with Open Source project called KubeVirt.  Part of our mission 
> is to ensure that the project can easily be deployed ... this includes host 
> os and Kubernetes.  We dev and test on Fedora, CentOS, and RHEL and several 
> Debian derivatives for OS's and minikube for Kubernetes.
>
> We've discovered a fresh install of Fedora 31 and CentOS 8 cannot run 
> `minikube start --driver=podman`.  Exploring the reasons for this led me to 
> the discovery that Section HowTos/Virtualization is missing a section on how 
> to use the tools from the Open Containerization Initiative (cni, cri-o, 
> podman, etc).  The result is our users are having to search through the 
> blogosphere for inconsistent procedures on deploying os, kubernetes just to 
> get starting exploring the KubeVirt project.
>
> I would love to participate in getting a section added to the wiki to enable 
> a smoother user experience.  I have a lot of exp writing this sort of doc 
> since my full time employment is with Red Hat and my prior team wrote 
> reference architectures for OpenShift 3.x using various cloud providers.
>
> Thanks,
> /Chris Callegari

Hi Chris,

You should have edit access there now. Please let us know if you find any issue.

Thanks for your contribution,

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Incorrect link in /Contribute wiki page

2020-03-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:59 PM Lucio Seki  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 6:50 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Lucio Seki  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > In the page https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#Contribute_to_the_Wiki
>> > there's a "Create a login" link that leads me to 
>> > https://wiki.centos.org/UserPreferences
>> > which doesn't help me creating a login at all.
>> >
>> > Should it be replaced by https://wiki.centos.org/FrontPage?action=login or 
>> > https://wiki.centos.org/FrontPage?action=newaccount ?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > LucioSeki
>>
>> Thank you for contacting us. The link has been updated accordingly.
>> Please let us know if it needs further adjustment.
>>
>> Akemi

> Thanks Yagi-san!
>
> So I was originally wondering how to fix some issues (e.g. typo) in the wiki, 
> and I ended up finding this mailing list.
> Should I report the issue in the mailing list, and wait for someone with 
> proper privileges to fix it?
> Or am I allowed to edit it by myself?
>
> Lucio Seki

Hi Lucio,

This is the correct mailing list. If you'd like to be able to edit
wiki pages yourself, please make such a request. You might not get
global edit right instantly, so you may want to start with some
specific page(s).

Thank you,
Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Incorrect link in /Contribute wiki page

2020-03-26 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Lucio Seki  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> In the page https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#Contribute_to_the_Wiki
> there's a "Create a login" link that leads me to 
> https://wiki.centos.org/UserPreferences
> which doesn't help me creating a login at all.
>
> Should it be replaced by https://wiki.centos.org/FrontPage?action=login or 
> https://wiki.centos.org/FrontPage?action=newaccount ?
>
> Regards,
> LucioSeki

Thank you for contacting us. The link has been updated accordingly.
Please let us know if it needs further adjustment.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS wiki self-introduction: BenCotton

2020-03-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 6:56 AM Ben Cotton  wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to request access to edit the CentOS wiki. I am requesting
> access so that I can add and maintain an FAQ page for CentOS Stream.
>
>
> Thanks,
> BC
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

I assume your wiki username is BenCotton. You should have edit access to:

https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ

Please let us know if you find any issue.

Thank you,
Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Fwd: Update CentOS wiki 8.1 Release notes

2020-02-09 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 2:04 PM Timothy Lee  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I received this e-mail from Christer regarding dead links in the CentOS
> 8.1911 release notes.
>
> Can the maintainer of the CentOS 8 release notes determine what the best
> course of action is?  Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Timothy
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject: Update CentOS wiki 8.1 Release notes
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:03:42 +0100
> From: Christer M. Fekjan 
> 
> To: Timothy Lee  
>
> Hi Timothy!
>
> I discovered three link errors (404s) in the 8.1. release notes. I
> registered a user for the wiki, downloaded and edited the file. As I have
> no update credentials, I hereby attach the updated file and kindly ask you
> to update the wiki. Of course I could always do that myself if I'm given
> the necessary credentials.
>
> I also attach a diff file. As you can see I suggest to move the link for
> known issues forward in the sentence, from "RHEL 8.1 release notes" to
> "known upstream issues". Just to let you know in case you have a different
> opinion and want to keep that unchanged.
>
> Thank you in advance, and have a great day!
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Christer Michaelsen Fekjan
>

Thanks for reporting broken links. I have just fixed them. Please do let us
know if the page needs more adjustments.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 and E1000 intel driver

2020-01-17 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:16 PM david  wrote:
>
> Folks
>
> I know that support for the network adaptors supported by the 'e1000'
> driver have been removed from the base distribution.  However, I have
> exactly that controller (Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet PCI, not
> PCIe).  Is there a way for me to add support for that on Centos
> 8.1?  Perhaps a driver in an RPM package?
>
> Thanks
>
> David

The e1000 driver should be in the 8.1 kernel:

$ modinfo e1000
filename:
/lib/modules/4.18.0-147.3.1.el8_1.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.ko.xz
version:7.3.21-k8-NAPI
license:GPL
description:Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver
author: Intel Corporation, 
rhelversion:8.1

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Raspberri PI 4B 4GB install image

2019-12-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 7:53 AM Strahil via CentOS  wrote:
>
> Hello Community,
>
> I'm waiting for my first ARM-based toy - a 4GB Raspberry Pi 4B and I was 
> looking for a CentOS 8/ CentOS Stream image with no success.
>
> Do we have an image ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov

Here we go:

https://forums.centos.org/viewtopic.php?f=49=71407=305437=pgreco#p305437

Thanks to Pablo Greco.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 5:30 PM Bill Maidment  wrote:
>
> > https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x
>
> This misses the point of where are the intermediate updates to 8.0 ? or
> can we only get point releases with no updates in between?

You may want to watch the "CR work" on that wiki page.

What is the CR repo?

https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS website/blog localization support for IT (italian...) language

2019-12-16 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:00 PM Fleur  wrote:

> Il lun 16 dic 2019, 20:11 Akemi Yagi  ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Fleur  wrote:
>> >
>> > I'll reply to myself only to redo a point of where we've arrived and
>> > what I need to start my job
>> >
>> > On last Monday 9th Dec I Wrote
>> > > What I can give now is to help translate the CentOS website/blog to 
>> > > italian language.
>> >
>> > I followed the steps suggested in the Contribute to the Wiki [1] page
>> > - Create a login account with username in the right format: 
>> > FirstnameLastname
>> > - Subscribed me to the CentOS-docs mailing list
>> > - Sent a message to that mailing-list " CentOS-docs" after I've
>> > received the subscription notification
>> > - Wait a bit that someone in the AdminGroup creates the requested
>> > pages and give me editing rights
>> >
>> > So, after I've verified that my email arrived, has been archived, and
>> > no reply was sent to that, I'm now at the check step "...If there were
>> > no replies then be persistent and resend your original email".
>> >
>> > I think that after my first proposal with a long list of pages to be
>> > translated can be revised to start directly from this shorten list :
>> > (Yes, I'm official asking to edit this pages)
>> >
>> >  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/Contribute?action=edit
>> >  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/HowTos/Wiki/Editing?action=edit
>> >  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/FrontPage?action=edit
>> >  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/Documentation?action=edit
>> >
>> > Can someone read this message (Rich are you there?) directly involved
>> > in the CentOS Project support me with this request to the AdminGroup?
>> > [2]
>> >
>> > It's time to strike while the iron is hot
>> >
>> > Forgive my impertinence but I'm impatient to start giving a -small-
>> > but I think useful contribute to the project
>> >
>> > Happy hacking
>> > Andrea Flori
>> > aka
>> > Fleur
>> >
>> > [1] : https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#Contribute_to_the_Wiki
>> > [2] : https://wiki.centos.org/AdminGroup
>>
>> Sorry for not replying sooner. Is your wiki name AndreaFlori ?
>>
>> Akemi
>
> Yes, it is.

You should be able to edit (or create) any page under it/ . Also, you
are in the translation group. Please let us know if you find any
problem with the translation work.

Thank you for your contribution,

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS website/blog localization support for IT (italian...) language

2019-12-16 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Fleur  wrote:
>
> I'll reply to myself only to redo a point of where we've arrived and
> what I need to start my job
>
> On last Monday 9th Dec I Wrote
> > What I can give now is to help translate the CentOS website/blog to italian 
> > language.
>
> I followed the steps suggested in the Contribute to the Wiki [1] page
> - Create a login account with username in the right format: FirstnameLastname
> - Subscribed me to the CentOS-docs mailing list
> - Sent a message to that mailing-list " CentOS-docs" after I've
> received the subscription notification
> - Wait a bit that someone in the AdminGroup creates the requested
> pages and give me editing rights
>
> So, after I've verified that my email arrived, has been archived, and
> no reply was sent to that, I'm now at the check step "...If there were
> no replies then be persistent and resend your original email".
>
> I think that after my first proposal with a long list of pages to be
> translated can be revised to start directly from this shorten list :
> (Yes, I'm official asking to edit this pages)
>
>  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/Contribute?action=edit
>  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/HowTos/Wiki/Editing?action=edit
>  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/FrontPage?action=edit
>  - https://wiki.centos.org/it/Documentation?action=edit
>
> Can someone read this message (Rich are you there?) directly involved
> in the CentOS Project support me with this request to the AdminGroup?
> [2]
>
> It's time to strike while the iron is hot
>
> Forgive my impertinence but I'm impatient to start giving a -small-
> but I think useful contribute to the project
>
> Happy hacking
> Andrea Flori
> aka
> Fleur
>
> [1] : https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#Contribute_to_the_Wiki
> [2] : https://wiki.centos.org/AdminGroup

Sorry for not replying sooner. Is your wiki name AndreaFlori ?

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 Plus Kernel Update Missing?

2019-12-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 8:34 AM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 5:50 AM Albert McCann  
> wrote:
> >
> > Along with the recent kernel update (3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7), the CentOS 7 
> > plus kernel was likewise updated. The plus kernel though hasn't shown up in 
> > the mirrors yet, while the plain kernel has. Could someone please push the 
> > release button for the plus kernel?
>
> That "someone" is Johnny Hughes. :)

The release button pushed today.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 Plus Kernel Update Missing?

2019-12-08 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 5:50 AM Albert McCann  wrote:
>
> Along with the recent kernel update (3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7), the CentOS 7 plus 
> kernel was likewise updated. The plus kernel though hasn't shown up in the 
> mirrors yet, while the plain kernel has. Could someone please push the 
> release button for the plus kernel?

That "someone" is Johnny Hughes. :)

> What I do see in the various random mirrors I've manually checked is the 
> previous plus kernel (kernel-plus-3.10.0-1062.7.1.el7.centos.plus.rpm) shows 
> a release date of 12-6 instead of 12-3 it had a few days ago.

You can follow the source updates for the plus kernel here:

https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/commits/c7-sig-centosplus-kernel

> Thanks, and thank you for all the work and help you folks do, it's greatly 
> appreciated by this retired old phart.
>
> Albert McCann

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Account registration

2019-11-24 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 10:26 AM Thomas Doczkal  wrote:
>
> On 11/24/19 6:40 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > https://wiki.centos.org/de/*?action=edit
> > You should be able to edit those pages. Please let us know if you find
> > any problem.
> >
> > Akemi
> Many thanks Akemi, for granting me access.
>
> I just added the expired note which worked fine.
>
> I can create new pages for /de/* but cannot update the "/de/FrontPage"
>
> which is slightly outdated.
>
> Die aktuellen Versionen sind *7.5-1804* und *6.10*.
>
> vs.
>
> Current major versions are 8 (1905), 7 (1908) and 6.10.
>
>
> Which would be a trivial change to do.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Thomas

Please try now. I have also added you to the translation group.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Account registration

2019-11-24 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 7:10 AM Thomas Doczkal  wrote:
>
> Username: ThomasDoczkal
>
> I have found an expired URL on the Wiki and would like to add a hint to it.
>
> As an active member of the Free Software Foundation Europe I am
> translating website and news entries to German from time to time.
>
> Please enable editing for the page:
> https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/OtherVoices
> and https://wiki.centos.org/de/*?action=edit
>
> Thanks
> Thomas

You should be able to edit those pages. Please let us know if you find
any problem.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Suggestion for wiki page edit; "OtherSpins"

2019-11-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:42 AM Simon Avery  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Discussion point and request for edits (either through an existing approved 
> editor, or via myself if I am granted access) Hopefully a constructive 
> suggestion to improve documentation, and elsewhere in the Wiki it advises me 
> to raise such things through this mailing list.
>
> I recently noticed in Freenode/#centos somebody seeking help and being 
> redirected to http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/OtherSpins as soon 
> as they mentioned their issue was on a VPS. Curious, I read the page and have 
> some suggestions about the wording.
>
> Through this wiki page, the phrase "Genuine CentOS" is used to indicate a 
> version of CentOS that has been modified by the VPS host.
>
> I think this wording is misleading and would like to suggest is is changed 
> through this document.
>
> Reasoning: In the computing world, Microsoft and others widely use the phrase 
> "Genuine" to indicate whether Windows, Office or other products are licenced 
> legally. The inferrance from this is that these VPS providers are somehow 
> providing an illegal copy of CentOS. This is obviously not the case. In fact, 
> this is explained in the text:
> "I was sent to this page because I was told that my version of CentOS isn't 
> genuine CentOS. Will you please explain this?
> We have noticed that a lot of people are offering something that they call 
> CentOS. But this something is in reality only based on CentOS and it has been 
> modified by the people making it available."
>
> Suggestion 1: Change "Genuine" to "Modified" (contexed accordingly)
>
> Suggestion 2: Rework the tone of this wiki article to be less disdainful. My 
> personal view is that phrases like "We are not mind readers", "we cannot 
> provide you with support" are not friendly and would put some people off from 
> asking for help again. (A similar view to overly widespread use of irc bot 
> triggers)
>
> Suggestion 3: Make it clearer that some VPS hosts may provide unmodified 
> CentOS. Whilst the phrase "This is usually the case" comes through, no 
> evidence to support this assertion is given, so it is heresay. The document 
> does contain a very clear guide to establishing whether your install is 
> modified or not, so why not refer to it internally?
>
> In summary: I see the need for this page and think it serves a useful 
> purpose. However, the frustration of the author comes through too nakedly. It 
> is too easy to read this page and consider yourself "told off".
>
> Context, from freenode #centos
> [17:25:38]  Good afternoon I have the doubt how I can clear 
> cache from the vps, CentOS version is 7
> [17:25:55]  Cache for?
> [17:26:19]  @vps
> [17:26:19]  You are not running CentOS. Please read 
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/OtherSpins and please ask your 
> provider for further assistance.
>
> Regards
>
> S

You should be able to edit wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/OtherSpins now.

Since you did not give us your wiki name, I assumed it is SimonAvery.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8.1

2019-11-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 10:09 PM Thomas Stephen Lee  wrote:
>
> RHEL 8.1 released to cdn.
>
> did
>
> $ dnf upgrade
>
> and got 8.1
>
> No official announcement yet.
>
> thanks
>
> ---
> Thomas Stephen Lee

Press Release [1] and Release Notes [2] are available.

(1) 
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-ups-iq-intelligent-operating-system-latest-release-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8
(2) 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/8.1_release_notes/index

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] No IrDA Support with CentOS anymore?

2019-10-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:09 AM  wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> I've a laptop with CentOS 8 and a PC with CentOS 7. After 3 years of break
> I was Scuba Diving last 3 weeks. Back at home I wish to download all dive
> logs from my divecomputer connext via IrDA to my PC.
>
> But no kernel modul for IrDA was found.
>
> [root@rechner1 ~]# modprobe ircomm
> modprobe: FATAL: Module ircomm not found in directory
> /lib/modules/4.18.0-147.6.el8.x86_64
> [root@rechner1 ~]# modprobe ircomm_tty
> modprobe: FATAL: Module ircomm_tty not found in directory
> /lib/modules/4.18.0-147.6.el8.x86_64
> [root@destn40768 ~]#
>
>
> [root@rechner1 ~]# lsusb | grep -i irda
> Bus 002 Device 011: ID 9710:7780 MosChip Semiconductor MCS7780 4Mbps Fast
> IrDA Adapter
> [root@rechner1 ~]#
>
> Same with CentOS7
>
> How do I get IrDA support?
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
>
> Andreas Reschke

As you found out, there is no support for IrDA in CentOS-7 or -8. The
only CentOS kernel I see with the support for device [9710:7780] is
the centosplus kernel for CentOS-6. This means that you'd need to
install CentOS-6 and then update it with the kernel in the centosplus
repository.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 and DELL 7540 Intel AX200 WIFI

2019-10-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 7:33 PM John Pierce  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:50 PM David Summers 
> wrote:
> > .
>
> > 70:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2723]
> > (rev 1a)
> >
> > I believe the Intel AX200 Wifi card is the device 8086:2723 (rev1a) entry.
> >
> > Is there something I can do to enable it or is this a bug I need to file
> > with RedHat?
> >
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/05511/network-and-i-o/wireless-networking.html
>
> says that the AX200 is supported with Linux Kernel 5.1+, and the firmware
> linked on that page.
> --
> -john r pierce

Device ID pair [8086:2723] is not in the current CentOS kernel
4.18.0-80.11.2.el8_0. However, it is found in the CentOS Stream kernel
4.18.0-144.el8. So, you may want to give it a try.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 8 Release Notes - Czech translation

2019-10-11 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:14 PM Jan Papež (honyczek)
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've just finished the translation and added the link to main article
> https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS8.1905
>
> Now I'd like to create my Userpage, could you add me rights, please?
> https://wiki.centos.org/JanPapez
>
> Thank you.
>
> Jan

Alan has just created your homepage. Please let us know if you find any problem.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 Broken Installation

2019-10-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:10 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:35 PM Günther J. Niederwimmer  
> wrote:
> >
>
> > This Board have 2 Controller!°
> > 00:1f.2 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation C600/X79 series chipset SATA
> > RAID Controller (rev 06)
> >
> > On this controller all drives are found and it is possible to create a 
> > Raid1!
> >
> > 07:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller: Intel Corporation C602 chipset 
> > 4-Port
> > SATA Storage Control Unit (rev 06)
> >
> > But on this Contoller NO drives found?
>
> If you provide the device ID pairing [:] for the one that is
> not working, it will become clear. Can you show us the output from:
>
> lspci -nn
>
> Is it this one?
>
> Serial Attached SCSI controller [0107]: Intel Corporation C602 chipset
> 4-Port SATA Storage Control Unit [8086:1d6b]
>
> If so, the above device ID [8086:1d6b] is not supported in RHEL/CentOS
> 8, unfortunately.
>
> Akemi

And if that is indeed your device, that was bad news. But you have
good news too.

Device [8086:1d6b] is supported by the isci kernel module. ELRepo has
a DUD for this driver: dd-isci-1.2.0-1.el8.elrepo.iso

Ljubomir provided detailed instructions on how to use ELRepo's DUD
isos earlier in this thread.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 Broken Installation

2019-10-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:35 PM Günther J. Niederwimmer  wrote:
>

> This Board have 2 Controller!°
> 00:1f.2 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation C600/X79 series chipset SATA
> RAID Controller (rev 06)
>
> On this controller all drives are found and it is possible to create a Raid1!
>
> 07:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller: Intel Corporation C602 chipset 4-Port
> SATA Storage Control Unit (rev 06)
>
> But on this Contoller NO drives found?

If you provide the device ID pairing [:] for the one that is
not working, it will become clear. Can you show us the output from:

lspci -nn

Is it this one?

Serial Attached SCSI controller [0107]: Intel Corporation C602 chipset
4-Port SATA Storage Control Unit [8086:1d6b]

If so, the above device ID [8086:1d6b] is not supported in RHEL/CentOS
8, unfortunately.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 will be released soon?

2019-09-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jonathan Billings  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 12:11:09PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:04:04AM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > > I doubt that releasing CentOS 7.7 is a higher priority as many people are
> > > using CentOS 7,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I'm not quite sure how to parse that...
>
> I believe it is supposed to be:
>
> "I doubt that!  Releasing CentOS 7.7 is a higher priority, as many
> people are using CentOS 7."
>
> Punctuation is important.

I have yet another theory. He probably meant to say:

"I suspect that releasing..."

As someone who is not a native English speaker, I know how this
happens. "doubt" and "suspect" can be translated into the same word
(certainly in Japanese). As a result, these two words are often used
incorrectly.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia-430.40-1.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 fails to install

2019-08-24 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 3:21 PM Ian Mortimer  wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> > On August  2, my desktop unit updated with
> > kmod-nvidia-430.40-1.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64
> > which broke yum having a multiple of dependencies not being present.
>
> The latest from elrepo - kmod-nvidia-430.40-2.el7_7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm -
> is built for EL 7.7 and is not compatible with CentOS 7.6.
>
> kmod-nvidia-430.40-1.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 is the last that will work
> with the latest CentOS 7.6 kernel.
>
>
> ---
> Ian

This issue can be taken care of by installing yum-plugin-elrepo from ELRepo.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] C7 Kernel module compilation

2019-08-08 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:00 PM Alessandro Baggi
 wrote:
>
> Il 07/08/19 20:15, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 9:00 AM Alessandro Baggi
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> Il 07/08/19 01:02, Phil Perry ha scritto:
> >>> On 06/08/2019 14:45, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> >
> >>> Please post the actual error message in dmesg or /var/log/messages.
> >>>
> >>> It's likely that the kernel is just grumbling that the module is not
> >>> signed (missing key), but it's just noise unless you're using
> >>> SecureBoot. Posting the actual message in full will help determine if
> >>> that is the case.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Phil
> >>
> >> Hi, thank you for your reply,
> >> I solve adding in "General Setup" values of current kernel on
> >> localversion option and adding Module.symver from
> >> /boot/symver-version.gz to module directory.
> >>
> >> Now I get another problem compiling the third party module (i2c-nct6775):
> >>
> >> "CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y but not supported by the compiler. Compiler update
> >> recomended. Stop."
> >>
> >> I tried using scl gcc7 and 8 but get the same issue.
> >>
> >> I checked that retpoline is related to Spectre but checking on centos with:
> >>
> >> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2
> >>
> >> I get:
> >>
> >> Mitigation: IBRS (kernel), IBPB
> >>
> >> and RETPOLINE seems disabled (I'm wrong?).
> >>
> >> I ridden in a blog post that I can disable this check commenting out
> >> some lines starting from N. 166 of arch/Makefile but I don't think this
> >> is the best approach.
> >>
> >> At this point I can't understand what means the previous error and why I
> >> get this error when compiling i2c-nct6775.
> >>
> >> Can someone point me in the right direction?
> >
> > Please post the output from:
> >
> > rpm -qa kernel\* | sort
> >
> > and
> >
> > uname -r
> >
> > Akemi
>
> kernel-3.10.0-957.12.1.el7.x86_64
> kernel-3.10.0-957.12.2.el7.x86_64
> kernel-3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64
> kernel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
> kernel-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64
> kernel-devel-3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64
> kernel-devel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
> kernel-headers-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
> kernel-ml-5.1.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
> kernel-ml-devel-5.1.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
> kernel-tools-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
> kernel-tools-libs-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
> kernel-tools-libs-devel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
>
>
> 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64

So, you tried to build the i2c-nct6775 module against
kernel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7 under the running kernel 3.10.0-957.27.2
and you have a matching version of kernel-devel. Then I don't quite
understand why you get the "not supported by the compiler" error...

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] C7 Kernel module compilation

2019-08-07 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 9:00 AM Alessandro Baggi
 wrote:
>
> Il 07/08/19 01:02, Phil Perry ha scritto:
> > On 06/08/2019 14:45, Alessandro Baggi wrote:

> > Please post the actual error message in dmesg or /var/log/messages.
> >
> > It's likely that the kernel is just grumbling that the module is not
> > signed (missing key), but it's just noise unless you're using
> > SecureBoot. Posting the actual message in full will help determine if
> > that is the case.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Phil
>
> Hi, thank you for your reply,
> I solve adding in "General Setup" values of current kernel on
> localversion option and adding Module.symver from
> /boot/symver-version.gz to module directory.
>
> Now I get another problem compiling the third party module (i2c-nct6775):
>
> "CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y but not supported by the compiler. Compiler update
> recomended. Stop."
>
> I tried using scl gcc7 and 8 but get the same issue.
>
> I checked that retpoline is related to Spectre but checking on centos with:
>
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2
>
> I get:
>
> Mitigation: IBRS (kernel), IBPB
>
> and RETPOLINE seems disabled (I'm wrong?).
>
> I ridden in a blog post that I can disable this check commenting out
> some lines starting from N. 166 of arch/Makefile but I don't think this
> is the best approach.
>
> At this point I can't understand what means the previous error and why I
> get this error when compiling i2c-nct6775.
>
> Can someone point me in the right direction?

Please post the output from:

rpm -qa kernel\* | sort

and

uname -r

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki edit: HowTos/Grub2

2019-08-07 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:52 AM Mitchell Roe  wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> This is my first contribution, so please let me know if there is anything I 
> should be doing differently. I am following the instructions found here: 
> https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute.
>
> Your FirstnameLastname username: MitchellRoe
>
> The proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s): Corrected path for getting 
> menu entries
>
> The proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s): In 
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Grub2, in section 2 titled "2. How to Define 
> the Default Entries", in the first code block, the command given is:
>
> awk -F\' '$1=="menuentry " {print i++ " : " $2}' /etc/grub2.cfg
>
> I propose it should be the following:
>
> awk -F\' '$1=="menuentry "{print i++ " : " $2}' /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>
> Thanks for the helpful guides. I look forward to contributing more in the 
> future!
>
> -- Mitchell Roe (he/him/his) mitchell@member.fsf.org

Thank you for the suggestion. After discussing this with the original
author of the article, the following description taken from the RHEL
documentation has been added:

"The file name /etc/grub2.cfg is a symbolic link to the grub.cfg file,
whose location is architecture dependent. It is better to use absolute
paths when accessing to a file, as in the example above, especially
when repairing a system."

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] C7 Kernel module compilation

2019-08-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:21 AM Alessandro Baggi
 wrote:
>
> Il 05/08/19 18:07, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Alessandro Baggi
> >  wrote:

> > Do you have secureboot enabled? Then yes, that requires a proper key.
> >
> > Akemi
>
> Yes I have secureboot enabled. If usefull to others in list this could
> helps:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Kernel_Administration_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-modules-for-secure-boot.html
>
> I think also that  centos's wiki must be updated because steps are valid
> for centos 5 and because key-signing is required for secure boot I think
> that a proper section must be inserted.

Update not finished yet but the above link has been added near the top
of the wiki article.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] C7 Kernel module compilation

2019-08-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Alessandro Baggi
 wrote:
>
> Il 05/08/19 17:49, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:42 AM Alessandro Baggi
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> Il 05/08/19 17:30, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
> >>>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey there,
> >>>> I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d2e4c05886f94c701e4ae74387d41d8c40c25d01
> >>>>
> >>>> and
> >>>>
> >>>> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source
> >>>>
> >>>> I tried to compile a module for novuton led controller supplied by
> >>>> thirdparty and I got several error.
> >>>>
> >>>> To check if this is the wrong procedure I tried to compile cifs module
> >>>> as listed in howto but when loading with modprobe I get "Exec format
> >>>> error", and from dmesg "cifs: no symbol version for module_layout
> >>>> ", the same errors when compiling novuton module and I don't know why I
> >>>> get this error.
> >>>
> >>> When following the instructions in BuildingKernelModules, which kernel
> >>> version did you use? Also, after the "depmod -a" step, what is the
> >>> output from:
> >>>
> >>> $ modinfo cifs | grep filename
> >>>
> >>>> I noticed that modules in centos are compressed in .xz but after running
> >>>> make M=fs/cifs I got only a .ko kernel module and then I run xz to
> >>>> compress the new module.
> >>>
> >>> Compressing modules is optional. Uncompressed form is functionally the
> >>> same (of course it saves some disk space).
> >>>
> >>>> Can someone help me please?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>> Akemi
> >>
> >> Hi Akemi,
> >> thank you for your answer.
> >>
> >> Kernel version used is 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
> >>
> >> [root@c7-test SPECS]# modinfo cifs | grep filename
> >> filename:   /lib/modules/3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64/extra/cifs.ko
> >
> > Looking good. I assume your running kernel is 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7 ?
> >
> > Akemi

> Reading from dmesg seems that the module is not accepted by kernel due
> to invalid signature. I need to sign the module with a key?

Do you have secureboot enabled? Then yes, that requires a proper key.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] C7 Kernel module compilation

2019-08-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:42 AM Alessandro Baggi
 wrote:
>
> Il 05/08/19 17:30, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey there,
> >> I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d2e4c05886f94c701e4ae74387d41d8c40c25d01
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source
> >>
> >> I tried to compile a module for novuton led controller supplied by
> >> thirdparty and I got several error.
> >>
> >> To check if this is the wrong procedure I tried to compile cifs module
> >> as listed in howto but when loading with modprobe I get "Exec format
> >> error", and from dmesg "cifs: no symbol version for module_layout
> >> ", the same errors when compiling novuton module and I don't know why I
> >> get this error.
> >
> > When following the instructions in BuildingKernelModules, which kernel
> > version did you use? Also, after the "depmod -a" step, what is the
> > output from:
> >
> > $ modinfo cifs | grep filename
> >
> >> I noticed that modules in centos are compressed in .xz but after running
> >> make M=fs/cifs I got only a .ko kernel module and then I run xz to
> >> compress the new module.
> >
> > Compressing modules is optional. Uncompressed form is functionally the
> > same (of course it saves some disk space).
> >
> >> Can someone help me please?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Akemi
>
> Hi Akemi,
> thank you for your answer.
>
> Kernel version used is 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64
>
> [root@c7-test SPECS]# modinfo cifs | grep filename
> filename:   /lib/modules/3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64/extra/cifs.ko

Looking good. I assume your running kernel is 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7 ?

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] C7 Kernel module compilation

2019-08-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
 wrote:
>
> Hey there,
> I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d2e4c05886f94c701e4ae74387d41d8c40c25d01
>
> and
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source
>
> I tried to compile a module for novuton led controller supplied by
> thirdparty and I got several error.
>
> To check if this is the wrong procedure I tried to compile cifs module
> as listed in howto but when loading with modprobe I get "Exec format
> error", and from dmesg "cifs: no symbol version for module_layout
> ", the same errors when compiling novuton module and I don't know why I
> get this error.

When following the instructions in BuildingKernelModules, which kernel
version did you use? Also, after the "depmod -a" step, what is the
output from:

$ modinfo cifs | grep filename

> I noticed that modules in centos are compressed in .xz but after running
> make M=fs/cifs I got only a .ko kernel module and then I run xz to
> compress the new module.

Compressing modules is optional. Uncompressed form is functionally the
same (of course it saves some disk space).

> Can someone help me please?
>
> Thanks in advance.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Request to edit https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS

2019-07-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 11:53 AM Jeff Bachtel  wrote:
>
> The list of non-AWS Marketplace AMIs in https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS is 
> extremely outdated. I would like to request either edit permissions (or, more 
> likely because you don't know me) an active editor of the page who would not 
> mind edits being submitted via email.
>
> Username: JeffreyBachtel
> Location: Cloud/AWS
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Jeff

Thanks for your offer to update the list. I believe someone who is
involved in maintaining that wiki page will be responding to your
request.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Replacing kernel-headers with custom compiled version (from kernel.org) - safe?

2019-06-26 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:20 AM Bagas Sanjaya  wrote:
>
> Hello CentOS users,
>
> Currently I have compiled kernel version 4.19.37, which the source is from 
> kernel.org. I compiled the kernel by following
> steps:
> - get the kernel tarball and unpack it
> - install prerequisties as described in 
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel (in addition bc and 
> openssl-devel)
> - copy the kernel configuration:
>$ cp /boot/config-3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64 ~/linux-4.19.37/.config
> - create configuration:
>$ cd ~/linux-4.19.37
>$ make olddefconfig
>$ make nconfig
> - compile and create RPM package:
>$ make vmlinux
>$ make modules
>$ make rpm-pkg
> - install kernel RPM:
># yum install ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/kernel-*.rpm
>
> However, in the last step (installing kernel RPM), I got following notice:
> 
>   PackageArch   Version
>   Repository
> Size
> 
> Installing:
>   kernel x86_64 4.19.37_sentinel_custom-1
>   /kernel-4.19.37_sentinel_custom-1.x86_64 
> 209 M
>   kernel-devel   x86_64 4.19.37_sentinel_custom-1
>   /kernel-devel-4.19.37_sentinel_custom-1.x86_64   
> 817 M
>   kernel-headers x86_64 4.19.37_sentinel_custom-1
>   /kernel-headers-4.19.37_sentinel_custom-1.x86_64 
> 4.6 M
>   replacing  kernel-headers.x86_64 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7
>
> Transaction Summary
> 
> Install  3 Packages
>
> There, the compiled kernel-headers package (4.19.37_sentinel_custom-1) is 
> about to replace stock version
> (3.10.0-957.21.3.el7). Is it safe to continue installing from compiled RPM 
> package above, or install kernel manually?

In general, you want to keep the distro's kernel-headers unless you
also plan to play with glibc. You may find the following article
useful:

https://kernelnewbies.org/KernelHeaders

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] does centos 7.6 support TL-WN725N

2019-05-31 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:31 AM qw  wrote:
>
> Does centos 7.6 support TL-WN725N, which is a wireless adaptor?

According to this forum thread:

https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=49=58006

ELRepo's kmod-8188eu seems to support your device. You may want to
check the device IDs by running lsusb.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] youtube-dl No module named 'pkg_resources'

2019-05-08 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:55 PM Michael Hennebry
 wrote:
>
> youtube-dl doesn't work for me after a recent update.
> I do not use it often, so do not know whether the update matters.
> It gives the error message:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "/usr/bin/youtube-dl", line 6, in 
>  from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources'
>
> I've tried reinstalling python-setuptools,
> installing python34-setuptools and reinstalling youtube-dl .
>
> I'm aware there is a bugzilla on it.
> That and stackoverflow are where I got the ideas above.
>
> How do I make youtube-dl work on Centos 7?

If you are using the EPEL one, you can resolve it by installing:

(1) python36-setuptools from epel
and
(2) youtube-dl from epel-testing

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] firewalld configuration for securing SSH

2019-04-24 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:13 AM Kimberlee Integer Model
 wrote:
>
> HI all,
>
> 1st time contributor here. I was using the guide on securing SSH, and
> noticed that the firewall-cmd snippets for filtering by requests per
> time seem somewhat outdated. From what I can tell the given snippets,
> relay arguments directly down to iptables, and do not cover both IPv4
> and v6. (and in fact when attempting to extend to v6 the firewall would
> fail to reload). I came up with an "all firewall-cmd" solution which
> I'd like to share.
>
> It boils down to using rich rules in firewalld instead of direct rules
> for iptables. The code snippets in section 6 of <
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH> would be changed to
>
> firewall-cmd --permanent --add-rich-rule='rule port port="22"
> protocol="tcp" accept limit value="4/m"'
> firewall-cmd --permanent --remove-service ssh
> firewall-cmd --permanent --remove-port 22/tcp
> firewall-cmd --reload
>
> newly minted wiki username is "KimeeModel".
>
> Regards,
> Kimee

You should be able to edit that page. Let us know if you find any problem.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Translate Wiki to Brazilian Portuguese

2019-03-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 8:21 AM Carlos Nascimento
 wrote:
>
> Hello friends,
>
> I would like to join the translation team of the CentOS project.
>
> I'm from Brazil and I realized that the Project Wiki does not have a 
> Portuguese version of Brazil and I wanted to use my skills to translate it 
> into my native language.
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Carlos Henrique do Nascimento

Hi Carlos,

Thank you for offering to contribute to the wiki. I assume your wiki
name is CarlosNascimento. There is a frontpage in Brazilian
Portuguese:

https://wiki.centos.org/bp/FrontPage

It was last edited in 2015, so you might want to start with updating
that page. The Release Note could be another immediate target. If you
have trouble editing those pages, please let us know.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] detect agfl count corruption and reset agfl

2019-03-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:43 AM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
> > On 3/25/19 4:44 AM, Richard Flack wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > My apologies if this is the wrong place to post this, but I was
> > > wondering if anyone had any information on whether or not the following
> > > patch has or will make its way into the CentOS Kernel?
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10283095/

> The patch is commit a27ba2607e60312554cbcd43fc660b2c7f29dc9c upstream
> (kernel.org). It was applied to kernel 4.16 and backported to 4.14 (
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/184 ). Therefore both CentOS kernels
> 4.14 and 4.19 have that patch.

Just checked the current CentOS kernel and confirm that the patch is in there.

[fs] xfs: detect agfl count corruption and reset agfl (Brian Foster) [1569471]

It was added as of kernel 3.10.0-912.el7. In other words all 7.6.1810
kernels are patched. What is the version of your running kernel?

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] detect agfl count corruption and reset agfl

2019-03-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:04 AM Johnny Hughes  wrote:
>
> On 3/25/19 4:44 AM, Richard Flack wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > My apologies if this is the wrong place to post this, but I was
> > wondering if anyone had any information on whether or not the following
> > patch has or will make its way into the CentOS Kernel?
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10283095/

> 2. Kernel in the AltArch tree .. We have to use a different kernel for
> armhfp, and we also build it for other CentOS arches .. it lives at:
>
> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/kernel/
>
> This kernel is based on a kernel.org LTS kernel (currently 4.14.x) and
> if that patch gets rolled into the LTS stream, it will be in our kernels
> there.
>
> 3. Experimential kernel in the AltArch tree .. this is a newer LTS
> kernel (which we will use in future armhfp releases .. it is currently
> based on 4.19.x LTS kernel.org kernel.  This one will replace the 4.14
> kernel in the 7.7.x release whenever that happens.  If that patch makes
> it into 4.19.x LTS at kernel.org then it will be in this kernel too.
>
> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/

The patch is commit a27ba2607e60312554cbcd43fc660b2c7f29dc9c upstream
(kernel.org). It was applied to kernel 4.16 and backported to 4.14 (
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/4/184 ). Therefore both CentOS kernels
4.14 and 4.19 have that patch.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen-kernel: Update to 4.14 or 4.19?

2019-03-07 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:42 AM George Dunlap  wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> We've been on 4.9 for some time now, and while it's still supported, I
> think it's time to start thinking about upgrading, and I'd like input
> from the community about which version to move up to.
>
> 4.19 has been out for almost 5 months now.  It will include PVH domU
> support, and PVH dom0 support in what _is believed_ to be the final
> form; so when the Virt SIG moves to a version of Xen that supports PVH
> dom0, the kernel will already be in place with no need to upgrade.
>
> The other option would be to move to 4.14: Probably more stable (as
> it's been out for over a year now), but doesn't have either PVH domU
> or PVH dom0 support.
>
> I'd suggest 4.19. Any other opinions?
>
>  -George

You may also want to consider each version's EOL:

4.9   Jan, 2023
4.14   Jan, 2020
4.19   Dec, 2020

Akemi
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki edit request

2019-03-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 1:33 PM Alan Bartlett  wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 19:49, Rich Bowen  wrote:
> >
> > Please add edit rights for 'ChrisLayton' for the page
> > https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/ORNL2019
> >
> > I thought I could do this myself, but got a "you're not an admin" message.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Rich Bowen - rbo...@redhat.com
>
> Done. (Please check that you still have edit access.)
>
> Alan.

Hi Rich,

Because of the work involved, you'd often need to add people to the
#acl line. If I did it right, you should be able to do that anywhere
under Events/. Please let us know if it does not work.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7 i386 & PAE Kernel

2019-03-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:23 AM Mike McTernan (wavemobile)
 wrote:
>
> On 3/6/19 1:28 PM,  Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 3/6/19 6:26 AM, Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote:
> > > On 3/5/19 5:48 PM,  Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> 
>
> > > Last question, if I may - Is there any specific reason why an i686 PAE
> > > kernel built from the main RHEL sources isn't in the AltArch i386 os- 
> > > repo?
> > >
> > > Notably CentOS 6 provided both non-PAE and PAE 32-bit kernels, and
> > > it's that step from CentOS 6 32-bit PAE onto CentOS 7 32-bit which
> > > made me stumble, but okay now.
> >
> > The only reason is .. it is not included in the mainline RHEL 7 kernel 
> > source
> > code.
>
> Ah - I guess since mainline RHEL 7 is only 64-bit on x86 now, it doesn't have 
> to worry about PAE vs non-PAE kernels.
>
> ...
> > I have no objections trying to make PAE work with that kernel .. Patches
> > accepted :D
> >
> > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828
>
> So with what I know now (thank you!) I recon the mainline 4.14 is probably a 
> better tested path for a 32-bit x86 PAE kernel, rather than starting at RHEL 
> 7.  And since you are already building that kernel it's good news all round 
> :-)
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Mike

Going for the 4.14 kernel is absolutely a better choice. The i686 plus
kernel is just lucky to be existing. It would not have been possible
to maintain it without great support from people like Pablo and @kabe.
We initially got the 32-bit version from Springdale (formerly Puias).
Then they stopped building at some point. Building it becomes harder
and harder with each release, it seems. So, there is no guarantee that
there is another update to the i686 plus kernel.

Akemi



Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos bug 15570 - Not just a VBOX bug, can also reproduce on direct hardware install

2019-02-14 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:58 PM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:32 PM Steve Gomez  
> wrote:
> >
> > However, the bug lists seem to refer only to issues with VirtualBox.  I
> > have experienced the same symptom when installing on a "hardware" system
> > (no hypervisor).  The same commands above also provide a workaround here,
> > but thought the flag should be raised for CentOS and RHEL that it doesn't
> > seem to be just VBOX.
>
> As noted in the CentOS bug report you referenced (
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15570 ), I filed a report upstream
> ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658669, marked
> private). In that RHBZ, they were able to reproduce it without
> VirtualBox. Therefore they are aware this is not just a VBox problem.
> The fix has been added to kernel-3.10.0-984.el7, meaning it will be in
> the EL 7.7 kernel.
>
> Now there is a separate RHBZ for "Z-Stream" for the same issue. This
> means that the fix will be ported to the current series (EL 7.6).
> Unfortunately I have no access to this BZ, so cannot tell the progress
> there. Once it is fixed in RHEL, CentOS will inherit it.
>
> Akemi

I added the following note to bug 15570:

"The problem is not unique to VirtualBox. It can be reproduced _without_ VBox."

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos bug 15570 - Not just a VBOX bug, can also reproduce on direct hardware install

2019-02-14 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:32 PM Steve Gomez  wrote:
>
> Ran into this rather frustrating bug when working with VBOX on a Windows 10
> host.  It should come as no surprise that I would hit this bug when
> installing CentOS, and also with RHEL 7 Server  with GUI (since you get the
> same kernel).  Based on information from your bug list, I was fortunately
> able to workaround the trouble with:
>
> wget
> https://people.centos.org/toracat/kernel/7/plus/bug15570new/kernel-3.10.0-957.1.3.bug15570.plus.el7.x86_64.rpm
> wget
> https://people.centos.org/toracat/kernel/7/plus/bug15570new/kernel-devel-3.10.0-957.1.3.bug15570.plus.el7.x86_64.rpm
>
> yum -y localinstall kernel-3.10.0-957.1.3.bug15570.plus.el7.x86_64.rpm
> yum -y localinstall kernel-devel-3.10.0-957.1.3.bug15570.plus.el7.x86_64.rpm
>
> However, the bug lists seem to refer only to issues with VirtualBox.  I
> have experienced the same symptom when installing on a "hardware" system
> (no hypervisor).  The same commands above also provide a workaround here,
> but thought the flag should be raised for CentOS and RHEL that it doesn't
> seem to be just VBOX.
>
> Perhaps the priority of this issue should be raised further up the pole
> since I can't imagine it being a good experience for someone who doesn't
> know how to dig through a problem like this.  The average bear would
> install something else and move on.
>
> In any case, thank you for the patch information.  Look forward to a "real"
> fix soon.  Other than that I'm really liking CentOS 7.
>
> SG

As noted in the CentOS bug report you referenced (
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15570 ), I filed a report upstream
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658669, marked
private). In that RHBZ, they were able to reproduce it without
VirtualBox. Therefore they are aware this is not just a VBox problem.
The fix has been added to kernel-3.10.0-984.el7, meaning it will be in
the EL 7.7 kernel.

Now there is a separate RHBZ for "Z-Stream" for the same issue. This
means that the fix will be ported to the current series (EL 7.6).
Unfortunately I have no access to this BZ, so cannot tell the progress
there. Once it is fixed in RHEL, CentOS will inherit it.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

2019-01-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:49 AM Jonathan Billings  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:03:22PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Another alternative may be to pull down the SRPM and run it through rpmbuild
> > to locally create a binary package compatible with the system as it's
> > currently installed/running.
>
> I encourage this behavior, however, elrepo kmod packages often have
> the kernel version hard-coded into it, so you'd need to either edit
> the .spec file, or run rpmbuild with a
>
> --define 'kversion 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64'
>
> to force it to build against the latest el7 kernel.

Well, I wouldn't call it "hard-coded', but yes, if the kernel version
is not defined from the command line, then whatever the version
defined in the spec file is used. :)

By the way, the updated package is now in the elrepo testing repository, e.g.

https://elrepo.org/linux/testing/el7/x86_64/RPMS/kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-5.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

2019-01-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:01 AM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic  wrote:

> > What is the best way to resolve this? Is there some kernel package
> > somewhere that matches these properties, or is there some other package
> > that provides these features to an existing kernel, or something else?
>
> That output indicates that that kmod package is built for the EL 7.5
> kernel and is not compatible with the current kernel. I suggest you
> file a request to have the kmod-8188eu rebuilt for EL 7.6 at
> http://elrepo.org/bugs/ .

Users seeing the same issue can now go to:

https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=893

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

2019-01-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic  wrote:
>
>
> I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link
> usb wifi dongle. Upon plugging it, the device gets registered by the
> kernel (in /var/log/messages), but that's about it, no network device
> is being created (iwconfig does not see it, nothing else works).
>
> A few google searches later I found out that this realtek chip is not
> supported by the kernel and requires a driver, and that the driver is
> packaged for C7 as kmod-8188eu in elrepo.
>
> However, yum install kmod-8188eu refuses to install it (full yum
> output is here: https://pastebin.com/raw/vvak6FCU ), complaining that
> the following dependencies cannot be met:
>
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(wireless_send_event) = 0xa02e7e03 for
> package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_submit_urb) = 0x74c6ac58 for
> package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_reset_device) = 0xddd0084e for
> package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_put_dev) = 0xf709107c for
>  package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_kill_urb) = 0xa55bf715 for
> package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_get_dev) = 0x372a41af for
>  package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_free_urb) = 0x739aecf4 for
>  package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_control_msg) = 0xd04e3a9e for
>  package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(usb_alloc_urb) = 0x12a4948e for
> package: kmod-8188eu-4.1.4_6773.20130222-4.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
>
> I've never seen such output from yum before --- I'm guessing it is
> asking for a kernel with specific "properties", and failing to find
> one.
>
> What is the best way to resolve this? Is there some kernel package
> somewhere that matches these properties, or is there some other package
> that provides these features to an existing kernel, or something else?

That output indicates that that kmod package is built for the EL 7.5
kernel and is not compatible with the current kernel. I suggest you
file a request to have the kmod-8188eu rebuilt for EL 7.6 at
http://elrepo.org/bugs/ .

Akeme
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Request for edit permission on HowTos/BuildingKernelModules

2019-01-16 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:22 AM Zamir SUN  wrote:
>
> Hi CentOS Docs team,
>
> I am writing to request for updating the wiki page
> HowTos/BuildingKernelModules[1]
>
> Basically, the page need some love for more recent CentOS releases -
> in CentOS 7 if people use the in-distro /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/kmodtool
> the following command won't work
>
> rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` --define 'kversion 3.10.0-862.el7'
> testkmod.spec
>
> Instead, people should use something like
>
> rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` --define 'kernel_version
> 3.10.0-862.el7' testkmod.spec
>
> In my case
>
> # rpmspec --define "kernel_version 3.10.0-957.el7" -P ~/testkmod.spec
> | grep "BuildRequire"
> warning: Macro %kmp_release defined but not used within scope
> warning: Macro %kmp_version defined but not used within scope
> warning: Macro %latest_kernel defined but not used within scope
> BuildRequires: kernel-devel
> BuildRequires: kernel-devel-x86_64 = 3.10.0-957.el7
>
> So I want to get this mentioned in case of confusion, either by myself
> or some maintainer of the page.
>
> My wiki username is ZamirSUN. And my email address for the wiki is
> just this one.
>
> Thanks.
> [1] https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules
>
> --
> Zamir SUN
> GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E

You should be able to edit the wiki page requested. Please let us know
if you find any issue.

Thanks for your contribution.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS-Docs] permission to edit wiki pages.

2019-01-16 Thread Akemi Yagi
Please try now. Let us know if you have trouble with the edit.

Thanks for your contribution.

Akemi

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:12 PM jinho kong  wrote:
>
> Dear Centos-docs team
>
> Can I get a permission to edit "https://wiki.centos.org/kr/Download;
> I can't modify link of release notes now.
>
> - zino
>
> 2016년 1월 1일 (금) 오전 7:25, Alan Bartlett 님이 작성:
>>
>> On 30 December 2015 at 07:39, jinho kong  wrote:
>> > My username is KongJinho
>> >
>> >
>> > I'd like to ask permission to edit CentOS wiki pages.
>> >
>> > I want to contribute to the wiki Korean translation.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>>
>> Sorry for the delay.
>>
>> You should now be able to edit pages in the Korean section of the
>> CentOS wiki. It would be good idea for you to make contact with the
>> other translators, so as not to cause a conflict in the translated
>> pages.
>>
>> Alan.
>> ___
>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>> CentOS-docs@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool unaviliable

2019-01-08 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:47 AM Pavel Drankov  wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> It seems that https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool is no 
> longer available. Can you help me with reaching an older version? Where I can 
> find the article history?
>
> Best wishes,
> Pavel

If you must see it, here:

https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool?action=recall=26

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Broken wiki

2019-01-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 11:29 PM Timothy Lee  wrote:
>
> Hi Akemi
>
> Thanks for reverting then re-applying the changes to
> https://wiki.centos.org/zh-tw/SpecialInterestGroup.  You're right, the
> zh translation somehow did not go through.  I've updated it again
> without an issue.  Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Timothy

Hi Fabian,

Still no clue as to what's causing the issue? I read somewhere that
certain version of python and moinmoin may go well together. Which
version of python is the wiki running?

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.6 1810 vs. VirtualBox : bug with keyboard layout selection

2019-01-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:43 AM Jonathan Billings  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:42:55AM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> >  And I'm glad to begin chapter 2 of my Introduction To Linux with
> > something like "Well, folks, unfortunately you can't select a custom
> > keyboard layout in VirtualBox because the enterprise class Linux we
> > talked about in chapter 1 has a bug in the kernel so for now the default
> > keyboard layout will have to be sufficient.
>
> I suppose this shows you how little Red Hat cares about using
> VirtualBox (product by their competition).
>
> If I were running a VM on a linux system, I'd probably use
> KVM/qemu/libvirt. I'm sure that was exhaustively tested.

You guys are overreacting. :)

The bug was in a patch applied to the upstream (kernel.org) kernel
version 4.17. Therefore any distribution running this kernel was
affected -- including Fedora and SuSE. Red Hat backports upstream
patches and this particular one was one of them.

By the way, there is a nicely written article about VirtualBox at RH:

https://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/hello-world/#virtualbox

along with other VM technologies.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.6 1810 vs. VirtualBox : bug with keyboard layout selection

2019-01-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:53 PM Nicolas Kovacs  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on my next Linux book, which will be an elementary
> course about CentOS administration. I'm using VirtualBox for all the
> installer screenshots.
>
> Since CentOS has recently been upgraded to version 7.6, I thought I
> might as well base all book references on this version. So I downloaded
> the 7.6 1810 minimal ISO and started a fresh installation in VirtualBox.
>
> I'm using a Swiss French keyboard layout (ch-fr or fr_CH-latin1), so one
> of the first things I do in the installer is replace the default French
> AZERTY keyboard (since I use the french language) by a swiss french
> QWERTZ layout.
>
> Now when I reach this dialog in the installer and try do define my new
> layout, the slider in the selection window doesn't appear, and clicking
> on any of the first layouts doesn't do anything, so I'm basically stuck
> there.
>
> I'm running OpenSUSE Leap 15.0 KDE on my workstation, so I tried the
> same thing with the previous CentOS 7.5 1804 minimal ISO, and the
> keyboard selection dialog works perfectly.
>
> So my intuition would tell me that there's a nasty bug in the CentOS 7.6
> installer. Maybe it went unnoticed, since most folks stick to the
> default keyboard layout selected in their language.
>
> Any suggestions ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Niki

There are known issues with VirtualBox and RHEL (therefore CentOS) 7.6.

(1) https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=3=90103
(2) https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=3=90267

(1) is about the GuestAdditions, so this should not affect the
installation. But you were most likely hit by (2). All the details are
in that forum thread. In short, this is caused by a bug in the 7.6
kernel (see also https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15570 ). It is
possible that the next update to the kernel has the fix but this
remains to be seen.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Broken wiki

2019-01-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:29 PM Alan Bartlett  wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 21:21, Timothy Lee  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've made a minor change (changed one CJK character) on
> > https://wiki.centos.org/zh-tw/SpecialInterestGroup and
> > https://wiki.centos.org/zh/SpecialInterestGroup , and now the whole
> > CentOS wiki is broken.  Can someone undo the changes to fix the wiki?
> >
> > I've maintained the wiki's Chinese translation for 7 years, and this is
> > not the first time the same thing has happened to those two pages, and
> > only those two pages.  Can someone possibly look into the root cause?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Timothy
>
> I'm having a problem in that I cannot revert/roll-back the last change.
>
> Jim or Fabian -- can you assist, please?
>
> Alan.

I was able to revert (just lucky, the wiki is quite unstable):

https://wiki.centos.org/zh-tw/SpecialInterestGroup

But https://wiki.centos.org/zh/SpecialInterestGroup did not have today's date.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] would you please approve KenDreyer to edit SIGGuide/* ?

2018-12-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 5:24 PM Ken Dreyer  wrote:
>
> Hi wiki admins,
>
> I would like to edit the content here:
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/SIGGuide/Content/BuildLogs
> https://wiki.centos.org/SIGGuide/Content/Mirror
>
> Proposed edits:
>
> 1) The pages are really similar. At a glance, it's not clear whether
> I'm viewing one or the other. Let's add text to clearly distinguish
> them for newcomers.
>
> 2) The pages do not link back to each other, and they should, because
> SIG members need to know how to distribute both test content
> (buildlogs) and GA content (mirror).
>
> - Ken

You should be able to edit any of the wiki pages. Please let us know
should you find any issue.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] ZFS fails with C7 957

2018-12-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:23 PM Jonathan Billings  wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 17:45, david  wrote:
> >
> > Folks
> >
> > I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in ZFS.  
> > It's been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos
> > from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64
> >  to 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64
> >
> > The import of the pools didn't happen at boot.  When I tried executing:
> > zpool list
> > I got the diagnostic suggesting I do /sbin/modprobe zfs
> > And that command claimed the module didn't exist.
>
> You need to go wherever you got your ZFS kernel module and rebuild it for the 
> kernel included in CentOS 7.6.1810. I had to rebuild several of my kmods for 
> the -957 kernels too. If you use a kmod that relies on kernel symbols that 
> are not on the kabi whitelist, you need to rebuild the kmod for every minor 
> release, and probably several times mid release.

If you get the ZFS from the zfs.repo, they just published the EL7.6 package:

https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CR repo update disaster for my desktop.

2018-12-05 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:38 AM Rob Kampen  wrote:
>
> On 5/12/18 7:21 AM, Phil Perry wrote:

> > The only issue I've seen reported that sounds similar or possibly
> > related is:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650634
> Yes, seems this is the laptop issue, will prove tomorrow.
> >
> > There is a patch in that bug you might like to try.
> Not too keen on this, would need to find a detailed howto as I have not
> done any rebuilds for a number of years. I presume that RH will at some
> point release a fix for this?

The submitter of RHBZ 1650634 is a developer of Scientific Linux. The
xorg packages in SL 7.6 have been published with the referenced patch
applied. If you so wish, you could install their packages.

ftp://linux1.fnal.gov/linux/scientific/7.6/x86_64/updates/security/

Note the "sl7" tag instead of "el7".

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] editing CentOS Storage SIG wiki

2018-11-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:58 AM Ken Dreyer  wrote:
>
> Sure, I've renamed it to https://wiki.centos.org/KenDreyer

That homepage is also available.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] editing CentOS Storage SIG wiki

2018-11-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:58 AM Ken Dreyer  wrote:
>
> Sure, I've renamed it to https://wiki.centos.org/KenDreyer
>
> Would you please consider dropping this policy? It's not very
> welcoming to new contributors, and I don't think it'll integrate well
> with https://accounts.centos.org/ if the MoinMoin instance can use
> that for authentication.
>
> - Ken
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:39 AM Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:23 AM Ken Dreyer  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I would like to contribute to the CentOS Storage SIG wiki pages.
> > >
> > > Would you please allow my "ktdreyer" account to edit the following pages?
> > >
> > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage
> > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/sigworkflow
> > >
> > > - Ken
> >
> > The wiki name is supposed to be FirstnameLastname. Could you create
> > your account as KenDreyer?
> >
> > Akemi

Hi Ken.

You should be able to edit all pages under Storage/ .

Regarding the policy, it's not mine. :) I'm sure someone will chime in. Fabian?

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] editing CentOS Storage SIG wiki

2018-11-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:23 AM Ken Dreyer  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to contribute to the CentOS Storage SIG wiki pages.
>
> Would you please allow my "ktdreyer" account to edit the following pages?
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/sigworkflow
>
> - Ken

The wiki name is supposed to be FirstnameLastname. Could you create
your account as KenDreyer?

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] [External] Re: CentOS 7 package not present in Red Hat EL 7 - qt-assistant

2018-11-28 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:00 AM Toralf Lund  wrote:
>
> On 28/11/18 01:24, Akemi Yagi wrote:

> > The qt-assistant package is available in RHEL-7:
> >
> > $ sudo yum list qt-assistant
> >
> > qt-assistant.x86_64   1:4.8.7-2.el7rhel-7-server-optional-rpms
> Right. I notice the word "optional" here - I guess this is where some of
> the confusion comes from, as the Red Hat doc mentioned above does not
> say anything about optional packages, it just mentions base and
> "supplementary" channels. Evidently, optional rpms are not enabled on
> the system mentioned earlier...
>
> Also, this must mean that CentOS "base" is not the same as Red Hat
> "base". Right?
>
> - Toralf

Please note that there are multiple Red Hat subscriptions. Workstation
is one of them. CentOS builds all the packages made publicly available
through git.centos.org.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 package not present in Red Hat EL 7 - qt-assistant

2018-11-27 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 5:47 AM Toralf Lund  wrote:
>
> I'm using CentOS 7 for development of software that is sometimes used on
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. I conjunction with an update of one of the
> applications, I asked some Red Hat users to install the Qt 4 Assistant
> application via the qt-assistant package (which is used by a "help"
> function in our software.) It seemed like there was no such package in
> the Red Hat package set, however, and I also see no mention of it in
> "package manifests" like
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/package_manifest/chap-base-workstation-variant.
> Yet I can install the package from the "base" repository on my CentOS
> machine.
>
> Questions: Isn't CentOS base supposed to contain exactly the same
> packages as Red Hat Enterprise, except in some special cases that relate
> to distribution information, installation sources etc.? Does anyone know
> what's going on with the specific package I mention above?
>
> - Toralf

The qt-assistant package is available in RHEL-7:

$ sudo yum list qt-assistant

qt-assistant.x86_64   1:4.8.7-2.el7rhel-7-server-optional-rpms

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC not set for CentOS kernels

2018-11-15 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:31 AM Anand Buddhdev  wrote:
>
> On 15/11/2018 18:09, Phil Perry wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> >> Does anyone know why this option is not enabled for CentOS kernels?
> >
> > Because it is not enabled on RHEL kernels.
>
> Heh, okay, that's an easy explanation.
>
> I'll try to open a bug report in RedHat's bugzilla, and see if they give
> me any attention.
>
> Regards,
> Anand

In addition to that, you have an option to ask CentOS to have it
enabled in the centosplus kernel.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Fresh install C7 nvidia

2018-11-07 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:36 PM Jerry Geis  wrote:
>
> I am install C7.5 on a nvidia unit and nvidia-detect tells me to use
> kmod-nvidia-390xx
> so I do the yum install and and after a long time I see this
>
> -> Processing Dependency: kernel(__drm_atomic_helper_crtc_duplicate_state)
> = 0xa5f3a170 for package: kmod-nvidia-390xx-390.87-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(__drm_atomic_helper_crtc_destroy_state) =
> 0x00a9c70b for package: kmod-nvidia-390xx-390.87-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(__check_object_size) = 0x88db9f48 for
> package: kmod-nvidia-390xx-390.87-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel(___ratelimit) = 0x155f4108 for package:
> kmod-nvidia-390xx-390.87-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: kernel >= 3.10.0-957.el7 for package:
> kmod-nvidia-390xx-390.87-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64
> ---> Package nvidia-x11-drv-390xx.x86_64 0:390.87-1.el7_5.elrepo will be
> installed
>
> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
> kmod-nvidia-390xx-390.87-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo
> nvidia-x11-drv-390xx-390.87-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo
>
> I have also tried --skip-broken and get the same result as above.
>
> have I missed something ?   This has always working in the past.
> Thanks,
>
> Jerry

I suggest you join the elrepo mailing list. You'll find the following
posts, for example:

http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2018-October/004523.html
http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2018-November/004529.html
http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2018-November/004531.html

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] Intro

2018-11-01 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:37 AM John Boero  wrote:
>
> your FirstnameLastname username
>
> JohnBoero
>
> the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s)
>
> To seek the holy grail.
> But mostly to fix the rampant 404 download links for CentOS Atomic media here:
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download
>
> the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s)
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download
>
> Ex RedHatter and lifelong CentOS user/supporter.
> Thanks folks!
> John Boero

You should be able to edit the page. Let us know if you see any problem.

Thanks for the contribution,

Akeme
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >