This tool might be of interest to you:
https://ssl-config.mozilla.org/#server=apache=2.4.41=intermediate=1.1.1d=5.6
Don't forget to configure to match your software versions and requirements.
Cheers,
Jamie
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 10:03, Adrian Jenzer
wrote:
> Dear Community
>
> I try to get
Sorry, re-read your question and realise my suggestion would only help you get
SASL authentication working.
> On 31 Mar 2021, at 09:19, Jamie Burchell wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure I encountered this and needed to yum install
> cyrus-sasl-plain to resolve it.
>
>> On
I'm pretty sure I encountered this and needed to yum install cyrus-sasl-plain
to resolve it.
> On 29 Mar 2021, at 20:31, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My main mail server is running CentOS 7 with Postfix and Dovecot.
>
> Last week I was surprised to see that Postfix had some troubles on
How about using yum history to find when and why the package was installed?
yum history summary dnsmasq
yum history package-list dnsmasq
Jamie
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 20:56, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 3:31 PM -0500 Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
> > or one can
So RH could make it difficult for downstream projects such a Rocky Linux.
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 20:46, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/22/21 2:39 PM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote:
>>>> Am 22.01.2021 um 21:36 schrieb Jamie Burchell :
>>>
>>> C
Good. At least I can consider moving to that without fear of RH pulling the
plug!
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 20:39, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 22.01.2021 um 21:36 schrieb Jamie Burchell :
>>
>> Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux?
>
Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux?
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 18:04, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS
> wrote:
>> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their
>> December announcement.
>
> I
The RHEL announcement is of no use to me or my company. We spin up DigitalOcean
droplets for each of our client websites/apps. If we were utilising horizontal
scaling we'd have even more droplets per website/app. We'd easily have over 16
installations.
> On 21 Jan 2021, at 19:57, Scott
Didn't the CentOS Vault repo ensure that every package ever published was still
available?
> On 7 Jan 2021, at 07:03, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 1/6/21 8:01 PM, Strahil Nikolov via CentOS wrote:
>> - No chance to "yum history undo last" as there are no older packages
>
>
> I've seen that
ready been said, Stream might actually be a positive
but I shall wait and see what happens. And as for the 5 years LTS, that will be
the same for every distro anyway.
Cheers
Jamie
> On 6 Jan 2021, at 17:56, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 8:30 AM Jamie Burchell w
use tools like ansible/chef? If you can put the time in,
> you can make your webservers rather distro agnostic. I would even put
> terraform on the table. It is not like your customers will know the
> difference.
>
>>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:20, Gordon Messmer
>>> wrote
Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of
destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple
way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:20, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/5/21 3:02 PM, Jamie Burchell wr
> Probably. For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's
better than CentOS was
We will need to (manually) migrate to Stream 9.x after 5 years instead of
10 though?
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 22:51, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/5/21 11:32 AM, Jamie Burchell wrote:
> > i
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 22:51, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/5/21 11:32 AM, Jamie Burchell wrote:
> > is the change a non-issue for my use-case?
>
>
> Probably. For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's
> better than CentOS was, because it gets updates consistentl
In that case, it sounds like a non-issue for the way we currently use
CentOS.
As there's a simple migration from CentOS 8 to Stream and Digital Ocean
currently provide CentOS 8 images, it'll be interesting to see what they do
moving forward.
___
CentOS
nse of
the impact in real-terms i.e. what actually changes if we move to Stream.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:59, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:32:18 +0000
> Jamie Burchell wrote:
>
> > The uncertainty is frustrating and unsettling.
>
> I certainly agree with you on this point!
to jump to.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:48, Jon Pruente wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:32 PM Jamie Burchell
> wrote:
>
> > I'm sure it's my lack of understanding, but there feels too much hope
> > pinned on "Rocky", which seems like one person (albeit a k
I guess we need to wait and see how the dust settles. For those lucky
enough to still be on CentOS 7, there's a bit of breathing space although
these things take time to plan and implement of course. Those unlucky
enough to have updated to CentOS 8 have less than a year to decide to move
to stream
Hello
I've recently discovered the announcement regarding the change in direction
for the CentOS project and I imagine like many others, I'm confused and
concerned about what this means moving forward.
I work for a small web development agency and we offer hosting as part of
our package to
19 matches
Mail list logo
