Linux kernel signing key
sig_key:2C:BC:98:70:54:63:43:CA:3A:E1:20:C2:BC:EB:98:44:01:95:59:62
sig_hashalgo: sha256
I'm happy to provide any other relevant info if needed! Thanks again!
Nick
On 1/31/18, 12:49 AM, "CentOS on behalf of Nick.Jacques"
<centos-boun...@centos.
Below are dumps from udevadm of the block devices, /dev/sda (a Google Cloud
persistent disk that is my root partition) and /dev/sdb (a Google Cloud
ephemeral disk [local SSD] that is mounted at /local-ssd).
Thanks in advance for any assistance!
Nick
# udevadm info -q all -a /dev/sda
looking at d
Hello there !
Has anyone managed to make work on tcp wrappers on hosts.allow the swpan
command in order to check the ip if it is on the permitted one ..?
__ Information from ESET Endpoint Antivirus, version of detection
engine 16143 (20170926) __
The message was checked by
Hello there to all !
I have issues to make work the spawn on hosts.allow on a CentOS 7 system ?
Has anyone succeed with this ..?
Thanks in advance
Nick
__ Information from ESET Endpoint Antivirus, version of detection
engine 16085 (20170914) __
The message was checked
would be to use xvfb or some such but that's super overweight.
So, finally, a question - does anyone know how you solve this today?
Best,
--Nick Cammorato
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ll the daemons.
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http://
On 11/16/2015 3:58 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/16/2015 01:39 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
This is very frustrating, and not obvious. If --permanent doesn't
work for a command, then it should give an error - not silently fail
without doing anything!
But --permanent *did* work.
No, it didn't
monitoring --add-service=snmp
firewall-cmd --zone=monitoring --add-interface=ens192
firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent
Would this be an appropriate approach? Is it the 'most correct' way?
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice
commands _*not working and failing
silently*_.
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http
On 11/17/2015 11:12 AM, Nick Bright wrote:
firewall-cmd --zone=monitoring --add-source=1.2.3.4/32
firewall-cmd --zone=monitoring --add-service=snmp
firewall-cmd --zone=monitoring --add-interface=ens192
firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent
I went ahead and tried this and found that the zone
didn't think to try "snmpd", because "http" isn't "httpd" and so on.
I was also surprised to not find SNMP defined, though it was easy enough
to do so. I would have assumed that anything in /etc/services would be
defined.
--
----
Is there any information available about what packages are being planned
for the SCL? For example, will PHP 5.6 be made available & maintained?
By "maintained" I mean kept up to date with back ported security patches
and such.
--
---
, one must execute firewall-cmd
--runtime-to-permanent.
This is very frustrating, and not obvious. If --permanent doesn't work
for a command, then it should give an error - not silently fail without
doing anything!
--
---
- N
? Why does the documented command structure not work?
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
-
is that, with the compatibility package installed, could this
present vulnerabilities or compliance problems in Apache?
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You
has advised
installing package openssl098e from yum; but I'm hesitant to do so from
a compliance and security perspective.
What are the implications of this compatibility package? What does it
provide/do?
Thank you,
--
---
- Nick Bright
will not start.
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http://www.valnet.net
: 90:e2:ba:1e:12:5c
Slave queue ID: 0
Slave Interface: p6p2
MII Status: up
Speed: 1 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 90:e2:ba:1e:12:5d
Slave queue ID: 0
Any suggestions and help are much appreciated!
Thanks!
Nick
___
CentOS
.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
--
Carlos R!.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
--
PALOMINO PÉREZ, Nick
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 21:36 -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
Hello:
Skype for Linux version 4 has recently been released. An RPM package has
been made, and it's mentioned in the Wiki:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype#head-
a08dbc518378653842007a2eec37bc32e13c0bd0
However, Microsoft
: Imágenes integradas 1]
Si alguien tiene EXPERIENCIA espero su ayuda porfavor.
Gracias Lista !
--
Nick B. Palomino Pérez
*Universidad Nacional de Educación *
*Enrique Guzmán y Valle*
*
*
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http
,
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks for the links.
On 12/03/12 16:06, John Doe wrote:
Maybe try to tweak:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/p/perl-5.14.2-212.fc18.src.rpm
On 12/03/12 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is where all the CentOS-6.2 SRPMS live:
On 01/02/12 21:06, Les Mikesell wrote:
Hmm...
I just tried this and besides needing ip route add default
It does not seem to work when I unplug the cable on my primary link.
Well, I should disclose that is an experiment, and I may not have explained the
config fully - see the pages I
)?
Cheers,
Nick
ps. Hints about this obtained from
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/net/0201.0/.html
http://lartc.org/lartc.html#AEN298
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I also encountered a similar problem.
yum clean all did not resolve it, but *not* installing the CR prior to the
update repo did.
I think the problem is that my update script was still installing
centos-release-cr-5.6 (the URL was hardwired, as I couldn't think of a simple
way to get the correct
On 08/09/11 07:23, Emmett Culley wrote:
Today I suddenly have two VMs that have read only file systems. The host is
CentOS 6, as are the two VMs with this problem.
Disclaimer: I can't claim this matches your circumstance exactly, but it is
something you might check.
I have seen problems with
On 21/07/11 07:27, Nguyen Vu Hung (VNC) wrote:
Any suggestion for an alternative of tripwire for my CentOS 5.6?
AIDE, available in the base centos repo.
N
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 31/03/11 15:24, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Cal Sawyer wrote on 03/31/2011 08:13 AM:
CentOS 5.4(final) 2.6.18-164el5PAE.
I hope you are aware that you are using a very obsolete OS with a lot of
known (i.e. exploitable) security holes and bugs that have subsequently
been fixed.
Do you really
On 13/12/10 16:14, Sven Aluoor wrote:
I have more than 12 years experience with UNIX system administration,
but I am too stupid for programming. My only programming experience is
shell scripting. I tried to learn Java, but don't understand it
because it is too complicated for my limited
On 19/11/10 00:11, Kenni Lund wrote:
I think cgroups is the solution, if you want to guarantee resources to some
guests. I haven't tested it with KVM, but perhaps nice and ionice can be
useful as well...the guests are just Linux processes after all.
Just to clarify, it isn't that *I* want to
utilise more - say four or more -
physical CPUs. Is KVM better at this than VMware Server, or does the same basic
problem persist?
Thanks,
Nick
1. http://communities.vmware.com/thread/169323
http://cs.gmu.edu/~hfoxwell/cs671projects/southern_v12n.pdf
The SMP
scheduling algorithms used
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 18/11/10 23:45, Kenni Lund wrote:
The good thing about KVM compared to other virtualization solutions,
is that KVM doesn't try to reinvent the wheel. It leaves scheduling to
the Linux kernel, so whatever your Linux system is setup to use, KVM
will use that. You
On 10/08/10 17:52, Keith Roberts wrote:
1. yum check-updates and yum update do *not* warn you of an impending
unresolved dependency caused by YP hiding the required package.
It seems the only way to find out is if you go ahead and try and perform the
update, which potentially leaves you
November 2009?
Thanks,
Nick
1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.general/86563
2. An example of when yum_priorities bites included here:
http://www.noodlefactory.co.uk/~nick/wu-lee/Notes/YumPrioritiesPitfalls
Comments welcomed.
___
CentOS
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 12:44 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Nick Sklav sk...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Someone needs to update the website to give info about the 5.4 update
ISO's The download link point to 5.4 but the description still states
5.3
Changed
Hi List
my question to everyone is. What is exactly wrong with having helpful
documentation on the centos wiki? Does it really matter if the original
maintainer documents his app. I for one love the fact i can search threw
the wiki and get app#1 working and I also know the procedure has gone
.
Thank you,
Nick Sklav
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
On Friday 19 September 2008 09:08, Josh Donovan wrote:
Nick Goddard wrote:
aide is now provided in 4.7 as well.
I installed aide and did # aide --init. Does it not mail
root like tripwire used to each morning? The manual is
does not mention mailing root.
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~rammer/aide
On Thursday 18 September 2008 16:35, Jim Perrin wrote:
For CentOS5, I'd recommend using aide instead of tripwire. The two do
pretty much the same thing, but aide comes with centos5 by default
(and is recommended in the NSA guide)
aide is now provided in 4.7 as well.
Regards
Nick.
---
Nick
for the OpenManage software here:
http://linux.dell.com/repo/hardware/
Regards
Nick.
--
*Nick Goddard*
Systems Administrator and Developer
*Sigmer Technologies Ltd*
*/considered IT solutions/*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
as I believe the software used to check that file -
just change it back after install. (not sure if this is true of the later
releases of OpenManage).
Regards
Nick.
--
*Nick Goddard*
Systems Administrator and Developer
*Sigmer Technologies Ltd*
*/considered IT solutions
:)
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
MHR wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Nick Fenwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
How can I investigate why my Windows key is not triggering the expected
keybinding commands?
This may seem dumb, but are you sure it's not your keyboard? I use a
Logitech EX110 wireless keyboard
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hello!
I've just started trying gnome-terminal (instead of xterm) because of
its tabbing facility. However, I note that with it backslashes
appear something like a W with a horizontal line through it. Any
known way to get a backslash to appear as a backslash?
in an xterm pressing the key combination just sends an 'x' to
the console, whereas alt-x does not. When the windows key is working as
expected, I don't see an 'x' echo'd to the console.
How can I investigate why my Windows key is not triggering the expected
keybinding commands?
TIA
Nick
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:02 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 9:31 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
Let's go live now.
Akemi
I Second the opinion of going live. let this baby be the new face of the
wiki. Also fine tuning is an art and takes a life time ;)
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 15:40 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
Your suggestion was added in 1.7-7 version, now available in
http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Wiki page. Also we modified the
moin-bottom.png and
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 17:48 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Nick Sklav wrote:
I like the new look by far better than the original. My only comment is
is there a need to have the same menu structure on the bottom as we have
on top. I am a firm believer in not having to be repetitive.
I'm
DVD with the 'linux rescue'
option all RAID LVM volumes are available for use. So from this it
seems I need to update some CentOS config file?
Here are some config files:
http://pastebin.com/m6d5075dc
Thanks!
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On 9/4/07, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Webb
Hi All,
I have what I believe to be a pretty basic LVM RAID setup on my
CentOS 5 machine:
Raid Partitions:
/dev/sda1,sdb1
/dev/sda2,sdb2
/dev/sda3
On 9/4/07, Nick Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/07, Shad L. Lords [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This worked fine, but on reboot I get a ton of errors from LVM saying
that volume with id --... was not found and the system
automatically reboots. This seems to happen for all
Hi,
Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's
shows up as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 33695442549668 819876 0 290082382360
-/+ buffers/cache: 138300
Hi,
Sorry this is OT.
I was wondering if anyone had any tips or advice on a password
management and distribution system for systems admin type purposes?
We're just a small team of engineers currently using GPG/PGP to
distribute passwords securely now. However it's already becoming an
admin
54 matches
Mail list logo
