Re: [CentOS] systemd-networkd issue

Sometimes we build kernels that need the minimal amount of functionality that we can get away with, the environment this system is in an environment that does not use, and won't use IPv6 for some time. systemd-networkd has some nice features for setting link speed, renaming interfaces etc, and so

Re: [CentOS] systemd-networkd issue

work in CentOS, but is it worth trying to turn off ipv6 > for a single nic as as outlined at > https://coreos.com/os/docs/latest/network-config-with-networkd.html ? > > > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Phil Manuel <p...@zomojo.com> wrote: > > > Hi Clint, >

Re: [CentOS] systemd-networkd issue

Hi Clint, systemd-networkd doesn't use those files at all. On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 13:55 Clint Dilks <cli...@scms.waikato.ac.nz> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Phil Manuel <p...@zomojo.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > If I disable ipv6 via the

[CentOS] systemd-networkd issue

Hi, If I disable ipv6 via the kernel command line, ipv6.disable=1, then systemd-networkd fails to bring up any interfaces. Removing the option and networking works as expected. Phil. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] keepalived segfault after upgrade to 7.4

Prior to upgrading to CentOS 7.4 everything was fine, after upgrade I'm seeing /etc/keepalived# keepalived -f /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf --dont-fork --log-console --log-detail --dump-conf -m -v Starting VRRP child process, pid=17224 Registering Kernel netlink reflector Registering Kernel

[CentOS] Timemaster systemd

Hi, If I run timemaster from systemd it fails with:- Aug 02 06:07:41 machinename timemaster[19230]: [1494069.352] process 19231 started: /usr/sbin/chronyd -u chrony -n -f /var/run/timemaster/chrony.conf Aug 02 06:07:41 machinename timemaster[19230]: [1494069.352] process 19232 started:

Re: [CentOS] OpenVAS: confusion with 3rd party repos

I gave up with the repo method and ended up building it from source. It worked out a lot easier. On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 02:35 Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 18/07/2017 à 17:42, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : > > I'm reading through various HOWTOs and tutorials, and it seems like I'm

Re: [CentOS] What's Next

Hi, At the time of testing support for the Ryzen CPU was added in February of this year. This kernel was used for testing.and we usually build them as rpm's. Regards Phil On Thu, 18 May 2017 at 22:24 Eugene Poole wrote: > I read somewhere that the PCIe issue is

Re: [CentOS] What's Next

Latency over PCIe is an issue with the new Ryzen chips/motherboards, the PCIe layout is different https://community.amd.com/thread/214078 On Thu, 18 May 2017 at 08:55 Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 17/05/17 04:34, Eugene Poole wrote: > > OK, AMD has announced it's new line of

Re: [CentOS] Compiling custom "vmlinuz" PXE kernel?

Hi, This page http://www.pkje.net/meander/2014/07/27/centos-6-5-on-supermicro-hft-server/ detailed how to add modules for C6, I imagine the process to be similar for C7 On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 at 00:02 Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, JXVS wrote: > > From:

[CentOS] renaming mdadm name

Hi I have a disk which two of the partitions are part of a RAID1 setup. I'm trying to rename the the second raided partition mdadm -E /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdc4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 1.2 Feature Map : 0x1 Array UUID : 83d7657b:ebfddcb7:36b0fa14:d29a350c Name

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart issue with UEFi

> On 28 Aug 2016, at 10:04 AM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Gordon Messmer > <gordon.mess...@gmail.com <mailto:gordon.mess...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 11:35 PM, Phil Manuel wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart issue with UEFi

on --boot-drive=sda1 Still fails. Thanks On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 at 02:07 Gordon Messmer <gordon.mess...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/22/2016 11:31 PM, Phil Manuel wrote: > > Should I need to change anything to this ? > > > As far as I know, you shouldn't. If installation still fa

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart issue with UEFi

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 at 02:18 Gordon Messmer <gordon.mess...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/21/2016 11:56 PM, Phil Manuel wrote: > > part /boot/efi --fstype="efi" --size=200 --ondisk=sda > > And I have tried the latter with location as mbr still fails > > Wha

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart issue with UEFi

On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 at 12:51 Gordon Messmer <gordon.mess...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/19/2016 11:35 PM, Phil Manuel wrote: > > The install fails under UEFi due to the fact the partitions are not > cleared, and it doesn’t have any space to continue. Is there an extra step > I

[CentOS] Kickstart issue with UEFi

Hi, I have a test system that booted fine using "Legacy Bios” mode and using the following Kickstart snippet configured the disks correctly:- # Clear the Master Boot Record zerombr # Partition clearing information clearpart --all --initlabel # Disk partitioning information part raid.01

Re: [CentOS] Help with C7 start script

Hi, I think it's related to either TimeoutStopSec=0 TimeoutStartSec=0 You might want to check out these options for your service definition. Phil. On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 at 03:21 Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:06:59PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, mptfusion software?

> On 13 Jul 2016, at 4:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 7/12/2016 10:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I'll mention it to my manager. However, much more important is finding >> something that will tell me*which* drive in a RAID just failed so I can >> replace it > >

Re: [CentOS] Realtek 8111GR on C7

You can get the Linux driver from http://www.realtek.com/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1=5=5=5=4=3=false#RTL8111B/RTL8168B/RTL8111/RTL8168%3Cbr%3ERTL8111C/RTL8111CP/RTL8111D%28L%29%3Cbr%3ERTL8168C/RTL8111DP if you can't find it under C7 Regards On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Alessandro

Re: [CentOS] Zoneminder

On 22/09/10 2:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: We gave up on zoneminder and moved to motion, easy to build RPM's and configure. http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome Looks nice, I'll sub to that list but quick last question: After a read of the docs, I get the idea it's not

Re: [CentOS] Zoneminder

On 22/09/10 11:39 AM, Thomas Dukes wrote: I have zoneminder 1.24.4 running under 5.5. The docs/support sucks. There is one comment you need to add to ./configure to get it to compile. It took me months to figure it out and find it on the zoneminder website. The best version was 1.23.3 but

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

On 29/07/10 9:55 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote: Hi, I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the ethernetadress of a client 1:1. The tutorial here [1] is simple and looks like the thing I need.

[CentOS] LVM issue

Hi We use AoE disks for some of our systems. Currently, a 15.65Tb filesystem we have is full, I then extended the LVM by a further 4Tb but resize4fs could not handle a filesystem over 16Tb (CentOS 5.5). I then reduced the lvm by the same amount, and attempted to create a new LV, but get this

Re: [CentOS] LVM issue

OK I believe I've resolved it. I knew I was in test mode, but wasn't expecting those messages. Running the command out of test mode just works. Should have tried that earlier, never mind I'll know next time. Phil. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] how to properly change the timezone

- Original Message - changed the timezone by copying the correct file to /etc/localtime, however something keeps changing it back. I'm not sure if this is a yum update or what. Without installing the graphical tools, how can I update the timezone in such a way that the

Re: [CentOS] Migrating away from Nagios

- Original Message - Did you consider opennms - and if so was there a reason for not using it? It has some integration for provisioning, but I'm not exactly sure how it works and the latest release made some changes. its on the list of things I want to get to one day, not quite

Re: [CentOS] GUID Partition Tables and Ext3 Partition Size

This might help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table We certainly have a GPT partition of 15Tb but I know it can go much larger. Phil. Manish Kathuria wrote: Hello, Does CentOS 5.4 support large ( 2 TB) external storage devices using GPT (GUID Partition Tables), while the main

Re: [CentOS] GUID Partition Tables and Ext3 Partition Size

Manish Kathuria wrote: Thanks Phil. I had seen that site before and I wanted to know the status on the current CentOS kernels. Are you running CentOS 5.x and using LVM for this partition or have you formatted it as ext3 filesystem directly ? -- Manish