On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Karanbir Singh wrote:
making a few edits i just noticed that a lot of emails get sent out on
every edit on wiki.c.o - this isnt a problem as such, but i wonder if
its better for more people to use an rss feed ?
I read each commit and have for many years, as an anti-spam
and experiment
- -- Russ herrold
- --
end
==
.-- -... ---.. ... -.- -.--
Copyright (C) 2014 R P Herrold
herr...@owlriver.com
My words are not deathless prose,
but they are mine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014, Jordan wrote:
http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/vtpm.txt
What I cannot find is the vTPM manager that distributes
vTpms to domains.
The other places to read are:
1. the primary site at Berlios
(this has of course gone dark)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
Karsten Wade kw...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
What's all this about SIGs, contributors, and committers? The CentOS
Wiki didn't use to work that way.
This is part of a piece I sent this to Karsten
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Stephen Harris wrote:
I have a device I want a guest to see. I've configured the following:
And then in udev:
% cat /etc/udev/rules.d/90-owon.rules
ACTION==add, \
SUBSYSTEM==usb, \
SYSFS{idVendor}==5345, \
SYSFS{idProduct}==1234, \
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Robert Dinse wrote:
I am getting to where we want to offer virtual servers
for lease but to do so we need some method of measuring
and/or limiting traffic to individual guests.
I am wondering what others are using for this purpose?
I know that you can look
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Ben Hosmer wrote:
Username: BenHosmer
Title: Building an RPM from Scratch
Placement: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Rpm
I went through the process of building and documenting how
to build an RPM from scratch using node.js as an example.
I'd like to
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, sumit gupta wrote:
I tried installing Cent-OS 6.3 in my laptop. Its not getting installed
normally, i've to install it using basic graphics drivers. post
installation my laptop is running hot and when i am trying to install ATI
graphix card drivers,its getting stuck at
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
Russ, the texinfo-tex, gettext, vim-enhanced and sudo packages were
already added to prepare functionality so they should be installed once
the prepare functionality completes its duty.
thank you -- setting up a fresh test box
- Russ herrold
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Christoph Galuschka wrote:
already added to prepare functionality so they should be
installed once the prepare functionality completes its
duty.
working from the outlines at:
https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork
- and -
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
echo $MESSAGE /dev/stderr
Yes. These are error messages. Where else does they should go to but the
standard error output? Isn't it the usual way of printing error messages?
no:
echo $MESSAGE 12
is the usual way, so
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
Could you move the following information
'remove' perhaps?
The centos-art.sh preparation process is being documented at
`trunk/Manuals/Tcar-ug' directory, specifically in the
`trunk/Manuals/Tcar-ug/Scripts/Bash/prepare.docbook' file.
I lack
at:
wiki.centos.org/ArtWork
I set up a machine to test
at step: 4.2, it states:
4.2. Configure Your Workstation
...
To download your working copy execute the following command:
svn co https://projects.centos.org/svn/artwork ~/
This command will create your working copy inside
$ bash -x ~/artwork/trunk/Scripts/Bash/centos-art.sh prepare
...
++ echo prepare
+ ARG=prepare
+ ARGUMENTS=' '\''prepare'\'''
+ [[ ! -n prepare ]]
+ [[ ! prepare =~ \^\[\[:alpha:]] ]]
+ exec /home/artwork/artwork/trunk/Scripts/Bash/centos-art.sh
help
... just hangs
Luc Lalonde wrote:
I would like to add an article to your documentation wiki:
- CentOS 6 as a Time Machine server for Mountain Lion (Howtos, Misc, Time
Machine Server)
Here's my wiki informations:
Username: LucLalonde
Hi, Luc,
I have set up a blank 'homepage', with the appropriate ACL
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Alan Bartlett wrote:
Sorry Bob, I have obviously failed.
We really need Ralph, the wiki-Meister, to correctly set the ACL for that
page.
or to take look at a ACL on a homepage and to replicate it's
ACL model
Robert, I had added:
#acl RobertLightfoot:read,write,revert
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Ron Arts wrote:
I found an error on the page http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey,
and I wanted to fix it, but appararently I need to follow this procedure.
The error is you need 20mb on the USB VFAT partition in stead of 10mb
for the latest CentOS 5.x
I've updated:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EOLC3
which, of course no longer applies to just one major release
I am unfamiliar with the process of pushing through a rename
of a page, but I see copies of change notices with Ralph doing
it from time to tome. May I request an assist here
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Perhaps, More Actions dropdown menu = select Rename Page ?
heh ... done
- R
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, R P Herrold wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Norman Gaywood wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746602
(pygrub cannot start F16 PV guests (GPT partition) under Xen 4.1.1)
why would one use GPT for a domU? seems like gross overkill
... following on myself, I
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Craig White wrote:
I just can't embrace installing an OS whose security updates have
...
Then please leave -- your sustained venom and bile are not
needed, wanted, nor useful here, let alone remotely on topic
-- Russ herrold
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote:
Oh, things have improved have they? Last I tried, you could not get d-i
Please take this elsewhere -- it has nothing to do with centos
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:49 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
Then please leave -- your sustained venom and bile are not
needed, wanted, nor useful here, let alone remotely on topic
what venom? what bile?
For the record, I wasn't the one who brought up
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't care in general, but dislike hypocrisy. If you are going to
claim to be open source, it should work to rebuild.
les ... go rent a forum of your own -- this has no centos
aspect any more
-- Russ herrold
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/21/2011 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
They have created an optional channel in several of those
groupings that is only accessible via RHN and they do not
put those RPMS
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Gary Greene wrote:
Trust me ... the Linux Foundation thinks it is OK, so we are SOL.
I'd rather get the opinion of the FSF (those whom wrote the
license) instead of LF, as they don't matter as much,
really.
Feel free to approach whoever you wish on your own account
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Johnny Tan wrote:
Like recent Ubuntus, C6 uses upstart in place of traditional Sys V init.
Likely, you will want this in /etc/init/ -- note!, not the same as
/etc/init.d/
I don't know WHAT you are looking at, if anything, but it is
not a CentOS 6 install; 'upstart' is a
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
ok, not my best bug report.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5136
but I guess it will serve as a placeholder for clarifications.
you know, if there is not a report, there is not a bug ;)
I've addressed the documentation issue already facing end
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
On 09/21/11 8:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
5.7 has been released, obsoleting the 5.6/cr/
John or Always
I am in a low bandwidth environment, and so cannot do this
myself
Plesae file a bug at: http://bugs.centos.org/ so that the
release process
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
What state should it be in? should that file be referenced as
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/cr/x86_64/RPMS/centos-release-cr.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
?
or should there be a new
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
I am unaware of ever making those comments !
Check your file copy of your email to me of 25 Aug. I won't
engage in a battle of semantics with an anonymous troll
To all:
As a matter of logistics, we are putting some new permissions
in place to
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
However, you can file a bug report against the website.
What is the point in 'complaining' by filing a BUG report when it is
conspicuously evident the existing web person(s) can not cope because
they have insufficient time or have died or have
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
Can't see any new web site on the latter URL. I'm not a Flash user by
choice.
Perhaps the Centos web site should be simple, practical, helpful in
preference to emulating the very latest presentation gimmicks ? A larger
font size will be useful for
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
as described by CISCO in
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_7-2/ipv6_autoconfig.html
a router has to send ICMPv6 messages of type RS to the all-router multicast
group: ff02::1 and ff02::2 for stateless
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Jerry Amundson wrote:
The last sentence of http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute
indicates a RHEL Beta is available, but this is not the case,
currently. Maybe a more generic statement, and not specific to release
number, could be in place here? If such a link to upstream can
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions:
http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
and this issue about a third party writeup is not asked
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Digimer wrote:
That was hardly called for. If you find a post off topic or
uninteresting, just delete it. Either no one will reply or, if there is
interest in the question, others will and the question will be decided
to have value.
wrong
Seemingly you feel it is proper
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, John Doe wrote:
I am in the process of trying (and convincing my colleagues) to learn/setup
selinux as we switch to 6.0...
Quick question: do I really need to install the setools/setroubleshoot
packages or can I live without them? They want to install 80 packages
(gnome
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
- rh
Russ why don't you just discipline everyone? Cause no-one can stick to
CentOS-only conversations in your righteous eyes.
Rudi,
I know it is confusing to you , as Robert
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote:
Brilliant job creation scheme to increase State and Federal tax yields.
'Always'
-- if you are going to post cr*p, at least have the courtesy
to not CROSS post to Red Hat lists and here
-- Russ herrold
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Russ, my fault - I'd crossposted to here and the general RH list. Dunno if
I should consider filing this as a bug or not with upstream.
yes but, no ... your content was not wild-ass OT political
- R
___
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
I think the centos-offtopic list should also be centos
related, but not so strict postings as the current list is.
yeah -- just like there is presently any self control being
shown by certain serial offenders here. We could set it up,
but the
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Surely it is easy enough to avoid reading an article
labelled OT?
sure -- one person SHOULD be able to burden tens of thousands
to clean up after them repeatedly
- R
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
And if anything drove posters away from here it was certain people
telling them their input wasn't wanted.
you are right, Lesthere is no purpose to participating
further here
-- Russ herrp;d
___
CentOS
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Looked over there. Any idea why they rebranded?
Total WAG: to offer deb file downloads?!
later by Tom H, not willing to accept that his remarks were
out of scope:
It was a WAG! :)
no -- it was
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Makes sense, and I would propose that would replace the current content
on http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaOnCentOS
My thoughts exactly !
I am missing something ... a review of google inlinks
indicates this page is widely referenced by third
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
how do you supply the ks.cfg file when you're PXE booting
and have no CD or floppy?
ummm ... with DHCP, handing out the correct boot vmlinuz image
under PXE for the MAC address in question, and kernel command
line arguments, one of which is the
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 11:03 -0700, Todd wrote:
indeed no, but I want to work on some pattern matching, analysis for a
piece of software I have wanted to write for years..
Lots of success and good luck. Do let us know how it goes.
umm -- high
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Ned Slider wrote:
But as outlined in that thread it is not always easy (or indeed
possible) to establish which upstream source a given CentOS modified
package is built from. A more reliable method would be to check the
changelog.
A most reliable mechanism would be to
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:54 AM -0300 Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com
wrote:
The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e.
handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests)
I've only been watching this thread
I see in my overnight email spool:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726872
I am amused because this kind of request comes up time and
time again with respect the package management system
It is technically _possible_ to attain this kind of rollbacks,
in some tightly controlled
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Tomasz Ostrowski wrote:
I've managed to install CentOS 6 on a 192MB virtual machine using LiveCD
install-to-disk graphical method.
snip rework of Anaconda, Live CD discussions
I think you are over-thnking this. Anaconda is overkill if
all you want to do is blow images
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Frank Cox wrote:
Gimp on Centos 5 has somehow lost its ability to load a pdf
file on three (i386) different computers. I'm pretty sure
that this used to work.
just a stab in the dark here -- upstream issued an update to
poppler / evince that obsoleted xpdf
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Craig White wrote:
you made a vacuous argument.
Hunh. You are ** still ** trolling here [arguing against
package management] and on this thread [C 6 matters], Craig?
I thot back on June 13 you said here:
easier just to give up - I moved my new servers to ubuntu -
no
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
The specific example of zoneminder is particularly
insidious. On our zoneminder systems, even point updates to
certain libraries has created problems. A good, modern,
package of zoneminder in a repo somewhere would save a lot
of grief in that
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Marc Deop wrote:
It's more than twice as fast than the previous sh script.
In part this is /bin/sh v /bin/bash and using 'bashisms'
matter, but yes, I did not seek to optimize a teaching
throwaway
1- m5sum the file we need
... actually the NAME of the file, to make it
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 7/25/2011 11:37 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
Installing non RPM software on an RPM Distro like CentOS is frowned
upon. That is the worst way to do it.
else has already done it. That is, building an RPM is always more work
than doing a source install
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
My questions for any filesystem experts are:
Is there a way to adjust the existing md partitions to get the right
alignment for 4k sectors without having to do a file-oriented copy to
new partitions? A resize + a dd copy to shift the position might
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Mike Burger wrote:
If IBM can make this happen for their OS, and Red Hat certainly supports
such a process in the Fedora line of releases (including the ability to
list additional repositories for remote installation as part of the
process), they could certainly make it a
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
the coder is not tech savvy as one might expect, so it's
really hard for me to explain the issue of having lots of
files in one folder to the site owner or to the coder.
I do not expect coders to remain 'not tech savvy'
If the coder is not willing
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
If the pictures are named sequentially, why not store then at a 100 per
directory structure something like this
/pix/0/00/pix1.jpg
/pix/0/26/pix02614.jpg
/pix/6/72/pix67255.jpg
Go read Knuth
One does not do that because then one is
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread, but a SQL database index of
the actual
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I use to be able to upgrade by doing a 'yum update'. That doesn't work
either.
A low skill user was never able to go from 2.1 to 3, nor 3 to
4, nor 4 to 5, and an a minimally skilled will not be able
to go from 5 to 6. This is the policy of the
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Thomas Dukes wrote:
When I say non-rpm, I mean source packages I compiled such as zoneminder.
CentOS ships no non-RPM packaged packages -- look to whoever
put those packages on your box without using the packaging
system if you feel the need to blame someone
[clean up
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
As some of you probably already know, since RHEL 6 xorg.conf does
not exist any more by default.
it is not created by default any more, but is honored if
present is my understanding, as for multi-head, and for
solving tricky scan problems
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Emmett Culley wrote:
No, it isn't. At least it isn't trivial for those of us
that only occasionally need to modify their DNS server(s).
I had a few gripes about system-config-bind, but on the
whole it did make it easy for me to manage our DNS servers
without having
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
around. Russ may be of the opinion that everyone should memorize
bazillion-page books of details about each quirky service or hire
dunno that those are my words at all
The issue was DNS zone files
One takes a template, and in the residential user
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Please post your replies bellow the original text you are replying to
for easier read.
Has anybody looked is SL dev team created those?
Also, has anybody tried to rip out those files from C5 and just repack it?
Ljubomir ... PLEASE stop saying
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Someone posted that you can use VNC to install CentOS 6.
and this has WHAT to do with low ram installs?
PLEASE stop this noise, just to hear yourself talk, Ljubomir
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:04:41AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
I am more into creating some form of redirect from docs.c.o to
upstream's relevant docs.
Is this permissible now?
Not that I am aware of .. I have invited the upstream to
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
The 6.0 folder is not readable for external users until the bitflip
occurs.
The implicit statement being that a mirror operator could
_jump the gun_ on the official release, and 'have 'the release
early. Indeed, in the past some (former) mirror
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Hüvely Balázs wrote:
I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6.
The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the backlight
goes off. I see the windows, buttons, but it's very dark, maybe the
backlight switching off..
do a text
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Steve Campbell wrote:
Our company blocks bittorents due to abuse. I believe the DVD ISOs are now
taking up two DVDs, so I'm not sure how I'd do this either
As I recall, the DVD's were formerly created from a pile of CD
The former script that I used was based on one from:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
does someone have a script for maintaining a repo with lftp they'd like
to share? what I saw on the wiki wasn't very helpful.
[root@xps400 ~]# grep kernel *conf
lftp-centos-4-updates.conf:
ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/4/updates/i386 \
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi,
Has, or does, anyone use dm-cache - specifically for caching SAN based
storage locally?
hmmm
From another list
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:38:29 +0200
From: Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com
To: xen-users xen-us...@lists.xensource.com
Subject: xen-u]
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must say that the meaning of your message is not clear for me. What is
the difference for you between The sources that will become CentOS 6,
and CentOS proper ? What do you have in mind ? Why KVM may be excluded ?
for reasons out of scope here, CentOS
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Without implying that I can read his mind, I guess he meant People with
enough skills will be able to tweak C6 to use xen as Dom0
Wolfie beat me to the post by eight seconds, it seems
Yes, it appears that he can read my mind
-- Russ herrold
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Tom Bishop wrote:
Russ if you have time can you elaborate more about why you are continuing to
go down the Xen path, I for one would love to hear the why's and what for.
I can understand the hardware requirements, and I know xen is generally
going to be faster but my
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must add that, due to the fact Dom0 has been included in recent Kernel
3.0 tree, it will certainly be possible in future releases of RHEL, then
CentOS, to choose either Xen or KVM as virtualization solution.
perhaps, but this is in part a LKML
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 16 June 2011 08:26, Cody Jackson supertanke...@gmail.com wrote:
perl -npe
's/ca::ctrlaltdel:\/sbin\/shutdown/#ca::ctrlaltdel:\/sbin\/shutdown/'
-i /etc/inittab
I think God kills a kitten whenever perl is invoked when
simple sed would do ...
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Nothing that Red Hat did has increased the burden on CentOS.
so says the person who has not done it
- the rpm tool changed, adding a non-backward compatible
compression scheme. as I blogged about months ago; this has
'flow through' effects as to
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/14/2011 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
PLEASE ... let this thread die or take it to a bar somewhere
... it has NOTHING do do with the subject line
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Alexander Farber wrote:
does anybody know of a good source for a apr-util-pgsql rpm package
for CentOS 5.6 / 64 bit and even more I'm curious why isn't it included
but the apr-util-mysql is included...
I seem to have one built on a CentOS 5 platform, although I do
not
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Mike Williams wrote:
Do you edit rewrite rules for every access that would
otherwise be a 404 and change it to a 301? If so, what do
you redirect them to, and why? Sounds like a lot of work.
This was covered by me in a blog post some time ago, as to my
approach:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Steven Crothers wrote:
You could release your work to something like Github, but
I'm sure the CentOS team doesn't want that...
ehh? The CentOS team has been quite clear that its product
carries the license of the underlying packages, and then GPL
for released CentOS
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, n...@nux.ro wrote:
I'd like to see on the LiveCD the following:
1. latest dd_rescue
2. latest gparted
3. ntfs-3g
4. screen
5. mc
CentOS 6 Live CD would composed of packges from the
distribution's packages --- 'latest' is not a criteria there;
as to something with
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
[Upstream] didn't restrict access, it was only rebranded as
another project
oh horse puckety
The binaries (base and updates) formerly freely available in
RHL disappeared behind a license paywall; a new brand that was
'enforceable' emerged [RHL was
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Got back and look at the changelogs of the PostgreSQL packages.
Give me a hint about what to look for.
$ rpm -q --changelog postgresql-libs | grep -i owen
Lamar was, during the time of RHL, postgresql's maintainer as
to RPM based packaging, and as I
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, James B. Byrne wrote:
tell me how I can capture and log the initial response to the ftp
connection?
man expect
It is usually straightforward to capture a transcript of a
session, and then abstract away the needed prompts and
responses (The ORA 'Exploring Expect' by Don
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Mag Gam wrote:
I would like to confirm Matt's claim. I too experienced larger
latencies with Centos 5.x compared to 4.x. My application is very
network sensitive and its easy to prove using lat_tcp.
Russ,
I am curious about identifying the problem. What tools do you
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Community effort or not, it did once seem like you had goals
for timeliness as well. Are you happy with the current
situation? If more community participation is off the
table, what else could help?
Johnny points out that we get crickets at he
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
This seems to me to be an unnecessarily agressive response
to what appeared to me a rational question from Les Mikesell.
But I don't think the fact that a service is free
entitles its proponents to be rude to those using it.
You must be new to this
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Who said anything about 5.6 breaking the environment? Everyone in the
very long thread gave the excuse that it was done concurrent with other
releases.
customary trolling by Gordon Messmer -- passive agressive,
implying an unmet obligation
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Steven Crothers wrote:
I think you're missing the point, if you read between the lines, the
complaint I see is that CentOS (Community Enterprise Operating System)
is not community based whatsoever.
I don't mind-read as to what a third party meant so well as
you, it seems
On Sat, 21 May 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
Wait a cotton-picking minute. Why is vsftpd writing to
/var/log/xferlog in the first place, and not
/var/log/vsftpd.log?
early in the thread, it was clear from a reply's content that
a locally installed 'ftpd' and not the CentOS vsftpd was
being
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Matt Garman wrote:
We have several latency-sensitive pipeline-style programs that have
a measurable performance degredation when run on CentOS 5.x versus
CentOS 4.x.
By pipeline program, I mean one that has multiple threads. The
mutiple threads work on shared data.
On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote:
Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released
and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that
should have been in a dot zero release ... gee
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
herrold earlier:
and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that
should have been in a dot zero release ... gee
Which means, that RHEL6.0 should have just now come out today; the
release called 6.0 was a teaser and a beta of the
(possible duplicate -- the first post had some mal-formed
headers that the MailMan should have rejected)
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Markus Falb wrote:
Oh Lord! If everyone would avoid 'dot.zero' products then no
bugs would be discovered and no 'dot.one' product would be
released. You basically
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when
publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if
you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just
how bad things were and how much we
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
