On Sun, 2021-05-09 at 08:36 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On May 8, 2021, at 21:57, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS <
> centos@centos.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2021-05-08 at 13:53 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 08 May 2021 14:46:58 -050
On Sat, 2021-05-08 at 13:53 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 08 May 2021 14:46:58 -0500
> Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
>
> > CentOS 8.3,
> ...
> > yumex-3.0.15-1.el7.nux.noarch
>
> Centos 8.3 is not el7.
Frank,
Well rats. It seems dnfdragora didn'
If yumex is no longer available, please advise.
A few minutes ago when 'dnfdragora' failed for CentOS 8.3, I tried:
# yumex --root
bash: yumex: command not found...
Install package 'yumex' to provide command 'yumex'? [N/y] y
* Waiting in queue...
* Loading list of packages Failed to
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 20:41 +0100, André Verwijs via CentOS wrote:
>
> I blueray disk (25GB)?? works great :)
André,
I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have
never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the DVD iso was
released without any release notes
After setting up /etc/samba/smb.conf and running "testparm" in CentOS
7.9.2011, I have noticed that the list of parameters echoed back for
the [global] section do not match those in the smb.conf file. Is this
normal?
[global] in /etc/samba/smb.conf:
unix charset = UTF-8
dos charset = CP932
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote:
> Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the
> capacity.
John,
Wrong answer. The server's optical drive doesn't support double-layer
disks. The CentOS developers made a mistake on their DVD iso, and they
need to fix
I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking
system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing
front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a
bug on my behalf? Particulars:
"CentOS 7.9.2009 DVD iso image too large"
ISO image:
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 08:26 +0100, José María Terry Jiménez wrote:
>
> Do you know guest access to shares is disabled in windows 10?
>
> https://docs.microsoft.com/troubleshoot/windows-server/networking/guest-access-in-smb2-is-disabled-by-default
The error message this link says I should be
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 06:32 -0600, Chris Weisiger wrote:
>
> I’m not exactly sure if this may be the same issue I experienced but
> Google smb1 and windows10 . Apparently Microsoft removed support for
> Ann version 1 from windows 10 after one of the release updates
>
>
ng AD/FreeIPA/LDAP.
--Robert Savage
Fairview Heights, IL
>
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:57, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> > wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:18 +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote:
> > >
> > > Anything in the samba logs? May be SELinux/Fi
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:18 +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote:
>
> Anything in the samba logs? May be SELinux/Firewall issues?
Götz,
Unfortunately, no.
The nmbd log verifies that the fileserver's samba service is the local
master browser for WORKGROUP on both eth0 and virbr0.
[2021/01/17
Whenever I log into Cockpit, it flags mcelog as a service failure-to-
start failure. systemctl confirms this.
# systemctl status mcelog
* mcelog.service - Machine Check Exception Logging Daemon
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/mcelog.service; disabled;
vendor preset: enabled)
Active:
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:18 +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Am 18.01.2021 um 20:08 schrieb Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> > :
> >
> > I'm
> >
> following
> https://www.linuxbabe.com/redhat/set-up-samba-server-on-centos-8-rhel-8-for-file-sh
I'm
following
https://www.linuxbabe.com/redhat/set-up-samba-server-on-centos-8-rhel-8-for-file-sharing
to set up Samba 4.12.3-12 on my Storinator fileserver running CentOS
8.3. I am trying to share out /tank/Windows/ as a Samba share:
# ls -al /tank
total 61
drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 7 Dec 26
With the release of the vmlinuz-4.18.0-240.x and vmlinuz-
4.18.0.193.19.x kernels, ZoL cannot connect with a ZFS pool. I'm not
100% sure, but I believe the last CentOS 8 kernel to work with ZFS
0.8.5 was 4.18.0.6.x.
Obviously CentOS does not support ZFS, so this means the ZoL folks must
find and
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:58 -0500, Satish Patel wrote:
> Folks,
>
> What is going on here
> https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
>
> CentOS 8's future is not looking bright. Recently deployed CentOS8 on
> my production workload and now hearing this. What do other folks
>
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 15:43 +1100, Anthony K wrote:
> On 7/12/20 12:20 pm, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
> > A client's (truly ancient) file server running CentOS 7 suddenly
> > started misbehaving, and I believe the ext4 filesystem on
> > /dev/mapper/cl-root may b
A client's (truly ancient) file server running CentOS 7 suddenly
started misbehaving, and I believe the ext4 filesystem on
/dev/mapper/cl-root may be corrupted. A reboot fails with a file system
check and drops me into maintenance mode. I tried booting from a live
C7 DVD and as root running
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 10:44 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I stumbled on this today.
> https://www.hostwinds.com/guide/upgrading-from-centos-7-to-8/
>
> I understand the best is always a re-install But are these steps
> the
> next best thing to update from 7 to 8 ?
>
Jerry,
There is a formally
As if last weekend's UEFI debacle wasn't bad enough, it now seems the
latest C8 kernel (4.18.0-193.14.2) is incompatible with the current
ZFSOnLinux packages (0.8.4-1). When booted to the latest kernel, ZFS is
inaccessible on my C8 storage server. When I back off to the prior
kernel
-Original Message-
From: Stephen John Smoogen
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:57:49 -0400
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 10:20, david wrote:
> >
I agree it is a lot of
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 16:12 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 05:24:13AM -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via
> CentOS wrote:
> > > > If you look at the listing attached to my last message, you'll
> > > > see
> > > > three different gro
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 08:18 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:26 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via
> > > CentOS
> > > wrote:
> > > > I
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:26 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
> wrote:
> > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing
> > MATE
> > from scratch from the GNOME3
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS
wrote:
>
> I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing MATE
> from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without
> ripping
> the heart out of C8 by deleting other critical
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 10:32 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 05:30:26 -0400
> Eddie O'Connor wrote:
>
> > Are there .conf files for the desktop?what about
> > logs?something's
> > got to be amiss somewhereand Linux always complains when it
> > is.in
> > logs. Just
I need some C8 troubleshooting help with MATE.
I'm building a ZFS storage server with a SuperMicro H11SSL motherboard,
EPYC 7232 CPU, and 32 GB ECC SDRAM. I installed CentOS 8.1.1911 from
the iso as soon as it was released. I'm using the on-board ASPEED VGA
video. I installed MATE v1.22 from
I'm building a new storage server. I was unable to use the CentOS-8-
x86_64-1905-dvd1.iso image written to a 256GB thumb drive. It kept
failing the integrity check. I had to use the much smaller CentOS-8-
x86_64-1905-boot.iso image and do a network install from a mirror site.
That's a first for
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 13:03 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:57 AM Chris Card
> wrote:
>
> > I have built a CentOS 8 base image from a kickstart, for use in
> > OpenStack.
> > This image boots fine but the problem I have is that I can't stop
> > udev
> > from renaming
When RHEL8 and CentOS8 were released, I was looking forward to setting
up SAMBA as a AD DC server for CentOS8. But when I lifed the hood on
the samba.spec file I found the option to build the samba-dc binary rpm
has been disabled for rhel family builds.
Apparently Red Hat does not want to support
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 10:59 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
> > > update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> As of now, I have a working MATE DM on CentOS 8. It's a hack though,
> I
> used Fedora repositories. But that means compiling MATE in EPEL
> should
> be straightforward, just recompile Fedora 28 packages.
>
>
> I used Fedora 28
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 9/24/19 10:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox
> > wrote:
> > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any
> > > update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has
On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 10:47 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 10/5/19 3:14 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
> > On 10/4/19 6:59 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 04:52:28PM -0600, David G. Miller wrote:
> > > > On 10/3/19 1:37 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > > > > On 10/3/19
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 08:02 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> I managed to install F28 MATE packages to CentOS 8, so all is needed
> is
> to recompile those in EPEL.
I too am a solid fan of MATE. F28 had v1.16. F30 has the latest v1.22.
Is there any reason I should not try the latest?
35 matches
Mail list logo
