Re: [CentOS] first boot after install - WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB - fails ?
On 16/01/2024 15:43, Christopher Wensink wrote: Is the drive seen if you boot from a rescue disk? Post screenshots and details of errors. Chris Hi. that is one thing I did not try. I should have added - where booting 4TB fails, on same hardware other, previously used & smaller NVMes worked & still do work, when put back it. I'll report back tomorrow. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] first boot after install - WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB - fails ?
Hi guys. I'm trying to install Centos 9 Stream on a nvme - before I start tampering with other OSes - would anybody have an idea why... after a seemingly successful installation OS wont boot - hardware sees nvme drive, bios does - it does not see new/any EFI boot entry? To make it more bizarre - virtually identical hardware, only CPU is Ryzen Pro 3900 and not 3700 - and same Centos succeeded, it boots & starts fine. I'm going to try again with the latest available ISO as of today, but in the meanwhile - I'm hoping you can share some thoughts/ideas. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ssh keys hostname VS fqdn - offends?
Hi guys Though being a mere user, - as opposed to an expert - in many long years of ssh in my use this, is new: -> $ ssh box5.proxmox.mine hostname -i 10.3.1.78 -> $ ssh box5 hostname -i Warning: the RSA host key for 'box5' differs from the key for the IP address '10.3.1.78' Offending key for IP in /root/.ssh/known_hosts:2 Matching host key in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts:2 Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes 10.3.1.78 This is same one host I _ssh_ to. Is this purely _ssh_ and way to fix it would be 'configuration' or perhaps (ssh &) something else? I don't quite get what exactly is happening here. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Puppet from EPEL ?
Hi guys. It's a bit confusing - I'm only about to start a foray into it - whether _puppet_ from EPEL is the whole-lot-server? From the look of included _puppet.service_ - this package is only agent and if not why no server bits? Looking at what comes with Puppet's own repo - those appear quite different, packages. do. How do you install/get your _puppets_? thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] emulate ARM ?
On 14/11/2023 21:44, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: Hi guys. How do you emulate AMR arch - I mean, with what's in distro &| SIGs repos as oppose to do-it-yourself? surely I meant ARM, surely :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] emulate ARM ?
Hi guys. How do you emulate AMR arch - I mean, with what's in distro &| SIGs repos as oppose to do-it-yourself? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] cgroup controllers in recent systemd
Hi guys. I've noticed that recently, for a while, only these controllers are enabled by default: -> $ cat "/sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/user-$(id -u).slice/user@$(id -u).service/cgroup.controllers If I remember correctly 'cpu' was also available by default not long time ago. Would anybody know why such change, what's rationale behind it? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Terraform ?
Hi guys. Anybody here have Terraform run on c9s - does it work? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] IP routing basics?
Hi guys. I've always try to leave as mush as possible to the kernel but here I had to resort to source/rule based routing and I wonder why. Any expert cared to share some light on what is (not)happening here HOME -- tunnel --> public iface SHED gw A iface; B iface <-- to respectively --> SOME box A iface; B iface HOME can get to both A & B ifaces, (which are different subnets) all the way up to the SOME box Now, a DIFFERENT box runs/is behind/on that SOME box, which connects to A iface & B iface respectively (which SOME's A & B ifaces are linux bridges) need - so it appears - manual rules in order to have HOME get to DIFFERENT's iface B with IPs: 10.3.9.0/24 -> tunnel -> SHED's 10.1.1.254 & 10.3.1.254 -> SOME's 10.1.1.99 & 10.3.1.99 - all good! ---||--- -> DIFFERENT's 10.1.1.50 - works ---||--- -> DIFFERENT's 10.3.1.50 - for this one I need to set rules (on DIFFERENT only) so HOME can get to it All boxes have METRICs set the same way: iface on 10.1.1.0/24 runs with 111 & on 10.3.1.0/24 runs with 113 metrics. So I must(?) use these, so HOME can get to DIFFERENT's both ifaces: -> $ ip ro ls table 113 default via 10.3.1.254 dev enp0s3 -> $ ip ro ls table 114 default via 10.1.1.254 dev enp0s10 & rules: 32764: from 10.3.1.0/24 to 10.3.9.0/24 lookup 113 32765: from 10.1.1.0/24 to 10.3.9.0/24 lookup 114 I'd prefer to not to use human-set rules but if not possible, I'll be happy with an explanation. many tanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] macsec - place inside the stack of ifaces ?
Hi guys. Looking at macsec I've only started - so go easy on me with possibly trivial questions - and write here in hope, that some of you have expertise to tell... Having a bond device which is a slave to a bridge -> where must MACSEC go in order to - if feasible in NM at all that is - secure all the traffic going via the physical device(s)? Just to make it clear - though probably obvious - all traffic, say kernel VMs which use such bare-metal host's bridge iface for communication out/in of the host. Or even most basic of what I ponder over - macsec with 'bond' as parent? All & any thoughts shared are much appreciated. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] for code beakers/hackers/researchers - parallel
Hi guys. With the latest version of 'parallel' from EPEL - absolutely one of the coolest binaries ever - I wonder if you noticed this: I'm doing this as 'root', with no particular reason: -> $ > ~/1 -> $ parallel --tag --nonall -S boxA,boxB uptime -> $ cp /etc/shadow ~/1 -> $ parallel --tag --nonall -S boxA,boxB uptime one of the boXes has that 1 file. (previous parallel version do not do that) and if you happened to be a code-wizz, then you wondered & can tell what the source is doing & why. (is it bash/shell?) many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mock fails on gpg with epel - ?
On 03/05/2023 10:49, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: Hi guys, Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 The GPG keys listed for the "CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing package is: alternatives-1.20-2.el9.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-Official Public key for audit-libs-3.0.7-103.el9.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: audit-libs-3.0.7-103.el9.x86_64 ... many thanks, L. Seems that you have the gnupg2 package that was deprecating SHA1, so just downgrade it and it should work again. see (for example as there were multiple duplicates) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184640 downgraded it - though there is a new distribution-gpg-keys.noarch in epel-testing which I pulled in too - cannot tell which one or perhaps both. helped. thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mock fails on gpg with epel - ?
Hi guys, Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 The GPG keys listed for the "CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing package is: alternatives-1.20-2.el9.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-Official Public key for audit-libs-3.0.7-103.el9.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: audit-libs-3.0.7-103.el9.x86_64 ... many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bash test ?
On 19/04/2023 08:46, wwp wrote:
Hello lejeczek,
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:10:16 +0200 lejeczek wrote:
On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote:
Hello lejeczek,
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS
wrote:
Hi guys.
I cannot wrap my hear around this:
-> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $?
0
-> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $?
0
-> $ _Val=some; test -n ${_Val}; echo $?
0
What is this!?
How should two different, opposite tests give the same result
Is there some bash option which affects that and if so, then what would be the
purpose of such nonsense?
Surround ${_Val} with double quotes (as you should) and things will be
different:
$ unset _Val; test -n "${_Val}"; echo $?
1
Now you get it? :-)
I don't know, am not sure, I remembered it differently, did not think enclosing
quotes were necessary(always?) for that were {}
{} does not prevent this (at least not in bash):
$ FOO="a b"
$ test -z $FOO
bash: test: a: binary operator expected
$ test -z ${FOO}
bash: test: a: binary operator expected
Because after $FOO or ${FOO} variable expansion, bash parsed:
test -z a b
'b' is unexpected, from a grammar point of view.
Quoting is expected, here:
$ test -z "$FOO"
When FOO is unset, apparently it's a different matter, where you end up
with $?=0 in all unquoted -n/-z cases, interestingly. I could not find
this specific case in the bash documentation. That may not be portable
to other shells, BTW. I only use {} when necessary (because of what
bash allows to do between {}, plenty!, or when inserting $FOO into a
literal string that may lead the parser to take the whole string for a
variable name: echo $FOObar != echo ${FOO}bar).
Regards,
There is a several ways to run tests in shell, but 'test'
which is own binary as I understand, defeats me..
in those three examples - regardless of how one can "bend"
quoting & expanding - the same identical variable syntax is
used and yet different tests render the same result.
I thought 'test' broke and I had remembered it differently -
meaning 'test' used to give results I thought it did - or
perhaps some 'shopt' changed and affected its behavior.
I'd expect a consistency, like with what I usually do to
test for empty var:
-> $ export _Val=some; [[ -v _Val ]]; echo $?
0
-> $ unset _Val; [[ -v _Val ]]; echo $?
1
Learning, re-learning, round & round it goes..
thanks, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bash test ?
On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote:
Hello lejeczek,
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS
wrote:
Hi guys.
I cannot wrap my hear around this:
-> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $?
0
-> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $?
0
-> $ _Val=some; test -n ${_Val}; echo $?
0
What is this!?
How should two different, opposite tests give the same result
Is there some bash option which affects that and if so, then what would be the
purpose of such nonsense?
Surround ${_Val} with double quotes (as you should) and things will be
different:
$ unset _Val; test -n "${_Val}"; echo $?
1
Now you get it? :-)
I don't know, am not sure, I remembered it differently, did
not think enclosing quotes were necessary(always?) for that
were {}
thanks, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] bash test ?
Hi guys.
I cannot wrap my hear around this:
-> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $?
0
-> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $?
0
-> $ _Val=some; test -n ${_Val}; echo $?
0
What is this!?
How should two different, opposite tests give the same result
Is there some bash option which affects that and if so, then
what would be the purpose of such nonsense?
many thanks, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] how to wild-card autofs mount - ?
Hi guys. any autofs wizadm reading this and can tell how to "wild-card" this: /home/e23/U: -fstype=nfs4,acl 10.3.3.1:/USER-HOME/e23 I tried $USER in obvious place but it did not mount. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] R from EPEL
Hi guys. Does anybody use R from EPEL on centOS 8 Stream? Is it just me or R 4.1.3 became/is single-threaded now? r25 benchmark - https://mac.r-project.org/benchmarks/ in part where is used to be, should be multi-threaded now is not. Total result from the benchmark does not look bad but it's just one benchmark and I wonder about everything else if indeed it is EPEL's R problem. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] open source network diagnostic tools
On 08/06/2022 20:19, Christopher Wensink wrote: Everyone, From time to time on our network we experience a pause where it seems like everything just hesitates for a time, this could be 2-10 seconds, then communications resume and everything is normal again. I suspect that there one machine that is occasionally sending out bad packets or is flooding the network when it shouldn't, but I don't know for sure. I've tried scanning with angry ip scanner to confirm IP addresses are set and communicating as documented. I've tried running captures with wireshark to try to identify one culprit but nothing is sticking out. I've tried tcpdump to see if something obvious is placed there, but it's a flood of information and it's difficult to tell what (if anything) is a problem and what is not. I'm also working on setting up icinga for monitoring all servers to see if that provides insight. What other tools / tactics would you use to identify the core cause of these kinds of intermittent pauses? Chris Though I can not recommend any specific tools, a learning curve should be easy peasy, including tools/solution - unless you already looked into it & have it covered - in old days with Windowze NIC faulty drivers, OS own issues or intentionally provoked network stack misbehavior would/could put a device/NIC in the 'promiscuous' mode which would results in network "acts" in ways you describe. good luck, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Samba 4.16 hard-crashes
Hi guys. Does anybody see this/similar issue, with Samba (from centos-release-samba416-1.0-1.1.el8.noarch) under IPA? (also Samba uses GlusterFS' libgfapi - samba-vfs-glusterfs-4.16.1-100.el8s.x86_64) -> $ systemctl restart smb.service Starting Samba SMB Daemon... [2022/06/08 19:17:32.937351, 0, pid=49122] ../../source3/smbd/server.c:1741(main) smbd version 4.16.1 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2022 [2022/06/08 19:17:32.960756, 0, pid=49122] ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) === [2022/06/08 19:17:32.960925, 0, pid=49122] ../../lib/util/fault.c:176(smb_panic_log) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6: Aborted in pid 49122 (4.16.1) [2022/06/08 19:17:32.960981, 0, pid=49122] ../../lib/util/fault.c:181(smb_panic_log) If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting [2022/06/08 19:17:32.961022, 0, pid=49122] ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log) === [2022/06/08 19:17:32.961056, 0, pid=49122] ../../lib/util/fault.c:184(smb_panic_log) PANIC (pid 49122): Signal 6: Aborted in 4.16.1 [2022/06/08 19:17:32.961647, 0, pid=49122] ../../lib/util/fault.c:288(log_stack_trace) BACKTRACE: 15 stack frames: #0 /lib64/libsamba-util.so.0(log_stack_trace+0x34) [0x7f41bbc0c7c4] #1 /lib64/libsamba-util.so.0(smb_panic+0xd) [0x7f41bbc0ca1d] #2 /lib64/libsamba-util.so.0(+0xeab9) [0x7f41bbc0cab9] #3 /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x12ce0) [0x7f41bb83bce0] #4 /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x10f) [0x7f41bb2a4a4f] #5 /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x127) [0x7f41bb277db5] #6 /lib64/libtalloc.so.2(+0x2f40) [0x7f41a34a7f40] #7 /lib64/libtalloc.so.2(+0x336c) [0x7f41a34a836c] #8 /usr/lib64/samba/pdb/ipasam.so(+0x11c2f) [0x7f41a38e7c2f] #9 /lib64/libsamba-passdb.so.0(make_pdb_method_name+0xb2) [0x7f41bbdae2f2] #10 /lib64/libsamba-passdb.so.0(+0x1d604) [0x7f41bbdae604] #11 /lib64/libsamba-passdb.so.0(initialize_password_db+0x1d) [0x7f41bbdb096d] #12 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x5d9) [0x55c945bbcf09] #13 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3) [0x7f41bb290ca3] #14 /usr/sbin/smbd(_start+0x2e) [0x55c945bbe6de] [2022/06/08 19:17:32.962008, 0, pid=49122] ../../source3/lib/dumpcore.c:318(dump_core) coredump is handled by helper binary specified at /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern smb.service: Main process exited, code=dumped, status=6/ABRT smb.service: Failed with result 'core-dump'. Failed to start Samba SMB Daemon. For me all this, IPA's integrated Samba with GlusterFS, worked problem-free with 4.15 & earlier versions, so prior to 4.16 update which update brakes everything I believe. thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] server gave bad signature for RSA key 0 - ?
Hi guys. Anybody has seen something like this from 'ssh' and care to comment? -> $ ssh 10.0.1.6 (root@10.0.1.6) Password: client_global_hostkeys_private_confirm: server gave bad signature for RSA key 0: error in libcrypto I have virtually identical c8 Stream boxes and only one gives out this message. I regen keys but that changed nothing. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] kernel message format - how ?
Hi guys. When kernel - I think - broadcasts messages, spits to console, I wonder how one controls that message format. I specifically think of what 'dmesg' offers for time parts of the message, eg. '--reltime' - so the same only persistent/default behavior. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mock gimmicks - experts?
On 28/02/2022 21:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 2/28/22 08:49, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock
version 2.16
-> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--localrepo=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos --continue --chain
./mpfr-4.1.0-7.el9.src.rpm ./libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9.src.rpm
...
CentOS Stream 8 - PowerTools 14 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00
Error:
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package
libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64
- problem with installed package libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64
- package libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64 requires
libmpfr.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64
- cannot install both mpfr-4.1.0-7.el8.x86_64 and
mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64
- cannot install both mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64 and
mpfr-4.1.0-7.el8.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or
'--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
ERROR: Exception(./libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9.src.rpm)
Config(centos-stream-8-x86_64) 0 minutes 6 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in:
/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos/results/centos-stream-8-x86_64/libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9
ERROR: Command failed:
...
Why would it end up asking for 'mpfr-3.1.6' if 'libmpc-1.2.1'
requires ver. >4.x and..
why would 'ibmpc-1.1.0-9.1' even show up there I cannot wrap my head
around it.
I've only started using 'mock' but this weird stuff have not seen
until now.
Rather than passing in both SRPMS .. I would try with just one at a time.
You are first trying to build mpfr and after that, you are trying to
build libmpc.
If I am correct, the newer version of libmpc is required for mpfr.
So, first try building libmpc .. and look at what is necessary to
build that. Once you have that built, put it in your local repo and
rebuild tehmetadata and thentry to build mpfr by itself.
All '--chain' does is retry all failed builds if something actually
builds.
As to why the older version of libmpc or mpfr is trying to load ..
look at your root.log and it will tell you.
That was how I started first, each separately.
-> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--resultdir=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos/results/"{{root}}"/libmpc
libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9.src.rpm
...
Package gcc-8.5.0-10.el8.x86_64 is already installed.
Package make-1:4.2.1-11.el8.x86_64 is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'mpfr-devel >= 4.1.0'
Not all dependencies satisfied
'--chain' I believed was some way to "loop" and if one pkg might depend
on another it will (with perhaps of addition of '--continue') that would
be better alternative to "solve" those dependencies, anyway.
Having 'mpfr' ver. 4.x built and in repo, following fails the same way:
-> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--resultdir=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos/results/"{{root}}"/libmpc
libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9.src.rpm
--addrepo=http://10.3.1.100/centos-stream-8-x86_64
...
CentOS Stream 8 - PowerTools 113 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00
Error:
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package
libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64
- problem with installed package libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64
- package libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64 requires libmpfr.so.4()(64bit),
but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64
- cannot install both mpfr-4.1.0-7.el8.x86_64 and mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64
- cannot install both mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64 and mpfr-4.1.0-7.el8.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest'
to use not only best candidate packages)
'root.log' does not reveal anything, certainly not an explanation or...
I've gone blind.
My guess - because that would be such a "test" case where 'mock' fails
to tell, to explain what/how so I must only guess - is that something
else down the chain of dependencies, depends on those "older" versions
of 'mpfr' and/or 'libmpc', but..
if that theorem is true then, again, how to...
I also fiddled with 'best=' but to no avail.
many thanks, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mock gimmicks - experts?
Hi guys. I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock version 2.16 -> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos --continue --chain ./mpfr-4.1.0-7.el9.src.rpm ./libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 8 - PowerTools 14 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00 Error: Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64 - problem with installed package libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64 - package libmpc-1.1.0-9.1.el8.x86_64 requires libmpfr.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both mpfr-4.1.0-7.el8.x86_64 and mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both mpfr-3.1.6-1.el8.x86_64 and mpfr-4.1.0-7.el8.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) ERROR: Exception(./libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9.src.rpm) Config(centos-stream-8-x86_64) 0 minutes 6 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos/results/centos-stream-8-x86_64/libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9 ERROR: Command failed: ... Why would it end up asking for 'mpfr-3.1.6' if 'libmpc-1.2.1' requires ver. >4.x and.. why would 'ibmpc-1.1.0-9.1' even show up there I cannot wrap my head around it. I've only started using 'mock' but this weird stuff have not seen until now. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ha.. that might be quite curious..
hi guys check this - https://www.servethehome.com/dude-dell-hpe-ami-american-megatrands/ cheers, L ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OpenVPN & nftables
Hi guys. On CentOS Stream 8 with 4.18.0-348.el8.x86_64, I cannot get openvpn-2.4.11-1.el8.x86_64 with help of 'nftables' to allow certain traffic to get in. When OpenVPN does not use 'client-to-client' it is then supposed to pass to 'nftables' & let it handle all the traffic. I'm doing something trivial - put 'tun0' iface into 'trusted' zone and add 'forward' but vpn connected clients cannot talk to each other. I also fiddle with 'direct' rules but to no avail and I hope some Centosians have that already figured out and can advise. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] to which Bugzilla go to?
Hi devel I've noticed a while ago that Redhat's Bugzilla has had, in "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8" as one of the options "CentOS Stream" - which is where I've been recently reporting to. But I wonder about bugs relating to CentOS infra/repos - where to submit those, would you know? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] udev rules & USB devices - ignored at boot
On 09/02/2021 18:25, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
CentOS 7 doesn't use the old naming convention but ,if you
set a device name and mac address for your connection, the
network stack will rename the device during activation.
Try with:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add|change", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:1e:10:1f:00:00", ATTR{type}=="1",
pop NAME="lteusb"
dnf pulled in quite a few updates in the meanwhile but most
likely "change" does the trick.
I thought it had something to do with USB/kernel/subsystems
parts as the very same rules worked for PCIe devices, those
worked at re/boot.
many! thanks Strahil.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 17:04, lejeczek via CentOS
wrote:
On 08/02/2021 08:10, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> Can you share your udev rules ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 15:33, lejeczek via CentOS
> mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have an Ethernet USB adapter for which udev
executes my
> custom rules but!... udev does it only at plug-in
> event and
> not! when the USB stays plugged in during a
reboot, then
> same rules are ignored (or some other problem
results in
> udev failure to do the same when device is
plugged to a
> running system).
> My system is just an average box with a Ryzen on
a B550
> platform.
> Anybody sees this reproduce?
> many thanks, L.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>
<mailto:CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>>
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>
> <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>>
>
simple rules:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:1e:10:1f:00:00", ATTR{type}=="1",
KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="lteusb"
like I said - I get iface "lteusb" when I plug the USB
so it
works. If I leave that USB plugged in and reboot then no
"lteusb".
regards, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] udev rules & USB devices - ignored at boot
On 08/02/2021 08:10, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
Can you share your udev rules ?
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 15:33, lejeczek via CentOS
wrote:
Hi guys,
I have an Ethernet USB adapter for which udev executes my
custom rules but!... udev does it only at plug-in
event and
not! when the USB stays plugged in during a reboot, then
same rules are ignored (or some other problem results in
udev failure to do the same when device is plugged to a
running system).
My system is just an average box with a Ryzen on a B550
platform.
Anybody sees this reproduce?
many thanks, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>
simple rules:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:1e:10:1f:00:00", ATTR{type}=="1",
KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="lteusb"
like I said - I get iface "lteusb" when I plug the USB so it
works. If I leave that USB plugged in and reboot then no
"lteusb".
regards, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] udev rules & USB devices - ignored at boot
Hi guys, I have an Ethernet USB adapter for which udev executes my custom rules but!... udev does it only at plug-in event and not! when the USB stays plugged in during a reboot, then same rules are ignored (or some other problem results in udev failure to do the same when device is plugged to a running system). My system is just an average box with a Ryzen on a B550 platform. Anybody sees this reproduce? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] luks encrypted - tell at boot to skip/ignore it - how?
Hi guys. How to tell grub/kernel to ignore, skip either all or a specific block device which is luks-ecrypted - would anybody know? I have a box (kvm) which had a "secondary" luks-encrypted disk which now is detached and Centos just hangs @boot waiting for that disk. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Infiniband special ops?
On 22/01/2021 00:33, Steven Tardy wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:34 PM lejeczek via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote: Hi guys. Hoping some net experts my stumble upon this message, I have an IPoIB direct host to host connection and: -> $ ethtool ib1 Settings for ib1: Supported ports: [ ] Supported link modes: Not reported Supported pause frame use: No Supports auto-negotiation: No Supported FEC modes: Not reported Advertised link modes: Not reported Advertised pause frame use: No Advertised auto-negotiation: No Advertised FEC modes: Not reported Speed: 4Mb/s Duplex: Full Auto-negotiation: on Port: Other PHYAD: 255 Transceiver: internal Link detected: yes and that's both ends, both hosts, yet: > $ iperf3 -c 10.5.5.97 Connecting to host 10.5.5.97, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.5.5.49 port 56874 connected to 10.5.5.97 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.36 GBytes 11.6 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.87 GBytes 16.0 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.84 GBytes 15.8 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.83 GBytes 15.7 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.61 GBytes 13.9 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.60 GBytes 13.8 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.56 GBytes 13.4 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.52 GBytes 13.1 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.52 GBytes 13.1 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.52 GBytes 13.1 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 16.2 GBytes 13.9 Gbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 16.2 GBytes 13.9 Gbits/sec receiver It's rather an oldish platform which hosts the link, PCIe is only 2.0 but with link of x8 that should be able to carry more than ~13Gbits/sec. Infiniband is Mellanox's ConnectX-3. Any thoughts on how to track the bottleneck or any thoughts Care to capture (a few seconds) of the *sender* side .pcap? Often TCP receive window is too small or packet loss is to blame or round-trip-time. All of these would be evident in the packet capture. If you do multiple streams with the `-P 8` flag does that increase the throughput? Google says these endpoints are 1.5ms apart: (2.5 megabytes) / (13 Gbps) = 1.53846154 milliseconds Seems that the platform in overall might not be enough. That bitrate goes down even further when CPUs are fully loaded & occupied. (I'll try to keep on investigating) What I'm trying next is to have both ports(a dual-port card) "teamed" by NM, with runner set to broadcast. I'm leaving out "p-key" which NM sets to "default"(which is working with a "regular" IPoIP connection) RHEL's "networking guide" docs say "...create a team from two or more Wired or InfiniBand connections..." When I try to stand up such a team, master starts but slaves, both, fail with: "... [1611588576.8887] device (ib1): Activation: starting connection 'team1055-slave-ib1' (900d5073-366c-4a40-8c32-ac42c76f9c2e) [1611588576.8889] device (ib1): state change: disconnected -> prepare (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') [1611588576.8973] device (ib1): state change: prepare -> config (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') [1611588576.9199] device (ib1): state change: config -> ip-config (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') [1611588576.9262] device (ib1): Activation: connection 'team1055-slave-ib1' could not be enslaved [1611588576.9272] device (ib1): state change: ip-config -> failed (reason 'unknown', sys-iface-state: 'managed') [1611588576.9280] device (ib1): released from master device nm-team [1611589045.6268] device (ib1): carrier: link connected ..." Any suggestions also appreciated. thanks, L ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Infiniband special ops?
Hi guys. Hoping some net experts my stumble upon this message, I have an IPoIB direct host to host connection and: -> $ ethtool ib1 Settings for ib1: Supported ports: [ ] Supported link modes: Not reported Supported pause frame use: No Supports auto-negotiation: No Supported FEC modes: Not reported Advertised link modes: Not reported Advertised pause frame use: No Advertised auto-negotiation: No Advertised FEC modes: Not reported Speed: 4Mb/s Duplex: Full Auto-negotiation: on Port: Other PHYAD: 255 Transceiver: internal Link detected: yes and that's both ends, both hosts, yet: > $ iperf3 -c 10.5.5.97 Connecting to host 10.5.5.97, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.5.5.49 port 56874 connected to 10.5.5.97 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.36 GBytes 11.6 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.87 GBytes 16.0 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.84 GBytes 15.8 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.83 GBytes 15.7 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.61 GBytes 13.9 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.60 GBytes 13.8 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.56 GBytes 13.4 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.52 GBytes 13.1 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.52 GBytes 13.1 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.52 GBytes 13.1 Gbits/sec 0 2.50 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 16.2 GBytes 13.9 Gbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 16.2 GBytes 13.9 Gbits/sec receiver It's rather an oldish platform which hosts the link, PCIe is only 2.0 but with link of x8 that should be able to carry more than ~13Gbits/sec. Infiniband is Mellanox's ConnectX-3. Any thoughts on how to track the bottleneck or any thoughts I'll appreciate much. thanks, L ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos-release-stream VS centos-stream-release
hi guys, do you know what to make of that? Why these tho packages? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] selinux policy (& engine) broken in C7
hi guys I've just gotten a bunch of updates via yum and something weird seems to be going on after the update. System has: selinux-policy-3.13.1-268.el7_9.2.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.13.1-268.el7_9.2.noarch actually three different boxes, all the same: $ semodule -l No modules. and an attempt to install modules fails: $ semodule -i openvpn.pp Failed to resolve typeattributeset statement at /etc/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/400/pe-openvpn/cil:1 semodule: Failed! Does above "usual" work for you? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] krb5 update => Database module does not match KDC version
Hi everybody As a word of caution - make sure you are prepared for some trouble when upgrading krb5 packages to version 1.18.2-2.el8. FreeIPA brakes with: ...krb5kdc[554972](Error): Database module does not match KDC version - while initializing database for realm XX.YY ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba update to 4.10 (with c7.8) - broken -?
On 05/05/2020 15:55, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi guys > > I've just let the system to get big update to 7.8 and with > it came new Samba(4.10.4-10.el7.x86_64), a version with now > fails on my boxes for no apparent reasons. > My Samba uses LDAP backend but I can see no errors related > to that neither. > > ... > [2020/05/05 15:53:37.093041, 0] > ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:136(daemon_ready) > daemon_ready: daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready > to serve connections > [2020/05/05 15:53:37.106797, 2] > ../../source3/smbd/server.c:1415(smbd_parent_loop) > waiting for connections > [2020/05/05 15:53:37.108770, 3] > ../../source3/smbd/server_exit.c:236(exit_server_common) > Server exit (termination signal) > Failed to start Samba SMB Daemon. > Unit smb-ccnr-biotec.service entered failed state. > smb-ccnr-biotec.service failed. > > Are you seeing anything weir with your Sambas? > > many thanks, L. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ough... Never mind. I have a customized systemd service which did not work with this new Samba. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Samba update to 4.10 (with c7.8) - broken -?
hi guys I've just let the system to get big update to 7.8 and with it came new Samba(4.10.4-10.el7.x86_64), a version with now fails on my boxes for no apparent reasons. My Samba uses LDAP backend but I can see no errors related to that neither. ... [2020/05/05 15:53:37.093041, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:136(daemon_ready) daemon_ready: daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections [2020/05/05 15:53:37.106797, 2] ../../source3/smbd/server.c:1415(smbd_parent_loop) waiting for connections [2020/05/05 15:53:37.108770, 3] ../../source3/smbd/server_exit.c:236(exit_server_common) Server exit (termination signal) Failed to start Samba SMB Daemon. Unit smb-ccnr-biotec.service entered failed state. smb-ccnr-biotec.service failed. Are you seeing anything weir with your Sambas? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted container on CentOS VPS
On 24/02/2020 10:26, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 2020-02-24 10:51, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >> g) remember!! still at least (depending how you mount it) >> the 'root' will have access to that data while mounted, >> obviously! > > More than that: the root user will be able to access data > in the future too, since it can steal the key > while the data is mounted. > > Regards. > With a passphare only? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted container on CentOS VPS
On 23/02/2020 19:06, H wrote: > On 02/17/2020 05:03 AM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >> On 16/02/2020 15:18, H wrote: >>> I wonder if it is possible to set up an encrypted "file container" on a >>> CentOS VPS? I am the root user of the VPS but the hosting company also has >>> access to the VPS and thus all files. Is it possible to create a >>> LUKS-container on the VPS and those files only be accessible by me? IOW, >>> most of the file system on the VPS would be regular file system but the >>> container could be used by me as needed. This would allow the VPS to reboot >>> normally, I could ssh in normally etc etc. I would rsync files as needed to >>> this LUKS-container though. >>> >>> ___ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS@centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> How about a loop way? It would be a file which you can luks-enrypt, >> decrypt, u/mount on demand, keep a small filesystem on it. >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > What is a "loop way"? I googled it together with Linux and file and did not > find anything. Is this simply like a separate file that is LUKS-encrypted and > I would then mount it for remote access? If so, what would prevent the > hosting company - which I presume is the root user - from also accessing it? That's that precisely, very easy. a) use dd to create a a file, eg.: dd if=/dev/zero of=gor.loop bs=1M count=2000 b) luks encrypt it: cryptsetup luksFormat gor.loop c) dev mapper mount it: cryptsetup luksOpen gor.loop luks-gor.loop d) fs it: mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/luks-gor.loop e) mount it: mount /dev/mapper/luks-gor.loop $PWD/gor.rootfs.encrypted f) use it (to simplify I'd put cryptOpen + mount + unmount + luksClose into a script) g) remember!! still at least (depending how you mount it) the 'root' will have access to that data while mounted, obviously! > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] From network-scripts to NetworkManager on a router : questions
On 18/02/2020 11:00, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running CentOS 7 on all my servers, in three different contexts : > > 1. simple local server > 2. public facing server > 3. router/gateway/firewall > > I'm currently in the process of moving my KISS-style > network-scripts-style configurations to something more orthodox based > on NetworkManager. > > Scenarios (1) and (2) caused no problems, but (3) is giving me some > headache. Let me take an example. > > The router in my office is a PC Engines routerboard running CentOS 7. > It has three NICs, and I use two of these. > > WAN-facing NIC : > > # /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp1s0 > DEVICE=enp1s0 > TYPE=Ethernet > ONBOOT=yes > BOOTPROTO=static > IPADDR=192.168.1.1 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > > LAN-facing NIC : > > DEVICE=enp2s0 > TYPE=Ethernet > ONBOOT=yes > BOOTPROTO=static > IPADDR=192.168.2.1 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > > Third NIC is disabled : > > # /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp3s0 > DEVICE=enp3s0 > TYPE=Ethernet > ONBOOT=no > > Gateway information : > > # /etc/sysconfig/network > GATEWAY=192.168.1.254 > > The router is running Dnsmasq : > > # /etc/resolv.conf > nameserver 127.0.0.1 > > Packet forwarding is enabled and handled through the firewall script. > No need to go into the details for that. > > This setup works perfectly as is. Now I'd like to move it to a > NetworkManager-based configuration, and I have a couple questions > about that. > > I'm using NetworkManager TUI (nmtui) to configure my connections. I'm > defining two profiles WAN (enp1s0) and LAN (enp2s0). With > NetworkManager I have to configure gateway and DNS information on a > per-interface basis. > > 1. Which interface should have the gateway information ? > > 2. In a similar manner, which interface should have the DNS server > information ? > > Cheers from the sunny South of France, > > Niki > NM is actually pretty cool, to me it made all the stuff much easier. NM also cover & takes care of source/policy based routing. Also, if you go back to devel guys they listen and are happy to enhance NM including some suggestions. Development of NM is well active & solid in my option and it'll keep getting better I believe. With a system with many ifaces note NM has something called "priorities" with which you have controll over things like resolv.conf. connection.autoconnect-priority; ipv4.dns-priority Moving from what you had over to NM should be simple. enp1s0 should have ipv4.gateway value enp2s0 should have it empty. If you use firewalld then it also plays a role in linux router, with more complex setup you might need --direct but.. if you have been using it already with "network" then it will need no extra changes with NM. Kernel params also is good to have sussed out. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] anybody runs HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 ?
hi guys, what I would like to ask is DDR4 3200Mhz in these server - has anybody tried? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted container on CentOS VPS
On 16/02/2020 15:18, H wrote: > I wonder if it is possible to set up an encrypted "file container" on a > CentOS VPS? I am the root user of the VPS but the hosting company also has > access to the VPS and thus all files. Is it possible to create a > LUKS-container on the VPS and those files only be accessible by me? IOW, most > of the file system on the VPS would be regular file system but the container > could be used by me as needed. This would allow the VPS to reboot normally, I > could ssh in normally etc etc. I would rsync files as needed to this > LUKS-container though. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos How about a loop way? It would be a file which you can luks-enrypt, decrypt, u/mount on demand, keep a small filesystem on it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] lxc driver in libvirt - missing
hi everyone is lxc driver missing from libvirt by omission or by an oversight, would you know? many thaks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-33.1 and libvirt spits - error : virNetDevSendEthtoolIoctl:3078 : ethtool ioctl error: No such device
hi guys I wonder if any of you also started to get: error : virNetDevSendEthtoolIoctl:3078 : ethtool ioctl error: No such device in libvirtd logs after qemu-kvm-ev upgrade? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] HA tools from clusterlabs.org
hi everybody, would you know if 8 version is going to have HA solutions from clusterlabs.org available, just like Centos7 has? (from Centos' own repos/streams) many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 - no freeIPA servers
On 25/10/2019 14:46, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi, anybody knows why? > > many thanks, L. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos or rather why not in default steam but in a separate dnf module? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 8 - no freeIPA servers
hi, anybody knows why? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] samba with gluster almost non-usable
hi guys, anybody runs samba-4.9.1-6.el7.x86_64 with glusterfs-6.5-1.el7.x86_64 shares? Operations the Windows clients perform are incredibly slow. To create a new file(via right-click in Windows) take more then dozen of seconds, sometimes fails, the same with renaming files, deleting, etc. L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] freeIPA version vs RHEL's
On 13/08/2019 13:33, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:02:58PM +0100, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > >> I wonder if anybody might version of freeIPA in RHEL? >> >> I hear it's 4.6.6 and if that's true then when will Centos get it I >> might ask. > RHEL 7.7 has FreeIPA 4.6.5, and eventually CentOS will get that > version, but it's currently got 4.6.4. freeipa 4.6.6 looks like it > was released at the end of last month, too late to be included in > RHEL/CentOS 7.7. Perhaps in a later release? > and how far behind are we Centosians with that rhel 7's 4.6.5 IPA? thanks, L ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] freeIPA version vs RHEL's
hi guys I wonder if anybody might version of freeIPA in RHEL? I hear it's 4.6.6 and if that's true then when will Centos get it I might ask. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HPE ProLiant - support Linux Vendor Firmware Service ?
On 01/07/2019 17:42, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi guys > > does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? > I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor > Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' > BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? > > many thanks, L. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos So far it looks like not many people here if any at all, use fwupd/LVFS which is a bit surprising to me since this if what Redhat promote as a solution universally supported by increasingly more hardware vendors. I do upgrade UEFI/BIOS on my Dell Latitude with fwupd, have had for last couple of years and it works beautifully, though my other Lenovo e485 is missing from fwupd. regards, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HPE ProLiant - support Linux Vendor Firmware Service ?
On 01/07/2019 18:38, mark wrote: > lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >> hi guys >> >> does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether >> HPE support Linux Vendor >> Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' >> BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? >> >> > Dunno 'bout "Linux Vendor Firmware Service", but HPE support, ah, yeah... > let's not go there. And they *really* want you to use MS DOS to update the > firmware. Oh, and when we had support in to do repairs about 6 or so > months ago on our small SGI supercomputer (they bought SGI), the techs > were worried, because HPE was spinning off support to Unisys, and how they > were going to get parts > > mark "at least it's not Oracle/Sun support is all I can say" > hi, thanks for the info. And you have tried fwupdmgr and no positive results? Which Gen your ProLiants are? On https://fwupd.org/ HPE logo shows up plus some notes but first-hand experience is as always best to have, which I do not have as I only begin to consider HPE hardware for the first time. Dell, which I have had for many years, do their own OMSA which is better than nothing but this too is flaky at times. I also a few years ago got Dell's tech support telling me to do MS-DOS stuff in order to update BIOS. I'm thinking & hoping that maybe IBM, since they are now Redhat, will supply us with premium grade software support for their hardware. Although IBM is a bit like Intel in my opinion - they do not innovate that much, are old and struggle to understand the end users like us. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] HPE ProLiant - support Linux Vendor Firmware Service ?
hi guys does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] freeIPA from CR repo - conflicts
hi guys do you see the same by any chance? --> Processing Dependency: ipa-server-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 for package: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch --> Processing Dependency: ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 for package: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch (updates) Requires: ipa-server-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 Installed: ipa-server-common-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.noarch (@cr) ipa-server-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Error: Package: ipa-server-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.x86_64 (@cr) Requires: python2-ipaserver = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Removing: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.noarch (@cr) python2-ipaserver = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Updated By: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch (updates) python2-ipaserver = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 Error: Package: python2-ipaclient-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch (updates) Requires: ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 Installed: ipa-common-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.noarch (@cr) ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Error: Package: python2-ipaclient-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch (updates) Requires: ipa-client-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 Installed: ipa-client-common-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.noarch (@cr) ipa-client-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Error: Package: python2-ipalib-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch (updates) Requires: ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 Installed: ipa-common-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.noarch (@cr) ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Error: Package: ipa-client-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.x86_64 (@cr) Requires: python2-ipaclient = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Removing: python2-ipaclient-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.noarch (@cr) python2-ipaclient = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos Updated By: python2-ipaclient-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch (updates) python2-ipaclient = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 Error: Package: python2-ipaserver-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2.noarch (updates) Requires: ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos.2 Installed: ipa-common-4.6.4-10.el7.centos.noarch (@cr) ipa-common = 4.6.4-10.el7.centos You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] libvirt guest on host's shutdown/reboot - problem
hi guys I have just two guest after which libvirt looks and when I shutdown those guests: $ virsh shutdown $_dom that domain takes little time to power down, as expected one would say(~20sec) But! I reboot the hosts and I have in my: /etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests : ON_SHUTDOWN=shutdown PARALLEL_SHUTDOWN=1 SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT=300 I see libvirtd service shut down takes minutes, a few good minutes to deal with guests shutdown(I suppose?) How could I dig into it and troubleshoot? Would you have any idea as why libvirtd shutdown takes that long? many thank, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
On 20/12/2018 15:33, mark wrote: lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? I would not run it as a server. In a server and workstation environment, you do *not* want to have daily multiple updates to software, you want stability, or you're likely to have your users seriously aggravated by you, for breaking their jobs far too frequently. Spin up a VM or two, for folks who actually (or think they actually) need newer software and utility stacks, but use something stable as a base. mark "I do see how many update's my manager's fedora box gets..." What I'm really looking forward to - why I thought I'd poke around, thus that question - is RDP in Wayland. When it get's into RHELs I worry be ages and I'd really love to try to introduce Linux desktops to those really dumb and unreformable users. Everything else - frequent updates, etc. These can be as rare as we users want them, another extra bit of time to think of it would not kill me, personally. Also, we all know, what is in those Fedoras(maybe more so when it comes to "server" variant) is going to end up in our Centoses - why not help by using/testing those, I ask myself. Especially now with 29 which I suspect might be our Centos main new version. So I'm thinking.. I'll start mixing that Fedora Server in. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 - lost KVM guests - qemu-kvm-ev
On 17/12/2018 18:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:52:40PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:50:44PM +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: I updated to qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 (also libvirt) and my Centos 6.10 kvm guests now do not start. Funnily enough Win10 guest are fine, only Centoses cannot start, silently & without any errors. Any care to comment? It looks like you installed CentOS 7 packages on a CentOS 6 system. I'm amazed it even worked. Try removing the packages and re-installing the appropriate packages for CentOS 6. Oh, never mind me, I missed that you were saying that your *GUESTS* don't start. Did you do a full update to CentOS 7.6.1810, or just the libvirt/qemu packages? yes, I see my sentence was not complete, although it non-explicitly said Centos 7 (qemu package version). So, host is Centos 7 updated to the latest (no fasttrack repo, but cr(rolling) yes) and quests are(if not gone now?) Centos 6.10. virsh start such a guest okey, complains of nothing, no errors but guess does not boot. I see qemu BIOS and boot menu but when it comes to booting the OS/grub/kernel, then this does not happen. Checking qcow image with qemu confirms images are free of errors, etc. I can mount these Centos guests okey, filesystem seems good. I do not want to downgrade just yet, but will have to check that option soon. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 - lost KVM guests - qemu-kvm-ev
hi guys, I updated to qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 (also libvirt) and my Centos 6.10 kvm guests now do not start. Funnily enough Win10 guest are fine, only Centoses cannot start, silently & without any errors. Any care to comment? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 + EFI on Dell server - problem
On 20/11/2018 13:58, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:32:44PM +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat troublesome. After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter Something has gone seriously wrong: import_mok_state() failed : Invalid Parameter Has anybody seen that? And maybe know to fix it? many thanks, L. I don't know if it's related, but all of our dual-boot workstations that used rEFInd for the boot selector stopped being able to launch the shim EFI executable after upgrading to the 7.6 shim. I had to manually change the refind configuration to point at the GRUBX64 EFI executable instead (we turn off secure boot anyway, custom kernel modules). no dual boot for me, just Centos. Can you outline the steps you took to fix it? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] kernel 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 + EFI on Dell server - problem
hi guys I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat troublesome. After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter Something has gone seriously wrong: import_mok_state() failed : Invalid Parameter Has anybody seen that? And maybe know to fix it? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] rescue - UEFI revert to BIOS boot - how?
hi guys I have a box on which UEFI boot has gone haywire and instead of boot it power the box down, that is before even going to grub2. (displays some error message) I if change to BIOS boot then I can start Centos' rescue - my question is: how can I rescue, re-build grub so it would boot from tradition BIOS? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mount points @install time
hi everyone, is there a way to add custom mount points at installation point? And if there is would you say /usr should/could go onto a separate partition? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Seagate - experience/opinion on vendor?
On 26/09/18 19:16, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I have rather a large set of Seagate's SAS ST32000444SS, over a hundred - experience I'm having from those in conjunction with their tech support is abysmal. I'm trying to update firmware of these drives and nothing works, including tech support. ... and I cannot help but wonder - is just me who is so unlucky and getting very, very poor support(taking naturally only of Linux) or in fact Seagate are rubbish! Care to share your say? thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos dos, dos, exe... why?.. reasons.. what for?.. etc.. Can I guys share a thought and a friendly advice with you? (I'm sure some of you will get) I was not looking to philosopie or ponder over that simple question: whether to upgrade or not - but if I was - one argument could be: vendors are almost always very reluctant (if not purely lazy) to spend extra resources to re-work something they thought was probably their final piece. And when they do release new software(which firmware is) then, they must have a very good reason(which sometimes they do not say, but often than not they do say) to do that. Have some trust in what they do? (if not, we would have stopped somewhere around DOS, OS/2 maybe) I was hoping some of you guys have first-hand experience using tools Seagate themselves provide which Seagate say are Linux native tools - that's all. My own experience is very off-putting and was hoping to learn yours, so I could be wiser when I next time need to buy a hundred and so HDD/SSDs. many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Seagate - experience/opinion on vendor?
On 26/09/18 21:13, mark wrote: Mauricio Tavares wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:37 PM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: On 26/09/18 20:19, Mauricio Tavares wrote: If ti makes you feel any better, I am not having stellar service from WD's support. In fact, they act like they never received the HD I sent for RMA whose tracking number says they did 10 days ago. On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:16 PM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: Here's a thought: have you asked to speak with "enterprise support"? Dell supports Linux (hell, their OMSA disk *is* CentOS), but only their enterprise support knows something other than WonDoze. mark maybe it's Dell you were thinking of when said OMSA? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Seagate - experience/opinion on vendor?
On 26/09/18 20:19, Mauricio Tavares wrote: If ti makes you feel any better, I am not having stellar service from WD's support. In fact, they act like they never received the HD I sent for RMA whose tracking number says they did 10 days ago. On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:16 PM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I have rather a large set of Seagate's SAS ST32000444SS, over a hundred - experience I'm having from those in conjunction with their tech support is abysmal. I'm trying to update firmware of these drives and nothing works, including tech support. ... and I cannot help but wonder - is just me who is so unlucky and getting very, very poor support(taking naturally only of Linux) or in fact Seagate are rubbish! Care to share your say? thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos what seems really really bad, is that none of the tools their tech support suggest works, at least for me. You would think that simple thing such as firmware update should be really a piece of cake, but it seems that Seagate too, is rubbish when it come to Linux. One would think Seagate should not that mistake but, yet again, yet another business which does not like Linux customers. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Seagate - experience/opinion on vendor?
hi guys I have rather a large set of Seagate's SAS ST32000444SS, over a hundred - experience I'm having from those in conjunction with their tech support is abysmal. I'm trying to update firmware of these drives and nothing works, including tech support. ... and I cannot help but wonder - is just me who is so unlucky and getting very, very poor support(taking naturally only of Linux) or in fact Seagate are rubbish! Care to share your say? thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-plus (plus 1?)
On 23/08/18 18:44, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:42 AM lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys did you notice, if you use kernel-plus on 7.5 this CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.1.x86_64) 7 (Core) CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.x86_64) 7 (Core) is that "plus.1" a new naming convention or just one off? It has a bug fix for the IPoIB issue: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15193 Akemi I wish guys kept changelog always updated and consistent so when the rest of us do rpm -q --changelog then we know right away everything and do not need to bother each other with mundane question like that one of mine, nor search for answers. thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] kernel-plus (plus 1?)
hi guys did you notice, if you use kernel-plus on 7.5 this CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.1.x86_64) 7 (Core) CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.x86_64) 7 (Core) is that "plus.1" a new naming convention or just one off? regards, L ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grub2 - add NVME to boot from - how?
On 14/08/18 12:30, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys, I thought I should ask before I start fiddling and break something - can we tell grub2 to add nvme device as an option to boot from? And if yes then what do tell grub? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos what mean by "add" is: that you already have grub2 booting off whatever you have it on, then you add another device, nvme in this case, and you add it to grub2 as/with chainloader, so a result grub2 will have yet another entry to chainload to another(windows) boot on that nvme. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] grub2 - add NVME to boot from - how?
hi guys, I thought I should ask before I start fiddling and break something - can we tell grub2 to add nvme device as an option to boot from? And if yes then what do tell grub? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ecryptfs (from centosplus) and libvirt lxc quest on it - quest upon start shoots host in the head
hi guys I have a lxc guest on Dell's R815(AMD Opterons) which I just moved to an ecryptfs mounted folder(using centosplus' kernel) Copying data to that folder seems to work just fine, but I as soon as I start the quest the host gets shot in the head, hard reboot, no dump. I also have another, virtually identical guest but on Intel platform and that one does not do anything but runs okey. Any of you guys has experience such gross abnormality? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Solarflare SFC9000 direct connection
On 10/07/18 17:56, mark wrote: lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I wonder if any of you might be using SFN6122F-R7 SFP+ (SFC9000, same firmware everywhere, Centos 7.5 too. I'm trying poor man's setup to get the servers onto 10GbE network. Setup is such that three Dell R815 are connected to each other, each has one Solarflare(SFP ports) and each Solarflare is set as net-team(both ports on a card are net-team device) with runner in broadcast mode. And it all seems to work, they ping each other, iperf okey. The problem, big problem is that when traffic start to flow between all three servers simultaneously, with rsync for example, then!! one box gets shoot in the head, hard reset, gone. Every time same one box. Sure there are some bits that run on that one box that are not on the other two. Now, I know you would normally put it via a switch, but like I said: poor man's config, but you would not expect system to die like this neither, right? What CPU do they have? mark dell r815 are AMD platform, Opteron 63xx. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Solarflare SFC9000 direct connection
hi guys I wonder if any of you might be using SFN6122F-R7 SFP+ (SFC9000, same firmware everywhere, Centos 7.5 too. I'm trying poor man's setup to get the servers onto 10GbE network. Setup is such that three Dell R815 are connected to each other, each has one Solarflare(SFP ports) and each Solarflare is set as net-team(both ports on a card are net-team device) with runner in broadcast mode. And it all seems to work, they ping each other, iperf okey. The problem, big problem is that when traffic start to flow between all three servers simultaneously, with rsync for example, then!! one box gets shoot in the head, hard reset, gone. Every time same one box. Sure there are some bits that run on that one box that are not on the other two. Now, I know you would normally put it via a switch, but like I said: poor man's config, but you would not expect system to die like this neither, right? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] shellinabox
Anybody else? Anybody has gotten shellinabox working witout modification to SE policies? On 05. juli 2018 16:08, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys, shellinabox, do you use it? I in pretty vanilla setup get selinux denials and cannot login. Selinux says: #= unconfined_service_t == # The file '/usr/bin/bash' is mislabeled on your system. # Fix with $ restorecon -R -v /usr/bin/bash allow unconfined_service_t unconfined_t:process transition; audit2allow suggests to make a new module or restore /usr/bin/bash type context. Try to restore context first, in many cases it helps on "vanilla" setup. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] shellinabox
hi guys, shellinabox, do you use it? I in pretty vanilla setup get selinux denials and cannot login. Selinux says: #= unconfined_service_t == # The file '/usr/bin/bash' is mislabeled on your system. # Fix with $ restorecon -R -v /usr/bin/bash allow unconfined_service_t unconfined_t:process transition; but that does not seem right to me, to allow such a transition, right? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba issues with Win 10
On 28/06/18 15:30, mark wrote: Hi, folks, Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10, version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can install support for that manually I fail to understand what's the problem you are having. I say that smbv1 can be re/added to Win10 and I think there is a few pages on that on the net, so is it that Win10 is still not working after addition of smbv1? The server running samba can *not* be updated to 7 - we have a lot of stuff based off it, and most of our users use it, one way or another, so it's a major thing when we do finally upgrade (or, more likely, replace the server). Has anyone run into this, and if so, any workarounds on the Linux end? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] multipath recipe for an enclosure ?
hi guys, In hope that some experts roam around I post this one question - how do you multipath disks(all disks) that sit in one specific SAS enclosure? Blacklist everything else. And I'm hoping for something like "globing", so you do not want to go through it on by single disk/wwin basis. some experts?(or maybe even not, it could be that I do not get it) many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
