Re: [CentOS] BIND 9.9 RRL
On 08/10/2017 04:16 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 10.08.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Mark Haney: I can't seem to find anything clear on this, but is the C7 version of BIND 9.9 built with Request Rate Limiting? _Response_ Rate Limiting - I think its possible since EL6: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013:0550 Yeah, that's my bad, I was doing two things at once and didn't double check before sendinig. Apologies. I'll look at the link as soon as I can. Thanks. -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at NeoNova 919-460-3330 option 1 mark.ha...@neonova.net www.neonova.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BIND 9.9 RRL
> Am 10.08.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Mark Haney: > > I can't seem to find anything clear on this, but is the C7 version of BIND > 9.9 built with Request Rate Limiting? _Response_ Rate Limiting - I think its possible since EL6: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013:0550 -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BIND 9.9 RRL
On 10/08/2017 21:00, Mark Haney wrote: > I can't seem to find anything clear on this, but is the C7 version of > BIND 9.9 built with Request Rate Limiting? Run "named -V" and it will output the features it was compiled with. See if RRL is in there. Regards, Anand ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] BIND 9.9 RRL
I can't seem to find anything clear on this, but is the C7 version of BIND 9.9 built with Request Rate Limiting? -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at NeoNova 919-460-3330 option 1 mark.ha...@neonova.net www.neonova.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos