Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident.
There is a legal term that applies to this use case: extortion
AFAIK IX is not billing They do a
Am 19.11.14 um 15:31 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident.
There is a legal term
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 15:58 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:04:49PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
b) What assurance do I have that whoever I chose won't wind up with the
same problem, given that, as I mentioned, a dozen years ago, they were
blocking a good
John accused me of complaining about systemd... this here's *real*
complaining.
Several times every month, my email starts getting bounced by freakin'
nixspam, because my giant hosting provider, that hosts millions of
domains. Akemi has argued that nixspam works just fine (if so, then why
did we
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:48:16 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Several times every month, my email starts getting bounced by freakin'
nixspam,
I have seen you post this complaint here several times before.
It would probably be easier on your blood pressure to simply post to this
mailing list
Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:48:16 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Several times every month, my email starts getting bounced by freakin'
nixspam,
I have seen you post this complaint here several times before.
Yup.
It would probably be easier on your blood pressure to simply post
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:04:49 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
a) I will not use gmail. End of that suggestion.
Ok. There are numerous other providers available. I'm sure you can find them
as easily as I can. You also have the rcn.com email address in your whois
record.
b) What assurance do I
Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:04:49 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
a) I will not use gmail. End of that suggestion.
Ok. There are numerous other providers available. I'm sure you can find
them as easily as I can. You also have the rcn.com email address in your
whois record.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:04:49PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
b) What assurance do I have that whoever I chose won't wind up with the
same problem, given that, as I mentioned, a dozen years ago, they were
blocking a good part of the city of Chicago?
Umm, that's actually hardly true
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:50:56PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
By the way, IX, the German magazine that runs nixspam, doesn't respond to
emails, either. *THEY* are the problem, not my hosting provider (which,
their support tells me, does work with nixspam, and pays a nice chunk of
change
On 10/8/2014 1:50 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wait, I have*what*? How did you find that? I mean, the last time I was on
rcn was, I think, '09, if not '03.
you should update your domain registration, then...
$ whois 5-cent.us
[Querying whois.nic.us]
[whois.nic.us]
Domain Name:
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:04:49PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
b) What assurance do I have that whoever I chose won't wind up with the
same problem, given that, as I mentioned, a dozen years ago, they were
blocking a good part of the city of Chicago?
Umm, that's
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:50:56PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
By the way, IX, the German magazine that runs nixspam, doesn't respond
to
emails, either. *THEY* are the problem, not my hosting provider (which,
their support tells me, does work with nixspam, and pays
John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/8/2014 1:50 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wait, I have*what*? How did you find that? I mean, the last time I was
on
rcn was, I think, '09, if not '03.
you should update your domain registration, then...
Crap. I thought I did that a couple of years ago. I'll try
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident.
There is a legal term that applies to this use case: extortion
John
--
Perhaps the sentiments
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:50:56 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wait, I have *what*? How did you find that? I mean, the last time I was on
rcn was, I think, '09, if not '03.
Type whois 5-cent.us into your terminal and see what you get.
If that email address is indeed out of date, then I think
16 matches
Mail list logo
