Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-18 Thread m . roth
Vanhorn, Mike wrote: > > On 5/17/17, 5:27 PM, "CentOS on behalf of m.r...@5-cent.us" > wrote: > >>Why? I just rsync'd 159G in less than one workday from one server to >>another. Admittedly, we allegedly have a 1G network, but > > Well,

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-18 Thread Vanhorn, Mike
On 5/17/17, 5:27 PM, "CentOS on behalf of m.r...@5-cent.us" wrote: >Why? I just rsync'd 159G in less than one workday from one server to >another. Admittedly, we allegedly have a 1G network, but Well, I’ve don’t recall ever having

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-18 Thread Julius Tchanque
On 17 May 2017 at 22:27, wrote: > Vanhorn, Mike wrote: > > On 5/17/17, 12:03 PM, "CentOS on behalf of ken" < > centos-boun...@centos.org > > on behalf of geb...@mousecar.com> wrote: > > > >>An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux > >>machine to

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread m . roth
Vanhorn, Mike wrote: > On 5/17/17, 12:03 PM, "CentOS on behalf of ken" on behalf of geb...@mousecar.com> wrote: > >>An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux >>machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local subnet, >>there's no

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread Andrew Holway
> > If shutting the machines down is feasible, I’d put the source hard drive > into the destination machine and use rsync to copy it from one drive to the > other (rather than using rsync to copy from one machine to the other over > the network). > I'm not so sure about that. Probably the disk is

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 05/17/2017 04:31 PM, Vanhorn, Mike wrote: On 5/17/17, 12:03 PM, "CentOS on behalf of ken" wrote: An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread Vanhorn, Mike
On 5/17/17, 12:03 PM, "CentOS on behalf of ken" wrote: >An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux >machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local subnet, >there's no need for encryption. >

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread Andrew Holway
Rsync seems to be the obvious answer here. On 17 May 2017 at 18:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 05/17/2017 12:03 PM, ken wrote: > >> An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux >> machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 05/17/2017 12:03 PM, ken wrote: An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local subnet, there's no need for encryption. I've done this sort of thing before a few times in the past in different ways, but

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread Nux!
y, 2017 17:03:13 > Subject: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine > An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux > machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local subnet, > there's no need for encryption. > > I'v

[CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

2017-05-17 Thread ken
An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local subnet, there's no need for encryption. I've done this sort of thing before a few times in the past in different ways, but wanted to get input from others on