On Thursday, January 26, 2012 06:43:55 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
1.5Mbps is not faster than 40Mbps. There's nothing hidden in the way
they advertise speeds.
Speed != bandwidth.
That '40Mb/s' connection is surely massively oversubscribed, whereas the
1.5Mb/s DS1 won't be (the tariff here
From: Jason T. Slack-Moehrle slackmoeh...@gmail.com
Here is where I draw some confusion. Where do items such as Varnish Cache,
HAProxy go in relationship to firewall, DMZ, etc?
Here, we use 2 keepalived/lvs servers in direct routing for HA, then
n cache servers with nginx (for consistent
Hi John,
Are you using Comcast in Santa Cruz?
absolutely not.the local cable system blows. my home is on a sonic.net
(http://sonic.net)
ADSL circuit resold by another ISP. television is on satellite.
I am looking at Sonic.net and I am awaiting a call from a sales rep (had been 2
days)
On 01/26/2012 05:09 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Can you explain a bit so I can develop a better understanding of how they
advertise speeds, etc?
have you considered taking your questions to the lopsa lists ? That
would be far more topical ( or even to a local LUG list ) than the
CentOS
Hi Karanbir,
Can you explain a bit so I can develop a better understanding of how they
advertise speeds, etc?
have you considered taking your questions to the lopsa lists ? That
would be far more topical ( or even to a local LUG list ) than the
CentOS lists.
I have no idea what
On 01/26/2012 09:09 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding that the cost for a T seems high, but a better
option for me than getting their ADSL2+
Hi Gordon.
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding that the cost for a T seems high, but a better
option for me than getting their ADSL2+ service? I mean, is the T
faster over all
option for me than getting their ADSL2+ service? I mean, is the T
faster over all given it is all my traffic and I am not sharing?
Can you explain a bit so I can develop a better understanding of how
they advertise speeds, etc?
Yes, the cost for a T1 will seem very high. It is antiquated
On 01/26/12 3:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Yes, the cost for a T1 will seem very high. It is antiquated telco
tech. T1s are generally very reliable, but very very slow.
1.5Mbps is not faster than 40Mbps. There's nothing hidden in the way
they advertise speeds.
DSL and DOCSIS technologies
On 01/26/2012 03:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/26/2012 09:09 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding that the cost for a T seems high, but a better
On 01/26/2012 03:57 PM, Ken godee wrote:
Not so much haven't matured but are capable of some other technologies
besides internet access that the local CO could setup, like channelizing
and different types of signaling, not to mention a
dedicated circuit to the CO.
...which they always have
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/26/12 3:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Yes, the cost for a T1 will seem very high. It is antiquated telco
tech. T1s are generally very reliable, but very very slow.
1.5Mbps is not faster than 40Mbps. There's nothing hidden in the way
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, Raymond Lillard wrote:
On 01/26/2012 03:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/26/2012 09:09 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
They advertise the starting Business T at 1.5Mbps per second
They advertise the ADSL2+ 2 lines at up to 40Mbps per second.
Am I mis-understanding
On 01/26/12 4:32 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
T1 is a channelized synchronous telecommunications circuit type first
designed in the late 60s, updated in the 70s. After removing framing bits,
1.544 Mb/s.
DS0 is a sub-channel of a T1 when broken up into frames. Extended
SuperFrame being the
On 01/27/2012 12:14 AM, Raymond Lillard wrote:
There are two reasons T1 is more expensive. T1 requires
2 copper pairs in the cable. Those 2 pairs not available
for voice traffic. The other reason is the uptime
requirements.
the DSX or the old TX standard does not still deliver better
Hi All,
I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February 2011 to deal
with information archival. A long vision here, I wont bore you with the details
(if you really want to know, e-mail me privately) but the gist is I need to
build an infrastructure to accommodate about 2PB of
Am 26.01.2012 um 00:53 schrieb Jason T. Slack-Moehrle:
Hi All,
I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February 2011 to deal
with information archival. A long vision here, I wont bore you with the
details (if you really want to know, e-mail me privately) but the gist is I
Hi,
On 01/25/2012 11:53 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February 2011 to deal
with information archival. A long vision here, I wont bore you with the
details (if you really want to know, e-mail me privately) but the gist is
Hi,
I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February 2011 to
deal with information archival. A long vision here, I wont bore you with
the details (if you really want to know, e-mail me privately) but the gist
is I need to build an infrastructure to accommodate about 2PB
can you explain to the calculation to determine that 300gb is 2mbps?
What it is 300gb a day? Comcast has told me in the last two days I went through
127gb
--
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
On 01/25/2012 11:53 PM, Jason T.
On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February
2011 to deal with information archival.
Database servers and storage servers would go on the private VLAN? I
am building a box to store all the data
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
can you explain to the calculation to determine that 300gb is 2mbps?
What it is 300gb a day? Comcast has told me in the last two days I went
through 127gb
127Gb in 2 days is 0.73 Mbps. Did you mean 127 GB?
On 01/25/12 4:27 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
can you explain to the calculation to determine that 300gb is 2mbps?
300GB (big B for byte) / 30 days / 24 hours/day / 3600 seconds/hour, and
I get 0.12MB/second, so multiplying by 10 to get bits allowing for basic
protocol overhead, I come up
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/25/12 4:27 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
can you explain to the calculation to determine that 300gb is 2mbps?
300GB (big B for byte) / 30 days / 24 hours/day / 3600 seconds/hour,
and
I get 0.12MB/second, so multiplying by 10 to
Hi Aurf,
I am seeing a lot of solutions that are not all perfect and just insanely
expensive. BackBlaze seems like a pretty decent solution, I have control of all
hardware and software to do with as I please.
If you have ideas, please talk to me about them!
-Jason
--
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
racking 2 PiB (or 2048TiB) of nearline grade storage will require about
1000 3.5 3TB drives, allowing for a reasonable raid level and suitable
number of hotspares. If its frequently updated transactional database
storage, I'd want to use raid10. Using somethign like the Supermicro
847
I will read this tonight.
I have a meeting with Drobo tomorrow and I think this is the same article on of
their guys sent me.
--
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 5:37 PM, aurfalien wrote:
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/25/12 4:27 PM,
a major stumbling block is that the disk drive industry still hasn't
recovererd fully from the Thai floods, and 3tB nearline server grade
drives are on allocation and demanding high prices. you might find you
can't just order 1000 of these from Newegg or whatever, they don't have
them.
On 01/25/12 6:23 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Are you using Comcast in Santa Cruz?
absolutely not.the local cable system blows. my home is on a sonic.net
ADSL circuit resold by another ISP. television is on satellite.
in my personal opinion, the backblaze is a little too funky.. $job
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
slackmoeh...@gmail.com wrote:
HAProxy is a load-balancer, so It should do in front of web-servers so it
can decide which web-server to send the traffic to?
Varnish Cache is all about caching commonly used resources so it seems
that
30 matches
Mail list logo
