Hello,
Recently our dell sc1425 server has been locking up with kernel freezes
and required a hard reboot on each occasion. I've looked on the centos
forums with limited success - each problem seems slightly different
(some failure on high load, some not). Our kernel is 2.6.18-274.17.1.el5
On 04/04/2012 09:16 AM, Jonathan Alstead wrote:
Hello,
Recently our dell sc1425 server has been locking up with kernel freezes
and required a hard reboot on each occasion. I've looked on the centos
forums with limited success - each problem seems slightly different
(some failure on high
On 04/04/2012 09:31 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 04/04/2012 09:16 AM, Jonathan Alstead wrote:
Hello,
Recently our dell sc1425 server has been locking up with kernel freezes
and required a hard reboot on each occasion. I've looked on the centos
forums with limited success - each problem seems
On 04/04/2012 12:31 PM, Nataraj wrote:
On 04/04/2012 09:16 AM, Jonathan Alstead wrote:
Hello,
Recently our dell sc1425 server has been locking up with kernel freezes
and required a hard reboot on each occasion. I've looked on the centos
forums with limited success - each problem seems
Paul (Crunch) wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:31 PM, Nataraj wrote:
On 04/04/2012 09:16 AM, Jonathan Alstead wrote:
Hello,
Recently our dell sc1425 server has been locking up with kernel freezes
and required a hard reboot on each occasion. I've looked on the centos
forums with limited success -
On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Ken Smith k...@kensnet.org wrote:
Hi, I've seen comments about the poor performance of these cards with
raid 5 configs. I have an old card with 3 x 500G IDE drives connected in
raid 5 and I'm getting around 10mb/s write performance. :-(
I'm seeing high iowait
Hi, I've seen comments about the poor performance of these cards with
raid 5 configs. I have an old card with 3 x 500G IDE drives connected in
raid 5 and I'm getting around 10mb/s write performance. :-(
I'm seeing high iowait figures at times and associated very high cpu
load average
Hi, I've seen comments about the poor performance of these cards with
raid 5 configs. I have an old card with 3 x 500G IDE drives connected in
raid 5 and I'm getting around 10mb/s write performance. :-(
I'm seeing high iowait figures at times and associated very high cpu
load average figures,
On 09/15/2011 03:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
For us, it's breaking an ssh-restrict script we use with rsync for
backups, mangling some passed wildcards.
What is the actual problem causing this ?
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade
For us, it's breaking an ssh-restrict script we use
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade
For us, it's breaking an ssh-restrict
Hi all,
Almost wish I had something more exciting to say regarding the 5.6 to 5.7
upgrade, but it just worked flawlessly. Physical as well as virtual
machines.
Thanks CentOS-team for your good work!
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:53:44AM +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
Almost wish I had something more exciting to say regarding the 5.6 to 5.7
upgrade, but it just worked flawlessly. Physical as well as virtual
machines.
Thanks CentOS-team for your good work!
Seconded!
My update went
fred smith wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:53:44AM +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
Almost wish I had something more exciting to say regarding the 5.6 to
5.7
upgrade, but it just worked flawlessly. Physical as well as virtual
machines.
Thanks CentOS-team for your good work!
Seconded!
On 09/04/2011 04:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 02:09 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
A few days ago I upgraded from the Centos 5 CR repository software
including Apache ...
Found a solution: As an alternative to PHP Exec on a web page running
ImageMagick, now using
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
If one stays with Centos 5.x (currently on 5.6) is the
problem/enhancement/incompatibility involving PHP53 likely to be
resolved by general updates and/or the introduction of Centos 5.7 ?
Paul.
You can download the
On 9/3/11, Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com wrote:
Florin Andrei said the following on 02/09/11 21:51:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-August/017689.html
Is there something similiar for CentOS 6?
There was supposed to be a CR for 6 as well, at least I saw it
mentioned a
On 09/03/2011 09:24 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 9/3/11, Luigi Rosali...@luigirosa.com wrote:
Florin Andrei said the following on 02/09/11 21:51:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-August/017689.html
Is there something similiar for CentOS 6?
There was supposed to
Hi Guys,
On 09/03/2011 01:15 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
That is unfortunate because at the moment I have to use a Scientific Linux
kernel package on my new machines because of a bug in the 6.0 kernels.
Sorry about that. I'm working with the 6.0/cr stuff this weekend ( in
short sprints,
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 13:32 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Guys,
I highly recommend signup for the centos-cr-announce list to keep track
of whats available in the cr/ repos.
The place to do this starts at:
http://lists.centos.org
Paul.
If one stays with Centos 5.x (currently on 5.6) is the
problem/enhancement/incompatibility involving PHP53 likely to be
resolved by general updates and/or the introduction of Centos 5.7 ?
Paul.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Quoting Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net:
If one stays with Centos 5.x (currently on 5.6) is the
problem/enhancement/incompatibility involving PHP53 likely to be
resolved by general updates and/or the introduction of Centos 5.7 ?
Paul.
Me too. I have working Drupal installs that I want
A few days ago I upgraded from the Centos 5 CR repository software
including Apache. The Apache on my development server is:
Apache/2.2.3
Aug 31 2011 20:18:21
httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.3-53.el5.centos.1
A previously working PHP Exec(...) command on a web page no longer
works.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:15:43AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
If one stays with Centos 5.x (currently on 5.6) is the
problem/enhancement/incompatibility involving PHP53 likely to be
resolved by general updates and/or the introduction of Centos 5.7 ?
Redhat has basically come out and said
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 20:10 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
Solution: don't use the CentOS php53 and use that provided by IUS
instead. That works right.
Thank you.
Paul.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 02:09 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
A few days ago I upgraded from the Centos 5 CR repository software
including Apache ...
Found a solution: As an alternative to PHP Exec on a web page running
ImageMagick, now using GMagick (GraphicsMagick) in PHP to process
images.
On 08/30/2011 06:24 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Always Used to seeing regular GUI notices of updates, I also noticed the
absence of any.
Applications
System Tools
Software Updater
produces none. Neither does
yum update
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 12:51 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
On 08/30/2011 06:24 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Always Used to seeing regular GUI notices of updates, I also noticed the
absence of any.
Applications
System Tools
Software Updater
produces none. Neither does
Florin Andrei said the following on 02/09/11 21:51:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-August/017689.html
Is there something similiar for CentOS 6?
Ciao,
luigi
--
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
Superior ability breeds superior ambition.
--Spock, Space Seed
Am 31.08.2011 01:58, schrieb Always Learning:
I also notice our servers successfully contacting official time
references centres which are not those sites trying to connect to us. I
notice too the installed time software is listening on every available
IP. I can not identity any options in
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:13 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
ntpd shipping with CentOS 6 has an option -I iface; see man 8 ntpd.
Edit /etc/sysconfig/ntpd accordingly. ntpd shipping with CentOS 5 does
not have that and thus always binds to all available interfaces.
That explains why I can not
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 08:15:28 PM brian wrote:
...to your rule list will allow the specified net address(es) to contact
you on port 123. the above, of course, assumes your
input port is eth0 (change that, if different on your system), and that the
NTP server uses TCP protocol
Always Used to seeing regular GUI notices of updates, I also noticed the
absence of any.
Applications
System Tools
Software Updater
produces none. Neither does
yum update
yet there was on this List a recent warning about about an Apache
vulnerability.
--
Il 8/30/11 3:24 PM, Always Learning ha scritto:
Always Used to seeing regular GUI notices of updates, I also noticed the
absence of any.
Applications
System Tools
Software Updater
produces none. Neither does
yum update
yet there was on this List a recent
Hi Gian,
Please have a look there:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732928
Thank you. However my concern is the apparent absence of regular Centos
5.6 updates (revisions and improvements). Accustomed to regularly seeing
the updates GUI inform me of new updates, I have noticed
any patch for this bug?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
Hi Gian,
Please have a look there:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732928
Thank you. However my concern is the apparent absence of regular Centos
5.6 updates (revisions
hi,
On 08/30/2011 02:47 PM, Mohammadreza Ansari wrote:
any patch for this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732928
follow that bugreport, patches and fix's into the distro will be
announced there first.
Also, please dont top post.
- KB
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/30/2011 02:47 PM, Mohammadreza Ansari wrote:
any patch for this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732928
follow that bugreport, patches and fix's into the distro will be
announced there first.
Thanks, Karanbir, for the quick response.
Curiously examining some of the blocked IP addresses in the daily
Logwatch report, I notice strange sites attempting to connect to our
servers on port 123 (the time port).
I also notice our servers successfully contacting official time
references centres which are not those sites trying to
On 08/30/2011 07:58 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Curiously examining some of the blocked IP addresses in the daily
Logwatch report, I notice strange sites attempting to connect to our
servers on port 123 (the time port).
I also notice our servers successfully contacting official time
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 20:15 -0400, brian wrote:
On 08/30/2011 07:58 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Curiously examining some of the blocked IP addresses in the daily
Logwatch report, I notice strange sites attempting to connect to our
servers on port 123 (the time port).
I also notice
However I am curious to know why strange sites contact our servers on
port 123 and why the installed Centos time software listens on every
available IP address.
For your first part either people probing you or have you checked to see if
a previous admin had joined the ntp.org pool with your
On 06/29/2011 07:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hüvely Balázs wrote:
On 06/28/2011 11:06 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Hüvely Balázs wrote:
I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6.
The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the
Hvely Balzs schreef:
I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6.
The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the
backlight goes off. I see the windows, buttons, but it's very dark,
maybe the backlight switching off..
Hüvely Balázs wrote:
I tried to manually edit the xorg.conf, but the result is the same blank
screen.
I think that the problem is depending by the resolution.
Any clue?
Have you tried with nomodeset option in grub's kernel options? It helped
me with my older Intel graphics on RHEL 6
Hi.
I tried your advice, but still no luck.
my grub.conf: (menu.lst)
default=0
timeout=0
splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title CentOS (2.6.18-238.12.1.el5)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 ro root=LABEL=/ nomodeset
initrd
On 06/28/2011 11:06 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Hüvely Balázs wrote:
I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6.
The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the backlight
goes off. I see the windows, buttons, but it's very dark, maybe
Hüvely Balázs wrote:
On 06/28/2011 11:06 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Hüvely Balázs wrote:
I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6.
The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the
backlight goes off. I see the windows, buttons, but
Hi!
I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6.
The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the backlight
goes off. I see the windows, buttons, but it's very dark, maybe the
backlight switching off..
How can I get the installer to work correctly?
The
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Hüvely Balázs wrote:
I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6.
The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the backlight
goes off. I see the windows, buttons, but it's very dark, maybe the
backlight switching off..
do a text
Le 2011-04-29 14:03, Guy Boisvert a écrit :
Le 2011-04-27 13:44, Ryan Wagoner a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Guy Boisvert
boisvert@videotron.ca wrote:
Hi!
I have upgraded my servers yesterday to CentOS 5.6 via yum update.
Everything went smoothly except that i have
Am 24.05.2011 23:41, schrieb John R. Dennison:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:00:01PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
OK, so I did an upgrade to PHP 5.3 on one of my servers. I noticed the
uninstall of php also removed SquirrelMail and it won't install under
PHP 5.3. Has anybody worked this out with a
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:11:57PM +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
Could you elaborate what other issues it has?
Doesn't Provide: php / php-common
Lack of native mcrypt support
I think there were problems with mbstring early on that may have been resolved.
Perhaps others that I am not thinking of
Am 25.05.2011 14:09, schrieb John R. Dennison:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:11:57PM +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
Could you elaborate what other issues it has?
Doesn't Provide: php / php-common
Lack of native mcrypt support
I think there were problems with mbstring early on that may have been
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Dump the CentOS php53 package and use the 5.3 provided by the IUS
repository. See http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
for more information and links to IUS.
CentOS' 5.3 doesn't Provide: php and has
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 09:43:48AM -0400, Steven Crothers wrote:
Why should a PHP 5.3 package provide PHP? To many libs are different,
and it would allow for the installation of something like php-ldap
from base to a php53 which provided the php dependency. That is not
how RPM's are supposed
Rainer Traut wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 14:09, schrieb John R. Dennison:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:11:57PM +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
Could you elaborate what other issues it has?
Doesn't Provide: php / php-common
Lack of native mcrypt support
snip
Yeah ok. Let's hope that at least for the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:28:00AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Good grief! Back in '06 and '07, where I worked, I had to build php
because it didn't have mcrypt support by default. They *still* don't, at
this late date?
I'm sure that there was a valid reason for this changelog entry from
On 5/24/2011 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:00:01PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
OK, so I did an upgrade to PHP 5.3 on one of my servers. I noticed the
uninstall of php also removed SquirrelMail and it won't install under
PHP 5.3. Has anybody worked this out with a
OK, so I did an upgrade to PHP 5.3 on one of my servers. I noticed the
uninstall of php also removed SquirrelMail and it won't install under
PHP 5.3. Has anybody worked this out with a good RPM or repo solution?
--
John Hinton
877-777-1407 ext 502
http://www.ew3d.com
Comprehensive Online
Why not just install SquirrelMail the old fashioned way?
cd /var/www
wget
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/squirrelmail/stable/1.4.21/squirrelmail-1.4.21.tar.gz?r=http%3A%2F%2Fsquirrelmail.org%2Fdownload.phpts=1306258610use_mirror=superb-sea2;
tar xvzf squirrelmail-1.4.21.tar.gz
Done.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:00:01PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
OK, so I did an upgrade to PHP 5.3 on one of my servers. I noticed the
uninstall of php also removed SquirrelMail and it won't install under
PHP 5.3. Has anybody worked this out with a good RPM or repo solution?
Dump the CentOS
Hi guys,
Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6?
I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform.
Everything is up-to-date and yet I'm running into major problems.
How do I make sense of these kernel errors? Any help will be greatly
appreciated, as I'm now had to roll back to an old copy
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote:
Hi guys,
Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6?
I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform.
...
While serving httpd pages:
...
May 19 12:19:19 ip-10-234-90-180 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.16-xenU
#1)
...
not
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote:
Hi guys,
Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6?
I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform.
...
While serving httpd pages:
...
May 19
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote:
Hi guys,
Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6?
I cant get it stable on as a
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Mailing List
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 13:57
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
List,
I was not able
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org
mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Mailing List
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 13:57
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
List,
I was not able
list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
List,
I was not able to resolve my issue with the time on this machine.
I
went ahead and rolled the update back to 5.5 and disabled the update
to
5.6.
What I would like to know is if CentOS 6 might be ok when
Le 2011-04-27 13:44, Ryan Wagoner a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Guy Boisvert
boisvert@videotron.ca wrote:
Hi!
I have upgraded my servers yesterday to CentOS 5.6 via yum update.
Everything went smoothly except that i have client workstations not part of
the domain
Hi!
I have upgraded my servers yesterday to CentOS 5.6 via yum update.
Everything went smoothly except that i have client workstations not part
of the domain that are not able to access the samba server anymore. The
samba server is part of the domain. We recently added Windows 2008 R2
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Guy Boisvert
boisvert@videotron.ca wrote:
Hi!
I have upgraded my servers yesterday to CentOS 5.6 via yum update.
Everything went smoothly except that i have client workstations not part of
the domain that are not able to access the samba server
Hi,
On a box running CentOS 5.6 x86_64 and Virtualbox 4.0.6, I have
configured 2 guests (WinXP x86 + CentOS 5.6 x86_64) in bridged mode.
The hosting box and the two guests are dhcp enabled. The hosting box
get its address normally, but the 2 hosted systems fail to get theirs.
The dhcp server
On 04/26/2011 03:28 AM, Philippe wrote:
Hi,
On a box running CentOS 5.6 x86_64 and Virtualbox 4.0.6, I have
configured 2 guests (WinXP x86 + CentOS 5.6 x86_64) in bridged mode.
The hosting box and the two guests are dhcp enabled. The hosting box
get its address normally, but the 2 hosted
Philippe wrote:
Hi,
On a box running CentOS 5.6 x86_64 and Virtualbox 4.0.6, I have
configured 2 guests (WinXP x86 + CentOS 5.6 x86_64) in bridged mode.
The hosting box and the two guests are dhcp enabled. The hosting box
get its address normally, but the 2 hosted systems fail to get theirs.
--On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10:28:40 AM +0200 Philippe li...@lrnx.ath.cx
wrote:
The hosting box
get its address normally, but the 2 hosted systems fail to get theirs.
The dhcp server log tells : DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:xx:xx:xx:xx via
em0: network xx.xx/16: no free leases.
Based on that
Le 26/04/2011 11:26, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
On 04/26/2011 03:28 AM, Philippe wrote:
Hi,
On a box running CentOS 5.6 x86_64 and Virtualbox 4.0.6, I have
configured 2 guests (WinXP x86 + CentOS 5.6 x86_64) in bridged mode.
The hosting box and the two guests are dhcp enabled. The hosting box
Le 26/04/2011 16:58, Devin Reade a écrit :
--On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10:28:40 AM +0200 Philippe li...@lrnx.ath.cx
wrote:
The hosting box
get its address normally, but the 2 hosted systems fail to get theirs.
The dhcp server log tells : DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:xx:xx:xx:xx via
em0:
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C521 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right
time on the machine. This is with / without
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Mailing List
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 13:57
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have
2011/4/21 Ian Forde ianfo...@gmail.com:
Turns out that wasn't the only problem I faced in my migration. With 2
KVM servers, both sharing a volume mounted via NFS for VMs, I migrated
all VMs to the second node, upgraded the first, them moved them all back
to KVM1. Instant disk corruption on
On 04/21/2011 01:16 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
2011/4/21 Ian Forde ianfo...@gmail.com:
Turns out that wasn't the only problem I faced in my migration. With 2
KVM servers, both sharing a volume mounted via NFS for VMs, I migrated
all VMs to the second node, upgraded the first, them moved them all
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 20:16 +0200, Kenni Lund wrote:
2011/4/21 Ian Forde ianfo...@gmail.com:
Turns out that wasn't the only problem I faced in my migration. With 2
KVM servers, both sharing a volume mounted via NFS for VMs, I migrated
all VMs to the second node, upgraded the first, them
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right
time on the machine. This is with / without
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right
time on the machine. This is with /
On 4/20/2011 5:45 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Have you tried installing the adjtimex package? If your system clock
is running reliably fast under the 5.6 kernel, maybe adjtimex can turn
that reliability into reliable time sync for you?
Rick
No I haven't, I will look into it. Thank you for
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 03:47 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/09/2011 12:04 PM, compdoc wrote:
A similar incident was reported during the QA. Look at the .xml file.
If it says type='raw', change it to type='qcow2' and restart libvirtd.
Would that fix the problem ?
Akemi
Thank you.
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right
time on the machine. This is with /
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:28 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is
On 04/14/2011 06:23 AM, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is perfect. All
clients can
On 04/15/2011 04:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/14/2011 06:23 AM, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5
On 4/15/2011 7:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I do not see anything from Dell that is a model C151.
I also do not see anything in the RH bugzilla that is problematic for
older AMD processors and the clock, unless running KVM type virtual
machines.
Is this a VM or regular install?
If this a real
On 4/15/2011 4:58 PM, Mailing List wrote:
Johnny,
Sorry about the wrong system id number here is what it is.
Dell Inspiron C521
Bios Version 1.1.11 (08/07/2007)
It is not a VM, it is a regular install. I have not made any
changes to the kernel options. It has been fine with a
Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 3:35 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
I'm running the same kernel and ntp versions and I'm having no problems
at all on ntp servers or clients.
If my previous suggestions didn't help maybe you could share contents of
the following files and output of some commands
On 04/13/2011 10:31 AM, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is perfect.
All clients can get from this machine with no issues. As soon as
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is perfect.
All clients can get from this machine with no issues. As
Hello fellow CentOS users,
until now I was using CentOS 5.5 with php 5.3 through this file:
# grep -v ^# /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo
[c5-testing]
name=CentOS-5 Testing
baseurl=http://dev.centos.org/centos/$releasever/testing/$basearch/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
On 04/13/2011 08:59 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
Do you think it is safe to remove /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo
yes,
and run yum update again or will my Drupal 7 site burn and die?
You should be fine. the php53 is now in the main distro. The testing
packages were put into the Testing
On 04/13/2011 02:59 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello fellow CentOS users,
until now I was using CentOS 5.5 with php 5.3 through this file:
# grep -v ^# /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo
[c5-testing]
name=CentOS-5 Testing
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
