Re: [CentOS] Evolution: always a 90-second delay

2018-11-11 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 11/11/18 4:44 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: it is generally better to use IMAP, and in that case what the mail client uses to store mail is not relevant since no mail is stored locally. Most IMAP clients that I've used treat IMAP as a synchronization protocol for their local mail store (cache),

Re: [CentOS] Evolution: always a 90-second delay

2018-11-11 Thread Pete Biggs
> > Whenever I try to receive or send mail, there's always a 90-second > delay before the connection works. Since the delay is always exactly > 90 seconds, I think I may be waiting for something to time out. > > Perhaps this is a clue. My address is u...@example.com. I have to log > in to

Re: [CentOS] Evolution: always a 90-second delay

2018-11-10 Thread Eddie O'Connor
Isn't there some way to write a script that would prevent it from looking for anything but what you want? Just curious... On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, 7:57 PM Frank Cox On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:37:10 -0500 > Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > > > I want to use Evolution because I want my mail client to use

Re: [CentOS] Evolution: always a 90-second delay

2018-11-10 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:37:10 -0500 Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > I want to use Evolution because I want my mail client to use maildir > rather then mbox. I used to use kmail, but that's no longer possible > with CentOS 7. You might want to look at Sylpheed. I use Sylpheed on my desktop and

[CentOS] Evolution: always a 90-second delay

2018-11-10 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
I'm trying to use Evolution on the latest CentOS 7. Whenever I try to receive or send mail, there's always a 90-second delay before the connection works. Since the delay is always exactly 90 seconds, I think I may be waiting for something to time out. Perhaps this is a clue. My address is