On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
It is not wise to have third-party repositories
Vreme: 12/15/2011 12:37 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
It is
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
rpmfusion-* =3, etc.
Here is
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
rpmfusion-*
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
There are few changes needed like torakat repo with now centosplus
kernels.
Can you explain, please, about those exclude=*releases statements?
What
On 12/15/2011 01:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
lesser priority (larger number).
Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:27 PM, Les Mikesell piše:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs wrote:
You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
lesser priority (larger number).
Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:32 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
There are few changes needed like torakat repo with now centosplus
kernels.
Can you explain, please,
Hello there,
since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
[snip]
Installing for dependencies:
perl-CGI
Am 13.12.2011 09:40, schrieb wwp:
Hello there,
since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
With the release of 6.1 packages
wwp wrote:
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
It's yum. It's fragile.
Whenever it doesn't do what you think it should, run yun clean all and
try again.
___
CentOS mailing list
Hello Nicolas, Alexander,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:11:36 +0100 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
wwp wrote:
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
It's yum. It's fragile.
Whenever it doesn't do what you
On 12/12/2011 07:44 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 12/12/11 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I
don't really understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all
my attempts to sort it out have failed, so I need help, please.
The current
Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base
packages. This should only be used by
For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I don't really
understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all my attempts to sort it
out have failed, so I need help, please. The current state is
Skipping filters plugin, no data
-- Running transaction check
--- Package
On 12/12/11 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I don't really
understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all my attempts to sort it
out have failed, so I need help, please. The current state is
Skipping filters plugin, no data
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
