On 04/05/2021 05:55 PM, Albert McCann wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS On Behalf Of H
>> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:59 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82
>>
>>> One thing
On 04/05/2021 03:42 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:32:04 -0400
> H wrote:
>
>> Is something at Google responsible for this problem?
> In one of your (numerous) previous messages you said that Firefox wasn't
> working properly either, so I'd say it's not a problem with Google unless
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS On Behalf Of H
> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:59 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82
>
> > One thing remains: I would also like to move my entire browsing
> history fro
On 04/05/2021 04:44 PM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote:
>>> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200
>>> From: Simon Matter
>>>
>>> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed
>>> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems
>>>
On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote:
>> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200
>> From: Simon Matter
>>
>> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed
>> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems
>> where a build didn't work and also updates
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:32:04 -0400
H wrote:
> Is something at Google responsible for this problem?
In one of your (numerous) previous messages you said that Firefox wasn't
working properly either, so I'd say it's not a problem with Google unless
you're using their dns servers or something
On 04/05/2021 01:38 PM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote:
>> On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
>> H wrote:
>>
>>> Here are two typical
> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200
> From: Simon Matter
>
> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed
> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems
> where a build didn't work and also updates were not in time. We
> also had problems
On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
> H wrote:
>
>> Here are two typical examples:
> Javascript is disabled?
>
On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
H wrote:
> Here are two typical examples:
Javascript is disabled?
>>> No, just checked that Javascript is
> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
>>> H wrote:
>>>
Here are two typical examples:
>>> Javascript is disabled?
>>>
>> No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings.
>> When I load the
On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
>> H wrote:
>>
>>> Here are two typical examples:
>> Javascript is disabled?
>>
> No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. When I
> load the browser and try
On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
> H wrote:
>
>> Here are two typical examples:
> Javascript is disabled?
>
No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. When I
load the browser and try to access eg nytimes.com I see "Establishing
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
H wrote:
> Here are two typical examples:
Javascript is disabled?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 04/04/2021 02:46 PM, H wrote:
> On 04/04/2021 12:35 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote:
>>
>>Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It
>>is no longer in EPEL.
>>
>> Look in koji:
>>
On 04/04/2021 12:35 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote:
>
>Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It
>is no longer in EPEL.
>
> Look in koji:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=22672
>
> And the
On 04.04.21 16:19, H wrote:
I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version 89.0.4389.82 from
EPEL.
Did you tested the .90 release?
yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing "chrom*"
--
Leon
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 04.04.21 18:29, H wrote:
On 04/04/2021 11:24 AM, Richard wrote:
Date: Sunday, April 04, 2021 10:19:34 -0400
From: H
I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version
89.0.4389.82 from EPEL.
Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the
previous version of
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote:
Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It
is no longer in EPEL.
Look in koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=22672
And the particular version you mentioned:
On 04/04/2021 11:24 AM, Richard wrote:
>> Date: Sunday, April 04, 2021 10:19:34 -0400
>> From: H
>>
>> I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version
>> 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL.
>>
>> Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the
>> previous version of chromium
> Date: Sunday, April 04, 2021 10:19:34 -0400
> From: H
>
> I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version
> 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL.
>
> Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the
> previous version of chromium (88.0.4324.150) running for several
> weeks but
I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version 89.0.4389.82 from
EPEL.
Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the previous
version of chromium (88.0.4324.150) running for several weeks but it crashed
and the new version was then loaded.
The older version
22 matches
Mail list logo
