On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You picked a good day to ask, I am getting ready to build the new plus
kernel for c5 right now :D
Any luck with this? :)
--
Matthew Kent \ SA \ bravenet.com
___
CentOS mailing list
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:46, Matthew Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You picked a good day to ask, I am getting ready to build the new plus
kernel for c5 right now :D
Any luck with this? :)
I contacted Johnny last Friday, he was
Matthew Kent wrote:
Any luck with this? :)
Not wanting to sound like a spoil sport but if its critical
to your server(s) can't you build your own kernel, pretty
sure I've seen this discussed on the docs list. I suppose
the CentOS plus one has to go through QA and regression
testing no?
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 12:56 -0500, Robert wrote:
Spike Turner wrote:
Matthew Kent wrote:
Any luck with this? :)
Not wanting to sound like a spoil sport but if its critical
to your server(s) can't you build your own kernel, pretty
sure I've seen this discussed on the
Hi,
I have an Adaptec eSATA card, model 1225SA:
http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sata/entry/AAR-1225SA/
Although the chipset is sata_sil24, it is not recognized by default by
the kernel because its PCI ID is different than the ones recognized by
this driver on the
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
I have an Adaptec eSATA card, model 1225SA:
http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sata/entry/AAR-1225SA/
Although the chipset is sata_sil24, it is not recognized by default by
the kernel because its PCI ID is different than the ones
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:57, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You picked a good day to ask, I am getting ready to build the new plus
kernel for c5 right now :D
Great to know! :-D
I will put that patch in there too if it applies cleanly for me.
Let me know if it doesn't. I included it
7 matches
Mail list logo
