Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-26 Thread Lamar Owen

On 12/23/19 3:16 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:

Le 23/12/2019 à 02:48, Akemi Yagi a écrit :

You may want to watch the "CR work" on that wiki page.


CR seems to be empty right now.


Not any more; updating one of my testing C8 VMs to the CR content now.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-24 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS

Am 24.12.19 um 16:06 schrieb Gionatan Danti:

Il 24-12-2019 11:30 John Pierce ha scritto:

on the other hand, 99% of those security updates are things that probably
don't affect most centos deployments.


It does not only affect security, but also *functional* updates.

For an example of a quite important, but not fixed bug in current CentOS 
8: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680481
Long story short: currently, CentOS 8 is not usable as webmail server 
with classical httpd+prefork+mod_php (due to httpd crashing loop).





The default and for performance and less mem resources reasons
is mpm_event handler and php via fpm ... did you tried?

--
Leon



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-24 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS

Am 24.12.19 um 11:30 schrieb John Pierce:

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:57 AM Nicolas Kovacs  wrote:


That's missing the point.

While it's perfectly understandable that there's always a certain lag
between upstream RHEL and CentOS, seven weeks without security updates
is a serious showstopper for production use.

There's a difference between "use upstream Red Hat if you badly need
those critical updates" and "don't use CentOS on your production servers".



on the other hand, 99% of those security updates are things that probably
don't affect most centos deployments.



BTW, also RH has a gap to the individual upstream projects.
So, define the requirements and make a choice ...

--
Leon

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-24 Thread Gionatan Danti

Il 24-12-2019 11:30 John Pierce ha scritto:
on the other hand, 99% of those security updates are things that 
probably

don't affect most centos deployments.


It does not only affect security, but also *functional* updates.

For an example of a quite important, but not fixed bug in current CentOS 
8: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680481
Long story short: currently, CentOS 8 is not usable as webmail server 
with classical httpd+prefork+mod_php (due to httpd crashing loop).


Looking forward for CentOS 8.1!
Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-24 Thread John Pierce
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:57 AM Nicolas Kovacs  wrote:

> That's missing the point.
>
> While it's perfectly understandable that there's always a certain lag
> between upstream RHEL and CentOS, seven weeks without security updates
> is a serious showstopper for production use.
>
> There's a difference between "use upstream Red Hat if you badly need
> those critical updates" and "don't use CentOS on your production servers".
>

on the other hand, 99% of those security updates are things that probably
don't affect most centos deployments.


-- 
-john r pierce
  recycling used bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-24 Thread Nicolas Kovacs

Le 24/12/2019 à 08:03, Thomas Stephen Lee a écrit :

I don't know whether the below steps are permitted.
but, you can install RHEL 8.1 Developer Edition on a VM.
Download the SRPM for your package.
Then rebuild on the CentOS machine and install the RPM.
This is just for the important fixes like security.


That's missing the point.

While it's perfectly understandable that there's always a certain lag 
between upstream RHEL and CentOS, seven weeks without security updates 
is a serious showstopper for production use.


There's a difference between "use upstream Red Hat if you badly need 
those critical updates" and "don't use CentOS on your production servers".


Cheers & merry Christmas from blocked Paris on strike

:o)

Niki

--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-23 Thread Thomas Stephen Lee
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:19 AM Nicolas Kovacs  wrote:

> Le 23/12/2019 à 23:01, Jonathan Billings a écrit :
> > No.  8-stream is where packages will (eventually) be available to test
> software that’ll be part of the next point release of RHEL. So, for
> example, before RHEL 8.1 was released, 8-stream had kernel packages with a
> version-release close to what was eventually released in RHEL 8.1, and
> eventually into CentOS 8.1..
>
> In short and to sum it up, CentOS 8 in its current state has some
> unpatched vulnerabilities. They have been adressed in RHEL since
> October, but not in CentOS.
>
> It's fair to say this raises a few eyebrows among concerned CentOS users.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Niki
>
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

I don't know whether the below steps are permitted.
but, you can install RHEL 8.1 Developer Edition on a VM.
Download the SRPM for your package.
Then rebuild on the CentOS machine and install the RPM.
This is just for the important fixes like security.

thanks

---
Thomas Stephen Lee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-23 Thread Nicolas Kovacs

Le 23/12/2019 à 23:01, Jonathan Billings a écrit :

No.  8-stream is where packages will (eventually) be available to test software 
that’ll be part of the next point release of RHEL. So, for example, before RHEL 
8.1 was released, 8-stream had kernel packages with a version-release close to 
what was eventually released in RHEL 8.1, and eventually into CentOS 8.1..


In short and to sum it up, CentOS 8 in its current state has some 
unpatched vulnerabilities. They have been adressed in RHEL since 
October, but not in CentOS.


It's fair to say this raises a few eyebrows among concerned CentOS users.

Cheers,

Niki

--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-23 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Dec 23, 2019, at 07:32, Pete Biggs  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 09:16 +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>>> Le 23/12/2019 à 02:48, Akemi Yagi a écrit :
>>> You may want to watch the "CR work" on that wiki page.
>> 
>> CR seems to be empty right now.
>> 
> I thought that was the role of 8-stream now?

No.  8-stream is where packages will (eventually) be available to test software 
that’ll be part of the next point release of RHEL. So, for example, before RHEL 
8.1 was released, 8-stream had kernel packages with a version-release close to 
what was eventually released in RHEL 8.1, and eventually into CentOS 8.1..

--
Jonathan Billings 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-23 Thread Pete Biggs
On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 09:16 +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 23/12/2019 à 02:48, Akemi Yagi a écrit :
> > You may want to watch the "CR work" on that wiki page.
> 
> CR seems to be empty right now.
> 
I thought that was the role of 8-stream now?

P.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-23 Thread Nicolas Kovacs

Le 23/12/2019 à 02:48, Akemi Yagi a écrit :

You may want to watch the "CR work" on that wiki page.


CR seems to be empty right now.

--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread Nicolas Kovacs

Le 23/12/2019 à 02:07, Leon Fauster via CentOS a écrit :
Here you can find information that explains why there is gap between RH 
and CentOS releases. Basically its not intentionally but just hard work:


https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8

https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x


While we're all aware that there will always be a gap between RHEL and 
CentOS, I guess what motivated the author's post initially (who by the 
way is an acclaimed  Linux author and I can only speak very highly of 
his competence) is the fact that a two-month lag for important security 
updates is more than just a gap.


It seems like it boils down to: have these been ported to the Continuous 
Release repository?


Cheers,

Niki

--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread Valeri Galtsev



> On Dec 22, 2019, at 7:07 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 22.12.19 um 21:31 schrieb Michael Kofler:
>> Hi,
>> I have been a happy user of CentOS 7 in the past. I am now considering 
>> switching to CentOS 8.
>> However, since end of Oct. 2019, I have not received any updates on my 
>> CentOS 8 test installations. Since then, RHEL 8 has published several 
>> critical security updates.
>> Obviously, this make the use of CentOS 8 in production dangerous.
>> I guess the missing updates have to to with RHEL version 8.1, which is not 
>> yet available for CentOS.
>> Basically, I would like to ask how the CentOS team sees the state of CentOS 
>> 8. Is the current version only intended for testing/evaluation? When does 
>> the CentOS team consider CentOS ready for production use? Is there any 
>> public documentation on this matter?
> 
> Here you can find information that explains why there is gap between RH and 
> CentOS releases. Basically its not intentionally but just hard work:
> 
> https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8
> 
> https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x
> 

And thanks for all hard work from us, users!

Valeri

> --
> Leon
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 5:30 PM Bill Maidment  wrote:
>
> > https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x
>
> This misses the point of where are the intermediate updates to 8.0 ? or
> can we only get point releases with no updates in between?

You may want to watch the "CR work" on that wiki page.

What is the CR repo?

https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread John Pierce
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 5:30 PM Bill Maidment  wrote:

> > https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8
> >
> > https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x
> >
>
> This misses the point of where are the intermediate updates to 8.0 ? or
> can we only get point releases with no updates in between?
>
>
8.0 has to be updated to 8.1 to get any future updates.apparently 8.1
came out in early November before CentOS was able to get the update
pipeline moving, so incremental updates will resume after 8.1 is released,
which should be pretty soon now based on the schedule on that 8.x page
above.


-- 
-john r pierce
  recycling used bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread Bill Maidment

On 23/12/2019 12:07 pm, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:

Am 22.12.19 um 21:31 schrieb Michael Kofler:

Hi,

I have been a happy user of CentOS 7 in the past. I am now considering 
switching to CentOS 8.


However, since end of Oct. 2019, I have not received any updates on my 
CentOS 8 test installations. Since then, RHEL 8 has published several 
critical security updates.


Obviously, this make the use of CentOS 8 in production dangerous.

I guess the missing updates have to to with RHEL version 8.1, which is 
not yet available for CentOS.


Basically, I would like to ask how the CentOS team sees the state of 
CentOS 8. Is the current version only intended for testing/evaluation? 
When does the CentOS team consider CentOS ready for production use? Is 
there any public documentation on this matter?


Here you can find information that explains why there is gap between
RH and CentOS releases. Basically its not intentionally but just hard
work:

https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8

https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x



This misses the point of where are the intermediate updates to 8.0 ? or 
can we only get point releases with no updates in between?


--
Cheers
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS

Am 22.12.19 um 21:31 schrieb Michael Kofler:

Hi,

I have been a happy user of CentOS 7 in the past. I am now considering 
switching to CentOS 8.


However, since end of Oct. 2019, I have not received any updates on my 
CentOS 8 test installations. Since then, RHEL 8 has published several 
critical security updates.


Obviously, this make the use of CentOS 8 in production dangerous.

I guess the missing updates have to to with RHEL version 8.1, which is 
not yet available for CentOS.


Basically, I would like to ask how the CentOS team sees the state of 
CentOS 8. Is the current version only intended for testing/evaluation? 
When does the CentOS team consider CentOS ready for production use? Is 
there any public documentation on this matter?


Here you can find information that explains why there is gap between RH 
and CentOS releases. Basically its not intentionally but just hard work:


https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8

https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x

--
Leon

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] State of CentOS 8

2019-12-22 Thread Michael Kofler

Hi,

I have been a happy user of CentOS 7 in the past. I am now considering 
switching to CentOS 8.


However, since end of Oct. 2019, I have not received any updates on my 
CentOS 8 test installations. Since then, RHEL 8 has published several 
critical security updates.


Obviously, this make the use of CentOS 8 in production dangerous.

I guess the missing updates have to to with RHEL version 8.1, which is 
not yet available for CentOS.


Basically, I would like to ask how the CentOS team sees the state of 
CentOS 8. Is the current version only intended for testing/evaluation? 
When does the CentOS team consider CentOS ready for production use? Is 
there any public documentation on this matter?


Thank you, best wishes and happy holidays,

   Michael
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos